Influence of base designs on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts using two different technologies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Diagnostic casts can incorporate different base designs and be manufactured using different vat-polymerization technologies. However, the influence of the interrelation between the base design and the 3D printing technology on the casts' final accuracy remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the influence of different base designs of 3D printed casts on the accuracy of 2 vat-polymerization technologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A digital maxillary cast was obtained and used to generate 3 different base designs: solid (S group), honeycombed (HC group), and hollow (H group). The HC and H groups were subdivided based on the wall thickness of the cast design, resulting in 2 subgroups with thicknesses of 1 mm (HC1 and H1) and 2 mm (HC2 and H2) (N=100, n=10). Eleven reference cubes were added to each specimen for subsequent measurements. Specimens were manufactured by using 2 vat-polymerization 3D printers: Nextdent 5100 (ND group) and Sonic Mini 4K (SM4K group) and a resin material suitable for both 3D printers (Nextdent Model 2.0). A coordinate measuring machine quantified the linear and 3-dimensional discrepancies between the digital cast and each reference specimen. Trueness was defined as the average absolute dimensional discrepancy between the virtual cast and the specimens produced through additive manufacturing (AM), while precision was delineated as the standard deviation in dimensional discrepancies between the digital cast and the AM specimens. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U pairwise comparison tests (α=.05). RESULTS: For the NextDent group the trueness ranged from 21.83 µm to 28.35 µm, and the precision ranged from 17.82 µm to 37.70 µm. For the Phrozen group, the trueness ranged from 45.15 µm to 64.51 µm, and the precision ranged from 33.51 µm to 48.92 µm. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences on the x-, y-, and z-axes and in the 3D discrepancy (all P<.001). On the x-axis, the Mann-Whitney U test showed significant differences for the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 groups (P=.001), H-2 and S groups (P<.001), and HC-2 and S groups (P=.012). On the y-axis, significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 groups (P=.001), the H-2 and S, H-1 and HC-1, and HC-1 and S groups (P<.001), the H-1 and HC-2 groups (P=.007), and the HC-2 and S groups (P=.009). The NextDent group exhibited significant differences, particularly among the HC-1 and H-2 groups (P=.004), H-1 (P=.020), and HC-2 (P=.001) groups; and on the z-axis significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 and S groups and the HC-2 group and H-1 and S groups (both P<.001). In the NextDent group, significant differences were found between the H-2 and HC-2 (P=.047) and HC-1 (P=.028) groups. For the 3D discrepancy analysis, significant differences were found in the Phrozen group between the H-2 and H-1 and S groups (P<.001), the H-1 and HC-2 groups (P=.001), the S and HC-1 and HC-2 groups (P<.001), and the H-1 and HC-1 groups (P=.002). In the NextDent group, significant differences were observed between the H-2 and HC-1 groups (P=.012). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of digital casts depends on the manufacturing trinomial and base design of the casts. The honeycomb and hollow based designs provided the highest accuracy in the NextDent and Phrozen groups respectively for the material polymer tested. All specimens fell in the clinically acceptable range.

Comparative Clinical Study of Two Tooth Whitening Protocols. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Part 2.

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of two different home whitening protocols and to determine which is more effective: applying the whitening gel every 48 hours or every 72 hours for 6 weeks. The differences in terms of tooth sensitivity are also analyzed. A sample of 72 patients was randomly divided into 3 groups of 24 (N=24). Group A: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 48h for 6 weeks. Group B: 16% carbamide peroxide applied every 72h for 6 weeks. Group C (control group): a placebo gel without peroxide (glycerin gel) was applied every 48h for 6 weeks. To compare the groups, color measurements were made using a spectrophotometer and ANOVA test and Bonferroni test was used. The confidence level was set at 95% (p ≤ 0.05) and no statistically significant differences between applying 16% carbamide peroxide every 48h or every 72h for 6 weeks (p> 0.05) were found. The study concluded that carbamide peroxide 16% is equally effective applied with both protocols, obtaining the same results.

Influence of Polymerization Postprocessing Procedures on the Accuracy of Additively Manufactured Dental Model Material.

PURPOSE: To measure the influence of postpolymerization condition (dry and water-submerged) and time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes) on the accuracy of additively manufactured model material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bar standard tessellation language (STL) file was used to manufacture all the resin specimens using a 3D printer. Two groups (n = 80 each) were created based on postpolymerization condition: dry (D group) and water-submerged (W group). Each group was then divided into four subgroups (D1 to D4 and W1 to W4; n = 20 each), which were each assigned a postpolymerizing time (2, 10, 20, and 40 minutes). The specimens' dimensions were measured using a low-force digital caliper. The volume was calculated as follows: V = l × w × h. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences in length, width, height, and volume were found among the subgroups (P < .0018). In all groups, the width dimension (x-axis) presented less accuracy compared to height (z-axis) and length (y-axis) (P < .0018). The D2 and D4 subgroups obtained the closest dimensions to the virtual design, and there were no significant differences between these subgroups (P < .0018). The dry condition showed higher manufacturing accuracy than the water-submerged condition. In the water-submerged subgroups, the highest accuracy was obtained in the W2 and W4 subgroups (P < .0018). CONCLUSIONS: Postpolymerization condition and time influenced the accuracy of the material tested. The dry postpolymerization condition with times of 10 and 40 minutes obtained the highest accuracy.

Accuracy assessment (trueness and precision) of a confocal based intraoral scanner under twelve different ambient lighting conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The ambient lighting condition has been identified as an important factor that influences the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of 12 different ambient lighting conditions on the accuracy of a confocal based IOS (PrimeScan). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A typodont was digitized using a laboratory scanner (L2i) to obtain a reference standard tessellation language (STLr) file. A restorative dentist recorded the scans using an IOS (PrimeScan) under 12 different ambient lighting conditions where the luminosity was measured using a light meter (LX1330B Light Meter). Twelve groups were created, namely 0-, 500-, 1000-, 2000-, 3000-, 4000-, 5000-, 6000-, 7000-, 8000-, 9000-, and 10 000 lux groups. Ten STL files were recorded per group. The STLr file was used as a reference with which to compare the distortion of the 120 STL files obtained using a software program (Meshlab). The normality Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that the distributions were not normal. Therefore, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise multicomparison tests were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The group with the 1000 lux lighting condition obtained the smallest median ±interquartile range (IQR) with scanning distortion values of 69.5 ± 97.4 µm, followed by the 8000 lux group with a median ±IQR of 166.5 ± 318.1 µm. The 0 lx group presented the highest distortion values with a mean ±IQR of 355.5 ± 488.0 µm (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ambient lighting conditions influenced the accuracy of the IOS tested. The highest accuracy values were obtained with 1000 lux. The lowest scanning accuracy was obtained with 0 lux.

Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Photogrammetry technology has been used for the digitalization of multiple dental implants, but its trueness and precision remain uncertain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to compare the accuracy (trueness and precision) of multisite implant recordings between the conventional method and a photogrammetry dental system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A definitive cast of an edentulous maxilla with 6 implant abutment replicas was tested. Two different recording methods were compared, the conventional technique and a photogrammetry digital scan (n=10). For the conventional group, the impression copings were splinted to an additively manufactured cobalt-chromium metal with autopolymerizing acrylic resin, followed by recording the maxillary edentulous arch with an elastomeric impression using an additively manufactured open custom tray. For the photogrammetry group, a scan body was placed on each implant abutment replica, followed by the photogrammetry digital scan. A coordinate-measuring machine was selected to assess the linear, angular, and 3-dimensional discrepancies between the implant abutment replica positions of the reference cast and the specimens by using a computer-aided design program. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the data were not normally distributed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data (α=.05). RESULTS: The conventional group obtained an overall accuracy (trueness ±precision) value of 18.40 ±6.81 µm, whereas the photogrammetry group showed an overall scanning accuracy value of 20.15 ±25.41 µm. Significant differences on the discrepancies on the x axis (U=1380.00, P=.027), z axis (U=601.00, P<.001), XZ angle (U=869.00, P<.001), and YZ angle (U=788.00, P<.001) were observed when the measurements of the 2 groups were compared. Furthermore, significant 3-dimensional discrepancy for implant 1 (U=0.00, P<.001), implant 2 (U=0.00, P<.001), implant 3 (U=6.00, P<.001), and implant 6 (U=9.00, P<.001) were computed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional method obtained statistically significant higher overall accuracy values compared with the photogrammetry system tested, with a trueness difference of 1.8 µm and a precision difference of 18.6 µm between the systems. The conventional method transferred the implant abutment positions with a uniform 3-dimensional discrepancy, but the photogrammetry system obtained an uneven overall discrepancy among the implant abutment positions.

Influence of base design on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts: An in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Vat-polymerized casts can be designed with different bases, but the influence of the base design on the accuracy of the casts remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of various base designs (solid, honeycombed, and hollow) with 2 different wall thicknesses (1 mm and 2 mm) on the accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A virtual maxillary cast was obtained and used to create 3 different base designs: solid (S group), honeycombed (HC group), and hollow (H group). The HC and H groups were further divided into 2 subgroups based on the wall thickness of the cast designed: 1 mm (HC-1 and H-1) and 2 mm (HC-2 and H-2) (N=50, n=10). All the specimens were manufactured with a vat-polymerized printer (Nexdent 5100) and a resin material (Nexdent Model Ortho). The linear and 3D discrepancies between the virtual cast and each specimen were measured with a coordinate measuring machine. Trueness was defined as the mean of the average absolute dimensional discrepancy between the virtual cast and the AM specimens and precision as the standard deviation of the dimensional discrepancies between the virtual cast and the AM specimens. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests revealed that the data were not normally distributed. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U pairwise comparison tests (α=.05). RESULTS: The trueness ranged from 63.73 µm to 77.17 µm, and the precision ranged from 44.00 µm to 54.24 µm. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences on the x- (P<.001), y- (P=.006), and z-axes (P<.001) and on the 3D discrepancy (P<.001). On the x-axis, the Mann-Whitney test revealed significant differences between the S and H-1 groups (P<.001), S and H-2 groups (P<.001), HC-1 and H-1 groups (P<.001), HC-1 and H-2 groups (P<.001), HC-2 and H-1 groups (P<.001), and HC-2 and H-2 groups (P<.001); on the y-axis, between the S and H-1 groups (P<.001), HC-1 and H-1 groups (P=.001), HC-1 and H-2 groups (P=.02), HC-2 and H-1 groups (P<.001), HC-2 and H-2 groups (P=.003); and on the z-axis, between the S and H-1 groups (P=.003). For the 3D discrepancy analysis, significant differences were found between the S and H-1 groups (P<.001), S and H-2 groups (P=.004), HC-1 and H-1 groups (P=.04), and HC-2 and H-1 groups (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: The base designs tested influenced the manufacturing accuracy of the diagnostic casts fabricated with a vat-polymerization printer, with the solid and honeycombed bases providing the greatest accuracy. However, all the specimens were clinically acceptable.

Esthetic Integration Area concept to improve the emergence profile of fixed restorations: A dental technique.

A technique for obtaining the esthetic integration and optimal emergence profile of tooth-supported and implant-supported restorations is described. Using a computer-aided design software program, data captured with an intraoral scanner were used to establish the anatomic landmarks for determining the maximum buccal volume to which a restoration can be extended. This technique could be applicable to different types of fixed-dental prostheses treatments. Advantages of this technique include the establishment of periodontal-prosthetic criteria and the improvement of clinical and laboratory communication since the same guidelines for evaluating restorative space in the buccolingual direction of tooth preparations are used to avoid overcontoured restorations.

Fabricating a dual-material, vat-polymerized, additively manufactured static implant surgical guide: A dental technique.

Protocols with static computer-aided implant placement provide more tangible clinical advantages than conventional implant placement methods. A technique to manufacture a dual-material implant surgical guide by using a vat-polymerization printer is described. The implant surgical guide combined a resilient intaglio and hard exterior surface. The technique should minimize the clinical adjustments needed to ensure fit and improve patient comfort.

Influence of the base design on the accuracy of additive manufactured casts measured using a coordinate measuring machine.

PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy of the additively manufactured casts with 3 base designs: solid, honeycomb-structure, and hollowed bases. METHODS: A virtual cast was used to create different base designs: solid (S Group), honeycomb-structure (HC group), and hollowed (H group). Three standard tessellation language files were used to fabricate the specimens using a material jetting printer (J720 Dental; Stratasys) and a resin (VeroDent MED670; Stratasys) (n=15). A coordinate measuring machine was selected to measure the linear and 3D discrepancies between the virtual cast and each specimen. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that all the data was not normally distributed (P<.05). Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used (α=.05). RESULTS: The S group obtained a median ±interquartile range 3D discrepancy of 53.00 ±73.25 µm, the HC group of 58.00 ±67.25 µm, and the H group of 34.00 ±45.00 µm. Significant differences were found in the x- (P<.001), y- (P<.001), and z-axes (P<.001), and 3D discrepancies among the groups (P<.001). Significant differences were found between the S and H groups (P=.002) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the x-axis; S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the y-axis; S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the z-axis; and S and H groups (P<.001) and HC and H groups (P<.001) on the 3D discrepancy. CONCLUSION: The base designs influenced on the accuracy of the casts but all the specimens obtained a clinically acceptable manufacturing range. The H group obtained the highest accuracy.

Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: To measure the impact of different scanning patches on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner (IOS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A typodont was digitized using an industrial optical scanner (GOM Atos Q 3D 12 M) to obtain a reference mesh. The typodont was scanned using an IOS (TRIOS 3). Three groups were generated based on the rescan areas created: no mesh holes (G0 group), 3 mesh holes distributed on the digital scan (G1 group), and 3 mesh holes located on the left quadrant of the digital scan (G2 group). In the G0 group, a digital scan was completed following the manufacturer's scanning protocol. In the G1 group, a digital scan was obtained following the same protocol as G0 group. Three 12-mm diameter holes were created in the occlusal surfaces of the left second first molar, incisal edges of the central incisors, and right first molar of the digital scan using the IOS software. In the G2 group, a digital scan was obtained following the same protocol as G0 group. Three 12-mm diameter holes in the digital scan were created in the occlusal surface of the left first molar and left second and first premolars using the IOS software program. The discrepancy between the control and the experimental digital scans was measured using the root mean square calculation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test demonstrated that data were normally distributed. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc multiple comparison Bonferroni test were used to analyze the data (α = .05). RESULTS: Trueness values ranged from 15 to 26 µm and the precision ranged from 21 to 150 µm. Significant differences in trueness mean values were found among the groups tested (F(2, 42) = 6.622, P = .003); the Bonferroni test indicated significant mean differences between the G0 and G2 groups (mean difference=0.11, SE=0.003, and P = .002). For precision evaluation, significant precision differences were found between the groups tested (F(2, 39)=9.479, P < .001); the Bonferroni test revealed significant precision differences between G0 and G2 groups (mean difference=-0.12, SE=0.030, and P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures decreased the trueness and precision of the IOS tested; furthermore, the number and dimensions of mesh holes rescanned represented an important factor that influenced the scanning accuracy of IOS tested. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: It is a fundamental procedure obtaining intraoral digital scans without leaving mesh holes, so the rescanning techniques are minimized and, therefore, the scanning accuracy of the intraoral scanner tested is maximized.

3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the elements of the vat-polymerization workflow, including the 3D printing parameters, support structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures, as well as how these elements affect the characteristics of the manufactured dental devices. DATA: Collection of published articles related to vat-polymerization technologies including manufacturing workflow description, and printing parameters definition and evaluation of its influence on the mechanical properties of vat-polymerized dental devices was performed. SOURCES: Three search engines were selected namely Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane. A manual search was also conducted. STUDY SELECTION: The selection of the optimal printing and supporting parameters, slicing, and post-processing procedures based on dental application is in continuous improvement. As well as their influence on the characteristics of the additively manufactured (AM) devices such as surface roughness, printing accuracy, and mechanical properties of the dental device. RESULTS: The accuracy and properties of the AM dental devices are influenced by the technology, printer, and material selected. The printing parameters, printing structures, slicing methods, and the post-processing techniques significantly influence on the surface roughness, printing accuracy, and mechanical properties of the manufactured dental device; yet, the optimization of each one may vary depending on the clinical application of the additively manufactured device. CONCLUSIONS: The printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures have been identified, but additional studies are needed to establish the optimal manufacturing protocol and enhance the properties of the AM polymer dental devices. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The understanding of the factors involved in the additive manufacturing workflow leads to a printing success and better outcome of the additively manufactured dental device.

2D and 3D patient's representation of simulated restorative esthetic outcomes using different computer-aided design software programs.

OBJECTIVE: To review the techniques and available 2D and 3D computer-aided design (CAD) software programs to perform a diagnostic waxing for restorative procedures when cone beam computed tomography is not indicated. OVERVIEW: An electronic review was performed in Medline, Embase, and Scopus search engines. A manual search was also conducted. The articles evaluating methods to obtain a 2D or 3D patient's representation for restorative dental procedures were included. A total of 33 articles were included for full text review. CAD programs provide the capability to integrate facial features from 2D photographs or 3D facial scans and facilitate facially driven digital diagnostic waxing procedures. Diagnostic and design tools varied among the programs, and multiple technique descriptions were found. However, the literature evaluating the accuracy of virtual patients and the perception variations between the 2D and 3D dimensional representations is limited. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of digital technologies into treatment planning procedures introduce variation into the conventional interfaces; however, the concepts remain the same. Further studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of the virtual representations and the influence of the type of dimensional representation on the esthetic perceptions among dental professionals. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The 2D and 3D CAD software programs facilitate the integration of facial features into digital diagnostic waxing procedures; however, the esthetic perception of the patient's virtual representation might vary among the different systems.

A vat-polymerized 3-dimensionally printed dual-material occlusal device: A dental technique.

A technique to additively manufacture an occlusal device by using a completely digital workflow is described. Using a computer-aided design program, information captured with an intraoral scanner was used to additively manufacture a dual-material occlusal device by using a vat-polymerization printer. This technique allows for the combination of 2 different materials, resulting in an occlusal device with a resilient intaglio and a hard resin exterior surface. Advantages of the resulting occlusal device compared with a single-material device include improved patient acceptance and comfort, better fit, and minimal adjustments to ensure fit.

Influence of printing angulation on the surface roughness of additive manufactured clear silicone indices: An in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Vat-polymerization additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can be used to fabricate clear silicone indices for diagnostic trial restorations, interim restorations, and direct composite resin restorations. Different support parameters, including print orientation of the virtual design of the silicone index, need to be determined when a dental device is fabricated with AM. However, the optimal printing angulation for minimal surface texture remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the surface roughness of the AM clear silicone indices manufactured by using a vat-polymerization 3D printer with different print orientations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A virtual design of a facial silicone index was obtained, and the standard tessellation language file was exported and used to manufacture all the specimens using a vat-polymerization 3D printer. All the specimens were placed on the build platform with the same parameters, except for the print orientation which was selected as the only manufacturing variable. Therefore, the 5 different groups were 0, 25, 45, 75, and 90 degrees. To minimize variation in the procedure, all the specimens (N=50) were manufactured at the same time in the selected printer at a constant room temperature of 23°C. The printer had been previously calibrated following the manufacturer's recommendations. Surface roughness was measured in the intaglio of the left central maxillary incisor using an optical profilometer with a magnification of ×20 and an array size of 640×480. Three measurements per specimen were recorded. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were normally distributed, and the data were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Sidak test (α=.05). RESULTS: The 0-degree angulation printing group reported the least mean ±standard deviation surface roughness (0.9 ±0.3 µm), followed by the 90-degree group (3.0 ±0.6 µm), the 75-degree group (12.4 ±1.0 µm), the 25-degree group (13.1 ±0.9 µm), and the 45-degree group (13.5 ±1.0 µm). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the surface roughness between the 25-degree and 45-degree print orientation groups (P=.296). CONCLUSIONS: Print orientation significantly influenced the surface roughness measured on the intaglio of the facial AM silicone indices tested.

Workflow of a fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis by using a 4-piece additive manufactured silicone index: A dental technique.

A digital workflow for fabricating a fiber-reinforced composite prosthesis is described. A facial scanner and an intraoral scanner were used to gather records, and dental and open-source software programs were used to elaborate a diagnostic waxing and design a 4-piece additively manufactured clear silicone index. Advantages of the index design included precise translation of the diagnostic waxing, optimal composite resin stratification, and minimal clinical time.

Influence of the Rinsing Postprocessing Procedures on the Manufacturing Accuracy of Vat-Polymerized Dental Model Material.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of rinsing solvents, namely isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (TPM), and rinsing times (5-, 7-, 9-, and 11-minutes) for the postprocessing procedures on the manufacturing accuracy of an additively manufactured dental model resin material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The standard tessellation language (STL file) of the digital design of a bar (15 mm × 4 mm × 3 mm) was obtained. A resin dental material (E-Model Light; Envisiontec, Dearborn, MI) and a 3D printer (VIDA HD; Envisiontec) was selected to manufacture all the specimens using the STL file following the recommended printing parameters at a room temperature of 23 °C. Two groups were generated based on the rinsing solvent used on the postprocessing procedures, namely isopropyl alcohol (IPA-group) and tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (TPM-group). Each group was further divided into 4 subgroups (IPA-1 to IPA-4 and TPM-1 to TPM-4) depending on the rinsing time performed (5-, 7-, 9-, and 11-minutes). Twenty specimens per subgroup were fabricated. The dimensions (length, width, and height) of all the specimens were measured using a low force digital caliper (Absolute Low Force Caliper Series 573; Mitutoyo, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa). Each measurement was performed 3 times and the mean value determined. The volume of each specimen was calculated using the formula V = l × w × h. Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0.05), followed by pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.0018). RESULTS: The IPA groups obtained significantly lower trueness and precision values compared with TPM groups (p < 0.0018). Among the IPA groups, IPA-1 subgroup obtained the highest trueness and precision values compared to the rest of the IPA subgroups. The TPM-1 and TPM-2 subgroups obtained the highest trueness and prevision values among the TPM group and among all the groups tested. No significant difference was found between the TMP-1 and TPM-2 subgroups (p > 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: None of the manufacturing workflows tested were able to manufacture a perfect match of the bar virtual design dimensions. TPM solvent group obtained higher trueness and precision values compared to the IPA solvent group. The IPA-1 subgroup that replicated the manufacturer´s recommendations obtained the highest manufacturing accuracy among the IPA subgroup. TPM solvent used in a rinsing ultrasonic bath between 3 and 4 minutes followed by a second ultrasonic clean bath between 2 and 3 minutes of the just printed vat polymerized dental model specimens obtained the highest manufacturing accuracy values.

Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Diagnostic stone casts can be digitized by using dental optical scanners based on structured light scanning technology. Nondental structured light scanning scanners could also be used; however, the accuracy of these nondental scanners remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the scanning accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3 nondental extraoral structured light scanners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A representative maxillary diagnostic cast was obtained and digitized by using an extraoral dental scanner (Advaa Lab Scan; GC Europe), and a reference or control standard tessellation language file was obtained. Three nondental extraoral scanners were evaluated: groups ND-1 (Space Spider; Artec), ND-2 (Capture Mini; Geomagic), and ND-3 (DAVID SLS3; David). Ten digital scans per group were recorded at a constant room temperature (23 °C) by an experienced geodetic engineer following the manufacturer's recommendations. The control or reference file was used as a reference to measure the discrepancy between the digitized diagnostic cast and 3 different nondental scans by using an open-source software (CloudCompare v.2.6.1; CloudCompare) and the iterative closest point technique. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were normally distributed. The data were analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Bonferroni tests (α=.05). RESULTS: Significant differences between the 3 experimental nondental scanners and the control or reference scan (P<.001) were found. The ND-2 group had the lowest absolute mean error (trueness) and standard deviation (precision) (39 ±139 µm), followed by the ND-3 group (125 ±113 µm) and the ND1 group (-397 ±25 µm). No statistically significant differences were found in the mean error between the ND-2 and ND-3 groups (P=.228). CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 nondental extraoral scanner tested obtained trueness mean values similar to those of the reference dental scanner. In all groups, the precision mean values were higher than their trueness values, indicating low relative precision.

Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis using an additive manufactured silicone index.

OBJECTIVE: Digital tools such as facial and intraoral digitizers and additive manufacturing (AM) technologies assist restorative treatments. The objective of the present manuscript was to describe a workflow procedure for treatment planning and fabricating a fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) replacing an absent maxillary lateral incisor, using additively manufactured silicone indices to facilitate the clinical intervention. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The elaboration of a direct fiber-reinforced composite restoration is a technique sensitive procedure which might be time-consuming for the clinician. The digital waxing helped to determine the exact position and size of the lingual wings and connectors of the fiber-reinforced FDP and to design a three-piece index. And the AM of the index helped to transfer the information to the patient's dentition accurately. CONCLUSIONS: The protocol minimizes the time of clinical intervention by facilitating the transference of the virtual diagnostic waxing teeth into the patient's mouth. The three-piece silicone index provides an individualized path of insertion of each index part while also providing a customized space and location of the lingual wings of the restoration. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The usage of AM silicone indices facilitates the clinical intervention by translating the size and position of the diagnostic wax-up teeth into the patient's mouth, minimizing clinical procedure's time.

Digitally Created 3-Piece Additive Manufactured Index for Direct Esthetic Treatment.

Facial and intraoral scanners as well as additive manufacturing (AM) technologies can be integrated to virtually plan restorative procedures. The present article describes a digital workflow protocol for treatment planning an esthetic rehabilitation using direct composite restorations. The combination of facial digitalization and intraoral scans allowed a facially driven diagnostic waxing, while additive manufacturing technologies facilitate the translation of the digital waxing into the patient´s mouth through an AM 3-piece silicone index which was designed into a buccal and a lingual clear flexible silicone indices that were fitted into a clear and rigid custom tray. This procedure facilitated the treatment planning procedures as well as assisted the direct composite restoration procedures, providing several advantages compared with conventional procedures such as precise translation of the digital diagnostic waxing into the patient´s mouth, horizontal path of insertion of the silicone index, and minimized time of the clinical intervention.

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of a dual-structured light facial scanner and interexaminer reliability.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Digital waxing procedures should be guided by facial references to improve the esthetic outcome of a restoration. The development of facial scanners has allowed the digitalization of the extraoral soft tissues of the patient's face. However, the reliability of facial digitizers is questionable. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of extraoral 3D facial reconstructions performed by using a dual-structured light facial scanner and to measure the interexaminer variability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten participants were included. Six soft-tissue landmarks were determined on each participant, specifically reference (Ref), glabella (Gb), subnasal (Sn), menton (Me), chelion right (ChR), and chelion left (ChL). Interlandmark distances Ref-Sn, Sn-Gb, Ref-Gb, Sn-Me, and ChR-ChL (intercommissural) were measured by 2 different operators by using 2 different methods: directly on the participant' face (manual group) and digitally (digital group) on the 3D facial reconstruction of the participant (n=20). For the manual group, interlandmark measurements were made by using digital calipers. For the digital group, 10 three-dimensional facial reconstructions were acquired for each participant by using a dual-structured light facial scanner (Face Camera Pro Bellus; Bellus3D). Interlandmark measurements were made by using an open-source software program (Meshlab; Meshlab). Both operators were used to note 10 measurements for each manual and digital interlandmark distance per participant. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 operators was calculated. The Shapiro-Wilk test revealed that the data were not normally distributed. The data were analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between manual and digital interlandmark measurements in all participants. The mean value of the manual and digital group discrepancy was 0.91 ±0.32 mm. The dual-structured light facial scanner tested obtained a trueness mean value of 0.91 mm and a precision mean value of 0.32 mm. Trueness values were always higher than precision mean values, indicating that precision was relatively high. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 operators was 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The facial digitizing procedure evaluated produced clinically acceptable outcomes for virtual treatment planning. The interexaminer reliability between the 2 operators was rated as excellent, suggesting that the type of facial landmark used in this study provides reproducible results among different examiners.