AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

PURPOSE: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is reported as a feasible setup technique for whole-breast radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), but position errors of bony structures related to deeper parts of the target are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate patient setup accuracy and margins obtained with two different SGRT workflows with and without daily kV- and/or MV-based image guidance (IGRT). METHODS: A total of 50 breast cancer patients were treated in DIBH, using SGRT for the patient setup, and IGRT for isocenter corrections. The patients were treated at two different departments, one using AlignRT® (25 patients) and the other using Catalyst™ (25 patients). Inter-fractional position errors were analyzed retrospectively in orthogonal and tangential setup images, and analyzed with and without IGRT. RESULTS: In the orthogonal kV-kV images, the systematic residual errors of the bony structures were ≤ 3 mm in both groups with SGRT-only. When fine-adjusted by daily IGRT, the errors decreased to ≤ 2 mm; except for the shoulder joint. The residual errors of the ribs in tangential images were between 1 and 2 mm with both workflows. The heart planning margins were between 3 and 7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of IGRT may be considerably reduced with a well-planned SGRT-workflow for whole-breast DIBH with residual errors ≤ 3 mm. This accuracy can be further improved with an IGRT scheme.

Effects of multiple breath hold reproducibility on treatment localization and dosimetric accuracy in radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of breath hold reproducibility on positional and dosimetric errors in radiotherapy of patients with left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) treated with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (vDIBH) technique. Clinical data from 2 groups of patients with LSBC were retrospectively investigated: (1) those irradiated for the whole breast only (WB group, n = 20) using typically from 3 to 5 breath holds per treatment session and (2) those irradiated simultaneously also for supraclavicular lymph nodes (WB + SLN group, n = 27) using from 7 to 9 breath holds per fraction. Setup and field images (n = 1365) from tangential breast fields, and anterior and posterior lymph node fields were analyzed to obtain total, inter-, and intrafractional residual positional errors of the chest wall and clavicle. The dosimetric effect of intrafractional positional errors was investigated at the abutment level of breast and lymph node fields. The total systematic setup error in the longitudinal (superior-inferior [SI]) direction was 1.4 and 1.9 mm (1 standard deviation, p = 0.049) for the WB and WB + SLN groups, respectively, whereas in the anterior/lateral direction, the error was 1.2 mm for both groups. In the SI direction, the systematic intrafractional error was also larger in the WB + SLN group (1.9 vs 1.1 mm, p = 0.003). The latter positional errors correlated moderately (ρ = 0.51) with the number of breath holds. Mean intrafractional errors of at least 2 mm were observed for 38% of the patients in the WB + SLN group. These errors resulted in a dosimetric error from 8.3% to 10.1% (1 cc). The total localization errors and needed setup margins were wider for the WB + SLN group, due to increased amount of breath holds in treatment session. Mean intrafraction movements ≥ 2 mm were shown to occur with this patient group in the SI direction, requiring intrafractional positional monitoring and corrective actions in daily practice.

Residual position errors of lymph node surrogates in breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy: Comparison of two arm fixation devices and the effect of arm position correction.

Residual position errors of the lymph node (LN) surrogates and humeral head (HH) were determined for 2 different arm fixation devices in radiotherapy (RT) of breast cancer: a standard wrist-hold (WH) and a house-made rod-hold (RH). The effect of arm position correction (APC) based on setup images was also investigated. A total of 113 consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer with LN irradiation were retrospectively analyzed (53 and 60 using the WH and RH, respectively). Residual position errors of the LN surrogates (Th1-2 and clavicle) and the HH were investigated to compare the 2 fixation devices. The position errors and setup margins were determined before and after the APC to investigate the efficacy of the APC in the treatment situation. A threshold of 5mm was used for the residual errors of the clavicle and Th1-2 to perform the APC, and a threshold of 7mm was used for the HH. The setup margins were calculated with the van Herk formula. Irradiated volumes of the HH were determined from RT treatment plans. With the WH and the RH, setup margins up to 8.1 and 6.7mm should be used for the LN surrogates, and margins up to 4.6 and 3.6mm should be used to spare the HH, respectively, without the APC. After the APC, the margins of the LN surrogates were equal to or less than 7.5/6.0mm with the WH/RH, but margins up to 4.2/2.9mm were required for the HH. The APC was needed at least once with both the devices for approximately 60% of the patients. With the RH, irradiated volume of the HH was approximately 2 times more than with the WH, without any dose constraints. Use of the RH together with the APC resulted in minimal residual position errors and setup margins for all the investigated bony landmarks. Based on the obtained results, we prefer the house-made RH. However, more attention should be given to minimize the irradiation of the HH with the RH than with the WH.