RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds are a significant health problem with devastating consequences for patients' physical, social, and mental health, increasing healthcare systems' costs. Their prolonged healing times, economic burden, diminished quality of life, increased infection risk, and impact on patients' mobility and functionality make them a major concern for healthcare professionals. PURPOSE: This review offers a multi-perspective analysis of the medical literature focusing on chronic wound management. METHODS USED: We evaluated 48 articles from the last 21 years registered in the MEDLINE and Global Health databases. The articles included in our study had a minimum of 20 citations, patients > 18 years old, and focused on chronic, complex, and hard-to-heal wounds. Extracted data were summarized into a narrative synthesis using the same health-related quality of life instrument. RESULTS: We evaluated the efficacy of existing wound care therapies from classical methods to modern concepts, and wound care products to regenerative medicine that uses a patient's pluripotent stem cells and growth factors. Regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies, biologic dressings and scaffolds, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), electrical stimulation, topical growth factors and cytokines, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), advanced wound dressings, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital wound management are all part of the new arsenal of wound healing. CONCLUSION: Periodic medical evaluation and proper use of modern wound care therapies, including the use of plasma-derived products [such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)] combined with proper systemic support (adequate protein levels, blood sugar, vitamins involved in tissue regeneration, etc.) are the key to a faster wound healing, and, with the help of AI, can reach the fastest healing rate possible.
RESUMO
Introduction: Abdominal wall surgery for parietal defects is done by implanting a type of mesh in the surrounding tissue above or beneath the fascia layer of the abdominal wall. The most common type of mesh used is polypropylene which sometimes takes a lot of time to be covered by the fibrous tissue. In an attempt to accelerate the cellular binding on the mesh and so to increase the recovery rate, we developed a protocol with plasma derived products to accelerate the mesh integration. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) were evaluated in promoting the collagen synthesis and cell proliferation on the mesh surface. Material and Methods: We evaluated 32 patients with different types of abdominal wall defects which required polypropylene mesh implants in open surgery with the mesh implanted above the aponeurosis layer. We divided the patients into 3 groups: standard procedure, mesh augmented with PRF only, mesh augmented with PRP only. Results: Even though the number of patients involved in the study has a very small impact for a statistical analysis, the pattern observed in our prospective study reveals from the beginning that augmenting the standard procedure with plasma derived products improve the outcome (mesh integration) up to 65% faster integration. Conclusion: The technique that we used to augment the standard implant is cost-effective and simple to use in the surgical theatre.
Assuntos
Parede Abdominal , Polipropilenos , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to verify if the experience on 4 years in using minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of CE could match regarding the indications and results with the major studies on topic. METHOD: During 03.2014 - 03. 2018 period, 38 PAIR, 28 MoCaT procedures and 7 percutaneous drainages have been performed at 51 patients from 76 cases of hydatid hepatic cysts (67,1%). There were 26 men and 25 women, and the age ranged from 19 to 78. 7 patients have had 2 hydatid hepatic cysts or more and 2 procedures were performed at 3 of those patients; other 11 patients needed the second procedure during the surveillance. Results: The evolution of the patients was favorable, and the surveillance was 2 years postintervention at least. There were no major surgical adverse effects. We defined as an expected result obtaining a scar lesion or a small cavity with calcified walls (hyperechoic). Only 2 (3,9%) patients needed conversion to open surgery. The complications we have faced were represented by the cystic-biliary fistula in 15 cases (29,4%) and the re-opening of the cyst's cavity in 11 cases (21,67%). Conclusions: The percutaneous treatment of CE is safe and effective, following the correct assignation according with the cysts type. The percutaneous treatment of CE is an easier alternative to the open surgery and has lower rate of complications and relapses, and a shorter hospitalisation. Now routine, it becomes slighty the first option for invasive treatment of CE. The role of open surgery is restricted to CE with severe complications.