Prenatal Exome Sequencing Analysis in Fetuses with Various Ultrasound Findings.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of Exome Sequencing (ES) for the detection of genome-wide Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and the frequency of SNVs-InDels in selected genes related to developmental disorders in a cohort of consecutive pregnancies undergoing invasive diagnostic procedures for minor or simple ultrasound findings with no indication of ES. METHODS: Women undergoing invasive diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) for QF-PCR and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) due to prenatal ultrasound findings without an indication for ES were selected over a five-month period (May-September 2021). ES was performed to compare the efficiency of genome-wide CNV detection against CMA analysis and to detect monogenic disorders. Virtual gene panels were selected to target genes related to ultrasound findings and bioinformatic analysis was performed, prioritizing variants based on the corresponding HPO terms. The broad Fetal Gene panel for developmental disorders developed by the PAGE group was also included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 59 out of 61 women consented to participate in this study. There were 36 isolated major fetal anomalies, 11 aneuploidy markers, 6 minor fetal anomalies, 4 multiple anomalies, and 2 other ultrasound signs. Following QF-PCR analysis, two uncultured samples were excluded from this study, and six (10%) common chromosome aneuploidies were detected. In the remaining 51 cases, no pathogenic CNVs were detected at CMA, nor were any pathogenic variants observed in gene panels only targeting the ultrasound indications. Two (3.9%) monogenic diseases, apparently unrelated to the fetal phenotype, were detected: blepharo-cheilo-odontic syndrome (spina bifida) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (pyelocaliceal dilation). CONCLUSIONS: In our series of pregnancies with ultrasound findings, common aneuploidies were the only chromosomal abnormalities present, which were detected in 10% of cases. ES CNV analysis was concordant with CMA results in all cases. No additional findings were provided by only targeting selected genes based on ultrasound findings. Broadening the analysis to a larger number of genes involved in fetal developmental disorders revealed monogenic diseases in 3.9% of cases, which, although apparently not directly related to the indications, were clinically relevant.

Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panels and "Solo" Clinical Exome Sequencing Applied in Structurally Abnormal Fetuses.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield of 2 different next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches: gene panel and "solo" clinical exome sequencing (solo-CES), in fetuses with structural anomalies and normal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), in the absence of a known familial mutation. METHODOLOGY: Gene panels encompassing from 2 to 140 genes, were applied mainly in persistent nuchal fold/fetal hydrops and in large hyperechogenic kidneys. Solo-CES, which entails sequencing the fetus alone and only interpreting the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man genes, was performed in multisystem or recurrent structural anomalies. RESULTS: During the study period (2015-2020), 153 NGS studies were performed in 148 structurally abnormal fetuses with a normal CMA. The overall diagnostic yield accounted for 35% (53/153) of samples and 36% (53/148) of the fetuses. Diagnostic yield with the gene panels was 31% (15/49), similar to 37% (38/104) in solo-CES. CONCLUSIONS: A monogenic disease was established as the underlying cause in 35% of selected fetal structural anomalies by gene panels and solo-CES.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Influence of Prenatal Counseling on the Attitudes and Preferences Toward Invasive Prenatal Testing Among Women in Their First Trimester of Pregnancy (INVASIVE).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of prenatal genetic counseling on the attitudes and preferences toward invasive testing in first-trimester pregnant women. METHODS: This is a randomized open-label study, of pregnant women undergoing first trimester combined screening for aneuploidies. Women were divided into the experimental or control groups in a 1:1 design. The intervention consisted of 15-min extra counseling about prenatal screening and diagnosis. The main outcome was the desire to choose an invasive testing as their first prenatal testing option which was measured as absolute risk. RESULTS: After excluding those with incomplete data, 75 women remained in the experimental group and 75 as controls. Women receiving counseling were 32% more likely to choose an invasive prenatal testing as their first-line option after extra 15-min extensive counseling, reducing the first-trimester combined screening by 20% and the cell-free DNA by 12%. If given the opportunity, 59% of the women would like to be able to choose the prenatal test that suits their needs. CONCLUSION: Women given an extensive prenatal counseling are more likely to choose an invasive testing as their first-line test in spite of the concerning risks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04119349.

Maternal plasma genome-wide cell-free DNA can detect fetal aneuploidy in early and recurrent pregnancy loss and can be used to direct further workup.

STUDY QUESTION: Can maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detect chromosomal anomalies in early pregnancy loss (EPL) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Genome-wide cfDNA testing can serve as an alternative to cytogenetic analysis in products of conception (POCs) in RPLs and can guide further management. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Random chromosomal anomalies are the single most common cause for EPL and RPL. Cytogenetic analysis in POCs may be used to direct management in RPL because the detection of random chromosomal anomalies can eliminate further unwarranted testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective diagnostic test study from March 2018 to January 2019 of 109 patients experiencing pregnancy loss before 14 weeks gestation at a tertiary-care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blood samples were drawn for genome-wide cfDNA testing prior to chorionic villous sampling for cytogenetic analysis of POCs with both short-term cultures (STCs) and long-term cultures (LTCs). Final analysis included 86 patients with non-mosaic cytogenetic results in POCs and available cfDNA results. Aneuploidy detection rates by cfDNA testing and POC cytogenetic analysis were compared. The first 50 samples served as the Training Set to establish pregnancy loss-specific log-likelihood ratio (LLR) thresholds using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC)-like analyses. These were then used for the entire cohort. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Seventy-eight samples (71.5%) had results available from both STC and LTC; 12 samples (11%) had a result from STC only, and 7 samples (6.4%) had a result from LTC only. A chromosomal anomaly was detected in 55/86 (64%). The rates of chromosomal anomalies were 61, 72, 73 and 44% in patients undergoing their first, second, third and ≥4th pregnancy losses, respectively. The median cfDNA fetal fraction was 5%. With standard LLR thresholds used for noninvasive prenatal screening, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 55% (30/55) and with a specificity of 100% (31/31). Using pregnancy loss-specific LLR thresholds, the sensitivity of cfDNA in detecting aneuploidy was 82% (45/55), with a specificity of 90% (28/31). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.46 and 0.20, respectively. Fetal sex was correctly assigned in all cases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Cases with a false-positive result by cfDNA analysis would not receive the indicated RPL workup. Specificity could be improved by using a fetal fraction (FF) cutoff of 4%, but this would result in exclusion of more than a quarter of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: cfDNA-based testing can serve as an alternative to POC cytogenetic analysis and can guide further RPL management: if cfDNA demonstrates aneuploidy, no further action is taken and if no abnormality is detected, the recommended RPL workup is performed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Cell-free DNA testing was funded by Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA. Y.Y. is a member of Illumina's Clinical Expert Panel and has received travel grants. A.B. has received travel grants from Illumina. All authors have no competing interest to declare.