Back to Basics: Care of the Stereotactic EEG Implanted Patient.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic EEG (SEEG) is gaining increasing popularity in the United States. Patients undergoing SEEG have unique challenges, and their needs are different compared with noninvasive cases. We aim to describe the medical, nursing, and other institutional practices of SEEG evaluations among tertiary referral (level IV) epilepsy centers accredited by the National Association of Epilepsy Centers. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey we formulated and distributed to directors of all level IV epilepsy centers listed by the National Association of Epilepsy Center. Most questions were addressed to the adult and pediatric SEEG programs separately. RESULTS: Among 199 epilepsy center directors invited to complete the survey, 90 (45%) responded. Eighty-three centers (92%) reported they perform SEEG evaluations. Of the 83 respondents, 56 perform SEEG in adult and 47 in pediatric patients. Twenty-two centers evaluate both pediatric and adult subjects. The highest concordance of SEEG workflow was in (1) epilepsy monitoring unit stay duration (1-2 weeks, 79% adult and 85% pediatric programs), (2) use of sleep deprivation (94% both adult and pediatric) and photic stimulation (79% adult and 70% pediatric) for seizure activation, (3) performing electrical cortical stimulation at the end of SEEG evaluation after spontaneous seizures are captured (84% adult and 88% pediatric), and (4) daily head-wrap inspection (76% adult and 80% pediatric). Significant intercenter variabilities were noted in the other aspects of SEEG workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed significant variability in SEEG workflow across polled centers. Prospective, multicenter protocols will help the future development and harmonization of optimal practice patterns.

Stereo-electroencephalographic seizure localization in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis: A single center experience.

Objective: Epilepsy patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) on imaging who are drug-resistant usually undergo epilepsy surgery without previous invasive evaluation. However, up to one-third of patients are not seizure-free after surgery. Prior studies have identified risk factors for surgical failure, but it is unclear if they are associated with bilateral or discordant seizure onset. Methods: In this retrospective case series, we identified 17 epilepsy patients who had MRI-confirmed MTS but received invasive stereo-EEG (SEEG) evaluation before definitive intervention. We analyzed their presurgical risk factors in relation to SEEG seizure onset localization and MRI/SEEG concordance. Results: SEEG ictal onset was concordant with MTS localization (i.e. seizures started only from the hippocampus with MTS) in 5 out of 13 patients with unilateral MTS (UMTS) and in 3 out of 4 patients with bilateral MTS.No statistically significant association regarding concordance of SEEG ictal onset and MTS location was found in patients with such risk factors as a history of non-mesial temporal aura, frequent focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, prior viral brain infection, or family history of epilepsy. Nine out of 13 UMTS patients had resective surgery only, 5 out of 9 (56 %) have Engel class I outcome at most recent follow-up (median 46.5 months, range 22-91 months). In Engel class I cohort, the SEEG ictal onset was concordant with MTS location in 3 out of 5 patients, and 2 patients had ipsilateral temporal neocortical ictal onset. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with MTS might have discordant SEEG ictal onset (in 61.5% patients with UMTS in presented cohort), which may explain poor surgical outcome after destructive surgery in these cases. Significance: Although no statistically significant association was found in this under-powered study, these findings could be potentially valuable for future meta-analyses.

Real-Time Seizure Detection Using Behind-the-Ear Wearable System.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the usability and comfort of a behind-the-ear seizure detection device called brain seizure detection (BrainSD) that captures ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) data using four scalp electrodes. METHODS: This is a feasibility study. Thirty-two patients admitted to a level 4 Epilepsy Monitoring Unit were enrolled. The subjects wore BrainSD and the standard 21-channel video-EEG simultaneously. Epileptologists analyzed the EEG signals collected by BrainSD and validated it using video-EEG data to confirm its accuracy. A poststudy survey was completed by each participant to evaluate the comfort and usability of the device. In addition, a focus group of UT Southwestern epileptologists was held to discuss the features they would like to see in a home EEG-based seizure detection device such as BrainSD. RESULTS: In total, BrainSD captured 11 of the 14 seizures that occurred while the device was being worn. All 11 seizures captured on BrainSD had focal onset, with three becoming bilateral tonic-clonic and one seizure being of subclinical status. The device was worn for an average of 41 hours. The poststudy survey showed that most users found the device comfortable, easy-to-use, and stated they would be interested in using BrainSD. Epileptologists in the focus group expressed a similar interest in BrainSD. CONCLUSIONS: Brain seizure detection is able to detect EEG signals using four behind-the-ear electrodes. Its comfort, ease-of-use, and ability to detect numerous types of seizures make BrainSD an acceptable at-home EEG detection device from both the patient and provider perspective.

Stereo-EEG Evaluation and Surgical Treatment in Patients With Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy Associated With Nodular Heterotopia.

PURPOSE: Nodular heterotopia (NH) is a common cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Only limited studies detail the treatment of NH with laser interstitial thermal therapy and none analyze the relation between epileptogenicity and NH location. METHODS: We retrospectively studied nine patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and NH who underwent stereoelectroencephalography and subsequent epilepsy surgery. Nodular heterotopia in the frontal lobes or along the bodies of the lateral ventricles was classified as anterior NH. Nodular heterotopia in the trigones, temporal or occipital horns, or temporal lobes was classified as posterior NH. Nodular heterotopia in both anterior and posterior locations was classified as diffuse NH. Interictal and ictal stereoelectroencephalography were analyzed, and patients were followed postoperatively to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Of the six patients who underwent nine laser interstitial thermal therapy procedures either in isolation or in combination with other surgical therapies, four patients were Engel Ia, one was Engel IIb, and one was Engel IIIa, with an average follow-up of 22.8 months. All patients with posterior NH had interictal epileptiform abnormalities and seizures originating from the posterior NH. None of the patients with anterior NH had epileptiform activity recorded from their NH. CONCLUSION: Laser interstitial thermal therapy alone or in combination with other surgical therapies is an effective treatment in those with drug-resistant epilepsy because of NH, even in those with extensive NH and broad seizure onset. We observed a trend suggesting that posterior NH are more likely to be epileptogenic compared with anterior NH and recommend that in patients with anterior NH, alternative epilepsy etiologies and stereoelectroencephalography implantation strategies be considered.

Pearls & Oy-sters: Two Cases of Stereotactic EEG-Proven Insular Epilepsy With Nonlocalizing Scalp EEG and Interesting Semiologies.

Insular epilepsy is a great mimicker and can be mistaken for seizures originating from other areas of the brain or as nonepileptic spells. The semiology of insular epilepsy can include, but is not limited to, auditory illusions, paresthesias, gastric rising, laryngeal constriction, and hyperkinetic movements. These arise from both the functions of the insula itself and its extensive connections with other regions of the brain. Noninvasive workup can be negative or nonlocalizing because of the insula's location deep within the lateral sulcus. Stereotactic EEG can therefore be an important tool in cases of insular epilepsy so that patients may be appropriately diagnosed and evaluated for potential surgical treatment. We present 2 cases of epilepsy with nonlocalizing scalp EEG and challenging semiologies, the workup undertaken to identify them as cases of insular epilepsy, and subsequent surgical treatments and outcomes.

Epilepsy surgery in patient with monogenic epilepsy related to SCN8A mutation.

Epilepsy surgery is superior to prolonged medical therapy in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but reports on epilepsy surgery outcomes for patients with a genetic etiology are limited, especially in adults. This is the first documented report of a stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) evaluation and resective surgery outcome in an adult patient with epilepsy related to SCN8A mutation. We describe a patient with epilepsy related to SCN8A mutation which was reported as a variant of uncertain significance at time of his pre-surgical evaluation and reclassified as likely pathogenic about 3 years after resective epilepsy surgery. Most of his pre-surgical evaluation results suggested right temporal lobe epilepsy, but few reported semiological symptoms, ictal SPECT, and neuropsychology results were discordant, and brain MRI was non-lesional. Therefore, SEEG was recommended; ultimately, seizures were localized to the right hippocampus. He was seizure-free for 1.5 years after right anterior temporal lobectomy, then reported three focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures in the subsequent 12 months (preoperatively, 6 focal impaired awareness seizures and 4-6 FBTC per year). This case demonstrates that epilepsy surgery reduced seizure burden in a patient with SCN8A-related epilepsy granting him short-term seizure freedom after resection, and then decreased seizure frequency after relapse compared to the preoperative baseline.

