Real-World Treatment with Nivolumab or Cabozantinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto Region of Italy: Results of AMOUR Study.

BACKGROUND: Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials. OBJECTIVE: We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017-2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region. RESULTS: We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80. CONCLUSIONS: In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.

Management of dermatologic toxicities associated with monoclonal antibody epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: A case review.

INTRODUCTION: The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), cetuximab and panitumumab, represent an effective treatment option for patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); furthermore, they are relatively devoid of systemic toxicities, which are commonly observed with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients treated with these monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), will experience dermatologic toxicities, most notably the papulopustular skin rash, which can impact quality-of-life and affect adherence to therapy. This paper reviews the most recent practices in the management of skin rash related to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAbs, cetuximab and panitumumab, in the treatment of mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed relevant literature regarding dermatologic toxicities associated with anti-EGFR mAbs in order to give important indications about prevention and reactive treatment of skin rash. RESULTS: Two case reports were presented to show how skin rash could hamper mAb EGFRIs use in clinical practice, underscoring the need of implementing a comprehensive management strategy of skin toxicity in order to promote patients' compliance with anti-EGFR therapy and maintain quality-of-life. Based on randomized data, recent guidelines established by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Skin Toxicity Study Group suggest that prophylactic use of oral doxycycline or minocycline reduces the risk and severity of skin rash, improving clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: At the start of treatment with cetuximab and panitumumab, the proper patient education about the skin rash associated with these mAbs and the implementation of a pre-emptive, comprehensive skin toxicity program significantly contribute to improve adherence to therapy, optimize anti-EGFR therapy and maintain quality-of-life.

Metronomic chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer: clinical and biological activity.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy combined with targeted drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We included 26 untreated patients with HER2-negative (HER-) MBC and poor hormone receptor expression. The analysis of the results suggests that the metronomic chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and erlotinib is effective and well tolerated. BACKGROUND: The object of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with HER2-negative (HER2(-)) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and poor hormone receptor expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated MBC were candidates to receive metronomic oral capecitabine (500 mg thrice daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and erlotinib (100 mg daily). RESULTS: Of 24 patients assessable for response, we observed 1 complete response (CR, 4%), 14 partial responses (58%), 5 patients with stable disease greater than 9 weeks' duration (SD, 21%), and 1 patient (4%) with early progression of disease. The overall clinical benefit (CB) (CR + partial response + SD > 24 weeks) was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-90%). Median time to progression was 43 weeks (95% CI, 21-69). Patients with low levels of circulating endothelial progenitors (CEPs) at baseline had a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3 toxicity included diarrhea (n = 1), thrombosis (n = 1), and hypertension (n = 2). Grade 2 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 5), hand-foot syndrome (n = 13), and hypertension (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Treatment with metronomic chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and erlotinib was effective in HER2(-), estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-poor advanced breast cancer.

In vivo activity of gemcitabine-loaded PEGylated small unilamellar liposomes against pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine (GEM) is presently the standard option for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). We investigated the in vitro and in vivo antitumor potential of GEM-loaded PEGylated liposomes (L-GEM) as a novel agent for the treatment of PC. In vitro analysis of antitumor activity against human PC cell lines, BXPC-3 and PSN-1, showed a significant time- and dose-dependent reduction of cell viability following exposure to L-GEM as compared to free GEM [at 72 h, IC(50): 0.009 vs. 0.027 microM (P = 0.003) for BXPC-3 and 0.003 vs. 0.009 microM (P < 0.001) for PSN1, respectively]. Confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstrated an effective liposome/cell interaction and internalization process following 3-h cell exposure to L-GEM. The in vivo antitumor activity of L-GEM was investigated in a cohort of SCID mice bearing BxPC-3 or PSN-1 xenografts. Animals were i.p. treated with L-GEM (5 mg/kg), or a threefold increased dose of free GEM (15 mg/kg), or empty liposomes or vehicle, twice a week for 35 days. A significant higher inhibition of tumor growth in mice treated with L-GEM versus free GEM (P = 0.006 and P = 0.004 for BXPC-3 and PSN-1, respectively) or control groups (P = 0.0001), translated in a survival advantage of L-GEM treated animals versus other groups. Pharmacokinetic studies showed enhancement of systemic bioavailability of L-GEM (t (1/2) = 8 h) versus to GEM (t (1/2) = 1.5 h). Our findings demonstrate that L-GEM is an effective agent against PC and exerts higher antitumor activity as compared to free GEM with no appreciable increase in toxicity. These results provide the pre-clinical rational for L-GEM clinical development for the treatment of PC patients.