The scientific rationale and study protocol for the DPP3, Angiotensin II, and Renin Kinetics in Sepsis (DARK-Sepsis) randomized controlled trial: serum biomarkers to predict response to angiotensin II versus standard-of-care vasopressor therapy in the treatment of septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Data to support the use of specific vasopressors in septic shock are limited. Since angiotensin II (AT2) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017, multiple mechanistically distinct vasopressors are available to treat septic shock, but minimal data exist regarding which patients are most likely to benefit from each agent. Renin and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) are components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system which have been shown to outperform lactate in predicting sepsis prognosis, and preliminary data suggest they could prove useful as biomarkers to guide AT2 use in septic shock. METHODS: The DARK-Sepsis trial is an investigator-initiated industry-funded, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial of the use of AT2 versus standard of care (SOC) vasopressor therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with vasodilatory shock requiring norepinephrine ≥ 0.1 mcg/kg/min. In both groups, a series of renin and DPP3 levels will be obtained over the first 24 h of treatment with AT2 or SOC. The primary study outcome will be the ability of these biomarkers to predict response to vasopressor therapy, as measured by change in total norepinephrine equivalent dose of vasopressors at 3 h post-drug initiation or the equivalent timepoint in the SOC arm. To determine if the ability to predict vasopressor response is specific to AT2 therapy, the primary analysis will be the ability of baseline renin and DPP3 levels to predict vasopressor response adjusted for treatment arm (AT2 versus control) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary outcomes will include rates of acute kidney injury, need for mechanical ventilation and kidney replacement therapy, lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital, ICU and hospital mortality, and rates of prespecified adverse events. DISCUSSION: With an armamentarium of mechanistically distinct vasopressor agents now available, sub-phenotyping patients using biomarkers has the potential to improve septic shock outcomes by enabling treatment of the correct patient with the correct vasopressor at the correct time. However, this approach requires validation in a large definitive multicenter trial. The data generated through the DARK-Sepsis study will prove crucial to the optimal design and patient enrichment of such a pivotal trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05824767. Registered on April 24, 2023.

Mast cells are increased in the small intestinal mucosa of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colonic mast cells have been proposed to be related to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Whether mast cell counts are altered in the small intestine, a less-explored region in patients with IBS is not completely clear. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for case-control studies on mast cell count/density in the small intestine of patients with IBS vs controls through February 2019. Mast cell counts were separately analyzed in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. Data were pooled using the standardized mean difference (SMD) method. When zero was not within the 95% confidence interval (CI), the SMD was considered significant. KEY RESULTS: Data from 344 patients with IBS and 229 healthy controls from three studies in the duodenum, six in the jejunum, and five in the ileum were pooled in this meta-analysis. The number of mast cells was significantly higher in the ileum (SMD: 1.78 [95% CI: 0.89, 2.66]) of patients with IBS. Mast cell counts were not significantly different in the duodenum (SMD: 0.81 [-0.06, 1.67]) or the jejunum (SMD: 0.58 [-0.03, 1.19]) of patients with IBS vs healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Mast cells are increased in the small intestine of IBS vs controls, mainly in the ileum. Future studies should address whether such findings are IBS subtype or gender-dependent. Methodological variations, single-center bias, and the limited number of studies included in this meta-analysis may affect the final results.