Emergency department visits and readmissions in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) at a safety net hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits after an index admission have been become a quality measure due to associations with poor outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Readmissions and ED encounters have been studied in a variety of conditions including epilepsy but have not been examined exclusively in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). In this study we examined the rate of readmissions and ED visits after a discharge from an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) in a safety net hospital. We also determined patient phenotypes that are associated with readmissions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study with index admission being a discharge from an EMU between January 1 and December 31 2016 with follow-up until August 31 2020. We obtained data regarding demographics, medical and psychiatric history, and social history and treatment interventions. Our outcome variables were both all-cause and seizure-related hospital readmissions and ED visits 30 days following the index discharge and readmissions and ED visits 30 days thereafter. RESULTS: Eleven of 122 patients (9%) had a non-seizure-related ED visit and/or hospitalization within 30 days of index discharge while 45 (37%) had re-contact with the health system thereafter for non-seizure-related issues. Seven of 122 patients (6%) had a seizure-related ED visit or hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. Twenty-eight (23%) had a seizure-related readmission or ED visit after 30 days. Of these 28, 4 patients had been to an ER within 7 days of EMU discharge. The majority of subsequent encounters with the healthcare system were through the ED (n = 38) as compared to hospital (n = 10) and EMU readmissions (n = 9). On bivariate statistical analysis, charity or self-pay insurance status (p < 0.01), homelessness (p < 0.01), emergent EMU admission on index admission (p < 0.01), history of a psychiatric diagnosis (p < 0.02), and ED encounters 12 months prior to admission (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with readmission; however, on multivariate analysis only charity insurance status was a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of readmissions and ED visits after discharge with a diagnosis of PNES at a safety net hospital, we found a seizure-related readmission rate of approximately 6% in 30 days and 23% thereafter with the majority of re-contact with the hospital being in the ED. On multi-variate analysis insurance status was a significant factor associated with readmission and ED visits. Our future research directions include examining referrals and treatment completion at the hospital's PNES clinic as well as creating a risk score to better identify patients with PNES at risk of readmission.

Emergent Admissions to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit in the Setting of COVID-19 Pandemic-related, State-mandated Restrictions: Clinical Decision Making and Outcomes.

Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the state of Texas-limited elective procedures to conserve beds and personal protective equipment (PPE); therefore, between March 22 and May 18, 2020, admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) was limited only to urgent and emergent cases. We evaluated clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients who were admitted to the EMU. Nineteen patients were admitted (one patient twice) with average age of 36.26 years (11 female) and average length of stay 3 days (range: 2-9 days). At least one event was captured on continuous EEG (cEEG) and video monitoring in all 20 admissions (atypical in one). One patient had both epileptic (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) while 10 had PNES and 9 had ES. In 8 of 9 patients with ES, medications were changed, while in 5 patients with PNES, anti-epileptic drugs (AED) were stopped; the remaining 5 were not on medications. Of the 14 patients who had seen an epileptologist pre-admission, 13 (or 93%) had their diagnosis confirmed by EMU stay; a statistically significant finding. While typically an elective admission, in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, urgent and emergent EMU admissions were required for increased seizure or event frequency. In the vast majority of patients (13 of 19), admission lead to medication changes to either better control seizures or to change therapeutics as appropriate when PNES was identified.

Physical activity status and quality of life in patients with epilepsy - Survey from level four epilepsy monitoring units.

PURPOSE: People with epilepsy (PWE) tend to have sedentary lifestyles which may predispose them to a lower perceived quality of life (QOL). Moreover, the relationship between physical activity (PA) and QOL in populations of PWE with high disease burden has been under-studied. The goal of this study was to evaluate PA level and its impact on health-related QOL in PWE who were admitted to Level-4 epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 200 patients from two EMUs in Dallas, Texas completed the following standard surveys: Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA), the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire. Information on self-reported epilepsy history, severity of disease, and socioeconomic status were also collected. The diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed by video-EEG monitoring. RESULTS: Among the 200 who completed the survey, 113 had a diagnosis of epilepsy and 109 of them completed the RAPA. Ninety-two (84 %) of these PWE reported a sedentary level of physical activity (RAPA < 6) and 16 % reported an active level (RAPA ≥ 6). Self-reported QOL was slightly higher in PWE with an active level of PA compared to PWE with a sedentary level of PA (63.8 ± 15.0 vs 53.7 ± 17.9, p = 0.07), even though there was no difference in the severity of self-reported mood symptoms. After controlling for employment and seizure frequency, physical activity level measured by RAPA score was also positively related to QOL (r = 0.39, p = 0.01) and negatively correlated with anxiety symptoms (r = -0.28, p = 0.02) and depression symptoms (r = -0.25, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of PWE in this survey reported sedentary lifestyles despite most of them being young to middle-aged adults. Higher PA level was associated with fewer self-reported mood symptoms and higher QOL. In conjunction with the literature, these results suggest that PWE with a wide range of disease burden should be encouraged to participate in regular exercise to potentially improve QOL.

Non-lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy requires bilateral invasive evaluation.

PURPOSE: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) usually responds well to surgical treatment, although in non-lesional cases up to 50% of patients experience seizure relapse. The possibility of bilateral independent seizure onset should be considered as a reason for epilepsy surgery failure. METHODS: In a cohort of 177 patients who underwent invasive presurgical evaluation with stereo-tactically placed electrodes in two level four epilepsy centers, 29 had non-lesional MTLE. Invasive evaluation results are described. RESULTS: Among 29 patients with non-lesional MRI and mesial temporal lobe seizure onset recorded during stereo-EEG (SEEG) evaluation, four patients with unilateral preimplantation hypothesis had independent bilateral mesial temporal seizures on SEEG despite of unilateral non-invasive evaluation data. Three of these patients were treated with bitemporal responsive neurostimulator system (RNS). Independent bilateral mesial temporal seizures have been confirmed on RNS ECoG (electrocorticography). The fourth patient underwent right anterior temporal lobectomy. CONCLUSION: We propose that patients with non-lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy would benefit from bilateral invasive evaluation of mesial temporal structures to predict those patients who would be at most risk for surgical failure. Neurostimulaiton could be an initial treatment option for patients with independent bitemporal seizure onset.

Comparison of psychiatric comorbidities and impact on quality of life in patients with epilepsy or psychogenic nonepileptic spells.

OBJECTIVES: Psychiatric comorbidity is common in people with epilepsy (PWE) and psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES). These comorbidities can be detrimental to quality of life (QOL) and are often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Some types of epilepsy, such as focal temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), have been associated with higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity. This study examined the impact of psychiatric comorbidity on QOL in patients admitted to two level 4 epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 200 patients admitted to two level 4 EMUs completed standardized surveys including the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Hierarchal multiple regression was performed to assess impact on QOL. RESULTS: Of the 200 participants, 113 had a diagnosis of epilepsy, 36 had a diagnosis of PNES, and 51 were excluded for nondiagnostic evaluation or dual diagnosis. Of those with epilepsy, 65 had TLE, 28 had focal extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), and 20 had nonfocal epilepsy. Patients with PNES had higher self-reported anxiety and depression levels (GAD-7: p = 0.04, PHQ-9: p < 0.01; BDI-II: p < 0.01) but similar QOL to PWE (p = 0.78). Using hierarchal multiple regression, symptoms of anxiety and depression were significant predictors of lower QOL in PWE but not in patients with PNES. There was no difference in QOL in those with ETLE and TLE. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms are common in patients admitted to level 4 EMUs regardless of diagnosis and play an important role in predicting QOL in PWE. Our findings emphasize the importance of routinely screening all EMU patients for psychiatric comorbidity.

Epileptic auras: phenomenology and neurophysiology.

This review discusses the phenomenology, neurophysiology, and localization of epileptic auras with particular emphasis on how auras can manifest as part of an epileptic network. Epileptic auras, as the first clinical symptom of a seizure, may lead us to infer the site of seizure onset. At the same time, auras can also be a result of activation or alteration in an epileptic network. They can be highly specific or ill-defined in symptomatology. They occur as a result of limited seizure activation, allowing access of the neural signal to the conscious brain. An understanding of epileptic auras offers a window into understanding fundamental brain functions, and helps the clinician at the bedside to make appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic choices.

The relevance of somatosensory auras in refractory temporal lobe epilepsies.

The purpose of this study is to look at the prevalence, characteristics, and prognostic value of somatosensory auras (SSAs) in patients who have undergone temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent TLE surgery at Cleveland Clinic between 2005 and 2010 (n = 333) to study the prevalence, characteristics, and prognostic implications of SSA in the context of TLE surgery. Analyses were performed using two seizure outcome definitions: complete seizure freedom and Engel classification. Of the 333 patients, 26 (7.8%) had SSA. Almost half (12 patients) had unilateral sensory symptoms, whereas the rest had bilateral symptoms. Tingling and numbness were the most frequently reported sensations. Compared to their non-SSA counterparts, patients with SSA had the same clinical and imaging characteristics, but had a higher rate of breakthrough seizures (p = 0.03), although most (54%) were still able to achieve Engel class of I (p = 0.02). Based on our results we would encourage detailed presurgical testing, which may include an invasive evaluation to analyze the extent of the epileptogenic zone in patients with SSA and suspected TLE.

A rare case of intramedullary 'whorling-sclerosing' variant meningioma.

A 52-year-old man with a seven-year history of progressive weakness, gait problems, and pain in his extremities presented with subacute worsening of his symptoms. Examination revealed weakness in all four extremities, increased tone, hyperreflexia, and sensory deficits. MRI of the cervical spine showed an area of signal abnormality and abnormal enhancement within the cervical cord at the C5-C6 level. The patient initially underwent biopsy followed a few days later by a debulking surgery. Postoperatively, the patient showed improvement in strength as well as ambulation. Intraoperatively, the lesion was confirmed to be intramedullary without any dural attachments. Histopathological examination revealed an extensively hyalinized tumor with sparse collections of cells that were immunopositive for both cytokeratin and GFAP, and immunonegative for EMA and progesterone receptor. This is an unusual pattern of expression, with cytokeratin immunopositivity suggesting a meningioma and GFAP immunopositivity suggesting a glioma. Considering the combination of extensive hyalinization with cytokeratin positivity the tumor was thought to be most consistent with a hyalinized meningioma with GFAP positivity. GFAP-positive meningiomas are rare, and these include the recently described 'whorling-sclerosing' variant. Only three cases of this tumor have been previously reported, all of which were intracranial. This is the first reported case of an intramedullary whorling-sclerosing meningioma.

Critical evaluation of the claims made by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotional material in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: In Pakistan, there is no mechanism to monitor the drug promotional campaign by pharmaceutical industry despite the fact that there is enough evidence that irrational pharmacotherapy is increasingly encountered even in the developed countries due to unethical practices of pharmaceutical promotion. Objectives. To audit the drug promotional claims made by the pharmaceutical companies in Pakistan. METHODS: Drug promotional pamphlets and brochures containing claims for the drugs, which were circulated by the pharmaceutical representatives were collected from 122 general practitioners (GPs) from Karachi and Larkana cities of the Sindh Province. The claims were critically analyzed and audited with the help of currently available evidence in the medical literature. RESULTS: 345 distinct advertisements covering 182 drugs from different manufacturers were critically analyzed for information content. Sixty two out of 345 (18%) of the reviewed advertisements were adjudged to be misleading / unjustifiable, which were again classified as, exaggerated (32%), ambiguous (21%), false (26%), and controversial (21%). The primary source of information (approximately 78%) about the newly launched drugs for the GPs was found to be the pharmaceutical representatives followed by hospital doctors (5%) and colleagues (5%). Furthermore, 110 (90%) GPs were of the view that the drug promotion has definitely an influence on their prescribing pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Since GPs in Pakistan rate pharmaceutical companies as their primary source of information regarding drugs, it can be anticipated that inappropriate advertisement claims would lead to irrational prescribing if physicians had no any other information to follow.