Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 83: 103664, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513567

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: An objective categorization of respiratory infections based on outcomes is an unmet clinical need. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis remain used in clinical practice, whereas ventilator-associated events (VAE) are limited to surveillance purposes. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis from a multicentre observational prospective cohort study. VAE were defined as a sustained increase in minimum Oxygen inspired fraction (FiO2) and/or Positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) of ≥ 0.2/2 cm H2O respectively, or an increase of 0.15 FiO2 + 1 cm H20 positive end-expiratory pressures for ≥ 1 calendar-day. SETTING: 15 Paediatric Intensive Care Units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care and hospital length of stay; (LOS) and mortality. RESULTS: A cohort of 391 ventilated children with an age (median, [Interquartile Ranges]) of 1 year[0.2-5.3] and 7 days[5-10] of mechanical ventilation were included. Intensive care and hospital stays were 11 [7-19] and 21 [14-39] days, respectively. Mortality was 5.9 %. Fifty-eight ventilator-associated respiratory infections were documented among 57 patients: Seventeen (29.3 %) qualified as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and 41 (70.7 %) as ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). Eight pneumonias and 16 tracheobronchitis (47 % vs 39 %,P = 0.571) required positive end-expiratory pressure or oxygen increases consistent with ventilator-associated criteria. Pneumonias did not significantly impact on outcomes when compared to tracheobronchitis. In contrast, infections (pneumonia or tracheobronchitis) following VAEs criteria were associated with > 6, 8 and 15 extra-days of ventilation (16 vs 9.5, P = 0.001), intensive care stay (23.5 vs 15; P = 0.004) and hospital stay (39 vs 24; P = 0.015), respectively. CONCLUSION: When assessing ventilated children with respiratory infections, VAE apparently is associated with higher ventilator-dependency and LOS compared with pneumonia or tracheobronchitis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Incorporating the modification of ventilatory settings for further categorization of the respiratory infections may facilitate therapeutic management among ventilated patients.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Bronquite/etiologia , Bronquite/fisiopatologia , Traqueíte/etiologia , Traqueíte/fisiopatologia , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Criança , Recém-Nascido
2.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 43(3): 101363, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432476

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated events (VAE) is a tier implemented for surveillance by the CDC in the USA. Implementation usefulness for clinical decisions is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective, multicentre, international study, to assess the impact on outcomes of using tiers with shorter follow-up (VAE24), lower oxygenation requirements (light-VAE) or both (light VAE24). RESULTS: A cohort of 261 adults with 2706 ventilator-days were included. The median (IQR) duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) was 9 days (5-21), and the median (IQR) length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 14 days (8-26). A VAE tier was associated with a trend to increase from 32% to 44% in the ICU mortality rates. VAE Incidence was 24 per 1,000 ventilator-days, being increased when reduced the oxygenation settings requirement (35 per 1,000 ventilator-days), follow-up (41 per 1,000 ventilator-days) or both (55 per 1,000 ventilator-days). A VAE tier was associated with 13 extra (21 vs. 8) days of ventilation, 11 (23 vs. 12) ICU days and 7 (31 vs. 14) hospitalization days, outperforming the modified tiers' performance. CONCLUSIONS: The modification of ventilator settings (consistent with ventilator-associated events) was associated with worse outcomes among adults with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Monitoring ventilator-associated events at the bedside represents a new tool for quality improvement.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência
3.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 43(1): 101319, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925153

RESUMO

Patients with prolonged duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO) are a vulnerable population for sepsis, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infections. Rates differ between venous-arterial and venous-venous ECMO patients and according to the cannulation technique used. The presence of particular organisms depends on local epidemiology, antibiotic exposure, and the duration of the intervention; patients undergoing ECMO for more than three weeks present a high risk of persistent candidemia. Recognizing predisposing factors, and establishing the best preventive interventions and therapeutic choices are critical to optimizing the management of these complications. Infection control practices, including shortening the period of the indwelling devices, and reducing antibiotic exposure, must be followed meticulously. Innovations in oxygenator membranes require an updated approach. Hand hygiene and avoiding breaking the circuit-oxygenator sterility are cornerstones. ECMO management would benefit from clearer definitions, optimization of infection control strategies, and updated infectious clinical practice guidelines.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Sepse , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Controle de Infecções , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(11)2023 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37998828

RESUMO

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in children is a growing concern, particularly among septic patients, given the need for first-right dosing. Our aim was to determine the incidence rates and factors associated with MDR-sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), using data from the Spanish ENVIN-HELICS PICU registry between 2013 and 2019. The rate of MDR bacteria among septic children ranged between 5.8 and 16.2% throughout this study period, with a significant increase since 2015 (p = 0.013). MDR-gram-negative bacteria (92%), particularly EBL-Enterobacterales (63.7%), were the most frequent causative microorganisms of MDR-sepsis. During this study period, sixteen MDR-sepsis (32.6%) corresponded to intrahospital infections, and 33 (67.4%) had community-onset sepsis, accounting for 10.5% of the overall community-onset sepsis. Independent risk factors associated with MDR-sepsis were antibiotics 48 h prior to PICU admission (OR 2.38) and PICU onset of sepsis (OR 2.58) in >1 year-old children, and previous malnourishment (OR 4.99) in <1 year-old children. Conclusions: There was an alarming increase in MDR among septic children in Spain, mainly by gram-negative (ESBL-Enterobacterales), mostly coming from the community setting. Malnourished infants and children on antibiotics 48 h prior to PICU are at increased risk and therefore require closer surveillance.

5.
J Intensive Med ; 3(3): 204-211, 2023 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37533808

RESUMO

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-support therapy that may predispose to morbid and lethal complications, with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) being the most prevalent. In 2013, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) defined criteria for ventilator-associated events (VAE). Ten years later, a growing number of studies assessing or validating its clinical applicability and the potential benefits of its inclusion have been published. Surveillance with VAE criteria is retrospective and the focus is often on a subset of patients with higher than lower severity. To date, it is estimated that around 30% of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) develop VAE. While surveillance enhances the detection of infectious and non-infectious MV-related complications that are severe enough to impact the patient's outcomes, there are still many gaps in its classification and management. In this review, we provide an update by discussing VAE etiologies, epidemiology, and classification. Preventive strategies on optimizing ventilation, sedative and neuromuscular blockade therapy, and restrictive fluid management are warranted. An ideal VAE bundle is likely to minimize the period of intubation. We believe that it is time to progress from just surveillance to clinical care. Therefore, with this review, we have aimed to provide a roadmap for future research on the subject.

7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(2): 216-221, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35506391

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but its definite diagnosis remains controversial. The CDC Ventilator-Associated Event (VAE) module (validated in adults) constitutes a new approach for VAP surveillance. DESIGN: We described epidemiological characteristics of PICU VAE cases, investigated possible risk factors, and evaluated 3 different sets of diagnostic VAE criteria. SETTING: This study was conducted in a PICU in a tertiary-care general hospital in northern Greece during 2017-2019. PATIENTS: The study included patients aged 35 days-16 years who received mechanical ventilation. METHODS: From medical records, we retrieved epidemiological data, clinical data, and laboratory characteristics as well as ventilator settings for our analysis. We assessed "oxygen deterioration" for the tier 1 CDC VAE module using 3 sets of diagnostic criteria: (1) CDC adult VAE criteria [increase of daily minimum fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥ 0.2 or positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 3 cmH2O for 2 days], (2) the US pediatric VAE criteria [increase of FiO2 ≥ 0.25 or mean airway pressure (MAP) ≥ 4 cmH2O for 2 days], and (3) the European pediatric VAE criteria (increase of FiO2 ≥ 0.2 or PEEP ≥ 2 cmH2O for 1 day or increase of FiO2 ≥ 0.15 and PEEP ≥ 1 cm H2O for 1 day). RESULTS: Among 326 children admitted to the PICU, 301 received mechanical ventilation. The incidence rate according to the CDC adult VAE criteria was 4.7 per 1,000 ventilator days. For the US pediatric VAE criteria the incidence rate was 6 per 1,000 ventilator days. For the European pediatric VAE criteria the incidence rate was 9.7 per 1,000 ventilator days. These results revealed statistically significant correlation of all 3 algorithms with adverse outcomes, including mortality. CONCLUSIONS: All VAE algorithms were associated with higher mortality rates. Our findings highlight the need for a unified pediatric VAE definition to improve preventive strategies.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Estado Terminal/terapia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Oxigênio , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
8.
Children (Basel) ; 9(11)2022 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36360398

RESUMO

Healthcare-associated infections related to device use (DA-HAIs) are a serious public health problem since they increase mortality, length of hospital stay and healthcare costs. We performed a multicenter, prospective study analyzing critically ill pediatric patients admitted to 26 Spanish pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) over a 3-month period each year from 2014 to 2019. To make comparisons and evaluate the influence of HAI Zero Bundles (care bundles that intend to reduce the DA-HAI rates to zero) on PICU HAI rates, the analysis was divided into two periods: 2014-2016 and 2017-2019 (once most of the units had incorporated all the Zero Bundles). A total of 11,260 pediatric patients were included. There were 390 episodes of HAIs in 317 patients and the overall rate of HAIs was 6.3 per 1000 patient days. The DA-HAI distribution was: 2.46/1000 CVC days for central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), 5.75/1000 MV days for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and 3.6/1000 UC days for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Comparing the two periods, the HAI rate decreased (p = 0.061) as well as HAI episodes (p = 0.011). The results demonstrate that exposure to devices constitutes an extrinsic risk factor for acquiring HAIs. The multivariate analysis highlights previous bacterial colonization by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria as the most important extrinsic risk factor for HAIs (OR 20.4; 95%CI 14.3-29.1). In conclusion, HAI Zero Bundles have been shown to decrease HAI rates, and the focus should be on the prompt removal of devices, especially in children with important intrinsic risk factors.

9.
Adv Ther ; 39(9): 4037-4051, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35876973

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated diseases have caused an estimated 1.8 million hospital admissions and 40,000 deaths among children. RSV can cause lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in all age groups, adults with comorbidities, and immunocompromised patients. The aim was to summarize the evidence concerning efficacy and safety of ribavirin in subjects diagnosed with RSV associated with LRTI. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Eligible studies were observational (> 10 subjects) and randomized-controlled trials of subjects with aerosol/oral ribavirin for RSV-LRTI. Comparator was supportive care or placebo. Systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted between January 2001 and January 2022. PROSPERO register number: CRD42022308147. RESULTS: After retrieving 907 studies, 10 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included (4/11 high quality of evidence). Seven studies included subjects with haematological malignancy/stem cell transplant, two lung transplants, and two healthy individuals. A total of 788 subjects diagnosed with RSV infection were included; 14.3% of them presented with only LRTI. Among 445 subjects treated with ribavirin, 195 (43.8%) received an aerosolized formulation. Pooled meta-analysis showed no differences in mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-1.42] in all subjects treated with aerosol/oral ribavirin compared to supportive care. In subgroup analysis, mortality was significantly lower in haematological subjects (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.14-0.71), but did not differ significantly in lung transplant recipients (RR: 0.89; 95% CI 0.31-2.56). Oral ribavirin (vs. supportive care) was associated with increased viral clearance (RR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.35-4.99). Seventeen adverse events were reported among 119 subjects, but none were severe. CONCLUSION: Ribavirin should be considered for treatment of RSV-LRTI in haematological subjects. There is a lack of evidence to support its use in lung transplant recipients. Oral formulation appears to be an easier, safe, and cost-effective alternative to aerosolized ribavirin. Further advances needs to focus on newer antivirals.


Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Infecções Respiratórias , Adulto , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Criança , Humanos , Aerossóis e Gotículas Respiratórios , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/tratamento farmacológico , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico
10.
Children (Basel) ; 9(6)2022 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35740839

RESUMO

Antibiotic misuse in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) can lead to increased antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic-triggered side effects, hospital costs, and mortality. We performed a multicenter, prospective study, analyzing critically ill pediatric patients (≥1 month to ≤18 years) admitted to 26 Spanish PICUs over a 3-month period each year (1 April−30 June) from 2014−2019. To make comparisons and evaluate the influence of AMS programs on antibiotic use in PICUs, the analysis was divided into two periods: 2014−2016 and 2017−2019 (once 84% of the units had incorporated an AMS program). A total of 11,260 pediatric patients were included. Total antibiotic prescriptions numbered 15,448 and, overall, 8354 patients (74.2%) received at least one antibiotic. Comparing the two periods, an increase was detected in the number of days without antibiotics in patients who received them divided by the number of days in PICUs, for community-acquired infections (p < 0.001) and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) acquired in PICUs (p < 0.001). Antibiotics were empirical in 7720 infections (85.6%), with an increase in appropriate antibiotic indications during the second period (p < 0.001). The main indication for antibiotic adjustment was de-escalation, increasing in the second period (p = 0.045). Despite the high rate of antibiotic use in PICUs, our results showed a significant increase in appropriate antibiotic use and adjustment following the implementation of AMS programs.

