Toxicity at three years with and without irradiation of the internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph node chain in stage I to III breast cancer (EORTC trial 22922/10925).

INTRODUCTION: The EORTC 22922/10925 trial investigated the potential survival benefit and toxicity of elective irradiation of the internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) nodes Accrual completed in January 2004 and first results are expected in 2012. We present the toxicity reported until year 3 after treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At each visit, toxicity was reported but severity was not graded routinely. Toxicity rates and performance status (PS) changes at three years were compared by chi(2) tests and logistic regression models in all the 3,866 of 4,004 patients eligible to the trial who received the allocated treatment. RESULTS: Only lung (fibrosis; dyspnoea; pneumonitis; any lung toxicities) (4.3% vs. 1.3%; p < 0.0001) but not cardiac toxicity (0.3% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.55) significantly increased with IM-MS treatment. No significant worsening of the PS was observed (p = 0.79), suggesting that treatment-related toxicity does not impair patient's daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: IM-MS irradiation seems well tolerated and does not significantly impair WHO PS at three years. A follow-up period of at least 10 years is needed to determine whether cardiac toxicity is increased after radiotherapy.

Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of radiotherapy plus long-term medical suppression of androgens (> or = 2 years) improves overall survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. We compared the use of radiotherapy plus short-term androgen suppression with the use of radiotherapy plus long-term androgen suppression in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who had received external-beam radiotherapy plus 6 months of androgen suppression to two groups, one to receive no further treatment (short-term suppression) and the other to receive 2.5 years of further treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (long-term suppression). An outcome of noninferiority of short-term androgen suppression as compared with long-term suppression required a hazard ratio of more than 1.35 for overall survival, with a one-sided alpha level of 0.05. An interim analysis showed futility, and the results are presented with an adjusted one-sided alpha level of 0.0429. RESULTS: A total of 1113 men were registered, of whom 970 were randomly assigned, 483 to short-term suppression and 487 to long-term suppression. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 132 patients in the short-term group and 98 in the long-term group had died; the number of deaths due to prostate cancer was 47 in the short-term group and 29 in the long-term group. The 5-year overall mortality for short-term and long-term suppression was 19.0% and 15.2%, respectively; the observed hazard ratio was 1.42 (upper 95.71% confidence limit, 1.79; P=0.65 for noninferiority). Adverse events in both groups included fatigue, diminished sexual function, and hot flushes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radiotherapy plus 6 months of androgen suppression provides inferior survival as compared with radiotherapy plus 3 years of androgen suppression in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003026.)

Impact of the boost dose of 10 Gy versus 26 Gy in patients with early stage breast cancer after a microscopically incomplete lumpectomy: 10-year results of the randomised EORTC boost trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the boost dose in patients with involved surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial, 251 patients with a microscopically incomplete tumour excision were randomised to receive either a low boost dose of 10 Gy (126 patients) or a high boost dose of 26 Gy (125 patients). Overall survival and the cumulative incidence of local recurrence as first event were compared by Logrank and Gray test, respectively (2-sided alpha=0.05), with a median follow-up of 11.3 years. The planned sample size was 660 patients, but only 251 were recruited. RESULTS: The median age at randomisation was 54 years. Thirty-seven patient initially relapsed locally. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 17.5% (95% CI: 10.4-24.6%) versus 10.8% (95% CI: 5.2-16.4%) for the low and high boost dose groups, respectively (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.43-1.57, Gray p>0.1). Overall, 64 patients have died (25.5%), 47 of them of breast cancer, without a difference in duration of survival between the two groups (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.59-1.5, p>0.1). Severe fibrosis was palpated in the breast in 1% versus 5% and in the boost area in 3% versus 13% in the low and high boost dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in local control or survival between the high boost dose of 26 Gy and the low boost dose of 10 Gy in patients with microscopically incomplete excision of early breast cancer. Fibrosis, however, was noted significantly more frequently in cases treated with the high boost dose.

Results of the phase II EORTC 22971 trial evaluating combined accelerated external radiation and chemotherapy with 5FU and cisplatin in patients with muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

INTRODUCTION: We prospectively evaluated concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer in a phase II EORTC trial to test whether it could be further studied as a potential treatment of bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients up to 75 years of age with invasive transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder up to 5 cm, stage pT2 to pT3b, N0M0, without residual macroscopical tumour after transurethral excision were eligible. Radiotherapy consisted of 2 fractions of 1.2 Gy daily up to 60 Gy delivered in a period of 5 weeks. During the first and the last week, cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day and 5 FU 375 mg/m(2)/day were given concomitantly. RESULTS: The study was interrupted early due to poor recruitment. Nine patients of the originally 43 planned were treated. Mean age was 63 years. Five patients had tumour stage pT2, 1 stage pT3a and 3 stage pT3b. All patients completed radiotherapy and chemotherapy as scheduled. Only one grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicity was seen. All patients were evaluated 3 months after treatment: eight patients had no detectable tumour and one had para-aortic lymph nodes. During further follow-up, a second patient got lymph node metastases and two patients developed distant metastases (lung in the patient with enlarged lymph nodes at the first evaluation and abdominal in one other). Those three patients died at respectively 19, 14, and 18 months after registration. Late toxicity was limited and often temporary. After 26 to 57 months of follow-up, no local recurrences were seen. Six patients remained alive without disease. DISCUSSION: Despite the small cohort, this combination of concomitant chemotherapy and accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer seemed to be well tolerated and to result in satisfactory local control with limited early and late toxicity. It could therefore be considered for study in further clinical trials.

Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22921 compared adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (CT) to no adjuvant treatment in a 2 x 2 factorial trial with randomization for preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with resectable T3-4 rectal cancer. The results showed no significant impact of adjuvant CT on progression-free or overall survival, although a difference seemed to emerge at approximately, respectively, 2 and 5 years after the start of preoperative treatment. We further explored the data with the aim of refining our understanding of the long-term results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 785 of the 1,011 randomly assigned patients who whose disease was M0 at curative surgery were used. Using meta-analytic methods, we investigated the homogeneity of the effect of adjuvant CT on the time to relapse or death after surgery (disease-free survival [DFS]) and survival in patient subgroups. RESULTS: Although there was no statistically significant impact of adjuvant CT on DFS for the whole group (P > .5), the treatment effect differed significantly between the ypT0-2 and the ypT3-4 patients (heterogeneity P = .009): only the ypT0-2 patients seemed to benefit from adjuvant CT (P = .011). The same pattern was observed for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Exploratory analyses suggest that only good-prognosis patients (ypT0-2) benefit from adjuvant CT. This could explain why, in the whole group, the progression-free and overall survival diverged only after the poor-prognosis patients (ypT3-4) had experienced treatment failure. Patients in whom no downstaging was achieved did not benefit. This also suggests that the same prognostic factors may drive both tumor sensitivity for the primary treatment and long-term clinical benefit from further adjuvant CT.

Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term impact of a boost radiation dose of 16 Gy on local control, fibrosis, and overall survival for patients with stage I and II breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 5,318 patients with microscopically complete excision followed by whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomly assigned to receive either a boost dose of 16 Gy (2,661 patients) or no boost dose (2,657 patients), with a median follow-up of 10.8 years. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years. Local recurrence was reported as the first treatment failure in 278 patients with no boost versus 165 patients with boost; at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the no boost and the boost group, respectively (P < .0001). The hazard ratio of local recurrence was 0.59 (0.46 to 0.76) in favor of the boost, with no statistically significant interaction per age group. The absolute risk reduction at 10 years per age group was the largest in patients

Quality assurance in breast cancer: EORTC experiences in the phase III trial on irradiation of the internal mammary nodes.

The EORTC 22922/10925 trial randomly compares irradiation or no irradiation of the internal mammary and medio supraclavicular (IM-MS) nodes for stage I-III breast cancer. We report on the characteristics of 4004 participating patients, aspects of quality assurance and compliance to protocol treatment. The actual population has intermediate-risk disease: 51.8% stage II, 56% positive axillary nodes. The allocated treatment was not followed in 3.2% in the IM-MS irradiation arm versus 2% in the no IM-MS irradiation arm. In the IM-MS arm, there were major deviations for dose in 0.8%, surgery-to-radiotherapy time interval in 3.9% and in overall treatment time in 0.9% cases. Major deviations were found in 7.9% patients in the IM-MS group and in 2% patients in the no IM-MS group. In the final trial analysis, a sensitivity analysis should evaluate the subgroup of patients receiving an optimal treatment to verify the robustness of the results and the true impact of IM-MS irradiation.

Effect of age and radiation dose on local control after breast conserving treatment: EORTC trial 22881-10882.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the effect of an additional "boost" radiation after breast conservative therapy (BCT) on local control depends on age and evaluate the impact of a treatment policy with a threshold for age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from EORTC 22881-10882 trial, with median follow-up of 77.4 months. Patients receiving BCT and 50Gy whole breast irradiation were randomized to no boost and 16Gy boost (N=5318). RESULTS: In univariate analysis, a boost reduced local failure by a factor of 2 (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed local control increased with age (P=0.0003). There was no evidence that the relative effect of a boost on local control depends on age (P=0.97) However in younger patients the 5-year local failure was higher, therefore the absolute reduction was greater. If the threshold-age for boost treatment were set at 40 years, 8.4% of the study population would receive a boost, resulting in a 5-year local failure of 6.1% in the study population. Changing the threshold-age to 60 years, 67% of the study population would receive a boost and the 5-year local failure would be reduced to 4.4%. CONCLUSIONS: In younger patients a boost dose resulted in a greater absolute reduction of local failure. The relative risk reduction was however similar for all ages. Applying a treatment policy with a threshold-age of 60 would result in 0.6% increase in local failure in the total study population, while sparing the boost to 1/3 of the patients.

Patients at high risk of progression after radical prostatectomy: do they all benefit from immediate post-operative irradiation? (EORTC trial 22911).

EORTC trial 22911 demonstrated that immediate postoperative irradiation significantly improved biochemical failure free survival (BPFS) compared to wait-and-see (W and S) until relapse in patients with pT2-3 tumours and pathological risk factors after radical prostatectomy. In this study, we have investigated the heterogeneity of the treatment benefit across defined subgroups of patients. Data from 972 patients were used. A risk model was developed in the W and S group and the Log-rank test for heterogeneity was applied (alpha=0.05). Positive surgical margin (SM+), seminal vesicle invasion (SV+), WHO differentiation grade, pre- and post-operative PSA were independent predictors for BPFS in the W and S group. Men with SV+ were at higher risk of relapse whereas those with SM+ but no capsule infiltration (ECE-) did not seem to differ from those with SM-ECE+ or with SM+ECE+. Postoperative irradiation improved biochemical progression-free survival in all patient groups. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the endpoint of clinical progression-free survival.

Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911).

BACKGROUND: Local failure after prostatectomy can arise in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. We did a randomised controlled trial to compare radical prostatectomy followed by immediate external irradiation with prostatectomy alone for patients with positive surgical margin or pT3 prostate cancer. METHODS: After undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy, 503 patients were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy, and 502 to immediate postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy conventional irradiation delivered over 6 weeks). Eligible patients had pN0M0 tumours and one or more pathological risk factors: capsule perforation, positive surgical margins, invasion of seminal vesicles. Our revised primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The median age was 65 years (IQR 61-69). After a median follow-up of 5 years, biochemical progression-free survival was significantly improved in the irradiated group (74.0%, 98% CI 68.7-79.3 vs 52.6%, 46.6-58.5; p<0.0001). Clinical progression-free survival was also significantly improved (p=0.0009). The cumulative rate of locoregional failure was significantly lower in the irradiated group (p<0.0001). Grade 2 or 3 late effects were significantly more frequent in the postoperative irradiation group (p=0.0005), but severe toxic toxicity (grade 3 or higher) were rare, with a 5-year rate of 2.6% in the wait-and-see group and 4.2% in the postoperative irradiation group (p=0.0726). INTERPRETATION: Immediate external irradiation after radical prostatectomy improves biochemical progression-free survival and local control in patients with positive surgical margins or pT3 prostate cancer who are at high risk of progression. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on overall survival.

Quality assurance in the EORTC phase III randomised 'boost vs. no boost' trial for breast conserving therapy: comparison of the results of two individual case reviews performed early and late during the accrual period.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of quality assurance on treatment compliance, we compared the outcome of the two individual case reviews (ICR) conducted early and late during the accrual period of a large prospective multi-centre trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At the onset of the trial, medical files of five patients from each participating centre were evaluated for the compliance to the protocol for eligibility, surgery, pathology and radiotherapy and for the quality of reporting of the data on the case report forms. In nine major centres, this procedure was repeated near the end of the trial. RESULTS: Both in the early and the late ICR, we found a very limited number of deviations from the guidelines for eligibility, staging, surgery, and pathology. Compliance to radiotherapy requirements was good with the exception of a too low minimal dose in 30% and the lack of target volume delineation in the majority of the evaluated patients. The comparison of the late with the early ICR demonstrated an improvement of the quality of data reporting by 6% and of target volume delineation from 33 to 53%. CONCLUSIONS: The initial ICR has lead to the identification of a number of parameters, which needed a clarification in the protocol. These items have been corrected and the individual institutions have been made aware of the necessary adaptations. The evaluation at the end of the trial period showed that there was an improvement but also showed that continuous monitoring is necessary, especially for institutions which have the most deviations in the first ICR.

High conformality radiotherapy in Europe: thirty-one centres participating in the quality assurance programme of the EORTC prostate trial 22991.

Today, conformality in radiotherapy is at the centre of many investments in equipment and staffing. To estimate the current situation within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conformal radiotherapy trial for prostate cancer, a technology questionnaire was designed to assess whether participating centres can comply with the required radiotherapy procedures of EORTC trial 22991, where a high dose is prescribed to the prostate. Questions covered various items of computed tomography, data acquisition, treatment planning, delivery and verification. All centres (n=31) replied to the questionnaire. All generate beam's eye views and dose volume histograms. All, but two, centres use digitally reconstructed radiographs to display images. The vast majority of the centres perform at least weekly treatment verification and half have access to individual in vivo dosimetry. The results of the questionnaire indicate that participating centres have access to the equipment and apply the procedures that are essential for conformal prostate radiotherapy. The technology questionnaire is the first step in the extensive quality assurance programme dedicated to this high-tech radiotherapy trial.

Late toxicity following conventional radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of the EORTC trial 22863.

Late toxicity and other serious adverse events (SAE) were analysed in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22863. The study evaluated the value of adjuvant endocrine treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients were randomised. There was long-term toxicity information for 377 patients (91%). Median age was 70 years (range 50-80 years). Median follow-up for late toxicity was 42 months (range 3-136 months). Toxicity was graded according to a modified Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Other late SAE, that was not classified as severe treatment toxicity, but were still life-threatening, were also assessed. There were 72 patients with grade 2, 10 patients with grade 3 and 4 patients with grade 4 toxicity. There were 20 patients with other late SAE, who were grouped according to their relationship to treatment; likely related (n = 1), unrelated (n = 7) and not assessable (n = 12). Although four treatment-related deaths (1%) occurred, grade 3 or 4 late complications were less than 5%.

The influence of the boost technique on local control in breast conserving treatment in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' randomised trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The EORTC Trial 22881/10882 investigating the role of a boost dose in breast conserving therapy demonstrated a significantly better local control rate with the higher radiotherapy dose, especially in women younger than 50 years of age. This paper investigates the potential impact of the different boost techniques on local control and on fibrosis after breast conserving therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1996, 2661 patients were randomised to receive a boost dose of 16Gy to the primary tumour bed after microscopically complete tumorectomy and 50Gy whole breast irradiation. The choice of the boost technique was left to the treating investigator. Treatment data were prospectively recorded as well as the clinical outcome in terms of local control and fibrosis. Sixty-three percent of the patients received a boost dose with fast electrons, 28% with photon beams and 9% with interstitial brachytherapy. RESULTS: At 5 years, local recurrences were seen in 74 of the 1635 patients who received an electron boost (4.8%, CI 3.6-5.9%), in 28 of the 753 patients who received a photon boost (4.0%, CI 3.4-5.5%) and in 6 of the 225 patients after an interstitial boost (2.5%, CI 0.3-4.6%). The grade of fibrosis in the whole breast as well as at the primary tumour bed, as scored by the treating radiation oncologist, was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the three groups are of a rather unequal size, the results of the interstitial boost seem similar in terms of fibrosis and at least as good in terms of local control, despite a lower treatment volume and a longer overall treatment time.

Quality assurance in the EORTC 22921 trial on preoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: evaluation of the individual case review procedure.

The aim of this study was to assess any inconsistency with the protocol guidelines for preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer among radiotherapy institutions participating in the framework of a multicentre phase-III European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trial. Twelve radiotherapy departments with more than 10% of the evaluable patients recruited in the trial, were invited to participate in this individual case review. Participating institutions were asked to send five full patient records with the chemotherapy charts, surgical and pathology reports, radiation treatment charts, treatment planning calculations, computed tomography (CT) scans, portal images and follow-up charts. The sample of the 5 patients per institution was randomly selected at the EORTC Data Center. All 12 departments participated. In 21 (35%) of the cases, a three-field technique with two lateral opposed wedge fields and a posterior field was used, while in 39 (65%) of the cases a four-field pelvic box technique was used. All participants used linear accelerators with a minimum of 6 MeV photon-beam energy. In general, the patients were eligible, documentation of clinical data was fair to good and there were no systematic major protocol deviations. The actual total dose was 44.7+/-a standard deviation (S.D.) of 4.6 Gy. Some variation was found in the fraction size. All institutions complied with the protocol in specifying the reference dose at the ICRU point. The clinical target volume (CTV) drawn on the CT scan was narrow in 7 (12%) cases, but eventually the actually treated volumes in terms of planned treatment volume (PTV) were correct. In two institutions, although the CTV was drawn correctly, the fields appeared to be narrow especially in cranio-caudal direction. Variations in treated volumes and total radiation dose were encountered in the individual case review. By providing recommendations early during the course of the trial, we expect to improve the inter-institutional consistency and to promote a high quality treatment in all of the participating institutions.

Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: We did a randomised phase III trial comparing external irradiation alone and external irradiation combined with an analogue of luteinising-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) to investigate the added value of long-term androgen suppression in locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Between 1987 and 1995, 415 patients were randomly assigned radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus immediate androgen suppression. Eligible patients had T1-2 tumours of WHO grade 3 or T3-4 N0-1 M0 tumours; the median age of participants was 71 years (range 51-80). In both treatment groups, 50 Gy radiation was delivered to the pelvis over 5 weeks, and 20 Gy over 2 weeks as a prostatic boost. Goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was started on the first day of irradiation and continued for 3 years; cyproterone acetate (150 mg orally) was given for 1 month starting 1 week before the first goserelin injection. The primary endpoint was clinical disease-free survival. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 412 patients had evaluable data, with median follow-up of 66 months (range 1-126). 5-year clinical disease-free survival was 40% (95% CI 32-48) in the radiotherapy-alone group and 74% (67-81) in the combined-treatment group (p=0.0001). 5-year overall survival was 62% (52-72) and 78% (72-84), respectively (p=0.0002) and 5-year specific survival 79% (72-86) and 94% (90-98). INTERPRETATION: Immediate androgen suppression with an LHRH analogue given during and for 3 years after external irradiation improves disease-free and overall survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Randomized trial on the efficacy of radiotherapy for cerebral low-grade glioma in the adult: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study 22845 with the Medical Research Council study BRO4: an interim analysis.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the treatment strategy for adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. The diagnosis and primary treatment are usually undertaken by surgery. Some investigators doubt the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), whereas others advise routine postoperative RT. We report the primary results of a multicenter randomized trial on this controversy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 24 European centers, 311 adult patients with low-grade glioma were randomized centrally after surgery from March 1986 through September 1997, between the two arms of the trial. The irradiated group received 54 Gy in 6 weeks. The other patients did not receive any treatment after surgery until the tumor showed progression, defined as clinical-neurologic deterioration and evidence of progressive tumor on imaging. RESULTS: Of 290 eligible and assessable patients (93%), the irradiated group showed a significant (log-rank p = 0.02) improvement in time to progression but not in overall survival, with a median follow-up of 5 years. The 5-year estimate was, respectively, 63% vs. 66% (overall survival) and 44% vs. 37% (time to progression) for the treated and control arms. Different treatment modalities, including RT, were undertaken for the 85 controls when a progressive tumor was noted. CONCLUSION: Early postoperative conventional RT such as that used for this protocol appears to improve the time to progression or progression-free survival, but not overall survival, for patients with low-grade glioma.