Dashboard-Driven Accelerated Infliximab Induction Dosing Increases Infliximab Durability and Reduces Immunogenicity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accelerated infliximab (IFX) induction is often based on clinical parameters as opposed to pharmacokinetics (PK). We aimed to investigate the impact of dashboard-guided optimized induction dosing on IFX durability and immunogenicity in a real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) setting. METHODS: Pediatric and adult IBD patients were enrolled in a prospective single arm intervention trial. Cumulative data from each infusion (INF), weight, albumin, C-reactive protein, IFX dose, IFX trough level, and antidrug antibody presence were used to inform subsequent INF dosing. Forecasts driven by adaptive Bayesian modeling were generated to maintain trough levels for the third (INF3) and fourth (INF4) infusions of 17 µg/mL and 10 µg/mL, respectively. The primary outcome was proportion of patients prescribed accelerated dosing (AD) intervals by INF3 (<22 days) or INF4 (<49 days). Secondary outcomes included week 52 clinical and PK outcomes. Multivariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves compared outcomes based on adherence to dashboard forecasts. RESULTS: Of the 180 per-protocol population, AD was forecast for 41% (INF3) and 69% (INF4) of patients with median intervals of 17 (INF3) and 39 (INF4) days. Baseline age >18 years, albumin >3.5 g/L, and 10-mg/kg dose were independently associated with lower rates of AD by INF4. Nonadherence with the INF4 forecast (n = 39) was an independent predictor of antidrug antibody (P < .0001) and IFX discontinuation (P = .0006). A total of 119 of 123 patients on IFX at week 52 were in steroid-free remission. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a PK dashboard during induction can optimize dosing early to improve IFX durability and immunogenicity.

We present the first proactive infliximab optimization study during induction guided by a pharmacokinetics dashboard in a real-world inflammatory bowel disease setting. At 1 year, clinical outcomes were impacted significantly by the timing of the first maintenance infusion.

Use of Small Bowel Ultrasound to Predict Response to Infliximab Induction in Pediatric Crohn's Disease.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to explore the utility of small bowel ultrasound (SBUS) as a noninvasive tool to assess induction response to infliximab (IFX) in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease management has shifted to a treat-to-target and tight control strategy utilizing noninvasive serum and fecal markers to monitor disease activity in response to therapy. Bowel wall changes as seen on cross-sectional imaging may be a more accurate marker of treatment success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients with CD with small bowel involvement initiating IFX were prospectively enrolled. Clinical activity, biomarkers, and SBUS findings were evaluated at baseline (T0) and postinduction at week 14 (T1). The primary outcome was to describe the changes in SBUS parameters pre and post IFX induction and how they associate with clinical and biomarker response. Descriptive statistics summarized the data and univariate analysis tested associations. RESULTS: All 13 CD patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission (P<0.001) and a decrease in C-reactive protein (P=0.01) postinduction. Bowel wall hyperemia (BWH) (P=0.01) and bowel segment length involved (P=0.07) decreased postinduction. Decrease in fecal calprotectin at T1 moderately correlated with a decrease in bowel segment length (r=0.57; P=0.04). No correlation was seen with a change in bowel wall thickness or BWH postinduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study suggests that SBUS is a feasible, noninvasive tool to measure early treatment response to IFX. BWH, not bowel wall thickness, is the first parameter to change. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to validate the utility of SBUS as part of a disease monitoring strategy.

Coping Among Parents of Teens With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Parents of teens with inflammatory bowel disease must prepare their children for independent disease self-management. This study characterizes the stressors and coping strategies adopted among parents of teens with inflammatory bowel disease. Teens aged 16-22 years with inflammatory bowel disease who were consecutively seen by a pediatric gastroenterologist prior to transition to adult-centered care and their parents completed sociodemographic data, and two validated questionnaires for coping (Coping Health Inventory for Parents) and stress (Pediatric Inventory for Parents). Sixty-six patient-parent pairs were enrolled in this study-impairment was highest in role function (e.g., trying to attend to the needs of other family members, being unable to go to work, and feeling uncertain about how to maintain consistent discipline). These concerns seemed to be most pronounced among parents of children 18 years and older (χ (df) = 1, p = .04) with Crohn disease (χ (df) = 1, p = .02). The top five listed concerns differed depending on the caregiver's gender. Parents of teens with inflammatory bowel disease are concerned about parenting role function. Parents of teens 18 years and older with Crohn disease reported the highest stress. Caregiver gender differences were noted.

Higher Trough Vedolizumab Concentrations During Maintenance Therapy are Associated With Corticosteroid-Free Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab is an anti-α4ß7 biologic approved for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. We aimed to examine the association of maintenance vedolizumab concentrations with remission. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional multi-centre study of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients on maintenance vedolizumab. A homogeneous mobility shift assay [HMSA] was used to determine trough serum concentrations of vedolizumab and anti-drug antibodies [ATVs]. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission defined as a composite of clinical remission, normalized C-reactive protein [CRP] and no corticosteroid use in 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included corticosteroid-free endoscopic and deep remission. Vedolizumab concentrations were compared between patients in remission and with active disease. Logistic regression, adjusting for confounders, assessed the association between concentrations and remission. RESULTS: In total, 258 IBD patients were included [55% CD and 45% UC]. Patients in clinical and biochemical remission had significantly higher vedolizumab concentrations [12.7 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.002]. Concentrations were also higher among patients in endoscopic and deep remission [14.2 µg/mL vs 8.5 µg/mL, p = 0.003 and 14.8 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.01, respectively]. After controlling for potential confounders, IBD patients with vedolizumab concentrations >11.5 µg/mL were nearly 2.4 times more likely to be in corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission. Only 1.6% of patients had ATVs. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of vedolizumab maintenance concentrations, IBD patients with remission defined by objective measures [CRP and endoscopy] had significantly higher trough vedolizumab concentrations and immunogenicity was uncommon.

Real World Experience With Ustekinumab in Children and Young Adults at a Tertiary Care Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is an effective therapy for Crohn disease currently approved for adults. Off-label use in the pediatric population is increasing, but its effectiveness in this age group has not been reported. AIMS: The aim of the study was to describe real-world experience with ustekinumab at a tertiary care pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. METHODS: As part of an ongoing observational cohort study of biologic-treated pediatric IBD patients initiated in October 2014, data on demographics, disease behavior, location and activity, treatment, and surgical history were collected for all patients receiving ustekinumab. Disease activity was assessed using the Harvey Bradshaw index or partial Mayo score. Primary outcome was steroid-free remission at 52 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized the safety and efficacy outcomes, and univariate analyses were performed to examine associations of clinical characteristics with efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-two children and young adults initiating ustekinumab were analyzed; 81% Crohn Disease, 8% ulcerative colitis, and 11% IBD-unspecified. Median [IQR] age at induction was 16.8 [14-18] years. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Most patients (81%) failed >1 anti-TNF, and 37% failed anti-TNF and vedolizumab; 10 patients were biologic-naïve. At week 52, 75% were still on ustekinumab, and 50% (bio-exposed) and 90% (bio-naïve) were in steroid-free remission. Two infusion reactions and neither serious adverse events nor serious infections were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ustekinumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with IBD. Controlled clinical trial data are needed to confirm these observations.

Proactively Optimized Infliximab Monotherapy Is as Effective as Combination Therapy in IBD.

Background: Infliximab (IFX) discontinuation is not uncommon during the first year of treatment due to inadequate drug concentrations and anti-IFX antibodies (ATI). Both combination therapy and proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (pTDM) are used to decrease ATI and increase IFX durability. We proposed that monotherapy (Mono) is as effective as combination therapy (Combo) if the first maintenance infusion is dosed based on week 10 pTDM. Methods: In a retrospective cohort of 83 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we examined the frequency of IFX discontinuation, ATI, infusion reactions, and IFX concentrations during the first year of treatment in patients receiving week 10 pTDM-guided IFX monotherapy (Mono pTDM; n = 16) compared with patients on mono (n = 32) or combination therapy (n = 35) in whom TDM was introduced at or after week 14, per standard of care (SOC). Results: The frequency of IFX discontinuation was lower with Mono pTDM compared with Mono SOC (P = 0.04) but did not differ with Combo SOC (P = 1). At first TDM, no patient in the pTDM strategy had ATI, vs 41% in Mono SOC (P = 0.002) and 6% in Combo SOC (P = 1). Of the 13 subjects with ATI in Mono SOC, 7 (47%) had ATI already at week 14. IFX trough concentrations with Mono pTDM were higher during maintenance compared with Mono SOC (9.5 vs 6.4 µg/mL, P = 0.04) but not Combo SOC. Conclusions: Infliximab durability did not differ between patients on IFX monotherapy dosed based on p-TDM and patients receiving combination therapy. In the absence of concomitant immunosuppression, proactive TDM may improve IFX durability by maintaining higher IFX concentrations entering into maintenance. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Dashboards for Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Learning and Confirming.

Inflammatory diseases (ID) are incurable, progressive diseases. Literature evidence cites increasing incidence of these diseases worldwide. When treatments with chemical immunosuppressive agents fail, patients are often treated with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). However, MAb failure rates are generally high, with approximately half the patients being discontinued within 4 years, necessitating switching to another MAb. One potential cause of treatment failure is subtherapeutic exposure. Several studies demonstrated associations between trough MAb concentrations and clinical response, supporting the notion that improving drug exposure may result in improved outcomes. MAbs exhibit complex and highly variable pharmacokinetics in ID patients with numerous factors affecting clearance. Bayesian-guided dosing with dashboard systems is a new tool being investigated in the treatment of ID to reduce variability in exposure. Simulations suggest dashboards will be effective at maintaining patients at target troughs. However, when patients are dosed using doses or intervals outside those listed in prescribing information, there is concern that patients may have drug exposures beyond or below the ranges found to be safe and efficacious. This manuscript reviews the rationale behind dashboard development, evaluations of expected performance, and a simulated assessment of MAb exposure with dashboard-based dosing versus dosing based on the prescribing information. We introduce the concept of pharmacologic equivalence-if patients are dosed based on individual pharmacokinetics, the resulting exposure is consistent with exposures achieved using labeled dosing. We further show that dashboard-based dosing results in observed exposures that are generally contained within the range of exposures achieved with labeled dosing.

Pharmacokinetic Dashboard-Recommended Dosing Is Different than Standard of Care Dosing in Infliximab-Treated Pediatric IBD Patients.

Standard of care (SOC; combination of 5-10 mg/kg and an interval every 6-8 weeks) dosing of infliximab (IFX) is associated with significant loss of response. Dashboards using covariates that influence IFX pharmacokinetics (PK) may be a more precise way of optimizing anti-TNF dosing. We tested a prototype dashboard to compare forecasted dosing regimens with actual administered regimens and SOC. Fifty IBD patients completing IFX induction were monitored during maintenance (weeks 14-54). Clinical and laboratory data were collected at each infusion; serum was analyzed for IFX concentrations and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) at weeks 14 and 54 (Prometheus Labs, San Diego). Dosing was blinded to PK data. Dashboard-based assessments were conducted on de-identified clinical, laboratory, and PK data. Bayesian algorithms were used to forecast individualized troughs and determine optimal dosing to maintain target trough concentrations (3 µg/mL). Dashboard forecasted dosing post-week 14 was compared to actual administered dose and frequency and SOC. Using week 14 clinical data only, the dashboard recommended either a dose or an interval change (<0.5 mg/kg or <1 week difference) in 43/50 patients; only 44% recommended to have SOC dosing. When IFX14 concentration and ADA status were added to clinical data, dose and/or interval changes based on actual dosing were recommended in 48/50 (96%) patients; SOC dosing was recommended in only 11/50 (22%). Dashboard recommended SOC IFX dosing in a minority of patients. Dashboards will be an important tool to individualize IFX dosing to improve treatment durability.

Multi-Center Experience of Vedolizumab Effectiveness in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Though vedolizumab has received regulatory approval for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, there is increasing off-label use in children. AIMS: To describe the experience with vedolizumab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at 3 tertiary IBD centers and examine predictors of remission. METHODS: A retrospective review identified pediatric IBD patients (age < 18 yrs) receiving vedolizumab. Data on demographics, disease behavior, location, activity, and previous treatments/surgeries were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the weighted pediatric CD activity index or pediatric UC activity index. Primary outcome was week 14 remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index <10 or weighted pediatric CD activity index <12.5. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed to examine associations of clinical characteristics with efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients, 58% CD and 42% UC, initiated vedolizumab between June 2014 and August 2015. Median age at vedolizumab initiation was 14.9 (range 7-17) years. Ninety percent had failed ≥1 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent. Week 14 remission rates for UC and CD were 76% and 42%, respectively (P < 0.05). Eighty percent of anti-TNF-naive patients experienced week 14 remission. At week 22, anti-TNF-naive patients had higher remission rates than TNF-exposed patients (100% versus 45%, P = 0.04). There were no infusion reactions or serious adverse events/infections. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that vedolizumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric IBD patients, with UC patients experiencing earlier and higher rates of remission than CD patients. Anti-TNF-naive patients experienced higher remission rates than those with anti-TNF exposure. Controlled clinical trial data are needed to confirm these observations.