A portable primary-standard level graphite calorimeter for absolute dosimetry in clinical pencil beam scanning proton beams.

Objective. To report the use of a portable primary standard level graphite calorimeter for direct dose determination in clinical pencil beam scanning proton beams, which forms part of the recommendations of the proposed Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) Code of Practice (CoP) for proton therapy dosimetry.Approach. The primary standard proton calorimeter (PSPC) was developed at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and measurements were performed at four clinical proton therapy facilities that use pencil beam scanning for beam delivery. Correction factors for the presence of impurities and vacuum gaps were calculated and applied, as well as dose conversion factors to obtain dose to water. Measurements were performed in the middle of 10 × 10 × 10 cm3homogeneous dose volumes, centred at 10.0, 15.0 and 25.0 g·cm-2depth in water. The absorbed dose to water determined with the calorimeter was compared to the dose obtained using PTW Roos-type ionisation chambers calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water in60Co applying the recommendations in the IAEA TRS-398 CoP.Main results.The relative dose difference between the two protocols varied between 0.4% and 2.1% depending on the facility. The reported overall uncertainty in the determination of absorbed dose to water using the calorimeter is 0.9% (k= 1), which corresponds to a significant reduction of uncertainty in comparison with the TRS-398 CoP (currently with an uncertainty equal or larger than 2.0% (k= 1) for proton beams).Significance. The establishment of a purpose-built primary standard and associated CoP will considerably reduce the uncertainty of the absorbed dose to water determination and ensure improved accuracy and consistency in the dose delivered to patients treated with proton therapy and bring proton reference dosimetry uncertainty in line with megavoltage photon radiotherapy.

Development of optimised tissue-equivalent materials for proton therapy.

Objective. In proton therapy there is a need for proton optimised tissue-equivalent materials as existing phantom materials can produce large uncertainties in the determination of absorbed dose and range measurements. The aim of this work is to develop and characterise optimised tissue-equivalent materials for proton therapy.Approach. A mathematical model was developed to enable the formulation of epoxy-resin based tissue-equivalent materials that are optimised for all relevant interactions of protons with matter, as well as photon interactions, which play a role in the acquisition of CT numbers. This model developed formulations for vertebra bone- and skeletal muscle-equivalent plastic materials. The tissue equivalence of these new materials and commercial bone- and muscle-equivalent plastic materials were theoretical compared against biological tissue compositions. The new materials were manufactured and characterised by their mass density, relative stopping power (RSP) measurements, and CT scans to evaluate their tissue-equivalence.Main results. Results showed that existing tissue-equivalent materials can produce large uncertainties in proton therapy dosimetry. In particular commercial bone materials showed to have a relative difference up to 8% for range. On the contrary, the best optimised formulations were shown to mimic their target human tissues within 1%-2% for the mass density and RSP. Furthermore, their CT-predicted RSP agreed within 1%-2% of the experimental RSP, confirming their suitability as clinical phantom materials.Significance. We have developed a tool for the formulation of tissue-equivalent materials optimised for proton dosimetry. Our model has enabled the development of proton optimised tissue-equivalent materials which perform better than existing tissue-equivalent materials. These new materials will enable the advancement of clinical proton phantoms for accurate proton dosimetry.

Development of a heterogeneous phantom to measure range in clinical proton therapy beams.

PURPOSE: In particle therapy, determination of range by measurement or calculation can be a significant source of uncertainty. This work investigates the development of a bespoke Range Length Phantom (RaLPh) to allow independent determination of proton range in tissue. This phantom is intended to be used as an audit device. METHOD: RaLPh was designed to be compact and allows different configurations of tissue substitute slabs, to facilitate measurement of range using radiochromic film. Fourteen RaLPh configurations were tested, using two types of proton fluence optimised water substitutes, two types of bone substitute, and one lung substitute slabs. These were designed to mimic different complex tissue interfaces. Experiments were performed using a 115 MeV mono-energetic scanning proton beam to investigate the proton range for each configuration. Validation of the measured film ranges was performed via Monte Carlo simulations and ionisation chamber measurements. The phantom was then assessed as an audit device, by comparing film measurements with Treatment Planning System (TPS) predicted ranges. RESULTS: Varying the phantom slab configurations allowed for measurable range differences, and the best combinations of heterogeneous material gave agreement between film and Monte Carlo on average within 0.2% and on average within 0.3% of ionisation chamber measurements. Results against the TPS suggest a material density override is currently required to enable the phantom to be an audit device. CONCLUSION: This study found that a heterogeneous phantom with radiochromic film can provide range verification as part of a dedicated audit for clinical proton therapy beams.

Monte Carlo calculation of output factors for circular, rectangular, and square fields of electron accelerators (6-20 MeV).

Monte Carlo (MC) techniques can be used to build a simulation model of an electron accelerator to calculate output factors for electron fields. This can be useful during commissioning of electron beams from a linac and in clinical practice where irregular fields are also encountered. The Monte Carlo code BEAM/EGS4 was used to model electron beams (6-20 MeV) from a Varian 2100C linear accelerator. After optimization of the Monte Carlo simulation model, agreement within 1% to 2% was obtained between calculated and measured (with a Si diode) lateral and depth dose distributions or within 1 mm in the penumbral regions. Output factors for square, rectangular, and circular fields were measured using two different plane-parallel ion chambers (Markus and NACP) and compared to MC simulations. The agreement was usually within 1% to 2%. This study was not primarily concerned with minimizing the simulation time required to obtain output factors but some considerations with respect to this are presented. It would be particularly useful if the MC model could also be used to calculate output factors for other, similar linacs. To see if this was possible, the primary electron energies in the MC model were retuned to model a recently commissioned similar linac. Good agreement between calculated and measured output factors was obtained for most field sizes for this second accelerator.