Neuromodulation of OCD: A review of invasive and non-invasive methods.

Early research into neural correlates of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has focused on individual components, several network-based models have emerged from more recent data on dysfunction within brain networks, including the the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC)-ventromedial caudate, limbic, salience, and default mode networks. Moreover, the interplay between multiple brain networks has been increasingly recognized. As the understanding of the neural circuitry underlying the pathophysiology of OCD continues to evolve, so will too our ability to specifically target these networks using invasive and noninvasive methods. This review discusses the rationale for and theory behind neuromodulation in the treatment of OCD.

A Review of Medical and Surgical Options for the Treatment of Facial Pain.

Facial pain is a common medical complaint that is easily misdiagnosed. As a result, this pain often goes mistreated. Despite this, there are a variety of pharmacologic, surgical, and neuromodulatory options for the treatment of facial pain. In this review, the authors detail the forms of facial pain and their treatment options. They discuss the common medications used in the first-line treatment of facial pain and the second-line surgical and neuromodulatory options available to patients when pharmacologic options fail.

Cure and Hormonal Control After Prolactinoma Resection: Case Series and Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Surgical management of prolactinomas is an important treatment for patients intolerant of dopamine agonist therapy. However, predictors of postoperative outcomes remain unclear. OBJECT: While transsphenoidal surgical resection (TSSR) is important second-line therapy in prolactinoma patients, predictors of surgical cure and biochemical remission following TSSR remain sparse. METHODS: A retrospective review of prolactinoma patients undergoing TSSR at the USC Pituitary Center from 1995 to 2020 was conducted. Participants were categorized as surgical cure (normalization of serum prolactin without medical treatment), surgical noncure, biochemical control (prolactin normalization with or without adjuvant therapy), and nonbiochemical control. A systematic review of the outcomes of surgically managed prolactinomas was performed. RESULTS: The 40 female and 16 male participants had an average age of 35.6 years. Prior treatment included transsphenoidal resection (6, 11%) and dopamine agonist treatment (47, 84%). The 40 macroadenomas and 15 microadenomas exhibited suprasellar extension (24, 43%) and parasellar invasion (20, 36%). Fifteen (27%) were purely intrasellar. Gross total resection was achieved in 25 patients (45%) and subtotal in 26 (46%). Surgical cure was achieved in 25 patients (46%) and biochemical control in 35 (64%). Surgical cure was more likely in smaller, noninvasive tumors, those that were fully resected, and patients with lower preoperative (< 1000 ng/mL) and immediately postoperative (< 7.6 ng/mL) prolactin levels. Ten of 26 patients (38%) undergoing adjuvant therapy achieved biochemical control, which was less likely in men and those with higher preoperative prolactin or invasive tumors. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of prolactinomas is a safe procedure that, when offered judiciously, can achieve symptom and/or biochemical control in a majority of patients. A variety of predictors may be useful in advising patients on likelihood of postoperative remission.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Residual and Recurrent Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Contemporary Case Series of GammaKnife and CyberKnife Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: In patients with residual or recurrent nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) after transsphenoidal resection, both GammaKnife (GKRS) and CyberKnife (CKRS) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable treatment options. OBJECTIVES: We report a retrospective single center series comparing assessing the effectiveness and complications from of these 2 commonly used SRS techniques. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with prior surgical resection and residual or recurrent NFPAs who underwent GKRS or CKRS and minimum 3-month follow-up between January 2002 and February 2017 at a single center were identified. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent GKRS and 19 received CKRS. CKRS patients had a larger maximal tumor diameter (P = 0.005) and tumor volume treated (P = 0.001). Differences between GKRS and CKRS treatment parameters included target volume, target volume treated, prescribed dose, maximum dose, prescription isodose line, and conformity index (P < 0.05). The mean follow-up time was 53.74 months for GKRS and 41.48 months for CKRS patients. Tumor progression developed in 6% of cases after GKRS versus 5% after CKRS. The mean progression-free survival was 48.44 months after GKRS and 38.57 months after CKRS (P = 0.61). Five-year actuarial tumor control rates were 91% after GKRS versus 89% after CKRS (P > 0.99). There were no differences in worsened vision or rates of hypopituitarism. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing single fraction GKRS versus fractionated CKRS for NFPAs, both modalities had similar rates of tumor control, new hypopituitarism, and visual morbidity despite varying indications. This study validates the versatile use of these 2 SRS modalities for patients meeting their relative criteria, especially based on proximity to the optic apparatus and normal pituitary gland.