Discordance Between Diagnosis Tools for Assessing Eczema in Infants: A Challenge for Intervention Trials.

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized definition for infant eczema, and various tools have been used across studies, precluding direct comparison. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess and to compare the accuracy of diagnostic tools for infant eczema using the extensive data collected in Melbourne Infant Study: BCG for Allergy and Infection Reduction (MIS BAIR), an eczema prevention trial. METHODS: Eczema incidence was assessed by 3 questionnaire-based measures: modified UK diagnostic tool, parent-reported medically diagnosed eczema, and parent-reported use of topical corticosteroids. Agreement between the definitions was quantified using κ coefficient. Eczema severity was assessed by 3-monthly Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores and a SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) clinical assessment at a 12-month visit (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01906853). RESULTS: Among the 538 participants fulfilling at least 1 of the 3 questionnaire-based eczema definitions, only 197 participants (37%) met all 3 definitions. Agreement between the definitions was poor with κ coefficients ranging from -0.11 to 0.62. The most frequently reported symptoms were generally dry skin (483/538, 90%) and pruritus (400/538, 74%). The face (352/538, 65%) and the trunk (306/538, 57%) were more frequently affected than the creases (257/538, 48%). Participants fulfilling all 3 questionnaire-based definitions of eczema were more likely to have higher severity scores and earlier onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There is poor agreement between currently available tools for assessing infant eczema.

Prevention of infant eczema by neonatal Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination: The MIS BAIR randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine could play a role in counteracting the rising prevalence of atopic diseases, through its beneficial off-target effects. We aimed to determine whether neonatal BCG vaccination reduces the incidence of eczema in infants. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial with 1272 infants allocated to receive BCG-Denmark or no BCG at birth. The primary outcome was the 12-month incidence of eczema based on 3-monthly questionnaires. Eczema was also assessed at a 12-month clinic visit. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01906853. RESULTS: The 12-month eczema incidence was 32.2% in the BCG group compared with 36.6% in the control group (adjusted risk difference (aRD) -4.3%, 95% CI -9.9% to 1.3%, multiple imputation model). In addition, comparing infants in the BCG group with the control group, 15.7% vs. 19.2% had eczema lesions at the 12-month visit (aRD -3.5%, 95% CI -8.0% to 1.0%); 35.7% vs. 39.0% reported using topical steroids (aRD -3.3, 95% CI -9.2 to 2.7); and 7.3% vs. 10.2% had severe eczema scores (aRD -3.0%, 95% CI -8.8% to 2.7%). In 344 high-risk infants (two atopic parents), the 12-month eczema incidence was 35.3% in the BCG group compared with 46.8% in the control group (aRD -11.5%, 95% CI -21.9% to -1.2%; number needed to treat 8.7, 95% CI 4.6 to 83.3). CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to recommend neonatal BCG vaccination in all infants for the prevention of eczema in the first year of life; however, a modest beneficial effect was observed among high-risk infants. A single dose of BCG-Denmark soon after birth could reduce the incidence of eczema in infants with two atopic parents.

Timolol maleate 0.5% or 0.1% gel-forming solution for infantile hemangiomas: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Therapeutic options for superficial infantile hemangiomas (IH) are limited. Recently, timolol maleate gel, a topical nonselective beta-blocker, has been reported as a potentially effective treatment for superficial IH. This study is an extension of a previously published pilot study designed to further investigate the efficacy and safety and to identify predictors of good response of topical 0.5% or 0.1% timolol maleate gel-forming solution. This was a retrospective cohort study including patients enrolled from five centers. Patients were included if they were treated with timolol maleate 0.1% or 0.5% gel-forming solution and had photographic documentation of the IH and at least one follow-up visit. Patients with concomitant active treatment using other IH treatments were excluded. The primary endpoint was change in the appearance of IH as evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Data from 73 subjects were available for final analysis. Timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% was used in 85% (62/73) of patients, the remainder being treated with 0.1%. The median age at treatment initiation was 4.27 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.63-7.21 mos), and patients were treated for a mean of 3.4 ± 2.7 months. All patients except one improved, with a mean improvement of 45 ± 29.5%. Predictors of better response were superficial type of hemangioma (p = 0.01), 0.5% timolol concentration (p = 0.01), and duration of use longer than 3 months (p = 0.04). Sleeping disturbance was noted in one patient. This study further demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of topical timolol maleate and gradual improvement with longer treatment in patients with superficial IH.

The potential of capillary birthmarks as a significant marker for capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation syndrome in children who had nontraumatic cerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation (CM-AVM) is a new autosomal dominant disorder with cutaneous capillary malformations (CM) and high-flow cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Patients may have Parkes-Weber syndrome. This study determined if cutaneous CM are a significant indicator of CM-AVM in children with cerebral bleeds. METHODS: Children with cerebral AVMs between 1991 and 2009 were reviewed. A family history of brain hemorrhage, AVMs, or cutaneous birthmarks was elicited. Patients and siblings were examined for CM and a family tree recorded. A brief questionnaire determined the family's opinion regarding screening for this syndrome. RESULTS: Of 30 families, 1 family had Parkes-Weber syndrome. In 3 families, both patient and relatives had CM. In 9 families, patients had no CM, but relatives had them. One family had hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. From the survey, 80% of families would be concerned about vascular marks, and 87% of families would allow screening for cerebral AVMs. CONCLUSION: A family history of vascular marks may predict families at risk of having a cerebral AVM with hemorrhage. Most families would agree to screening. However, family history and physical examination alone do not confirm CM-AVM but form a useful screening tool to identify families needing further investigations with genetic testing and/or magnetic resonance imaging.