The palliative care needs and experiences of people with advanced head and neck cancer: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The palliative care needs of people with advanced head and neck cancer pose unique complexities due to the impact the illness has on eating, speaking, appearance and breathing. Examining these needs would help provide guidance about developing relevant models of care and identify gaps in research knowledge. AIM: To identify and map out the palliative care needs and experiences for people with advanced head and neck cancer. DESIGN: A scoping literature review following the methods described by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of the literature was undertaken in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE and CINAHL covering the years January 1996 to January 2019. RESULTS: People with advanced head and neck cancer often had palliative care needs but there was variability in the timing and access to relevant services. A high prevalence of interventions, for example hospital admissions were needed even during the last month of life. This was not necessarily negated with early engagement of palliative care. Dissonance between patients and family carers about information needs and decision-making was an additional complexity. Studies tended to be descriptive in nature, and often involved a single centre. CONCLUSION: This scoping review demonstrates the complexity of care for people with advanced head and neck cancer and the issues related to the current healthcare systems. Focus on appropriate referral criteria, increased integration and coordination of care and robust evaluation of specific care components seems key. Linkage between research and service design delivery across teams, disciplines and care settings seems pertinent.

The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single-catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally requires the use of circular mapping catheter (CMC) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a CMC-free approach for AF ablation performed by a contiguous optimized (CLOSE) ablation protocol. METHODS: A CLOSE-guided and CMC-free PVI protocol with a single transseptal puncture was attempted in 67 patients with AF. Left atrial (LA) CARTO voltage mapping was performed with the ablation catheter pre- and postablation to demonstrate entry block into the pulmonary veins, and pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. RESULTS: The CMC-free approach was successful in achieving PVI in 66 (98.5%) cases, with procedure time of 148 ± 32 minutes, ablation time of 27.5 ± 5.7 minutes, and fluoroscopy time of 7.8 ± 1.0 minutes. First-pass PVI was seen in 58(86.5%) patients, and pacing maneuvers successfully identified the residual gap in eight of the other nine cases. No complication was observed. At 12 months follow-up, 60 (89.6%) patients remained free from AF. The CMC-free approach resulted in a cost saving of £47,190. CONCLUSION: A CMC-free CLOSE-guided PVI approach is feasible, safe, and cost-saving, and is associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.