Renal involvement in sarcoidosis: histological patterns and prognosis, an Italian survey.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatous interstitial nephritis in sarcoidosis (sGIN) is generally clinically silent, but in <1% causes acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This Italian multicentric retrospective study included 39 sarcoidosis-patients with renal involvement at renal biopsy: 31 sGIN-AKI, 5 with other patterns (No-sGIN-AKI), 3 with nephrotic proteinuria. We investigate the predictive value of clinical features, laboratory, radiological parameters and histological patterns regarding steroid response. Primary endpoint: incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) beyond the 1°follow-up (FU) year; secondary endpoint: response at 1°line steroid therapy; combined endpoint: the association of initial steroid response and outcome at the end of FU. RESULTS: Complete recovery in all 5 No-sGIN-AKI-patients, only in 45% (13/29) sGIN-AKI-patients (p=0.046) (one lost in follow-up, for another not available renal function after steroids). Nobody had not response. Primary endpoint of 22 sGIN-AKI subjects: 65% (13/20) starting with normal renal function developed CKD (2/22 had basal CKD; median FU 77 months, 15-300). Combined endpoint: 29% (6/21) had complete recovery and final normal renal function (one with renal relapse), 48% (10/21) had partial recovery and final CKD (3 with renal relapse, of whom one with basal CKD) (p=0.024). Acute onset and hypercalcaemia were associated to milder AKI and better recovery than subacute onset and patients without hypercalcaemia, women had better endpoints than men. Giant cells, severe interstitial infiltrate and interstitial fibrosis seemed negative predictors in terms of endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: sGIN-AKI-patients with no complete recovery at 1°line steroid should be treated with other immunosuppressive to avoid CKD, in particular if males with subacute onset and III stage-not hypercalcaemic AKI.

[Acute pielonephritis and renal abscesses in Piedmont and Aosta Valley]. / Indagine sulla pielonefrite acuta e sugli ascessi renali in Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta.

The Piedmont Group of Clinical Nephrology compared the activity of 18 nephrology centers in Piedmont and Aosta Valley as regards acute pielonephritis (APN). Data from more than 500 cases per year of APN were examined. The microbial spectrum of APN consists mainly of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Diagnosis was based on both clinical and radiological criteria in most of the centers (computed tomography-CT o Magnetic Resonance Imaging-MRI). In four centers diagnosis was made with the radiological criteria and in one center only with the clinical features. CT and MRI were performed in about 47% and 44% of cases respectively. Urine culture was positive in 22 up to 100% of cases. The most commonly used antibiotics were fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin) and ceftriaxone (50% of centers) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (25% of centers). In 75% of the centers, patients received a combination of two antibiotics (aminoglycoside in 22% of them ). In 72% of the centers, almost 50% of the patients were re-examined, while 38.8% of centers re-examined all the patients. Renal ultrasound was inappropriate to identify abscesses. The mean of patients in whom renal abscesses were detected by CT or MRI was 18.2%. The analysis shows a high variability in the way of diagnosing and treating APN in Piedmont and Aosta Valley regions. This suggests that even if APN is a frequent pathological condition, practical recommendations are required.

[Renal biopsy practice in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta]. / Indagine sulle modalità di esecuzione delle biopsia renale in Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta.

In 2010 a questionnaire was administered to the renal units of Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta to analyze their procedures for renal biopsy (RB). Seventy-eight percent of units performed RBs, 57% for more than 20 years, but only 43% performed at least 20 BRs per year. 20/21 units performed RB in an inpatient setting and 1/21 in day hospital with the patient remaining under observation the night after. Thirty-two percent did not consider a single kidney as a contraindication to RB, 59% considered it a relative contraindication and 9% considered it an absolute contraindication. In 90.5% of units there was a specific protocol for patient preparation for RB and 86% used a specific informed consent form. Ninety-five percent of units performed ultrasound-guided RB, 60% of them using needle guides attached to the probe. In 81% of units the left side was preferred; 71% put a pillow under the patient's abdomen. All units used disposable, automated or semi-automated needles. Needle size was 16G in 29%, 18G in 58%, and both 16G and 18G in 14% of units; 1 to 3 samples were drawn. One third of units had a microscope available for immediate evaluation of specimen adequacy. After RB, 86% of units kept patients in the prone position for 2-6 hours and all prescribed a period of bed rest (at least 24 hours in 90.5%). 90.5% of units followed a specific postbiopsy observation protocol consisting of blood pressure, heart rate and red blood cell measurements at different times, and urine monitoring and ultrasound control within 12-24 hours (only half of them also employing color Doppler). One third of all units discharged patients after 1 day and two thirds after 2-3 days; all prescribed abstention from effort and from antiplatelet drugs for 7-15 days. In 9 units both RB and tissue processing and examination were done in the same hospital, while 12 units sent the samples elsewhere. 76% obtained results in 2-4 days, 19% in 6-7 days, and 5% in 10-15 days. Less than 20% of the interviewed operators were fully familiar with the clauses of hospital insurance securing their activity. Use of RB is widespread in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta but its practice shows variation between centers.