Brain Metastasis Incidence and Patterns of Presentation After Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Potential Argument for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance.

Purpose: Brain metastases (BMs) are a common source of morbidity and mortality. Guidelines do not advise brain surveillance for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We describe the incidence, time to development, presentation, and management of BMs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods and Materials: We reviewed records of patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT within the period from 2013 to 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to BM. Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Results: A total of 219 patients were reviewed including 96 with squamous cell carcinoma, 88 with adenocarcinoma, and 35 with large cell/not otherwise specified (LC/NOS). Thirty-nine patients (17.8%) developed BMs: 35 (90%) symptomatic and 4 (10%) asymptomatic. The rate of BM was highest in LC/NOS (34.3%) and adenocarcinoma (23.9%). Ninety percent of BMs occurred within 2 years. All asymptomatic patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery alone, compared with 40% of symptomatic patients (P = .04). Symptomatic patients were more likely to require hospitalization (65.7% vs 0%, P = .02), craniotomy (25.7% vs 0%, not significant), and steroids (91.4% vs 0%, P < .001). Cumulative BM volume was higher for symptomatic patients (4 vs 0.24 cm3, P < .001) as was median greatest axial dimension (2.18 vs 0.52 cm, P < .001). Conclusions: We identified a high rate of BMs, particularly in LC/NOS and adenocarcinoma histology NSCLC. The majority were symptomatic. These results provide rationale for post-CRT magnetic resonance imaging brain surveillance for patients at high risk of BM.

Five-year survivors from brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: Biology, improving treatments, or just plain luck?

Background: Improvements in therapies have led to an increasing number of long-term survivors of brain metastases. The present series compares a population of 5-year survivors of brain metastases to a generalized brain metastases population to assess for factors attributable to long-term survival. Methods: A single institution retrospective review was performed to identify 5-year survivors of brain metastases who received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A historical control population of 737 patients with brain metastases was used to assess similarities and differences between the long-term survivor population and the general population treated with SRS. Results: A total of 98 patients with brain metastases were found to have survived over 60 months. No differences between long-term survivors and controls were identified with regards to the age at first SRS (P = .19), primary cancer distribution (P = .80), and the number of metastases at first SRS (P = .90). Cumulative incidence of neurologic death at 6, 8 and 10 years for the long-term survivor cohort was 4.8%, 16%, and 16% respectively. In the historical controls, cumulative incidence of neurologic death reached a plateau at 40% after 4.9 years. A significant difference in the distribution of burden of disease at the time of the first SRS was found between the 5-year survivors and the control (P = .0049). 58% of 5-year survivors showed no evidence of clinical disease at the last follow-up. Conclusion: Five-year survivors of brain metastases represent a diverse histologic population, suggesting a small population of oligometastatic and indolent cancers exist for each cancer type.

Upstage Rate of Complex Sclerosing Lesions/Radial Scars.

BACKGROUND: Radial scars (RS) and complex sclerosing lesions (CSL) are breast radiologic findings described as small, stellate lesions causing architectural distortion. This can mimic malignancy. Core needle biopsy (CNB) is often performed. Advances in breast imaging have led to increased detection of RS/CSL. The upstage rate of RS/CSL to in situ or invasive disease is 0-40%. We sought to determine the upstaging rate of RS/CSL to in situ, invasive disease, or high-risk lesion at our institution to create excision guidelines. METHODS: The pathology database of a single center was searched for RS/CSL, from January 2013 to September 2020. We included CNB without malignancy or high-risk lesion (eg, atypical ductal hyperplasia). Patient demographics, indications for biopsy, imaging findings, biopsy procedure, and final pathology were collected. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included. 52.3% had CNB for architectural distortion on mammography, 18.2% for mass, 11.4% for calcifications, 2.3% for abnormal MRI, and 15.9% for multiple reasons (eg, calcifications and mass). Most had an ultrasound: 43.2% had no abnormality and 34.1% had a mass. All CNB were vacuum assisted, 65.9% with 9-gauge needle, and averaged 10.0 cores. 77.3% were stereotactic biopsies, 13.6% ultrasound, and 6.8% MRI. 59.1% had excision after CNB. 82.1% of patients did not upstage. One patient upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma (3.6%) and two patients to high-risk lesion (7.1%). DISCUSSION: There was low upstage rate of RS/CSL on excisional biopsy. Centers could consider close surveillance for RS/CSL on CNB. Longer follow-up in cases of deferred excision is needed to ensure oncologic safety.

Evaluation of the Axillary Surgery Performed in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 trial in 2013 demonstrated the fesability of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-positive patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to determine the continued impact of this study on our practice pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of institutional changes in the management of axillary nodal disease following the publication of Z1071. Patients with clinically node-positive disease that completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Cocoran-Armitage trend test was used to analyze change in categorical variables over time, and the Spearman's rank coefficient was used to analyze two-ranked variables. RESULTS: A cohort of 102 patients were included in the study and demonstrated that the number of sentinel lymph node biopsies to evaluate axillary disease increased over time. Additionally, the number of biopsies of suspicious nodes, and the use of marker clips on the biopsied nodes increased over time. CONCLUSION: Our institution has continued to incorporate the result from Z1071 in our practice patterns.

Metabolic Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Folate Restriction.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), accounting for approximately 15% of breast cancers, lack targeted therapy. A hallmark of cancer is metabolic reprogramming, with one-carbon metabolism essential to many processes altered in tumor cells, including nucleotide biosynthesis and antioxidant defenses. We reported that folate deficiency via folic acid (FA) withdrawal in several TNBC cell lines results in heterogenous effects on cell growth, metabolic reprogramming, and mitochondrial impairment. To elucidate underlying drivers of TNBC sensitivity to folate stress, we characterized in vivo and in vitro responses to FA restriction in two TNBC models differing in metastatic potential and innate mitochondrial dysfunction. METHODS: Metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells (high mitochondrial dysfunction) and nonmetastatic M-Wnt cells (low mitochondrial dysfunction) were orthotopically injected into mice fed diets with either 2 ppm FA (control), 0 ppm FA, or 12 ppm FA (supplementation; in MDA-MB-231 only). Tumor growth, metabolomics, and metabolic gene expression were assessed. MDA-MB-231 and M-Wnt cells were also grown in media with 0 or 2.2 µM FA; metabolic alterations were assessed by extracellular flux analysis, flow cytometry, and qPCR. RESULTS: Relative to control, dietary FA restriction decreased MDA-MB-231 tumor weight and volume, while FA supplementation minimally increased MDA-MB-231 tumor weight. Metabolic studies in vivo and in vitro using MDA-MB-231 cells showed FA restriction remodeled one-carbon metabolism, nucleotide biosynthesis, and glucose metabolism. In contrast to findings in the MDA-MB-231 model, FA restriction in the M-Wnt model, relative to control, led to accelerated tumor growth, minimal metabolic changes, and modest mitochondrial dysfunction. Increased mitochondrial dysfunction in M-Wnt cells, induced via chloramphenicol, significantly enhanced responsiveness to the cytotoxic effects of FA restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of targeted treatment options for TNBC, uncovering metabolic vulnerabilities that can be exploited as therapeutic targets is an important goal. Our findings suggest that a major driver of TNBC sensitivity to folate restriction is a high innate level of mitochondrial dysfunction, which can increase dependence on one-carbon metabolism. Thus, folate deprivation or antifolate therapy for TNBCs with metabolic inflexibility due to their elevated levels of mitochondrial dysfunction may represent a novel precision-medicine strategy.

Dietary Energy Modulation and Autophagy: Exploiting Metabolic Vulnerabilities to Starve Cancer.

Cancer cells experience unique and dynamic shifts in their metabolic function in order to survive, proliferate, and evade growth inhibition in the resource-scarce tumor microenvironment. Therefore, identification of pharmacological agents with potential to reprogram cancer cell metabolism may improve clinical outcomes in cancer therapy. Cancer cells also often exhibit an increased dependence on the process known as autophagy, both for baseline survival and as a response to stressors such as chemotherapy or a decline in nutrient availability. There is evidence to suggest that this increased dependence on autophagy in cancer cells may be exploitable clinically by combining autophagy modulators with existing chemotherapies. In light of the increased metabolic rate in cancer cells, interest is growing in approaches aimed at "starving" cancer through dietary and pharmacologic interventions that reduce availability of nutrients and pro-growth hormonal signals known to promote cancer progression. Several dietary approaches, including chronic calorie restriction and multiple forms of fasting, have been investigated for their potential anti-cancer benefits, yielding promising results in animal models. Induction of autophagy in response to dietary energy restriction may underlie some of the observed benefit. However, while interventions based on dietary energy restriction have demonstrated safety in clinical trials, uncertainty remains regarding translation to humans as well as feasibility of achieving compliance due to the potential discomfort and weight loss that accompanies dietary restriction. Further induction of autophagy through dietary or pharmacologic metabolic reprogramming interventions may enhance the efficacy of autophagy inhibition in the context of adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether therapeutic agents aimed at autophagy induction, autophagy inhibition, or both are a viable therapeutic strategy for improving cancer outcomes. This review discusses the literature available for the therapeutic potential of these approaches.