Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Aust J Rural Health ; 32(2): 249-262, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646861

RESUMO

INTROUDCTION: There is increased risk of skin cancer in patients with gloermular disease or those with renal transplant. OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of skin cancer between kidney recipients (KTRs) and patients with glomerular disease (GD). DESIGN: The cohort comprised patients with KTRs (n = 61) and GD (n = 51) in Central and Central West Queensland, Australia. A quantitative cohort study was undertaken to study the risk of skin cancer in rural communities between two subgroups of patients with kidney diseases in relationship to immunosuppression. Statistical analyses of the differences in incidence of skin cancers between the two groups were done by chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test and McNemar's test. FINDINGS: KTRs with non-melanoma skin carcinoma (NMSC) increased significantly after treatment with immunosuppressants (pre-transplantation, n = 11 [18.0%], post-transplantation, n = 28 [45.9%]; p < 0.001). There were no differences in number of patients with NMSC observed in the GD group (pre-diagnosis, n = 6 [11.8%], post-diagnosis, n = 7 [13.7%]; p = 1.000). Compared to the risks at 1 year post-immunosuppressants, the incidence of NMSC of KTRs increased significantly at 3 years (20.3% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) and 5 years (20.3% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.001) post-immunosuppressants, whereas the increased incidence of NMSC was observed only at 5 years (2.1% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.012) in the GD cohort. The mean cumulative number of NMSC in KTRs increased significantly at 3 years (p = 0.011), and 5 years (p = 0.001) post-immunosuppressants, compared to the risks at 1 year post-immunosuppressants, however, no differences were noted in the GD cohort. DISCUSSION: Immunosuppressants increased the risk of NMSC in KTRs. The increased risk is likely dependent on the intensity and duration of immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION: In patients with a high risk of NMSC, reducing skin cancer risk should be considered in conjunction with the optimisation of treatment.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Queensland/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Adulto , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 23(1): 361, 2022 11 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36357857

RESUMO

Sun-protective strategies focusing on skin cancer awareness are needed in immunosuppressed patients at risk of skin cancers. The study aims to determine the effect of an integrated skin cancer education program on skin cancer awareness and sun-protective behaviours in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and patients with glomerular disease (GD) treated with long-term immunosuppressants. A pilot prospective cohort study in Central Queensland, Australia was undertaken among adult RTRs and patients with GD, who completed survey questionaries on skin cancer and sun-health knowledge (SCSK), sun-protection practices and skin examination pre- and post-education. Fifty patients (25 RTRs, 25 patients with GD) participated in the study. All of them completed questionnaires at pre-, 3-month post-education and 92%(n = 46) at 6-month post-education. There was a significant increase in SCSK scores from baseline at 3-months (p < 0.001) and 6-months post-intervention (p < 0.01). Improved knowledge was retained for 6 months after education. There were changes in 2 of 8 photoprotective behaviours at 6 months. Interventional education enhanced regular self-skin examination rate (p < 0.001) as well as the frequency of full skin checks by general practitioners (GPs) (p < 0.001). Overall, RTRs had better compliance with sun-protective methods and higher skin examination rates by themselves and/ or GPs before and after the intervention of education compared to patients with GD. To conclude, an integrated skin cancer education program improved knowledge of skin cancer and skin health as well as the frequency of self-skin examination and formal skin assessments. However, improvement in patient compliance did not extend to other sun-protective practices.


Assuntos
Educação em Saúde , Nefropatias , Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Adulto , Humanos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Nefropatias/etiologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Transplantados
3.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(4): 294-302, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no previous study that compare skin cancer awareness and photoprotective behaviours between renal transplant recipients (RTR) and patients with glomerular disease (GD). OBJECTIVES/METHODS: Sixty-one RTR and 51 patients with GD were given a self-reported questionnaire to evaluate skin cancer awareness and photoprotective behaviours in this cross-sectional study. The former group received a formal education on skin cancer and the latter an informal session prior to immunosuppressant use. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (n = 57) of RTRs and 88% (n = 45) of patients with GD responded to the survey. Majority of participants from both groups were aware that ultraviolet radiation could play a role in the occurrence of skin cancers and the awareness increased in participants with higher education (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.95, P = .003). Ninety-eight percent vs 71% were aware that immunosuppressants can increase the risk of developing cancer (P < .001) and higher awareness was noted in younger participants (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87-0.97, P = .003). Suboptimal photoprotective behaviours (sun avoidance, sunscreen usage and sun-protective clothing) were noted in both cohorts and slightly lower sun protection rates were reported in RTR when compared with patients having GD. The level of sun protective measures in RTR based on high, moderate and minimal use of photoprotective measures were 21%, 46% and 33%, respectively. In terms of patients with GD, the latter practices were 13%, 50% and 37%, respectively (P = .560). Higher educational status was significantly associated with better sunscreen usage in RTR (P = .017) whereas this finding was not observed in patients with GD. CONCLUSION: Patients with GD and RTR should have formal education on the risks of skin cancers before starting immunosuppressants. Follow-up education and surveillance is required to improve skin protective practices in these patients.


Assuntos
Glomerulonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Transplantados , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Glomerulonefrite/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefrite/imunologia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/imunologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Fatores de Proteção , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA