Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft Versus Autograft: A Matched-Cohort Analysis.

Background: Disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) may lead to recurrent lateral patellar dislocation and patellofemoral chondral injury. Despite significant previous work investigating numerous performance parameters, the optimal graft choice for MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability remains unclear. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes scores, subjective recurrent instability, and revision rates between autograft and allograft in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autograft between 2013 and 2018 were identified. A 2:1 comparison group of patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with allograft was matched by sex, age (±3 years), and body mass index (BMI) (±3 kg/m2). Patient characteristics, preoperative radiograph measurements, and intraoperative data were compared between the groups, as were patient-reported outcome measures, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Subjective recurrent instability and revision rate were also compared between groups. Results: The autograft group was composed of 30 patients (13 male, 17 female) with a mean age of 24.4 years and mean BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, and the allograft group was composed of 60 matched patients (25 male, 35 female) with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean BMI of 25.1 kg/m2. The autograft and allograft groups reported similar IKDC scores (73.0 vs 73.7; P = .678), Lysholm scores (77.5 vs 80.7; P = .514), SANE (72.0 vs 75.8; P = .236), and VAS pain (30.7 vs 26.6; P = .482), as well as similar rates of postoperative patellar subluxations (20.0% vs 19.3%; P = .867) and dislocations (10.0% vs 15.0%; P = .805). Conclusion: Both allograft and autograft were found to be viable options for MPFL reconstruction. There were no significant group differences in failure rates, patient-reported outcomes, pain, or complications between autograft and allograft MPFL reconstruction in this series.

Outcomes following fixation of distal clavicle fractures utilizing arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament stabilization with a suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape.

Background: Distal one-third clavicle fractures are frequently unstable and often require surgical fixation due to high rates of nonunion. Many common methods of fixation have high rates of union but are associated with hardware discomfort and need for secondary surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a fixation technique involving arthroscopically assisted open reduction internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via a coracoclavicular (CC) suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape. Methods: This was a retrospective case series evaluating patients who underwent fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization by a single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon between 2020 and 2022. Demographic and injury-related data were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for signs of radiographic union. Primary outcome measures included fracture union, complications, and need for additional procedures. Patients were also contacted via telephone to obtain American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Results: Six patients were eligible for inclusion in this study with a mean age of 52.8 ± 14.0 and a mean follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1.6-2.7 years). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 86.2 ± 21.8 (range 52-100). There were no postoperative complications, signs of symptomatic hardware, or need for secondary surgery at the final follow-up among this cohort of patients. All patients had achieved and maintained full radiographic union at a mean radiographic follow-up of 5.5 months (range 2.0-12.9 months). Conclusion: Arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization of distal clavicle fractures demonstrated high union rates while limiting complications or need for secondary hardware removal. Further analysis on a larger scale is recommended to determine long-term outcomes and direct comparison to other surgical techniques.

In-Hospital Complications following Arthrotomy versus Arthroscopy for Septic Knee Arthritis: A Cohort-Matched Comparison.

There is a paucity of literature comparing the relative merits of open arthrotomy versus arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of septic knee arthritis. The primary goal of this study is to compare the risk of perioperative complications between these two surgical techniques. To this end, 560 patients treated for septic arthritis of the native knee with arthroscopy were statistically matched 1:1 with 560 patients treated with open arthrotomy. The outcome measures included major complications, minor complications, mortality, inpatient hospital charges, and length of stay (LOS). Major complications were defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, postoperative shock, unplanned ventilation, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, infected postoperative seroma, hospital acquired urinary tract infection, and retained surgical item. Minor complications included phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, postprocedural emphysema, minor surgical site infection, peripheral nerve complication, and intraoperative hemorrhage. Mortality data were extracted from the database using the Uniform Bill patient disposition. Complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, whereas mean costs and LOS were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test. Major complications occurred in 3.8% of the patients in the arthroscopy cohort and 5.4% of the patients in the arthrotomy cohort (p = 0.20). Too few patients in our sample died to report based on National (Nationwide) Impatient Sample (NIS) minimum reporting standards. Rates of minor complications were similar for the arthroscopy and arthrotomy cohorts (12.5 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any greater risk of minor or major complication between the two procedures. Inpatient hospital cost was similar for arthroscopy ( = $15,917; standard deviation [SD] = 14,424) and arthrotomy ( = $16,020; SD = 18,665; p = 0.42). LOS was also similar for both arthrotomy (6.78 days, SD = 6.75) and arthroscopy (6.24 days, SD = 5.95; p = 0.23). Patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the knee showed no difference in relative risk of perioperative complications, LOS, or hospital cost compared with patients who underwent open arthrotomy.

Early loss of fixation after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: Does the number of screws matter?

Fixation methods in distal radius fractures has been studied biomechanically, but studies evaluating clinical correlation of that data are lacking. We hypothesize that the use of unthreaded pegs and decreased screw number would correlate with an early failure of fixation. There were 50 operatively treated distal radius fractures with initial post-operative radiographs that demonstrated loss of fixation. An age, BMI, and fracture-type matched cohort of 50 non-failed distal radius fractures was used for comparison. The average number of distal screws in the failed fixation group was 5.3 compared to 4.8 in the group with no loss of fixation (p = 0.07). The average number of proximal shaft screws used in the failed fixation group was 3.2 compared to 3.2 in the control group (p = 0.60). There was no difference between the use of pegs in either group. There was a significant difference between distal screw number between constructs that failed from distal screw pullout as compared to the control group, 5.6 vs. 4.8 (p = 0.0001). In conclusion, there was no difference in the number of proximal screws used in distal radius fractures that demonstrated loss of early fixation. Additionally, having more than five screws in the distal fragment had a higher rate of failure from distal screw pullout, however this was likely confounded by the more severe intra-articular fractures that had additional fixation applied in an attempt to increase stability. Finally, using smooth pegs or screws in the distal fragment made no difference in loss of fixation.

Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates: Are Risk Adjustment Models Necessary in Cervical Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether lower socioeconomic status was associated with increased resource utilization following anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent a primary, 1- to 2-level ACDF between 2005 and 2014. Trauma, malignancy, infection, and revision surgery were excluded. The top and bottom income quartiles were compared. Demographics, medical comorbidities, length of stay, complications, and hospital cost were compared between patients of top and bottom income quartiles. RESULTS: A total of 69 844 cases were included. The bottom income quartile had a similar mean hospital stay (2.04 vs 1.77 days, P = .412), more complications (2.45% vs 1.77%, P < .001), and a higher mortality rate (0.18% vs 0.11%, P = .016). Multivariate analysis revealed bottom income quartile was an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio = 1.135, confidence interval = 1.02-1.26). Interestingly, the bottom income quartile experienced lower mean hospital costs ($17 041 vs $17 958, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients in the lowest income group experienced more complications even after adjusting for comorbidities. Therefore, risk adjustment models, including socioeconomic status, may be necessary to avoid potential problems with access to orthopedic spine care for this patient population.

Short-term Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty and Decompression and Fusion With Instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database years 2010 to 2015. OBJECTIVE: Investigate which short-term outcomes differ for cervical laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conflicting reports exist in spine literature regarding short-term outcomes following cervical laminoplasty and posterior laminectomy and fusion. The objective of this study was to compare the 30-day outcomes for these two treatment groups for multilevel cervical pathology. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty or posterior laminectomy and fusion were identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code: laminoplasty 63,050 and 63,051, posterior cervical laminectomy 63,015 and 63,045, and instrumentation 22,842. Propensity-adjusted multivariate regressions assessed differences in postoperative length of stay, adverse events, discharge disposition, and readmission. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred ninety-six patients were included: 2397 (63%) underwent cervical laminectomy and fusion and 1399 (37%) underwent cervical laminoplasty. Both groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification (ASA), Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI), and had similar rates of malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history for steroid use. Age more than 70 and age less than 50 were not associated with one treatment group over the other (P > 0.05). Compared with laminoplasty patients, laminectomy and fusion patients had increased lengths of stay (LOS) (4.5 vs. 3.7 d, P < 0.01) and increased rates of adverse events (41.7% vs. 35.9%, P < 0.01), discharge to rehab (16.4% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.01), and skilled nursing facilities (12.2% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.02), and readmission (6.2% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.05). Both groups experienced similar rates of death, pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, deep and superficial surgical site infection, and reoperation (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion patients were found to have increased LOS, readmissions, and complications despite having similar pre-op demographics and comorbidities. Patients and surgeons should consider these risks when considering surgical treatment for cervical pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Meteorological Variables Associated with Stroke.

To elucidate relationships between meteorological variables and incidence of stroke, we studied patients diagnosed with stroke after presenting to the emergency department (May 1, 2010-August 8, 2011). Patient demographics and medical data were reviewed retrospectively with regional meteorological data. Across 467 days, 134 stroke events were recorded on 114 days. On stroke days, maximum temperature (max T) and atmospheric pressure (AP) combined were a significant predictor of stroke (max T odds ratio (OR) = 1.014, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.003-1.026, and P = 0.04; AP: OR = 1.033, 95% CI = 0.997-1.071, and P = 0.02). When the patient could identify the hour of the stroke, average temperature (avg T) was significantly higher than nonstroke hours (18.2°C versus 16.16°C, P = 0.04). Daily fluctuations in AP and avg T also had significant effects on stroke incidence (AP: OR = 0.629, 95% CI = 0.512-0.773, and P = 0.0001; avg T OR = 1.1399, 95% CI = 1.218-606, and P = 0.0001). Patient age, stroke history, body mass index, ethnicity, and sex were further contributors to stroke risk. Temperature, atmospheric pressure, and certain physiological conditions likely play roles in weather-related stroke susceptibility. The mechanisms driving these associations are not fully understood.