Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Angiology ; 50(6): 455-63, 1999 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10378821

RESUMO

In order to evaluate the effect of triflusal (2-acetyloxy-4-trifluoromethyl benzoic acid), an orally active antiplatelet agent, on arteriosclerosis progression, a pilot, parallel, double-dummy, double-blind clinical trial vs acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was carried out in patients with subclinical atherosclerotic lesions. The trial consisted of a 2-week run-in placebo phase, followed by a 12-month oral treatment with triflusal (600 mg/day) or ASA (300 mg/day). The primary variable was identified in the ultrasonic biopsy (UB) score; the secondary variables were the UB class changes of each arterial site, the rate of progression (ROP), the intima-media thickness (IMT), and the symptoms of arteriosclerosis. Data were evaluated by use of analysis of variance and Chi-square test. Forty-three patients (31 men, 12 women, mean age 62.8 +/- 8.4 SD) were randomized to triflusal (15 men, 6 women, mean age 64.3 +/- 6.7) or to ASA (16 men, 6 women, mean age 61.3 +/- 9.6). The analysis of variance on the UB score showed no difference between treatments: the patients' UB scores remained unchanged with no progression, thus indicating that no patient worsened during treatment. When all arterial sites under evaluation are considered, 86% of the sites in the triflusal group and 85% in the ASA group remained unchanged. No relevant change was recorded in vital signs and routine laboratory tests. Gastric disturbances were reported by two and three patients treated with triflusal and ASA, respectively. In conclusion, triflusal appears as effective as ASA in slowing arteriosclerosis progression.


Assuntos
Arteriosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Salicilatos/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Arteriosclerose/diagnóstico por imagem , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/tratamento farmacológico , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Placebos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Salicilatos/administração & dosagem , Salicilatos/efeitos adversos , Estômago/efeitos dos fármacos , Túnica Íntima/diagnóstico por imagem , Túnica Íntima/efeitos dos fármacos , Túnica Média/diagnóstico por imagem , Túnica Média/efeitos dos fármacos , Ultrassonografia
2.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 26(1): 33-47, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18653124

RESUMO

In order to confirm the efficacy and safety of posatirelin (L-pyro-2-aminoadipyl-L-leucyl-L-prolinamide), a synthetic peptide having cholinergic, catecholaminergic and neurotrophic activities, a multicentre, double-blind, controlled study versus placebo was planned in elderly patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria, respectively. The trial consisted of a 2-week run-in phase with placebo administered once a day orally, followed by a double-blind period of 3 months, with posatirelin or placebo administered once a day intramuscularly. Efficacy was assessed using the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen (GBS) Rating Scale (primary variable) and the Rey Memory Test (secondary variable). Laboratory tests, vital signs and adverse events were monitored. A total of 360 patients were randomized, the intent-to-treat sample (ITT) being made up of 357 patients and the per protocol sample (PP) of 260 patients. Both pragmatic and explanatory analyses showed significant differences between treatment groups in the GBS Rating Scale and the Rey Memory Test, with no difference in the two types of dementia. No difference between treatments was observed in safety variables, the incidence of adverse events in the posatirelin group being 7.3%. The study confirms previous results showing that treatment with posatirelin can improve cognitive and functional abilities of patients suffering from degenerative or vascular dementia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA