Genotypes, phenotypes and whole genome sequence: Approaches from the My Life Our Future haemophilia project.

INTRODUCTION: Information from the genes encoding factor VIII (F8) and IX (F9) is used in reproductive planning and to inform inhibitor formation, bleeding severity and response to therapies. Advances in technology and our understanding of the human genome now allows more comprehensive methods to study genomic variation and its impact on haemophilia. AIMS: The My Life Our Future (MLOF) programme was begun in 2012 to provide genetic analysis and to expand research in haemophilia through a research repository. METHODS: MLOF enrolled haemophilia A and B patients followed at haemophilia treatment centers in the U.S., including, since 2015, known and potential genetic carriers. Initial F8 and F9 DNA analysis was performed utilizing a next generation sequencing approach which allowed simultaneous detection of F8 inversions and other variants. Candidate variants were confirmed using a second method and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification was used to detect structural variants. RESULTS: The initial phase of MLOF completed enrollment in December 2017 with 11,356 patients, genetic carriers, and potential carriers enrolled. In the 9453 subjects in whom analysis is complete, 687 unique previously unreported variants were found. Simultaneous sequencing of the F8 and F9 genes resulted in identification of non-deleterious variants previously reported as causative in haemophilia. DNA from 5141 MLOF subjects has undergone whole genome sequencing through the NHLBI TOPMed programme of the U.S. NIH. CONCLUSION: MLOF has provided genetic information for patients and their families to help inform clinical care and has established a repository of data and biospecimens to further advance haemophilia research.

Past, present and future of haemophilia gene therapy: From vectors and transgenes to known and unknown outcomes.

Since the 1960s, the pace of innovation in haemophilia treatment has been fast and furious and occasionally with unintended consequences. As newer technologies are harnessed to better treat, and potentially cure, haemophilias A and B, an understanding of their underlying scientific principles and their benefits and risks are essential for all stakeholders. This review summarizes the starts and stops of introducing FVIII and FIX transgenes clinically, beginning 20 years ago. Lessons from earlier nonclinical and clinical experiments have been utilized to improve vector selection, vector design, promoter/enhancer cis control regions and codon-optimized transgenes to trigger in vivo clinical FVIII and FIX levels in the near-normal to normal ranges. Many known and unknown questions remain, and some, based upon benefit and risk, should be answered during larger phase 3 clinical trials. Prior clinical outcomes in haemophilia trials have not been standardized, making between-trial comparisons difficult. Going forward, haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials should utilize a standard set of core outcomes, to facilitate comparisons to other gene- and protein-based therapies. These outcomes will be more important as the field moves beyond the first-generation gene therapies into more complex vectors that may address the shortcomings of first-generation vectors and offer greater benefits to the patient.

Core outcome set for gene therapy in haemophilia: Results of the coreHEM multistakeholder project.

BACKGROUND: Gene therapy trial results show potential to cure haemophilia A and haemophilia B. Securing broad access to a cure for a lifelong chronic disease is anticipated to face barriers at the individual and healthcare system levels, which can be partly mitigated by harmonized planning of clinical research studies. The aim of the coreHEM project was to determine the set of outcome measures required to evaluate efficacy, safety, comparative effectiveness and value of gene therapy for haemophilia. METHODS: Modified Delphi consensus process, based on methods adapted from the COMET Initiative. RESULTS: Forty-nine participants (five patients, five clinicians, five researchers, four regulators, three research agencies, six health technology assessors, nine payers and 12 drug developers) took part in the study, with over 90% participation. The frequency of bleeds, factor activity level, duration of expression, chronic pain, healthcare resource use and mental health were identified as the core outcomes to be measured in addition to regulatory-mandated adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time in haemophilia, a core outcome set has been developed, with the involvement of representatives of all relevant stakeholder groups. The core set has been expanded to include outcomes supporting assessment of comparative effectiveness and value, with the goal of streamlining regulatory approval, health technology assessment and market access decisions. Patient involvement ensures that outcomes are meaningful and relevant to those living with haemophilia. Active dialogue among drug developers, regulators and payers throughout the process is expected to facilitate broad uptake of the core outcomes in forthcoming clinical trials.

First-year results of an expanded humanitarian aid programme for haemophilia in resource-constrained countries.

INTRODUCTION: The gaps in haemophilia treatment around the world are enormous; approximately 60% of an estimated 475 000 individuals are not identified. Of the 187 000 diagnosed, 30% (57 000) access clotting factor replacement therapy. Since 1996, humanitarian aid distributed by the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) has played a minor, yet vital role providing life-saving clotting factor to countries in emergency situations. Donated amounts have been small and sporadic, often salvaging short-dated products, providing little opportunity to leverage donations with governments. In 2015, a prospective donation programme of 100 million I.U. per year of extended half-life factor VIII and IX over 10 years was established, necessitating the development of new logistics and training programmes by WFH. AIM: To measure the impact of a greatly expanded haemophilia humanitarian aid program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2016, the first full year of the expanded programme, WFH, distributed products to 58 countries with factor VIII usage <1 I.U. per capita, a level incompatible with long-term survival and far below the 4 I.U. FVIII per capita minimum established in Europe. RESULTS: The scope of the programme and utilization data for 2016 indicate primarily use for acute bleeding, orthopaedic and emergency surgeries. Compared to 2014, 2016 data showed substantial increases in patients served (5.9-fold, from 2119 to 14 579), surgeries performed (37-fold) and bleeds treated (6.9-fold). Patients on prophylaxis rose from 0 to 852, including 458 children under 10 years old. DISCUSSION: The expanded humanitarian aid programme impacts an estimated 10% of individuals with haemophilia previously unable to access treatment. CONCLUSION: This programme represents an unprecedented public-private partnership to deliver medicines to individuals with no access. Further, the programme offers the prospective opportunity to engage governments to take more responsiblity for increasing training, medical management, and product supply in 58 resource constrained countries.

Treatment of bleeding episodes with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in A-LONG study subjects with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 A-LONG study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in severe haemophilia A. AIM: To describe the treatment of bleeding episodes with rFVIIIFc in the A-LONG study. METHODS: A-LONG subjects (<1 IU dL-1 endogenous FVIII) were treated with individualized prophylaxis (Arm 1), weekly prophylaxis (Arm 2) or episodic treatment (Arm 3). Information recorded for each bleeding episode included type, location and dose to treat the episode. RESULTS: During A-LONG, 757 bleeding episodes occurred during the efficacy period; the majority [456 (60%)] occurred in Arm 3 (episodic treatment). Of 93 subjects in the prophylaxis arms who entered the study with target joints, 43 (60%) in Arm 1 and 11 (52%) in Arm 2 did not experience a target joint bleed. Overall, 98% of bleeding episodes (and 98% of bleeds involving a target joint) resolved with one or two infusions; the median dose per infusion to treat a bleed was 27 IU kg-1 (27 IU kg-1 for target joints). Using population pharmacokinetic simulations, FVIII activity levels were predicted to be below the upper limit of normal (150 IU dL-1 ) in most patients in the event that rFVIIIFc is used to treat a bleeding episode in close proximity to a prophylactic dose. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the efficacy of rFVIIIFc for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes in subjects with severe haemophilia A, regardless of treatment regimen.

Changes in health-related quality of life with treatment of longer-acting clotting factors: results in the A-LONG and B-LONG clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: In haemophilia, prophylactic infusion of replacement factor can result in improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) when compared with episodic treatment. The Haemophilia-specific Quality of Life (Haem-A-QoL) questionnaire assessed HRQoL in adults with severe haemophilia A or B who received prophylactic or episodic treatment with recombinant factor VIII or IX Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc) in the A-LONG or B-LONG clinical studies. AIMS: Understand changes in HRQoL during the A-LONG and B-LONG trials. METHODS: Group-level and individual-level changes over time for the Haem-A-QoL key domains of 'Physical Health' and 'Sports & Leisure,' and 'Total Score' were evaluated in adults through baseline and 6-month HRQoL assessments. Previously determined responder definitions (RDs) were used for evaluating meaningful subject-level HRQoL improvements. RESULTS: The analysis included 67 A-LONG and 51 B-LONG subjects who completed the Haem-A-QoL (baseline and 6 months). While HRQoL improvements were observed among all treatment groups, greater improvements in HRQoL were observed among subjects who received episodic treatment pre-study (and prophylaxis on-study) compared to those who received hyphenate prophylaxis. Applying the RDs for interpreting 6-month changes, 47.4%/33.3% ('Physical Health'), 35.9%/50.0% ('Sports & Leisure') and 23.9%/33.3% ('Total Score') of A-LONG subjects who received individualized or weekly prophylaxis were classified as HRQoL responders. In B-LONG, 69.2%/57.9% ('Physical Health'), 44.4%/56.7% ('Sports & Leisure') and 41.7%/44.1% ('Total Score') of subjects who received individualized or weekly prophylaxis were classified as HRQoL responders. CONCLUSION: Changes in Haem-A-QoL key domains and 'Total Score' suggest that prophylaxis with long-acting rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc resulted in meaningful HRQoL improvements.

Long-term safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in subjects with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: The safety, efficacy and prolonged half-life of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A was demonstrated in the phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG studies. Here, we report interim safety and efficacy data from the rFVIIIFc extension study, ASPIRE (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01454739). METHODS: Eligible subjects could enrol in ASPIRE upon completing A-LONG or Kids A-LONG. There were four treatment groups: individualized prophylaxis; weekly prophylaxis; modified prophylaxis (for subjects in whom optimal treatment could not be achieved with individualized or weekly prophylaxis); and episodic treatment. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors. RESULTS: A total of 150 A-LONG subjects and 61 Kids A-LONG subjects enrolled in ASPIRE. As of the interim data cut (6 January 2014), the median time on study was 80.9 (A-LONG) and 23.9 (Kids A-LONG) weeks. The majority of subjects (A-LONG, 92.0%; Kids A-LONG, 57.4%) had ≥100 cumulative rFVIIIFc exposure days. No inhibitors were observed. Adverse events were generally consistent with those expected in the general haemophilia A population. Median annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) were low with individualized [A-LONG: 0.66; Kids A-LONG: 0.00 (<6 years old), 1.54 (6 to <12 years old)], weekly (A-LONG: 2.03) and modified (A-LONG: 1.97) prophylaxis. There was no change in prophylactic infusion frequency or total weekly prophylactic dose in the majority of subjects from A-LONG and Kids A-LONG. CONCLUSION: Interim data from ASPIRE confirm the long-term safety of rFVIIIFc and the maintenance of a low ABR with extended-interval prophylactic dosing in patients with severe haemophilia A.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in children with severe hemophilia A.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic factor replacement, which prevents hemarthroses and thereby reduces the musculoskeletal disease burden in children with hemophilia A, requires frequent intravenous infusions (three to four times weekly). OBJECTIVE: Kids A-LONG was a phase 3 open-label study evaluating the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a longer-acting factor, recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A (endogenous FVIII level of < 1 IU dL(-1) [< 1%]). METHODS: The study enrolled 71 subjects. The starting rFVIIIFc regimen was twice-weekly prophylaxis (Day 1, 25 IU kg(-1) ; Day 4, 50 IU kg(-1) ); dose (≤ 80 IU kg(-1) ) and dosing interval (≥ 2 days) were adjusted as needed. A subset of subjects had sequential pharmacokinetic evaluations of FVIII and rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and number of infusions required to control a bleed. RESULTS: No subject developed an inhibitor to rFVIIIFc. Adverse events were typical of a pediatric hemophilic population. The rFVIIIFc half-life was prolonged relative to that of FVIII, consistent with observations in adults and adolescents. The median ABR was 1.96 overall, and 0.00 for spontaneous bleeds; 46.4% of subjects reported no bleeding episodes on study. Ninety-three per cent of bleeding episodes were controlled with one to two infusions. The median average weekly rFVIIIFc prophylactic dose was 88.11 IU kg(-1) . At study end, 62 of 69 subjects (90%) were infusing twice weekly. Among subjects who had been previously receiving FVIII prophylaxis, 74% reduced their dosing frequency with rFVIIIFc. CONCLUSION: Twice-weekly infusions with rFVIIIFc were well tolerated and yielded low bleeding rates in children with severe hemophilia A.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein: extended-interval dosing maintains low bleeding rates and correlates with von Willebrand factor levels.

BACKGROUND: Routine prophylaxis with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) - the standard of care for severe hemophilia A - often requires frequent intravenous infusions (three or four times weekly). An FVIII molecule with an extended half-life could reduce infusion frequency. The A-LONG study established the safety, efficacy and prolonged pharmacokinetics of recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously treated adolescents and adults with severe hemophilia A. OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc analysis, we investigated the relationship between subjects' prestudy (FVIII) and on-study (rFVIIIFc) regimens. METHODS: We analyzed two subgroups of subjects: prior prophylaxis and on-study individualized prophylaxis (n = 80), and prior episodic treatment and on-study weekly prophylaxis (n = 16). Subjects' prestudy dosing regimens and bleeding rates were compared with their final rFVIIIFc regimens and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in the last 3 months on-study. Dosing regimen simulations based on population pharmacokinetics models for rFVIII and rFVIIIFc were performed. RESULTS: As compared with their prestudy regimen, 79 of 80 (98.8%) subjects on individualized rFVIIIFc prophylaxis decreased their infusion frequency. Overall ABRs were low, with comparable factor consumption. Longer dosing intervals, including 5-day dosing, were associated with higher baseline von Willebrand factor antigen levels. Simulated dosing regimens predicted a greater proportion of subjects with steady-state FVIII activity trough levels of ≥ 1 IU dL(-1) (1%) with rFVIIIFc than with equivalent rFVIII regimens. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients on rFVIIIFc prophylaxis can reduce their infusion frequency as compared with their prior FVIII regimen while maintaining low bleeding rates, affording more patients trough levels of ≥ 1 IU dL(-1) than with rFVIII products requiring more frequent dosing regimens.

Validation of the manufacturing process used to produce long-acting recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein.

Recombinant factor IX Fc (rFIXFc) fusion protein is the first of a new class of bioengineered long-acting factors approved for the treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in haemophilia B. The aim of this work was to describe the manufacturing process for rFIXFc, to assess product quality and to evaluate the capacity of the process to remove impurities and viruses. This manufacturing process utilized a transferable and scalable platform approach established for therapeutic antibody manufacturing and adapted for production of the rFIXFc molecule. rFIXFc was produced using a process free of human- and animal-derived raw materials and a host cell line derived from human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293H cells. The process employed multi-step purification and viral clearance processing, including use of a protein A affinity capture chromatography step, which binds to the Fc portion of the rFIXFc molecule with high affinity and specificity, and a 15 nm pore size virus removal nanofilter. Process validation studies were performed to evaluate identity, purity, activity and safety. The manufacturing process produced rFIXFc with consistent product quality and high purity. Impurity clearance validation studies demonstrated robust and reproducible removal of process-related impurities and adventitious viruses. The rFIXFc manufacturing process produces a highly pure product, free of non-human glycan structures. Validation studies demonstrate that this product is produced with consistent quality and purity. In addition, the scalability and transferability of this process are key attributes to ensure consistent and continuous supply of rFIXFc.

Comparative field study evaluating the activity of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories.

Discrepancies exist for some of the modified coagulation factors when assayed with different one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assay reagents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), currently in clinical development for the treatment of severe haemophilia A, in a variety of one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays in clinical haemostasis laboratories. Haemophilic plasma samples spiked with rFVIIIFc or Advate(®) at 0.05, 0.20 or 0.80 IU mL(-1) were tested by 30 laboratories using their routine procedures and plasma standards. Data were evaluated for intra- and inter-laboratory variation, accuracy and possible rFVIIIFc-specific assay discrepancies. For the one-stage assay, mean recovery was 95% to 100% of expected for both Advate(®) and rFVIIIFc at 0.8 IU mL(-1). Intra-laboratory percent coefficient of variance (CV) ranged from 6.3% to 7.8% for Advate(®), and 6.0% to 10.3% for rFVIIIFc. Inter-laboratory CV ranged from 10% for Advate(®) and 16% for rFVIIIFc at 0.8 IU mL(-1), to over 30% at 0.05 IU mL(-1) for both products. For the chromogenic substrate assay, the average FVIII recovery was 107% ± 5% and 124% ± 8% of label potency across the three concentrations of Advate(®) and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Plasma rFVIIIFc levels can be monitored by either the one-stage or the chromogenic substrate assay routinely performed in clinical laboratories without the need for a product-specific rFVIIIFc laboratory standard. Accuracy by the one-stage assay was comparable to that of Advate(®), while marginally higher results may be observed for rFVIIIFc when using the chromogenic assay.

Biochemical and functional characterization of a recombinant monomeric factor VIII-Fc fusion protein.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A results from a deficiency in factor VIII activity. Current treatment regimens require frequent dosing, owing to the short half-life of FVIII. A recombinant FVIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) was molecularly engineered to increase the half-life of FVIII, by 1.5-2-fold, in several preclinical animal models and humans. OBJECTIVE: To perform a biochemical and functional in vitro characterization of rFVIIIFc, with existing FVIII products as comparators. METHODS: rFVIIIFc was examined by utilizing a series of structural and analytic assays, including mass spectrometry following lysyl endopeptidase or thrombin digestion. rFVIIIFc activity was determined in both one-stage clotting (activated partial thromboplastin time) and chromogenic activity assays, in the context of the FXase complex with purified components, and in both in vitro and ex vivo rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) assays performed in whole blood. RESULTS: rFVIIIFc contained the predicted primary structure and post-translational modifications, with an FVIII moiety that was similar to other recombinant FVIII products. The von Willebrand factor-binding and specific activity of rFVIIIFc were also found to be similar to those of other recombinant FVIII molecules. Both chromogenic and one-stage assays of rFVIIIFc gave similar results. Ex vivo ROTEM studies demonstrated that circulating rFVIIIFc activity was prolonged in mice with hemophilia A in comparison with B-domain-deleted or full-length FVIII. Clot parameters at early time points were similar to those for FVIII, whereas rFVIIIFc showed prolonged improvement of clot formation. CONCLUSIONS: rFVIIIFc maintains normal FVIII interactions with other proteins necessary for its activity, with prolonged in vivo activity, owing to fusion with the Fc region of IgG(1) .

Gene therapy, bioengineered clotting factors and novel technologies for hemophilia treatment.

The World Federation of Hemophilia estimates that of the 400,000 individuals worldwide with hemophilia, 300,000 receive either no, or very sporadic, treatment. Thus, considerable innovation will be required to provide cost-effective therapies/cures for all affected individuals. The high cost of prophylactic regimens hampers their widespread use, which further justifies the search for novel cost-effective therapies and ultimately a cure. Five gene transfer phase I clinical trials have been conducted using either direct in vivo gene delivery with viral vectors or ex vivo plasmid transfections and reimplantation of gene-engineered cells. Although there was evidence of gene transfer and therapeutic effects in some of these trials, stable expression of therapeutic factor VIII or FIX levels has not yet been obtained. Further improvements of the vectors and a better understanding of the immune consequences of gene transfer is warranted, as new trials are being initiated. Bioengineered clotting factors with increased stability and/or activity are being validated further in preclinical studies. Novel clotting factor formulations based on PEGylated liposomes with prolonged activities are being tested in the clinic, and are yielding encouraging results.

What is a cure and how do we get there?

The absence of adequate treatment for most of the world's 400 000 individuals with haemophilia makes the development of a cure compelling. Advances in the basic molecular sciences over the past 20 years have resulted in the feasibility of curing haemophilia through the application of gene therapy. However, the reality of this therapeutic strategy is highly complex. In addition, challenges to achieving a cure exist beyond the basic scientific hurdles. Thoughtful attention must also be given to a number of interrelated issues, including ethical considerations in patient recruitment, informed consent and geographical variables of global clinical trials. The global inequalities in healthcare mean that the ethics of international medical research, especially when it includes countries where people usually do not receive quality care, become much more complicated. The majority of haemophiliacs lives in developing countries and is a valuable resource of human subjects who could be enrolled in clinical trials. When recruiting subjects globally, investigators must be ever mindful that the patient population is a precious resource, which must be treated with respect and care. This presents a major challenge for investigators engaged in trials of haemophilia gene therapy to ensure that the informed consent process is current and comprehensive, that therapeutic misconceptions are appropriately managed, and that the roles of the researcher and physician are clear. Global clinical gene-therapy trials are an important and appropriate component in the quest to achieve a cure for haemophilia. When trials follow identical internationally accepted standards, a successful outcome can be achieved for trials including developing countries, if country specific cultural and economic aspects are considered.

Gene therapy: reality or myth for the global bleeding disorders community?

In recent years, five different human gene therapy clinical studies have been initiated in the United States, covering a broad spectrum of gene transfer technologies. Both in vivo and ex vivo studies have been performed, and a variety of target organs/tissues have been studied. The results of this early human clinical research indicate that there is still much to be done before a safe and effective gene therapy procedure becomes commercially available, but there is strong evidence that the obstacles that remain will not prove insurmountable. Small increases in circulating clotting factor levels have been achieved in some patients without significant side-effects, providing proof of the principle that gene therapy can provide a therapeutic benefit for patients with haemophilia. Still unclear is whether gene therapy, when it becomes available, will be accessible to the global haemophilia community. As seen with recombinant and other high purity factor concentrates, technological advances do not always lead to improvements in care for the majority of the world's haemophilia patients. In fact, advances in technology can potentially increase the gulf in care if newer processes displace existing manufacturing technologies. A modified vaccine production model should be considered to make gene therapy more widely available to those who presently have inadequate access to treatment.

Matrix immobilization enhances the tissue repair activity of growth factor gene therapy vectors.

Although growth factor proteins display potent tissue repair activities, difficulty in sustaining localized therapeutic concentrations limits their therapeutic activity. We reasoned that enhanced histogenesis might be achieved by combining growth factor genes with biocompatible matrices capable of immobilizing vectors at delivery sites. When delivered to subcutaneously implanted sponges, a platelet-derived growth factor B-encoding adenovirus (AdPDGF-B) formulated in a collagen matrix enhanced granulation tissue deposition 3- to 4-fold (p < or = 0.0002), whereas vectors encoding fibroblast growth factor 2 or vascular endothelial growth factor promoted primarily angiogenic responses. By day 8 posttreatment of ischemic excisional wounds, collagen-formulated AdPDGF-B enhanced granulation tissue and epithelial areas up to 13- and 6-fold (p < 0.009), respectively, and wound closure up to 2-fold (p < 0.05). At longer times, complete healing without excessive scar formation was achieved. Collagen matrices were shown to retain both vector and transgene products within delivery sites, enabling the transduction and stimulation of infiltrating repair cells. Quantitative PCR and RT-PCR demonstrated both vector DNA and transgene mRNA within wound beds as late as 28 days posttreatment. By contrast, aqueous formulations allowed vector seepage from application sites, leading to PDGF-induced hyperplasia in surrounding tissues but not wound beds. Finally, repeated applications of PDGF-BB protein were required for neotissue induction approaching equivalence to a single application of collagen-immobilized AdPDGF-B, confirming the utility of this gene transfer approach. Overall, these studies demonstrate that immobilizing matrices enable the controlled delivery and activity of tissue promoting genes for the effective regeneration of injured tissues.

Uptake of adenoviral vectors via fibroblast growth factor receptors involves intracellular pathways that differ from the targeting ligand.

Target-specific delivery of adenoviral gene therapy vectors has been achieved by introducing basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) onto viral capsids. FGF2-retargeted vectors enter the cell through high-affinity FGF receptors while normal adenoviral receptor interactions are ablated. In addition, FGF2-mediated targeting permits a higher level of transgene expression and in vivo efficacy. We now present studies on the intracellular pathways and mechanisms of transduction by FGF2-retargeted adenovirus. FGF2 retargeting results in increased virion entry. Nuclear delivery is also increased, but to a level that is directly proportional to virion entry. In addition, after entry, the retargeted particle rapidly localizes to the nucleus in a time frame similar to that of adenovirus alone. Transgene expression is always enhanced with FGF2-mediated delivery, whether overall transduction of the population is increased, equivalent, or decreased relative to nontargeted adenoviral vectors. However, the increase in transgene expression does not correlate quantitatively with enhanced cellular entry, indicating that other factors may influence transgene expression levels. The increase in transgene expression occurs only when the FGF2-retargeting moiety is physically complexed with the adenoviral vector, indicating a requirement for a spatial link between the ligand and the virus particle. The FGF2-adenoviral complex activates the FGF receptor-mediated proliferative signaling cascade, but this signal transduction is not required for the enhanced level of gene expression observed after FGF2-mediated delivery. These findings emphasize that, in addition to altering receptor tropism, the influence of FGF2 retargeting extends to intracellular adenoviral trafficking pathways. Although the increased delivery of virions into the cell and nucleus contributes to the enhanced transgene expression observed with FGF2 retargeting, other as yet undefined cellular mechanisms also contribute to this process.