Diagnosing and Managing Infection in Total Ankle Replacement.

Infections after total ankle replacement (TAR) within the first 4 weeks after implantation can be managed successfully with 1 or several debridements, irrigation, and a change of polyethylene inlay. Late infections require implant removal. Low-grade infections might be an underestimated problem so far. Although single-surgery revisions are reported in the literature, the authors' experience with 2-stage revisions using an antibiotics-loaded bone cement spacer is better. Additional antibiotics are used to support the surgical treatment. After antibiotic therapy of 12 weeks, the final treatment includes ankle or tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion and, with limitations, revision TAR.

Outcomes of Salvage Procedures for Failed Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The number of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) procedures increased rapidly in the last years and so have its complications. The main pillars in treating failed TAA are revision total ankle arthroplasty (RTAA), revision total ankle arthrodesis (RAA), or revision tibiotalocalcaneal fusion (RTTC). To evaluate these options, we compared clinical, radiologic, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of 111 cases of revision procedures of failed TAA from 2006 to 2020 was performed. Patients undergoing polyethylene exchange and revision of one metallic component were excluded. Demographic data, failure, and survival rates were analyzed. The European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score and radiographic changes in the subtalar joint were evaluated. The average follow-up was 67.89 ± 40.51 months. RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients underwent removal of TAA. The procedures included 40 revisions of both metallic components, 46 revision total ankle arthrodesis and 25 revision tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. The overall failure rate in the cohort was 5.41% (6/111). The failure rate after RAA was 4.35 times higher than that of RTAA, whereas RTTC did not show failures. RTAA and RTTC lead to a 1-year and 5-year survival rate of 100%. RAA resulted in a 1-year survival rate of 90% and a 5-year survival rate of 85%. The mean EFAS score in the cohort was 12.02 ± 5.83. Analysis of the EFAS score showed that RTTC provided the most reliable pain reduction, and RTAA achieved the best gait pattern. RAA resulted in poorer clinical results. Subtalar joint degeneration occurred significantly less in the RTAA group (P = .01). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests lower failure rates, increased short-term survival and a better clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion than ankle arthrodesis. Revision arthroplasty is a promising solution in treating failed total ankle arthroplasty considering lower rate of subsequent adjacent joint degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, non-randomized observational study.

Failure rates and patient-reported outcomes of revision of total ankle arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing number of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), the literature on indications, surgical options, and outcomes is limited. This study reports on failure rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROM) for a cohort of 122 patients who underwent revision of TAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of revision TAA between 2006 and 2020 was performed at one institution. Patient's demographics and different surgical procedures were analyzed with particular attention to comparing polyethylene exchange with revision of both metallic components and to additional interventions for axis correction. Failure rates and the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score were collected. The average follow-up period was 70.37 ± 46.76 months. RESULTS: 122 patients were treated with an exchange procedure. The surgery included 69 polyethylene exchanges, 12 revisions of one metallic component, and 41 revisions of both metallic components. The overall failure rate was 14.75%. The EFAS score, completed by 94 of the 122 patients, was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Median EFAS score was 12.51 ± 5.53, and median EFAS sports score was 2.97 ± 3.04. Revision rates after polyethylene exchange were significantly higher than after exchanging both metallic components (p value = 0.03), while the EFAS score showed slightly better results in patients treated with polyethylene exchange. Adding procedures to induce axis correction led to significantly lower revision rates (p value = 0.03), and the EFAS score was also improved but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The high failure rate of polyethylene exchange indicates that the intervention does not address the actual cause of failed TAA in many cases. Additional axis correction should be considered more frequently. If the underlying issues of prosthesis failure can be identified and sufficiently addressed, the results of revision surgery are likely to improve.

Common bacteria and treatment options for the acute and chronic infection of the total ankle arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is little valid data available on managing infected total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective evaluation from 20 patients with PJI (periprosthetic joint infection) of the ankle compared the bacteria isolated by preoperative arthrocentesis and intraoperative cultures to the pathogens of knee PJI. Long-term failure rates of irrigation and debridement (I&D) and polyethylene exchange, revision arthroplasty, and arthrodesis were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococci. There was no significant difference when comparing the causing pathogens of PJI of the ankle with the knee. After a follow-up of 50,4 months, the long-term failure rate after I&D and polyethylene exchange was 40%, and of revision was 9%. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the pathogenesis of PJI of the ankle and knee seems to be comparable. Regarding treatment options, we found that standardized techniques for PJIs of the knee have their limitations regarding infected TAA.