RESUMO
This study applies Jellyfish Search Algorithm and five other algorithms to minimize the electricity generation cost of two hybrid systems for one operating day. The first system comprises one pumped storage hydroelectric plant and two thermal power plants. The second system is expanded by integrating one wind and one solar photovoltaic power plant into the first system. For each system during one operating day, the pumped storage hydroelectric plant with only generation mode acts as a conventional hydroelectric plant in the first scenario. Still, it can run pumps to store water and produce electricity in the second scenario. As a result, JSA can reach smaller costs than all compared algorithms, from about 1 % to higher than 10 % for two scenarios in the two systems. The comparisons of generation cost indicate the second scenario with the pumped storage hydroelectric plant can reach a smaller cost than the first scenario with the conventional hydroelectric power plant by $53,359.7, corresponding to 7.4 % in the first system and $39,472.8, corresponding to 6.95 % in the second system. Therefore, the water storage function of the pumped storage hydroelectric plant is very effective in reducing the electricity generation costs for hybrid power systems.
RESUMO
The paper optimizes the placement of soft open points (SOPs) devices, shunt capacitor banks (SCBs), and distributed generators (DGs) in the IEEE 69-node distribution power grid for reducing the power loss of a single hour and total energy losses of one year. EO is proven to be more effective than previous methods and three other applied algorithms, including the Coot optimization algorithm (COOT), Modified weight inertia factor and modified acceleration coefficients-based particle swarm optimization (CFPSO), and Tunicate swarm algorithm (TSA). So, EO is applied for the last case considering one SOPs, one wind turbine (WT), two solar photovoltaic systems (PVs), and two SCBs over one year with twelve months and 24 h each month. The study reaches the smallest power loss compared to previous studies in the first case with one SOPs device. The results from the second to the fourth cases indicate that the power grid needs the placement of SCBs and DGs first and SOPs devices to reach the lowest power loss. Case 5 indicates that the hybrid system with one WT and two PVs suffers higher power losses than the base system at hours with high generation from renewable sources; however, integrating the SOPs and SCBs into the hybrid system can reach smaller losses than the base system at these hours. Thus, using SOPs and SCBs in integrated distribution power grids with renewable energies can greatly benefit energy loss reduction.