11.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 41(3): 101072, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35477009

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) broadened the focus of surveillance from ventilator-associated pneumonia to ventilator-associated event (VAE) for quality purposes. No paediatric definition of VAE (PaedVAE) has been accurately validated. We aimed to analyse the incidence and impact on patient outcomes resulting from the application of the adult and two paediatric VAE (PaedVAE) criteria. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: to evaluate VAE/PaedVAE as factors associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay. METHODS: Multicentre observational prospective cohort study in 15 PICUs in Spain. VAEs were assessed using the 2013/2015 CDC classification. PaedVAE were assessed using the CDC definition based on mean airway pressure (MAP-PaedVAE) versus a paediatric definition based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP-PaedVAE). Children who underwent MV ≥ 48 h were included. RESULTS: A total of 3626 ventilator-days in 391 patients were analysed. The incidence of VAE, MAP-PaedVAE and PEEP-PaedVAE was 8.55, 5.24 and 20.96 per 1000 ventilator-days, respectively. The median time [IQR] for VAE, MAP-PaedVAE and PEEP-PaedVAE development from the MV onset was 4 [3-12.5], 4 [3-14], and 5 [3-7.75] days, respectively. Among survivors, all three were associated with increased MV duration (> 7 days) and PICU stay (> 10 days) at univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that PEEP-PaedVAE was the only definition independently associated with MV above 7 days [OR = 4.86, 95% CI (2.41-10.11)] and PICU stay [OR = 3.49, 95% CI (1.68-7.80)] above ten days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A VAE definition based on slight PEEP increases should be preferred for VAE surveillance in children.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Ventiladores Mecânicos , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Espanha/epidemiologia
12.
Eur J Intern Med ; 99: 70-81, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35151542

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence concerning the effectiveness of antiseptic barrier caps vs. manual disinfection in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). METHODS: The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis was pre-registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021259582). PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from 2011 to 2021. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies on hospitalized patients of any age were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Compared with manual disinfection, antiseptic barrier caps significantly reduced CLABSI rate per 1000 line-days (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: -0.02; 95%CI: -0.03 to -0.01) and number of CLABSI per patient (RR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.41-0.89). Subgroup analysis showed that antiseptic barrier caps were more effective in reducing CLABSI rate per 1000 line-days in ICU (SMD: -0.02; 95%CI: -0.03 to -0.01) and non-ICU patients (SMD: -0.03; 95%CI: -0.05 to -0.01), adults (SMD: -0.02; 95%CI: -0.04 to -0.01), as in observational studies (SMD: -0.02; 95%CI: -0.02 to -0.01). Antiseptic barrier caps also significantly reduce CLABSI risk in ICU patients (RR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.42-1.00), adults (RR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.29-0.86), and observational studies (RR: 0.54; 95%CI: 0.32-0.91). No differences were found when only children or RCTs were taken into account. Median cost savings amongst studies were $21,890 [IQR 16,350-45,000] per CLABSI. CONCLUSIONS: Antiseptic barrier caps appear to be effective in reducing CLABSI. The real-world impact needs to be confirmed by RCTs.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Sepse , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Criança , Humanos
13.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 14(7): 901-918, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33861168

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Scarce evidence verifying the clinical impact of baloxavir on influenza complications is found. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched through December 2020. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) that enrolled patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza receiving neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) or baloxavir comparing to placebo were assessed. PROSPERO Registration-number: CRD42021226854. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs (11,697 patients) were included. Antiviral administration significantly reduced time to clinical resolution (mean difference: -21.3 hours) and total influenza-related complications (OR:0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.73). Specifically, antivirals significantly decreased bronchitis (OR:0.54, 95%CI: 0.38-0.75), sinusitis (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78), acute otitis media (OR:0.48, 95%CI: 0.30-0.77), and antibiotic prescription (OR:0.62; 95%CI: 0.48-0.80). A positive trend favored antivirals administration to reduce pneumonia (OR:0.47, 95%CI: 0.16-1.33), or hospitalization rates (OR:0.65; 95%CI: 0.34-1.24) compared to placebo, but did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events (AE) were reported in 11%, 8.9%, and 5.1% of NAIs, placebo and baloxavir recipients, respectively. Compared with NAIs, administration of baloxavir showed non-significantly reduced AEs (OR:0.74, 95%CI: 0.53-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose baloxavir and NAIs were superior to placebo to reduce complications in uncomplicated influenza, with 40% significant reduction in antibiotic prescription. Safety and efficacy of single-dose baloxavir were non-inferior to NAIs.


Assuntos
Dibenzotiepinas/farmacologia , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Morfolinas/farmacologia , Neuraminidase/antagonistas & inibidores , Piridonas/farmacologia , Triazinas/farmacologia , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/farmacologia , Dibenzotiepinas/administração & dosagem , Dibenzotiepinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Humanos , Influenza Humana/virologia , Morfolinas/administração & dosagem , Morfolinas/efeitos adversos , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Triazinas/administração & dosagem , Triazinas/efeitos adversos
14.
Respir Care ; 66(5): 798-805, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688086

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposed a shift in its surveillance paradigm from ventilator-associated pneumonia to ventilator-associated events (VAE) to broaden the focus of prevention and achieve a greater impact on outcomes. The main objective of the present study was to identify factors associated with pediatric VAEs in children undergoing mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a pediatric cohort of a multicenter prospective study. Children who underwent mechanical ventilation ≥ 48 h were included. Exclusion criteria were previous ventilation, extracorporeal life support, and right-to-left shunt or pulmonary hypertension. In the subjects with multiple episodes of mechanical ventilation, only the first episode was considered. Remifentanil and propofol are classified as short-acting sedative and analgesic agents. Pediatric VAE is defined as an "increase in PEEP ≥ 2 cm of H2O, an increase in [Formula: see text] of 0.20, or an increase in [Formula: see text] of 0.15 plus an increase in PEEP ≥ 1 cm of H2O sustained for ≥1 d. Associations with pediatric VAE were estimated through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Hazard ratios and 95% CI were computed. RESULTS: In a cohort of 90 children, 24 pediatric VAEs were documented in 906 ventilator-days. Pediatric VAEs developed after a median of 4.5 (interquartile range, 4-7.25) d. Surgical admissions, spontaneous breathing trials, early mobility, vasopressors, red blood cell units transfusion, type of sedation (continuous vs intermittent), benzodiazepine use for >3 d, and pharmacologic paralysis were not associated with pediatric VAE, whereas the use of continuous short-acting sedative-analgesic agents was identified as a strong protective factor against pediatric VAE (hazard ratio 0.06 [95% CI 0.007-0.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with short-acting sedative-analgesic agents should be preferred for sedation of mechanically ventilated children in intensive care.


Assuntos
Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Analgésicos , Criança , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Ventiladores Mecânicos
16.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(9): 1693-1699, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236736

RESUMO

A secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort was performed in six intensive care units (ICU) in four European countries (France, Greece, Spain and Turkey). The main objective was to identify factors associated with ventilator-associated events (VAEs) in adults who underwent mechanical ventilation (MV) ≥ 48 h. Secondary objectives were to identify: variables influencing VAE in the subpopulation with endotracheal intubation and in those subjects who were ventilated > 7 days. Subjects who had undergone MV ≥ 48 h were included. In subjects with multiple episodes of MV, only the first one was eligible. The adult definitions for VAEs were adjusted to the 2015 update of the CDC's 2013 National Healthcare Safety Network Association. Factors associated with VAE were estimated through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Among 163 adults (42 tracheostomies), 76 VAEs (34.9 VAEs/1,000 ventilator-days) were documented: 9 were Ventilator-Associated Conditions (VAC) and 67 Infection-related Ventilator-Associated Complications (IVAC)-plus (9 only IVAC and 58 Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia). VAEs developed after a median of 6 days (interquartile range: 4-9). VAEs were independently associated with long-acting sedative/analgesic drugs (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 4.30), selective digestive decontamination (SDD) (HR: 0.38), and surgical/trauma admission (HR: 2.30). Among 116 subjects with endotracheal tube, SDD (HR: 0.21) and surgical/trauma admission (HR: 3.11) remained associated with VAE. Among 102 subjects ventilated >7 days, only long-acting sedative/analgesic agents (HR: 8.69) remained independently associated with VAE. In summary, SDD implementation and long-acting analgesic/sedative agents restriction prescription may prevent early and late VAEs, respectively. Bundles developed to prevent VAEs should include these two interventions.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , França , Grécia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , Turquia
17.
Ann Transl Med ; 6(21): 425, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30581833

RESUMO

Despite ventilator-associated respiratory infections (VARI) are reported as the most common and fatal complications related to mechanical ventilation (MV), they are not the unique occurrences. The new classification of ventilator-associated events (VAE) proposed by the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) enhance the spectra of complications due to MV including both infection-related and non-infectious events. Both VAEs and VARIs are associated with prolonged duration of MV, longer stay in hospital and in the intensive care unit (ICU) and more antibiotic consumption, nonetheless patients with VAEs have worst outcomes. The VARI and VAE algorithms are focused on different targets and the correlation between both classifications is shown to be poor. The diagnostic criteria of the traditional classification have limited accuracy and the non-infectious complications may be misinterpreted as VARI. While the VAE surveillance enhances the spectra of MV complications but excludes less severe VARIs. Noninfective events explain up to 30% of VAEs, the main causes being atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary edema and pulmonary embolism. The bundles assessing VAE are associated with less incidence of VAP and improved outcomes but they fail to reduce the rates of VAE. Automated VAE surveillance is efficient and useful as a quality indicator in the ICU while the differences in the interpretation of VARI criteria limit its role in the design of global protocols and preventive strategies. We suggest that a more comprehensive strategy should combine both algorithms with emphasis on clinical outcomes.

18.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 12(12): 1037-1050, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30460868

RESUMO

Introduction: Intubation is required to maintain the airways in comatose patients and enhance oxygenation in hypoxemic or ventilation in hypercapnic subjects. Recently, the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) created new surveillance definitions designed to identify complications associated with poor outcomes. Areas covered: The new framework proposed by CDC, Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE), has a range of definitions encompassing Ventilator-Associated Conditions (VAC), Infection-related Ventilator-Associated Complications (IVAC), or Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia - suggesting replacing the traditional definitions of Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis (VAT) and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP). They focused more on oxygenation variations than on Chest-X rays or inflammatory biomarkers. This article will review the spectrum of infectious (VAP & VAT) complications, as well as the main non-infectious complications, namely pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and atelectasis. Strategies to limit these complications and improve outcomes will be presented. Expert commentary: Improving outcomes should be the objective of implementing bundles of prevention, based on risk factors amenable of intervention. Promotion of measures that reduce the exposition or duration of intubation should be a priority.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Edema Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/prevenção & controle , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia , Edema Pulmonar/etiologia , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia
19.
Intensive Care Med ; 44(8): 1212-1220, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30003304

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact on patient outcome of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2008, 2013, and the correlation with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or tracheobronchitis (VAT). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter, international study conducted at 13 intensive care units (ICUs); thirty consecutive adults mechanically ventilated for ≥ 48 h per site were eligible, with daily follow-up being recorded in a collaborative web database; VAEs were assessed using the 2013 CDC classification and its 2015 update. RESULTS: A total of 2856 ventilator days in 244 patients were analyzed, identifying 33 VAP and 51 VAT episodes; 30-day ICU mortality was significantly higher (42.8 vs. 19.6%, p < 0.007) in patients with VAP than in those with VAT. According to the 2013 CDC definitions, 117 VAEs were identified: 113 (96%) were infection-related ventilator-associated complication-plus (IVAC-plus), while possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) was found in 64 (56.6%) of them. VAE increased the number of ventilator days and prolonged ICU and hospital LOS (by 5, 11, and 12 days, respectively), with a trend towards increased 30-day mortality (43 vs 28%, p = 0.06). Most episodes (26, 55%) classified as IVAC-plus without PVAP criteria were due to atelectasis. PVAP significantly increased (p < 0.05) ventilator days as well as ICU and hospital LOS (by 10.5, 14, and 13 days, respectively). Only 24 (72.7%) of VAP and 15 (29.4%) of VAT episodes met IVAC-plus criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory infections (mainly VAT) were the most common complication. VAE algorithms only identified events with surrogates of severe oxygenation deterioration. As a consequence, IVAC definitions missed one fourth of the episodes of VAP and three fourths of the episodes of VAT. Identifying VAT (often missed by IVAC-plus criteria) is important, as VAP and VAT have different impacts on mortality.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bronquite/diagnóstico , Bronquite/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Bronquite/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA