Differences in Tertiary Glaucoma Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Importance: Glaucoma is a common cause of visual impairment in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, but to our knowledge, no data exist concerning tertiary glaucoma care (ie, laser and filtering surgery). Objective: To determine whether the rate of tertiary glaucoma care differs among veterans cared for through the 4 different eye care delivery models that are present in the VA: optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, clinics with optometry and ophthalmology functioning as a single integrated clinic with ophthalmology as the lead, and clinics with optometry and ophthalmology functioning as separate clinics. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective review of the Veterans Health Administration Support Service Center database, 490 926 veterans with a glaucoma-related diagnosis received care from 136 VA medical centers during fiscal year 2016. Demographic and baseline clinical factors, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes, and the rates of glaucoma surgery procedures were extracted from the database. The organizational structure of each VA eye clinic was obtained. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed for log percent for laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), and filtering surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of LPI, LTP, and filtering surgery. Results: Of the 490 926 veterans with a glaucoma-related diagnosis, 465 842 (94.9%) were male, 309 677 (63.1%) were white, and 203 243 (41.4%) were aged 65 to 74 years. The rate of LPI was 0.30%, 0.28%, 0.67%, and 0.69% in optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). The rate of LTP was 0.31%, 1.06%, 0.93%, and 0.92% in care delivery models that included optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). The rate of filtering surgery was 0.32%, 0.51%, 0.69%, and 0.60% in optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate regression analyses showed that these differences remained significantly different even after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions and Relevance: Disparities exist in the use of tertiary glaucoma services within the VA, and different care delivery models may play a role. Outcomes of glaucoma care for the different models of eye care delivery were not analyzed in this study.