Comparison of Demographic, Epidemiological, Immunological, and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with HIV Mono-infection Versus Patients Co-infected with HCV or/and HBV: A Serbian Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to correlate the status of hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with clinical and demographic data prior to starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and assess the impact of HCV and HBV co-infection on the natural history of HIV infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved a total of 836 treatment-naive patients with available serological status for HBV and HCV at the point of therapy initiation. Patients were stratified into four groups: HIV mono-infection, HIV/HCV, HIV/HBV, and HIV/HCV/HBV co-infection. Demographic, epidemiological, immunological and clinical characteristics were analyzed in order to assess the possible impact of HCV and HBV co-infection on HIV - related immunodeficiency and progression to AIDS. RESULTS: The prevalence of HCV and HBV co-infection in our cohort was 25.7% and 6.3%, respectively. Triple HIV/HCV/HBV infection was recorded in 1.7% of the patients. In comparison with those co-infected with HCV, patients with HIV mono-infection had lower levels of serum liver enzymes activity and higher CD4 cell counts, and were less likely to have CD4 cell counts below100 cells/µL and clinical AIDS, with OR 0.556 and 0.561, respectively. No difference in the development of advanced immunodeficiency and/or AIDS was recorded between patients with HIV monoinfection and those co-infected with HBV, or both HCV/HBV. CONCLUSION: HIV/HCV co-infection was found to be more prevalent than HIV/HBV co-infection in a Serbian cohort. Co-infection with HCV was related to more profound immunodeficiency prior to therapy initiation, reflecting a possible unfavorable impact of HCV on the natural history of HIV infection.

The prognosis of patients with dissociated virological and immunological responses to HAART.

BACKGROUND: While HAART allows for the reconstitution of immune functions in most treated HIV patients, failure to achieve a significant increase in circulating CD4+ T cells despite undetectable viremia occurs. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcome in a subgroup of 232 patients who after 3.1 years of treatment had not achieved desirable immune reconstitution despite a good virological response to HAART. RESULTS: After a further 3.6 ± 2.4 years of HAART, 82 (35.3%) patients achieved immune reconstitution (565.2 ± 174.6 CD4 cells/µl), while 149 (64.2%) patients did not (268.8 ± 91.1 cells/µl); the difference in the achieved CD4 counts between these subgroups was significant (P<0.01). One patient experienced treatment failure. Eleven patients died to the end of follow-up, of which 10 with a continuously dissociated response. Factors associated with immune recovery included clinical AIDS at HAART initiation (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.24-0.81, P<0.01), usage of PIs and of drugs from all three classes (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-3.0, P=0.046 and OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 1.15-18.19, P=0.03, respectively), and a rise in CD4 count to over 200 cells/µl after the first 3.1 years of treatment (OR: 5.3 95% CI: 2.6-11.0, P<0.01). Achievement of a rise in CD4 count to over 200 cells/µl after the first 3.1 years of treatment was an independent predictor of immune reconstitution in the following period. CONCLUSION: If patients on HAART reach CD4 cell counts of above 200 cells/µl in the first 3 years, immune recovery is possible after at least 6 years of treatment.