Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(7): 346-348, 2022 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the arrival of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020, it was proposed to make the change from intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ) to its subcutaneous formulation, in order to avoid rheumatological patients having to go to the day hospital and guarantee enough IV TCZ for those critical patients with COVID who needed it. The aim of this study was to describe the rate and reasons for switching back to IV TCZ from subcutaneous TCZ. METHODS: We included patients from the rheumatology service that were on treatment with IV TCZ in February 2020 and were followed up until March 2021. Patients that remained on subcutaneous TCZ were compared with those who switched back to IV TCZ (switch-back group). A subgroup analysis according to rheumatic disease was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients switched to subcutaneous TCZ: 28 rheumatoid arthritis, 19 giant cell arteritis, 4 polymyalgia rheumatica, 2 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 2 systemic sclerosis. Seventeen patients switched back to IV TCZ due to ineffectiveness (n = 8), patient preference (n = 4), adverse events (n = 4), and difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1). In the analysis by disease, 4 of 23 patients switched back to IV TCZ in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica group due to ineffectiveness (n = 2), injection site reaction (n = 1), or patient preference (n = 1). In rheumatoid arthritis group, 11 of 28 patients switched back to IV TCZ: ineffectiveness (n = 5), patient preference (n = 3), headache (n = 1), injection site reaction (n = 1), and due to difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Mass switch from IV to subcutaneous TCZ during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been safe, effective, and well tolerated after 1 year of follow-up.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Arterite de Células Gigantes , Polimialgia Reumática , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Reação no Local da Injeção/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Subcutâneas , Pandemias , Polimialgia Reumática/induzido quimicamente , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Angiol ; 18(3): 147-9, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22477517

RESUMO

The unusual clinical presentation, importance of imaging techniques and role of low molecular weight heparin are described for an initial treatment of thrombosis in inferior vena cava agenesis associated with heterozygous factor V Leiden. The patient, a 36-year-old woman, presented to the emergency room with sudden onset of back pain, swelling of the legs and thighs, and claudication while walking. Abdominal ultrasonography was immediately ordered. Anomalies in vascular blood flow were detected. Computed tomography was performed, and initially showed a complete absence of the infrarenal segment of inferior vena cava caudally to the origin of both renal veins. Treatment with enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice per day) was started. The patient was discharged and returned to her activities of daily living two weeks after admission. This vascular abnormality is mostly incidentally diagnosed in adults and only a few cases are described as being associated with thrombophilia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA