Prevalence of GLA gene mutations and polymorphisms in patients with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Fabry Disease (FD) has been frequently proposed as possible underestimated differential diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), but no study has been performed to test prevalence of GLA gene mutations in a population fulfilling diagnostic criteria of MS. Aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of GLA gene mutations in a large and representative population diagnosed with MS, simultaneously providing a critical revision of current literature reports of coexistence or misdiagnosis between these two conditions. METHODS: In this mono-centric cross-sectional study, 927 patients fulfilling McDonald diagnostic criteria and encompassing all MS phenotypes were enrolled. Patients underwent evaluation of α-GalA activity and genotyping. Both genetic variants annotated as pathogenic and GVUS were considered. Estimated alleles frequencies were then compared to the ones reported in the gnomAD database. RESULTS: GLA gene variants were found in seven individuals. Five patients carried variants previously described having controversial impact on FD phenotype, and the analysis of exome database revealed that they are not rare among healthy individuals. One patient showed a new variant never described before, and another one carried a late-onset FD cardiac variant. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of GLA gene variants in MS patients is comparable to the one estimated in healthy population. This result is further supported by critical revision of current literature evidences of misdiagnosis between MS and FD, arguing in favour of independence between these disorders.

Oral Sucrosomial® iron versus intravenous iron for recovering iron deficiency anaemia in ND-CKD patients: a cost- minimization analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral iron is recommended as first line treatment of anemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patients. Sucrosomial® iron, a new generation oral iron with high absorption and bioavailability and a low incidence of side effects, has shown to be not inferior to intravenous (IV) iron in the replacement of iron deficiency anemia in patients with ND-CKD. Besides the clinical benefit, it is also important to determine the comparative total costs of oral versus IV iron administrations. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-minimization analysis of oral Sucrosomial iron, compared with IV iron gluconate from an Italian societal perspective. METHODS: Cost analysis was performed on the 99 patients with ND-CKD and iron-deficiency anemia of the randomized trial by Pisani et al. Human and material resources utilization was recorded during each iron administration. According to study perspective, direct and indirect costs were considered. Costs for each resource unit were taken from official Italian sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed an average cost/cycle per patient of € 111 for oral iron and € 1302 for IV iron. Thus, the potential saving was equal to € 1191 per patient/cycle. The sensitivity analysis showed that the most sensitive driver is the time loss by patient and caregivers for the therapy and related-care, followed by the minutes of nursing care and the number of kilometres travelled to reach the referral centre. DISCUSSION: This study showed that oral Sucrosomial® iron could offer specific advantages in terms of potential savings, and allowed identifying some implications for future research. Such advantages still persist with the new single dose IV iron formulation available in the market, although to a lesser extent.