CT protocol optimisation in PET/CT: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Currently, no consistent guidelines for CT scans used within PET/CT examinations are available. This systematic review provides an up-to-date overview of studies to answer the following questions: What are the specific CT protocols used in PET/CT? What are the possible purposes of requiring a CT study within a PET/CT scan? Is the CT protocol obtained from a dosimetric optimisation study? MATERIALS AND METHOD: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched for relevant studies in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted from January 2007 until June 2019. Data derived from studies were standardized in order to reduce possible biases, and they were divided into clinically homogeneous subgroups (adult, child or phantom). Subsequently, we divided the CT protocol intents into 3 types (anatomic localization only, attenuation correction only and diagnostic purpose). A narrative approach was used to summarise datasets and to investigate their heterogeneity (due to medical prescription methodology) and their combination in multiseries CT protocols. When weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) was available, we calculated the volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) using the pitch value to make the results uniform. Eventually, the correlation between protocol intents and CTDIvol values was obtained using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA statistical test. RESULT: Starting from a total of 1440 retrieved records, twenty-four studies were eligible for inclusion in addition to two large multicentric works that we used to compare the results. We analyzed 87 CT protocols. There was a considerable range of variation in the acquisition parameters: tube current-time product revealed to have the most variable range, which was 10-300 mAs for adults and 10-80 mAs for paediatric patients. Seventy percent of datasets presented scans acquired with tube current modulation, 9% used fixed tube current and in 21% of them, this information was not available. Dependence between mean CTDIvol values and protocol intent was statistically significant (p = 0.002). As expected, in diagnostic protocols, there was a statistically significant difference between CTDIvol values of with and without contrast acquisitions (11.68 mGy vs 7.99 mGy, p = 0.009). In 13 out of 87 studies, the optimisation aim was not reported; in 2 papers, a clinical protocol was used; and in 11 works, a dose optimisation protocol was applied. CONCLUSIONS: According to this review, the dose optimisation in PET/CT exams depends heavily on the correct implementation of the CT protocol. In addition to this, considering the latest technology advances (i.e. iterative algorithms development), we suggest a periodic quality control audit to stay updated on new clinical utility modalities and to achieve a shared standardisation of clinical protocols. In conclusion, this study pointed out the necessity to better identify the specific CT protocol use within PET/CT scans, taking into account the continuous development of new technologies.

Attenuation assessment of medical protective eyewear: the AVEN experience.

The goal of this paper is to test the attenuation capability of seven models of protective eyewear used in routine clinical practice. Scattered radiation from a standard patient was simulated by using a water tank located over the treatment couch of a GE Innova 3100 x-ray angiography system. Seven protective eyewear models were tested using an anthropomorphic phantom mimicking the first operator. At each test, 4 thermoluminiscent dosimeters were placed on the phantom (respectively in front of the protective eyewear, under the eyewear, on the left earpiece and at chest level) in order to have an eyewear-independent reference. A test session without glasses was also acquired. Each model was tested with standard posterior-anterior (PA) projections and the two most common protective eyewear were tested using LAO90° and LAO45°CRA30° projections. A worst-case scenario was created to be sure of having an upper limit for the assessment of eyewear attenuation in routine clinical practice. In PA projections, the absolute attenuation value ranged between 71% and 81%, while relative attenuation between dose measured at eye lens and that measured at eyewear earpiece ranged from 67% to 85%. The slightly wider range was probably due to scatter radiation variability; anyway, differences are still included in the variable uncertainty of experimental measurements. It is worth noting that #3 eyewear model (the one without lateral protection) allows an attenuation similar to that of #5 eyewear model (with 0.5 mm lead lateral protection) in LAO90° and LAO45°CRA30° projections. Despite the experimental limitations, a description of the radiation properties of protective eyewear concerning radiation attenuation can be useful to rely on protection devices which can be used in routine clinical practice.

[Quality evaluation of a personal dosimetry service]. / Valutazione della qualità del servizio di dosimetria individuale.

In a hospital environment high quality personal dosimetry is demanded by two different considerations: first, the marked reduction in the radiation exposure levels of hospital workers during the last 10 years and second, the recent decrease in the allowed absorbed dose thresholds for the different categories of workers and for the general population. In fact, according to the new Italian Radioprotection Law (D.L. vo 230/95), the dose equivalent limit for the general population has been decreased to 1 mSv per year. This means that a dosimetric system should be able to measure, with acceptable precision and accuracy, dose levels as low as 0.1 mSv per observation period (generally 1 month or 45 days). This is quite a stringent requirement for this kind of dosimetry. During a tender, the performances of the whole body personal dosimetry systems by four Italian service providers were analyzed by irradiating more than 60 test samples for each provider with four different energies in a wide dose interval (0.01-100 mSv). The results show that all systems perform quite well in the 0.2-100 mSv dose range; on the contrary, in the 0.01-0.2 mSv dose range, significant differences appear between the services and TLD based systems perform better than film based ones. In particular, one of the two TLD based systems measured doses as low as 0.01 mSv. To conclude this very high sensitivity level really opens a new "observation window" on the low doses world. The use of higher quality (and, of course, more expensive) materials by this provider seems to be the key of its success.

[Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes]. / Assicurazione della qualità nella radiologia: il controllo della qualità delle cassette radiografiche.

A "quality team" in radiology, whose members are the authors of this paper, has implemented a quality control program to test the cassettes with intensifying screen systems used in radiology departments. 149 systems-124 of them for general purpose radiology and 25 for mammography-were submitted to the following tests: visual inspection of radiographic cassettes and intensifying screens, screen-film contact, intensifying screen cleanliness and relative sensitivity of the intensifying screens. The results of each type of test are reported in detail in the paper, on a 3-point scale: good, sufficient and poor. The overall results of the quality control tests show 78% of general purpose radiology cassettes to qualify as good (69%) or sufficient (9%), while 22% were of poor quality. 88% of the mammographic cassettes qualified as good (76%) or sufficient (12%), while 12% were of poor quality. All tests were easy to perform and required limited resources. The necessary procedures to keep quality high over time are also reported. To conclude, the results obtained with our quality control program could be used as an effective tool to address and plan the turnover of the cassettes with intensifying screens which are usually used in diagnostic radiology practice.

[Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement]. / Valutazione della qualità di sistemi radiografici schermo-pellicola: principi fisici e metodi di misura.

Comparative evaluation of radiographic film-screen systems presents several problems from both the theoretical and the experimental point of view. From the theoretical point of view the main difficulties are related to the choice of the parameters best suited to express the "overall quality" of a system. From the practical point of view the main problem is that to measure some basic quantities (resolution and noise) sophisticated and expensive instruments are required. This paper deals with both these problems. To express image quality we have assumed the signal-to-noise power ratio: this index depends in a explicit way on contrast, resolution and noise of the system. The dependence on sensitivity is implicit and was derived using literature data. From a knowledge of the dependence of image quality on sensitivity it is possible to develop an "overall quality" index which is considered to express the "technological level" of the system. This index can be used in the comparative evaluation of the different systems. In this work some basic physical quantities (characteristic curve, sensitivity) were evaluated using standard instruments. To measure spatial resolution and noise an inexpensive, PC-based, TV-digitizer system was developed. As an example, both image and overall quality indices were evaluated on three mammographic systems which are typical of the three different "phases" of the development of this technique.