Prognostic impact of Ki-67 proliferative index in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease characterized by complex biological features and poor prognosis. A prognostic stratification of PDAC would help to improve patient management. The aim of this study was to analyse the expression of Ki-67 in relation to prognosis in a cohort of patients with PDAC who had surgical treatment. Methods: Patients who had pancreatic resection between August 2010 and October 2014 for PDAC at two Italian centres were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with metastatic or locally advanced disease, those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with PDAC arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and those with missing data were excluded. Clinical and pathological data were retrieved and analysed. Ki-67 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and patients were stratified into three subgroups. Survival analyses were performed for disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific (DSS) survival outcomes according to Ki-67 expression and tumour grading. Results: A total of 170 patients met the selection criteria. Ki-67 expression of 10 per cent or less, 11-50 per cent and more than 50 per cent significantly correlated with DFS and DSS outcomes (P = 0·016 and P = 0·002 respectively). Ki-67 index was an independent predictor of poor DFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0·52, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 0·91; P = 0·022) and DSS (HR 0·53, 0·31 to 0·91; P = 0·022). Moreover, Ki-67 index correlated strongly with tumour grade (P < 0·001). Patients with PDAC classified as a G3 tumour with a Ki-67 index above 50 per cent had poor survival outcomes compared with other patients (P < 0·001 for both DFS and DSS). Conclusion: Ki-67 index could be of use in predicting the survival of patients with PDAC. Further investigation in larger cohorts is needed to validate these results.

Antecedentes: El adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) es una enfermedad agresiva con características biológicas complejas y pronóstico pobre. La estratificación pronóstica del PDAC ayudaría a mejorar el tratamiento del paciente. El objetivo de este estudio era analizar la expresión de Ki­67 como marcador pronóstico en una cohorte de pacientes con PDAC tratados quirúrgicamente. Métodos: Se efectuó un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a resección pancreática por PDAC en dos centros italianos entre agosto de 2010 y octubre de 2014. Se excluyeron los pacientes con enfermedad metastásica o localmente avanzada, los tratados con quimioterapia neoadyuvante, los pacientes con PDAC originado en una neoplasia papilar mucinosa intraductal y aquellos pacientes con datos incompletos. Se analizaron los datos clínicos y anatomopatológicos. La expresión de Ki­67 se evaluó por inmunohistoquímica y los pacientes se estratificaron en tres grupos. Se calculó la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (disease­free survival, DFS) y la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad (disease­specific survival, DSS) según la expresión de Ki­67 y el grado tumoral. Resultados: Un total de 170 pacientes cumplió los criterios de selección. La expresión de Ki­67 del ≤ 10%, 11­50% y > 50% mostró una correlación significativa con los resultados de DFS y DSS (P = 0,016 y P = 0,002, respectivamente). El índice Ki­67 fue un predictor independiente de pobre DFS (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 0,52, i.c. del 95% 0,29­0,91; P = 0,022) y DSS (HR 0,53, i.c. del 95% 0,31­0,91; P = 0,022). Asimismo, el índice Ki­67 se correlacionaba fuertemente con el grado tumoral (P < 0,001). Los pacientes con un PDAC clasificado como tumor grado G3 y con un índice Ki­67 > 50% tenían peores resultados de supervivencia en comparación con otros pacientes (P < 0,001 para ambos DFS y DSS). Conclusión: El índice Ki­67 se puede utilizar como predictor de supervivencia en pacientes con PDAC. Hace falta seguir investigando para validar estos resultados en cohortes más grandes.

Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective multicentre observational study by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iC.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded major complication after colorectal surgery. There is no uniform definition of anastomotic dehiscence and leak. Over the years many risk factors have been identified (distance of anastomosis from anal verge, gender, BMI, ASA score) but none of these allows an early diagnosis of AL. The DUtch LeaKage (DULK) score, C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been identified as early predictors for anastomotic leakage starting from postoperative day (POD) 2-3. The study was designed to prospectively evaluate AL rates after colorectal resections, in order to give a definite answer to the need for clear risk factors, and testing the diagnostic yeld of DULK score and of laboratory markers. Methods and analysis. A prospective enrollment for all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis carried out from September 2017 to September 2018 in 19 Italian surgical centers. OUTCOME MEASURES: preoperative risk factors of anastomotic leakage; operative parameters; leukocyte count, serum CRP, serum PCT and DULK score assessment on POD 2 and 3. Primary endpoint is AL; secondary endpoints are minor and major complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification; morbidity and mortality rates; readmission and reoperation rates, length of postoperative hospital stay (Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03560180, on June 18, 2018). Ethics. The ethics committee of the "Comitato Etico Regionale delle Marche - C.E.R.M." reviewed and approved this study protocol on September 7, 2017 (protocol no. 2017-0244-AS). All the participating centers submitted the protocol and obtained authorization from the local Institutional Review Board.

[Cervical cerclage and evidence-based medicine: if, how and when]. / Il cerchiaggio cervicale e la medicina basata sull'evidenza: se, come e quando.

Cervical cerclage has always been the main treatment option in cases of so-called cervical insufficiency, a condition that is notoriously associated with a high risk of second trimester abortion and/or preterm delivery. We can distinguish between a prophylactic cerclage, to be performed electively, usually at 13-16 weeks gestation, only when the woman has a history extremely suggestive for cervical incompetence (3 or more mid-trimester abortions or preterm deliveries) and a therapeutic cerclage. This last cerclage is recommended either for women who have ultrasonographic changes consistent with a short cervix or the presence of funneling after the 16-20 weeks gestation (urgent cerclage) and for women who present the asymptomatic dilation of the uterine cervix of at least 2 cm and/or a prolapse of the amniochorial membranes (emergent cerclage). So far there is still a lack of controlled and randomized trials that can unquestionably demonstrate the advantages of the cervical cerclage in comparison with a ''wait and see'' aptitude. The cerclage can be performed either transvaginally, usually according to the McDonald technique, or transabdominally. This last approach is recommended when a transvaginal cerclage has to be avoided because of technical difficulties depending on the conditions of the cervix or when the pregnant woman has a history of one or more failed transvaginal cerclages. Interesting perspectives are currently offered by the laparoscopic cerclage, a method that has been effective and unexpectedly safe till now.

Three-dimensional sonography and hysterosalpingosonography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies.

Uterine anomalies implicated in female subfertility, implantation failure and miscarriages can often be detected often by two-dimensional transvaginal (2D TV) ultrasound scanning. When used as a screening test TV ultrasound has provided sensitivity rates of up to 100% about uterine anomalies. Improved depiction has been achieved with the development of hysterosalpingosonography (HSSG). The anechoic interface provided by the saline solution allows the examiner to determine whether an abnormality is intracavitary, endometrial, or submucosal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of 2D TV contrast sonography and 3D TV ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in comparison with their appearance of hysterosalpingosonography findings.