Breast-Specific Sensuality and Appearance Satisfaction: Comparison of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that lumpectomy (L) patients reported higher appearance satisfaction, appreciation of a pleasurable breast caress, and persistence of the breast during intimacy than mastectomy with reconstruction, which we used to describe breast-specific sensuality. Our current objective was to compare breast-specific sensuality between L and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). DESIGN: An anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed to breast cancer survivors between 2014 and 2016. Eligible patients underwent operation between 2000 and 2014, were adults older than 18 years, English-speaking, and at least one year into the post-operative period. Demographic characteristics, treatment details, Female Sexual Function Index metrics, and investigator-generated questions about appearance satisfaction and breast-specific sensuality were collected. RESULTS: Of the 600 women who participated, 585 surveys were eligible. Surgical modality was reported as L by 406 (69.4%), mastectomy alone by 50 (8.5%), and mastectomy with reconstruction by 129 (22.1%). Nipple-preservation data were available for 47 of 129 mastectomy with reconstruction patients (36.4%), with 21 NSM and 26 non-nipple-sparing mastectomy patients. Favorable postoperative appearance satisfaction was reported by 76.2% of L and 71.4% of NSM (p = 0.039). Lumpectomy patients reported feeling more comfortable being seen undressed than NSM patients (82.4% vs 71.4%; p = 0.0003). The chest remained a part of intimacy for 65.4% of L patients vs 42.9% of NSM patients (p = 0.0009). A pleasurable breast caress was reported more frequently by L patients than NSM patients (66.2% vs 20%; p ≤ 0.0001). The breast caress was unpleasant for 40% of NSM patients, nearly 4-fold higher than L patients (11.3%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: NSM patients were significantly less satisfied with appearance, less comfortable being seen undressed, had decreased persistence of breast intimacy, and experienced a less pleasurable breast caress than L patients. Counseling patients about these findings will empower informed decision making, optimize expectations, and can enhance postoperative satisfaction.

Sexual Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors: Is it Surgical Modality or Adjuvant Therapy?

OBJECTIVES: Sexual dysfunction is common in breast cancer survivors. Our survey study aimed to delineate the relative associations between sexual dysfunction and breast cancer treatment including surgical modalities and adjuvant therapies. METHODS: Women in surveillance following breast cancer surgery were eligible for our survey incorporating the Female Sexual Function Index. Analysis involved multiple log-binomial regression to evaluate the association between sexual dysfunction (Female Sexual Function Index≤26.55) and treatment modality. RESULTS: Of the 600 completed surveys, the final eligible analytic sample included 278 sexually active respondents. Overall, 65%, 27%, and 8% underwent lumpectomy, mastectomy with reconstruction, and mastectomy alone, respectively. In total, 74.5% reported receipt of radiation; 47.8% chemotherapy; 27.3% tamoxifen, and 31.4% aromatase inhibitor (AI). No significant difference in prevalence of sexual dysfunction was observed by surgical modality, even when adjusted for adjuvant therapy. Chemotherapy or radiation was not associated with sexual dysfunction when adjusted for surgical modality. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 1.6 times higher for the AI group compared with the no endocrine therapy group (P=0.01), when adjusted for other treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the highest rates of sexual dysfunction were among breast cancer survivors treated with AI. Neither surgical modality, chemotherapy, nor radiation was associated with sexual dysfunction. These data may guide clinicians in counseling sexually active breast cancer patients in treatment planning and survivorship.

Axillary Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Is There a Role in the Post Z-0011 Era?

OBJECTIVES: Axillary ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (AXUSFNA) in early-stage breast cancer has required reappraisal. ACOSOG Z-0011 and after mapping of the axilla: radiotherapy or surgery have shown that women with limited nodal disease at sentinel lymph node biopsy got no survival advantage with completion axillary node dissection. We hypothesize that AXUSFNA may be sufficiently accurate for staging for some patients and sentinel lymph node biopsy need not be performed. We define the false negative rate (FNR) of AXUSFNA in different subsets of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included node positive patients who also underwent AXUSFNA between 1/2006 and 12/2010 followed by axillary surgery. The FNR was calculated for the entire group and for subgroups determined by tumor, nodal, and ultrasound findings. RESULTS: Out of ∼700 AXUSFNA patients, 128 node positive patients were included in the study. The overall AXUSFNA FNR was 35.9% (95% confidence interval, 28.1%-44.6%). There was a significantly higher FNR with smaller tumors and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ on multivariate analysis. On ultrasound, benign-appearing nodes had a higher FNR than indeterminate nodes (78.9% vs. 60.9%, P=0.2) and significantly higher than suspicious nodes (78.9% vs. 2.9%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the FNR for AXUSFNA was comparable with the rate of residual disease in the control arms of Z-0011 (27.4%) and after mapping of the axilla: radiotherapy or surgery (33%). However, our analysis suggests that we may be able to identify more appropriate patients for AXUSFNA and halve the FNR. As primary tumor characteristics and genomics drive systemic therapeutic recommendations, there may be an ongoing role for AXUSFNA in axillary staging.

Breast-Specific Sensuality and Sexual Function in Cancer Survivorship: Does Surgical Modality Matter?

PURPOSE: More early-staged breast cancer patients are choosing mastectomy. No studies have addressed breast-specific sensuality (BSS), defined as the breast's role during intimacy. We explored BSS among women undergoing lumpectomy (L), mastectomy alone (M), or with reconstruction (MR) and analyzed the association of surgical modality with sexual function. METHODS: Women undergoing breast cancer surgery between 2000 and 2013 were eligible for survey using investigator-generated questions and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Demographic and surgical data were collected by chart review. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze FSFI scores, and χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical data. RESULTS: Of 453 invited participants, 268 (59%) completed the survey. Of these, 69.4, 22.4, and 8.2% underwent L, MR, or M, respectively. The importance of the breast/chest wall during intimacy declined significantly regardless of surgical modality (L 83-74%, p = 0.0006; M 95-47%, p = 0.003; MR 93-77%, p = 0.002). No difference in sexual function was found between L, MR, and M (median FSFI score 28.2, 27.5, 25.9, respectively; p = 1.0). Comparing L versus MR, higher FSFI scores resulted with appearance satisfaction (29.0 vs. 22.6 p = 0.002) and preserved BSS as pleasurable breast caress (28.8 vs. 26.5, p = 0.04) and the breast as part of intimacy (28.8 vs. 24.8, p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer surgery is associated with lowered BSS. However, BSS and appearance satisfaction scores are better for L and appear to correlate with improved sexual function postoperatively. These data may guide surgical counseling and contribute to survivorship outcomes.

Influential Forces in Breast Cancer Surgical Decision Making and the Impact on Body Image and Sexual Function.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making with one's partner and body image satisfaction may affect surgical choices of breast cancer patients. This study analyzed whether partner opinion was associated with choice of operation and whether comfort level with one's partner was altered postoperatively. METHODS: A prospective anonymous survey was administered to breast cancer patients who underwent breast surgery between 2000 and 2014. Categorical variables were compared by χ (2) or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Women who elected to undergo mastectomy with reconstruction (MR) placed greater emphasis on their own decision making than on input from their partner, surgeon, or others (56.5 vs. 8.3 vs. 23.2 vs. 12, respectively), whereas those who chose lumpectomy (L) placed similar weight on surgeon input and self-input (44.2 vs. 42.7 %). Only 7.5 % of all patients identified their partner as the greatest influence on their surgical choice. Preoperatively, the L group was the most comfortable with their partner seeing their chest (91.9 % L vs. 83.9 % MR vs. 75.9 % mastectomy alone (M); p = 0.01), and postoperatively, the comfort levels for all were remarkably decreased. Furthermore, if a patient was a candidate for L but chose MR, the role her chest played in intimacy dropped more compared with those who chose L (83.8 % L vs. 91.7 % MR; p = 0.3 preoperatively to 65.1 % L vs. 42.9 % MR; p = 0.01 postoperatively). CONCLUSIONS: When making surgical decisions, most patients indicate that they value their own opinion over that of others. Mastectomy, regardless of reconstruction, leads to a significant reduction in comfort with one's partner postoperatively compared with lumpectomy. This information may be helpful in counseling couples at the time of consultation for breast cancer treatment.

The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In sentinel node surgery for breast cancer, procedural accuracy is assessed by calculating the false-negative rate. It is important to measure this since there are potential adverse outcomes from missing node metastases. We performed a meta-analysis of published data to assess which method has achieved the lowest false-negative rate. METHODS: We found 3,588 articles concerning sentinel nodes and breast cancer published from 1993 through mid-2011; 183 articles met our inclusion criteria. The studies described in these 183 articles included a total of 9,306 patients. We grouped the studies by injection material and injection location. The false-negative rates were analyzed according to these groupings and also by the year in which the articles were published. RESULTS: There was significant variation related to injection material. The use of blue dye alone was associated with the highest false-negative rate. Inclusion of a radioactive tracer along with blue dye resulted in a significantly lower false-negative rate. Although there were variations in the false-negative rate according to injection location, none were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of blue dye should be accompanied by a radioactive tracer to achieve a significantly lower false-negative rate. Location of injection did not have a significant impact on the false-negative rate. Given the limitations of acquiring appropriate data, the false-negative rate should not be used as a metric for training or quality control.