Effect of tocilizumab on intensive care patients with Covid-19 pneumonia, a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the efficacy of an IL-6 antagonist, Tocilizumab, administered in the early period was studied in intensive care patients with COVID-19 pneumonia followed by hypoxic and systemic inflammation not receiving mechanical ventilation support. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who have signs of hypoxia and systemic inflammation and/or who have acute bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph and who received tocilizumab treatment were compared with the patients who received standard medical therapy. Patients who were followed up with COVID-19 pneumonia and respiratory failure between March 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated in the study. A 400 mg - 800 mg iv dose (depending on weight) of Tocilizumab was administered. The primary endpoint was determined as intensive care unit mortality. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients who were admitted with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19 to our third-level intensive care unit were evaluated. Of these patients, the study was conducted with 50 patients in the tocilizumab treatment group and 92 patients in the standard treatment group. During the intensive care period, 26 patients (28.3%) in the standard treatment group and 12 patients (24%) in the group receiving tocilizumab died. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in the tocilizumab group was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.186 to 0.808; p = 0.001 by log-rank test). During the intensive care period, 22 patients (24.8%) in the standart treatment group and 16 patients (32%) in the tocilizumab group were intubated. The adjusted hazard ratio for a primary outcome intubation in the tocilizumab group was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.355 to 1.424; p = 0.184 by log-rank test).

Fungal culture results and clinical effects of bronchoscopy specimens.

Introduction: Early isolation of the fungal pathogen and early initiation of treatment affect mortality and morbidity rates. The purpose of this study was to reveal the frequency of determination of fungal pathogens in bronchoscopy unit patients. Materials and Methods: The study was designed retrospectively. All patients who underwent bronchoscopy for any reason were enrolled. The patients with suspected fungal infection were divided into three groups after the procedure: 1) Proven fungal infection, 2) Colonization, 3) Without infection. Result: One thousand one hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study. Fungal infection was suspected in 188 (16.7%) patients before bronchoscopy. After the examination of the bronchoscopic materials, it was determined that 59 (5.2%) patients had proven fungal infection, 148 (13.1%) patients had colonization, and 921 (81.7%) patients did not have fungal infection. The radiological findings of the patients that were indicative of fungal infection before bronchoscopy were observed as consolidation in 391 (34.7%) and nodule in 413 (36.6%). Fungal growth in bronchoscopic cultures was found in 186 (16.4%) patients, and the most common fungus was Candida albicans (C. albicans) in 110 (9.7%). The treatment was not changed according to the culture results in the patients. No treatment was initiated in the other 108 (98.2%) patients with C. albicans. One hundred and sixty-five (88%) of all fungal growths were detected in the BAL/bronchial lavage fluid. While 29 (45%) of them had not received antifungal treatment before, antifungal treatment was started after bronchoscopy. Conclusions: C. albicans was isolated the most among all bacterial and fungal agents in all patient groups that were immunosuppressed or not at a routine bronchoscopy unit. Diagnostic bronchoscopic sampling should be performed at the early stages of clinically or radiologically suspected fungal illness.

Timeline of critically ill 2019 SARS-CoV-2 cases after onset of illness: Intensive care data from Turkey.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of severe COVID19 cases from a 3rd degree intensive care unit in Turkey. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a level three, 16-bed COVID intensive care unit. The investigation was planned as a retrospective and observational study. Patients who were admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and respiratory failure in the intensive care unit between March 2020 and March 2021 and followed up due to critical illness were evaluated. Result: A total of 213 patients that were admitted to the intensive care unit with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia were included in the study. Median age of the patients was 66 (IQR 56.5-74) years, and 134 (62.9%) were males. One hundred and sixty-six (77.9%) of the patients had at least one comorbidity. Patients were followed up mainly with invasive mechanical ventilation [104 (48.8%)] and high flow nasal cannula [67 (31.5%)]. Median number of days was 7 (IQR 4-10) and included the first symptom onset to intensive care admission. The time to intubation was 9 (IQR 4-15) days, and the median day to intensive care discharge was 16 (IQR 11-23). After the symptoms started, first tocilizumab 9 (IQR 5-11) and pulse steroid treatment 8 (IQR 3-11) were found to be close to each other. In total, 95 (44.6%) of the 213 patients died. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 associated viral disease can progress after simple symptoms to hospital admission in a median of four days and to intensive care admission requiring intubation in a median of nine days. We believe that a better understanding of the clinical course of COVID-19 and its change between centers can be revealed through sharing information from different countries and centers.

Effects of personality traits on severity of sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to reveal the effect of the individual's lifestyle and personality traits on the disease process in patients with sepsis and to have clinical predictions about these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was planned as a multi-center, prospective, observational study after obtaining the approval of the local ethics committee. Patients were hospitalized in different intensive care units. Besides demographics and personal characteristics of patients, laboratory data, length of hospital and ICU stay, and mortality was recorded. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were followed up in 11 different intensive care units. Mortality rates, morbidities, blood analyses, and personality traits were evaluated as primary outcomes. RESULT: Of the 259 patients followed up, mortality rates were significantly higher in men than in women (p= 0.008). No significant difference was found between the patients' daily activity, tea and coffee consumption, reading habits, smoking habits, blood groups, atopy histories and mortality rates. Examining the personal traits, it was seen that 90 people had A-type personality structure and 51 (56.7%) of them died with higher mortality rate compared to type B (p= 0.038). There was no difference between personalities, in concomitant ARDS occurrence, need for sedation and renal replacement therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals diagnosed with sepsis/septic shock, mortality increased significantly in patients with A-type personality trait compared to other personality traits. These results showed that personal traits may be useful in predicting the severity of disease and mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock.