A phase 1-2 trial of DA-EPOCH-R plus ixazomib for MYC-aberrant lymphoid malignancies: the DACIPHOR regimen.

ABSTRACT: MYC-aberrant non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy. Ixazomib is an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor that targets drivers of MYC expression and has demonstrated preclinical activity in aggressive MYC-aberrant NHL. We conducted a phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of DA-EPOCH-R with adjunctive ixazomib in aggressive MYC-aberrant NHL. For induction, patients received 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R with ixazomib administered twice per 21-day cycle; responders continued weekly ixazomib maintenance for up to 1 year. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose in phase 1 and efficacy of DA-EPOCH-R with ixazomib as measured by 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate in phase 2. Thirty-six patients were evaluable for response. Median age was 63 years (range, 31-77) and 44% had double-hit lymphoma (DHL)/triple-hit lymphoma (THL). In phase 1, 3 mg of ixazomib was established as recommended phase 2 dose. Twenty-nine (76.3%) patients completed 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R and 25 (65.8%) underwent dose escalations. The ORR after induction was 97% (95% confidence interval, 81-100) with a CR rate of 69%. At median follow-up of 18.8 months, the 12-month PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 78% and 86%, respectively. For DHL/THL vs dual expressor lymphomas (DEL), 12-month PFS rates were 53% vs 95% and 12-month OS rates were 65% vs 100%, respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicities were predominantly hematologic. Twenty-seven (75%) of patients experienced neuropathy, nearly all low-grade. DA-EPOCH-R induction with adjunctive ixazomib is feasible and appears effective in patients with DEL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02481310.

Application of the model-informed drug development paradigm to datopotamab deruxtecan dose selection for late-stage development.

To replace the conventional maximum tolerated dose (MTD) approach, a paradigm for dose optimization and dose selection that relies on model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches has been proposed in oncology. Here, we report our application of an MIDD approach during phase I to inform dose selection for the late-stage development of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). Dato-DXd is a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate being developed for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other tumors. Data on pharmacokinetics (PKs), efficacy, and safety in NSCLC were collected in the TROPION-PanTumor01 phase I dose-expansion and -escalation study over a wide dose range of 0.27-10 mg/kg administered every 3 weeks. Population PK and exposure-response analyses were performed iteratively at three data cutoffs to inform dose selection. The 6 mg/kg dose was identified as the optimal dose by the second data cutoff analysis and confirmed by the subsequent third data cutoff analysis. The 6 mg/kg dose was more tolerable (i.e., lower rates of interstitial lung disease, stomatitis, and mucosal inflammation) than the MTD (8 mg/kg) and was more efficacious than 4 mg/kg (simulated mean objective response rate: 23.8% vs. 18.6%; mean hazard ratio of progression-free survival: 0.74) - a candidate dose studied just below 6 mg/kg. Therefore, the 6 mg/kg dose was judged to afford the optimal benefit-risk balance. This case study demonstrated the utility of an MIDD approach for dose optimization and dose selection.

Selective MCL-1 inhibitor ABBV-467 is efficacious in tumor models but is associated with cardiac troponin increases in patients.

BACKGROUND: MCL-1 is a prosurvival B-cell lymphoma 2 family protein that plays a critical role in tumor maintenance and survival and can act as a resistance factor to multiple anticancer therapies. Herein, we describe the generation and characterization of the highly potent and selective MCL-1 inhibitor ABBV-467 and present findings from a first-in-human trial that included patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (NCT04178902). METHODS: Binding of ABBV-467 to human MCL-1 was assessed in multiple cell lines. The ability of ABBV-467 to induce tumor growth inhibition was investigated in xenograft models of human multiple myeloma and acute myelogenous leukemia. The first-in-human study was a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study assessing safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of ABBV-467 monotherapy. RESULTS: Here we show that administration of ABBV-467 to MCL-1-dependent tumor cell lines triggers rapid and mechanism-based apoptosis. In vivo, intermittent dosing of ABBV-467 as monotherapy or in combination with venetoclax inhibits the growth of xenografts from human hematologic cancers. Results from a clinical trial evaluating ABBV-467 in patients with multiple myeloma based on these preclinical data indicate that treatment with ABBV-467 can result in disease control (seen in 1 patient), but may also cause increases in cardiac troponin levels in the plasma in some patients (seen in 4 of 8 patients), without other corresponding cardiac findings. CONCLUSIONS: The selectivity of ABBV-467 suggests that treatment-induced troponin release is a consequence of MCL-1 inhibition and therefore may represent a class effect of MCL-1 inhibitors in human patients.

Apoptosis is a type of cell death that removes abnormal cells from the body. Cancer cells can have increased levels of MCL-1, a protein that helps cells survive and prevents apoptosis. ABBV-467 is a new drug that blocks the action of MCL-1 (an MCL-1 inhibitor) and could promote apoptosis. In animal models, ABBV-467 led to cancer cell death and delayed tumor growth. ABBV-467 was also studied in a clinical trial in 8 patients with multiple myeloma, a blood cancer. In 1 patient, ABBV-467 treatment prevented the cancer from getting any worse for 8 months. However, in 4 out of 8 patients ABBV-467 increased the levels of troponin, a protein associated with damage to the heart. This concerning side effect may impact the future development of MCL-1 inhibitors as anticancer drugs.

Ibrutinib maintenance after frontline treatment in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Maintenance rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has improved survival and supports exploration of maintenance with novel agents. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib maintenance (I-M) after induction in patients with treatment-naive MCL. Patients with MCL with complete response (CR) or partial response to frontline chemoimmunotherapy ± autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) received I-M 560 mg daily for up to 4 years. Primary objective was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate from initiation of I-M. Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on peripheral blood were measured before I-M initiation and at 1, 6, and 18 to 24 months after initiation. Among 36 patients, the median age was 60 years (range, 46-90). For frontline treatment, 18 patients (50%) had consolidation with auto-SCT in CR1 before I-M. At median follow-up of 55.7 months, 17 patients (47%) completed full course I-M (median, 37.5 cycles; range, 2-52). The 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 94% and 97%, respectively. With prior auto-SCT, 3-year PFS and OS rates were both 100%. The most common treatment-related adverse event with I-M was infection (n = 31; 86%), typically low grade; the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic. In 22 patients with MRD assessments, all were MRD negative after induction. Six became MRD positive on I-M, with 2 reverting to MRD-negative status with continued I-M, and all maintain radiographic CR with the exception of 1 with disease progression. I-M is feasible in MCL after frontline chemoimmunotherapy with manageable toxicities although significant. Changes in NGS-MRD were noted in limited patients during maintenance with few progression and survival events. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02242097.

Multicenter phase 2 study of romidepsin plus lenalidomide for previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are associated with poor prognosis when treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We report the findings of a phase 2 study evaluating a chemotherapy-free combination of romidepsin plus lenalidomide as initial treatment for patients with PTCL who were aged >60 years or noncandidates for chemotherapy. Treatment was initiated with romidepsin 10 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 and lenalidomide 25 mg taken orally from days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycle for up to 1 year. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included safety and survival. The study enrolled 29 patients with a median age of 75 years, including 16 (55%) angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 10 (34%) PTCL- not otherwise specified, 2 ATLL, and 1 EATL. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and anemia (28%). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included hyponatremia (45%), hypertension (38%), hypoalbuminemia (24%), fatigue (17%), hyperglycemia (14%), hypokalemia (14%), dehydration (10%), and infection (10%). At median follow-up of 15.7 months, 23 patients were evaluable and received a median treatment of 6 cycles. The ORR was 65.2% with complete response (CR) at 26.1%, including 78.6% ORR and 35.7% CR for AITL. Median duration of response was 10.7 months, with 27.1 months for patients achieving CR. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 31.5%, and 2-year overall survival was 49.5%. This study provides the first demonstration that the biologic combination of romidepsin and lenalidomide is feasible and effective as initial therapy for PTCL and warrants further evaluation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02232516.

Eftozanermin alfa (ABBV-621) monotherapy in patients with previously treated solid tumors: findings of a phase 1, first-in-human study.

Eftozanermin alfa (eftoza), a second-generation tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL-R) agonist, induces apoptosis in tumor cells by activation of death receptors 4/5. This phase 1 dose-escalation/dose-optimization study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of eftoza in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received eftoza 2.5-15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 or day 1/day 8 every 21 days in the dose-escalation phase, and 1.25-7.5 mg/kg once-weekly (QW) in the dose-optimization phase. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during the first treatment cycle to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated in circulation and tumor tissue. A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study (dose-escalation cohort, n = 57; dose-optimization cohort, n = 48 patients [n = 24, colorectal cancer (CRC); n = 24, pancreatic cancer (PaCA)]). In the dose-escalation cohort, seven patients experienced DLTs. MTD and RP2D were not determined. Most common treatment-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, nausea, and fatigue. The one treatment-related death occurred due to respiratory failure. In the dose-optimization cohort, three patients (CRC, n = 2; PaCA, n = 1) had a partial response. Target engagement with regard to receptor saturation, and downstream apoptotic pathway activation in circulation and tumor were observed. Eftoza had acceptable safety, evidence of pharmacodynamic effects, and preliminary anticancer activity. The 7.5-mg/kg QW regimen was selected for future studies on the basis of safety findings, pharmacodynamic effects, and biomarker modulations. (Trial registration number: NCT03082209 (registered: March 17, 2017)).

Phase I/II clinical trial of temsirolimus and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas.

The PI3K/Akt/mTOR (PAM) axis is constitutively activated in multiple lymphoma subtypes and is a promising therapeutic target. The mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (TEM) and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) have overlapping effects within the PAM axis with synergistic potential. This multicenter phase I/II study evaluated combination therapy with TEM/LEN in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas. Primary endpoints of the phase II study were rates of complete (CR) and overall response (ORR). There were 18 patients in the phase I dose-finding study, and TEM 25 mg weekly and LEN 20 mg on day 1 through day 21 every 28 days was established as the recommended phase II dose. An additional 93 patients were enrolled in the phase II component with three cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=39), follicular lymphoma (FL, n=15), and an exploratory cohort of other lymphoma histologies with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) comprising the majority (n=39 total, n=20 with cHL). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of four (range, 1-14) prior therapies and one-third with relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); patients with cHL had a median of six prior therapies. The FL cohort was closed prematurely due to slow accrual. ORR were 26% (13% CR) and 64% (18% CR) for the DLBCL and exploratory cohorts, respectively. ORR for cHL patients in the exploratory cohort, most of whom had relapsed after both brentuximab vedotin and ASCT, was 80% (35% CR). Eight cHL patients (40%) proceeded to allogeneic transplantation after TEM/LEN therapy. Grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events (AE) were common. Three grade 5 AE occurred. Combination therapy with TEM/LEN was feasible and demonstrated encouraging activity in heavily-pretreated lymphomas, particularly in relapsed/refractory cHL (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT01076543).

A phase I/II trial of brentuximab vedotin plus rituximab as frontline therapy for patients with immunosuppression-associated CD30+ and/or EBV + lymphomas.

Treatment strategies for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) consist of response-adapted risk-stratified methods using immunosuppression reduction, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. We investigated the efficacy of Brentuximab vedotin given concurrently with Rituximab (BV + R) once weekly for four weeks, followed by optional consolidation, and up to one year of maintenance. Among 20 assessable patients, BV + R therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 75% (95% CI 51 to 91, p = 0.044) with 60% achieving a complete response. Median time to best response was 28 days. Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 75 and 90%, respectively. Most common severe grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (40%), hypertension (30%), infection (25%), and peripheral neuropathy (15%). BV + R is a novel and effective therapeutic strategy that achieved rapid and durable remissions in previously untreated PTLD patients; however, this treatment platform requires further modification due to the high rates of treatment-related toxicity.Key pointsBrentuximab vedotin + Rituximab showed ORR and CR rates of 75 and 60% in patients with immunosuppression-associated lymphoid malignanciesHigh rates of treatment delay were attributed to treatment-related toxicity; further dosing optimization of this regimen is required.

Venetoclax-rituximab with or without bendamustine vs bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

This open-label phase 2 study (CONTRALTO) assessed the safety and efficacy of BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) plus rituximab (R), and VEN plus bendamustine (B) and R, vs B + R (BR) alone in relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma. Patients in the chemotherapy-free arm (arm A: VEN + R) received VEN 800 mg/d plus R 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. After a safety run-in with VEN 600 mg, patients in the chemotherapy-containing cohort were randomized to either VEN + BR (arm B; VEN 800 mg/d for 1 year + 6 cycles of BR [B 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 and R 375 mg/m2 on day 1]) or 6 cycles of BR (arm C). Overall, 163 patients were analyzed (9 in the safety run-in and 52, 51, and 51 in arms A, B, and C, respectively). Complete metabolic/complete response rates were 17% (arm A), 75% (arm B), and 69% (arm C). Of patients in arm B, only 61% received ≥90% of the planned B dose vs 96% of patients in arm C. More frequent hematologic toxicity resulted in more reduced dosing/treatment discontinuation in arm B vs arm C. Rates of grade 3/4 adverse events were 51.9%, 93.9%, and 60.0% in arms A, B, and C, respectively. VEN + BR led to increased toxicity and lower dose intensity of BR than in arm C, but efficacy was similar. Optimizing dose and schedule to maintain BR dose intensity may improve efficacy and tolerability of VEN + BR, while VEN + R data warrant further study. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02187861.

Venetoclax plus R- or G-CHOP in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the CAVALLI phase 1b trial.

Novel strategies, such as chemosensitization with targeted agents, that build on the success of standard immunochemotherapy show promise for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Here, we report a phase 1b study investigating dose escalation of the BCL2 inhibitor, venetoclax, in combination with rituximab or obinutuzumab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-/G-CHOP) chemotherapy in B-cell NHL. Objectives included safety assessment and determination of a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Fifty-six patients were enrolled, most with follicular lymphoma (43%) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 32%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 3/14 patients at the first venetoclax dose (200 mg/d), after which dosing was changed from daily to 10 days per cycle and escalated to 800 mg. A further reduction to 5 days per cycle occurred at the 800-mg dose level in the G-CHOP arm. Cytopenias were predominant among grade 3/4 events and reported at a higher rate than expected, particularly in the G-CHOP arm; however, safety was manageable. Overall response rates were 87.5% (R-CHOP and G-CHOP combinations); complete response (CR) rates were 79.2% and 78.1%, respectively. Most double-expressor (BCL2+ and MYC+) DLBCL patients (87.5%; n = 7/8) achieved CR. Although the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, the RP2D for venetoclax with R-CHOP was established at 800 mg days 4 to 10 of cycle 1 and days 1 to 10 of cycles 2 to 8; higher doses were not explored, and this dosing schedule demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. This regimen is subsequently being evaluated in first-line DLBCL in the phase 2 portion of the study. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02055820.

Frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of central nervous system relapse in lymphoma patients treated with dose-adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a rare but serious complication that carries a poor prognosis. The use of infusional etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (EPOCH-R) for frontline treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasing, though little is known about incidence of and risk factors for CNS relapse with this regimen PATIENTS AND METHODS: We completed a chart review of patients with NHL who received EPOCH-R as front line therapy. Data obtained included baseline and treatment characteristics including if patients received CNS directed therapy. We measured overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and progression to CNS involvement. RESULTS: We identified 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 72% had DLBCL. Of all the patients, 5.8% experienced CNS relapse, and 38.6% were treated with CNS prophylaxis. There was no difference in rate of CNS relapse, OS, or PFS between patients who had and had not received CNS prophylaxis. Patients whose serum lactate dehydrogenase was greater than twice the upper limit of normal at diagnosis and those with extranodal disease were significantly more likely to have CNS relapse (P = .0247 and 0.022, respectively) than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CNS relapse in this patient population approaches 6%, not significantly different from reports on those receiving R-CHOP. The results of this study suggest that CNS prophylaxis might be more selectively used among patients treated with EPOCH-R with certain high-risk features.

Outcomes of Patients With Double-Hit Lymphoma Who Achieve First Complete Remission.

Purpose Patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) rarely achieve long-term survival following disease relapse. Some patients with DHL undergo consolidative autologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) to reduce the risk of relapse, although the benefit of this treatment strategy is unclear. Methods Patients with DHL who achieved first complete remission following completion of front-line therapy with either rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or intensive front-line therapy, and deemed fit for autoSCT, were included. A landmark analysis was performed, with time zero defined as 3 months after completion of front-line therapy. Patients who experienced relapse before or who were not followed until that time were excluded. Results Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 80% and 87%, respectively, for all patients (n = 159). Three-year RFS and OS rates did not differ significantly for autoSCT (n = 62) versus non-autoSCT patients (n = 97), but 3-year RFS was inferior in patients who received R-CHOP compared with intensive therapy (56% v 88%; P = .002). Three-year RFS and OS did not differ significantly for patients in the R-CHOP or intensive therapy cohorts when analyzed by receipt of autoSCT. The median OS following relapse was 8.6 months. Conclusion In the largest reported series, to our knowledge, of patients with DHL to achieve first complete remission, consolidative autoSCT was not associated with improved 3-year RFS or OS. In addition, patients treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior 3-year RFS compared with those who received intensive front-line therapy. When considered in conjunction with reports of patients with newly diagnosed DHL, which demonstrate lower rates of disease response to R-CHOP compared with intensive front-line therapy, our findings further support the use of intensive front-line therapy for this patient population.

Impact of treatment variability on survival in immuno-competent and immuno-compromised patients with primary central nervous lymphoma.

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) treated in the 'real-world' setting do not represent those treated on clinical trials and might not be treated similarly. We studied characteristics and variability in care for 113 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated at 5 institutions in the Chicago area between 2000 and 2012. In 111 patients, single modality therapy with a high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) regimen +/- rituximab, was most commonly employed (n = 65), and 34 underwent radiotherapy (+/- systemic therapy). Fifty-eight of 108 patients received rituximab. Twenty-nine of 110 patients (26%) received intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). Overall response rate was 80% (47% complete responses). With a median follow-up of 18·7 months, median overall survival (OS) was 65·2 months. In univariate analysis, HD-MTX (median OS 72·7 vs. 2·7 months, P < 0·001) and rituximab (median not reached versus 28·4 months, P = 0·005) impacted OS favourably. This significance was sustained regardless of immune status and in multivariate analysis. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) resulted in a trend for improved OS as compared with systemic therapy alone (P = 0·09), while ITC did not impact survival. Clinical practice has evolved to exclude WBRT and ITC while incorporating rituximab with clinical outcomes comparable in immuno-competent/compromised patients and similar to those achieved in recent clinical trials.

Sole rearrangement but not amplification of MYC is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell lymphoma unclassifiable.

Rearrangement of MYC is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and B cell lymphoma unclassifiable (BCLU), particularly in the setting of double hit lymphoma (DHL). However, little is known about outcomes of patients who demonstrate MYC rearrangement without evidence of BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement (single hit) or amplification (>4 copies) of MYC. We identified 87 patients with single hit lymphoma (SHL), 22 patients with MYC-amplified lymphoma (MYC amp) as well as 127 DLBCL patients without MYC rearrangement or amplification (MYC normal) and 45 patients with DHL, all treated with either R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or intensive induction therapy. For SHL and MYC amp patients, the 2-year progression-free survival rate (PFS) was 49% and 48% and 2-year overall survival rate (OS) was 59% and 71%, respectively. SHL patients receiving intensive induction experienced higher 2-year PFS (59% vs. 23%, P = 0·006) but similar 2-year OS as compared with SHL patients receiving R-CHOP. SHL DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP, but not intensive induction, experienced significantly lower 2-year PFS and OS (P < 0·001 for both) when compared with MYC normal patients. SHL patients appear to have a poor prognosis, which may be improved with receipt of intensive induction.

Durable Responses With Maintenance Dose-Sparing Regimens of Romidepsin in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.

IMPORTANCE: Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Durable responses have been published without establishing a standard recommendation about duration of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To review the long-term use of romidepsin in responders who received a dose-sparing regimen. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with a diagnosis of CTCL, including mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), or CTCL not otherwise specified seen at a multidisciplinary clinic at Northwestern University from 2009 until December 2014. EXPOSURES: Doses administered and different regimens of romidepsin were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Duration of treatment, participants receiving dose-sparing regimen. RESULTS: Of 47 patients identified, 23 had MF, 15 had SS, and 9 had other types of CTCL. None of these 9 (mostly cytotoxic lymphomas) achieved a durable response. Of the remaining 38 patients, 17 were considered long-term responders (>6 months of treatment). Nine of these patients received a dose-sparing regimen. The median (range) duration of treatment was 15 (7-34) months; the frequency of patients with SS (10 of 15) in the long-term group was significantly higher than that of patients with MF (7 of 23; P = .046). Adverse events were reported in 29 (69%) of 42 patients for whom data were available. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the short-term and long-term groups (12 of 21 vs 12 of 17; P = .50). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Decreasing the frequency of infusions in patients with MF or SS who achieve a response with romidepsin therapy may provide a practical strategy to prolong response.

Use of class I histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin in combination regimens.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are epigenetic-modifying agents that have shown promise as anticancer therapies. Several HDAC inhibitors have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as single-agent therapies to treat T-cell lymphoma. The synergistic combination of HDAC inhibitors with other anticancer agents has the potential to constitute treatment regimens with enhanced efficacy. Romidepsin is a structurally unique, potent, bicyclic class 1 selective HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma who have had at least 1 prior therapy and patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have had at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Here, we review data that support the use of romidepsin in combination with other anticancer agents for the treatment of various malignancies. Promising results have emerged from early clinical studies, supporting the potential for romidepsin combination regimens to constitute safe and effective treatments for cancer.

The evolving role of lenalidomide in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Recent advances in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma have driven a paradigm shift from standard chemotherapy to an ever-expanding choice of targeted agents and combinations. As an orally bioavailable immunomodulator with antineoplastic, immunologic, and antiproliferative activity in B-cell lymphoma, lenalidomide has emerged as one such option. Lenalidomide demonstrates clinically significant activity with a favorable safety profile as a single agent, as well as in combination therapy. Herein, we review accumulated clinical data on lenalidomide, with particular reference to patients with first-line and relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma, indolent lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Impact of oncogene rearrangement patterns on outcomes in patients with double-hit non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Double-hit lymphomas (DHLs) are collectively defined as B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas harboring rearrangements of MYC as well as B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and/or B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6). To the authors' knowledge, the impact of specific oncogene rearrangements on outcomes of patients with DHL who are treated with immunochemotherapy has not been previously described. METHODS: The authors identified patients whose diagnostic tissue specimens underwent metaphase karyotyping or fluorescence in situ hybridization for MYC as well as both BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements. Cohorts were defined by the presence (+) or absence (-) of rearrangements: MYC+/BCL2+/BCL6- (BCL2-DHL), MYC+/BCL2-/BCL6+ (BCL6-DHL), and MYC+/BCL2+/BCL6+ (triple-hit lymphoma; THL). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in the current analysis (76 BCL2-DHL patients, 16 BCL6-DHL patients, and 25 THL patients). Compared with patients with BCL2-DHL, those with BCL6-DHL were more likely to be classified as having a non-germinal center cell of origin, presented with extranodal disease, and appeared to achieve higher rates of complete response despite receiving intensive induction therapy less frequently. However, patients with BCL6-DHL experienced a shorter median overall survival if achieving an initial complete response compared with patients with BCL2-DHL. Patients with THL experienced survival outcomes similar to those of patients with BCL2-DHL. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of the specific oncogene rearrangements may be of prognostic value and potentially guide future therapeutic strategies for patients with DHL.