Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Genet ; 56(12): 809-817, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515274

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whole blood is currently the most common DNA source for whole-genome sequencing (WGS), but for studies requiring non-invasive collection, self-collection, greater sample stability or additional tissue references, saliva or buccal samples may be preferred. However, the relative quality of sequencing data and accuracy of genetic variant detection from blood-derived, saliva-derived and buccal-derived DNA need to be thoroughly investigated. METHODS: Matched blood, saliva and buccal samples from four unrelated individuals were used to compare sequencing metrics and variant-detection accuracy among these DNA sources. RESULTS: We observed significant differences among DNA sources for sequencing quality metrics such as percentage of reads aligned and mean read depth (p<0.05). Differences were negligible in the accuracy of detecting short insertions and deletions; however, the false positive rate for single nucleotide variation detection was slightly higher in some saliva and buccal samples. The sensitivity of copy number variant (CNV) detection was up to 25% higher in blood samples, depending on CNV size and type, and appeared to be worse in saliva and buccal samples with high bacterial concentration. We also show that methylation-based enrichment for eukaryotic DNA in saliva and buccal samples increased alignment rates but also reduced read-depth uniformity, hampering CNV detection. CONCLUSION: For WGS, we recommend using DNA extracted from blood rather than saliva or buccal swabs; if saliva or buccal samples are used, we recommend against using methylation-based eukaryotic DNA enrichment. All data used in this study are available for further open-science investigation.


Assuntos
Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA/genética , DNA/genética , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/normas , Adulto , DNA/sangue , DNA/química , DNA/normas , Metilação de DNA/genética , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Bucal/química , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Saliva/química , Análise de Sequência de DNA/normas
2.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 58: 18-23, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639755

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to compare the Infinite Cylinder and Forward Field methods of quantifying global venous oxygen saturation (Yv) in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) from MRI phase data, and assess their applicability in systemic cerebrovascular disease.15 children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and 10 healthy age-matched controls were imaged on a 3.0 T MRI system. Anatomical and phase data around the superior sagittal sinus were acquired from a clinically available susceptibility weighted imaging sequence and converted to Yv using the Infinite Cylinder and Forward Field methods. Yv was significantly higher when calculated using the Infinite Cylinder method compared to the Forward Field method in both patients (p = 0.003) and controls (p < 0.001). A significant difference in Yv was observed between patients and controls for the Forward Field method only (p = 0.006). While various implementations of Yv quantification can be used in practice, the results can differ significantly. Simplistic models such as the Infinite Cylinder method may be easier to implement, but their dependence on broad assumptions can lead to an overestimation of Yv, and may reduce the sensitivity to pathophysiological changes in Yv.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/sangue , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Oxigênio/química , Adolescente , Anemia Falciforme/diagnóstico por imagem , Mapeamento Encefálico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Hematócrito , Humanos , Masculino , Oximetria
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA