Clinical Audit to Assess Orthogeriatrician Input to the Management of Elderly Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to assess the adherence of our department to the British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for "the care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" and the results of this adherence on clinical patient outcome measures. METHODS: This was a clinical audit. All ≥65-year-olds admitted to the orthopaedic department with a fragility fracture between 8 September 2022 and 8 March 2023 with a length of stay (LOS) of >72 hours were included. Patients were stratified into hip fracture (HF) and non-hip fracture (NHF) patients. A further similar cohort of NHF admissions between 8 March and 8 May 2023 was added to the data. The adherence of both cohorts to the national guidelines was recorded. Primary outcome measures of each cohort were recorded such as LOS and patient mortality. RESULTS: Data from 70 patients was collected. HF patients adhered to the guideline 79.4% of the time (31/39 patients) compared to NHF patients at only 19.3% of the time (6/31 patients) (p<0.001). Further, on average, HF patients were seen by an orthogeriatrician 15 times compared to just five times for NHF patients during their hospital stay (p<0.001). No significant difference in LOS or in mortality at 30 days post-admission was observed. CONCLUSION: Medical orthogeriatric care is unequal despite similar LOS and mortality between both cohorts; thus, increasing orthogeriatrician input in NHF patients may lead to better patient outcomes for these patients.

Embracing Digital Transformation: A Three-Cycle Audit on Improving Intraoperative Tourniquet Documentation Following BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma) Guidelines.

Introduction Tourniquets are vital devices in orthopaedic surgery that aid in creating a bloodless field. While they reduce operative time and outcomes, improper use can lead to severe complications. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) offers guidelines for safe intraoperative tourniquet usage, emphasising proper application and accurate documentation. With the push for a paperless National Health Service (NHS), orthopaedic units across the UK are transitioning to electronic patient records (EPR). In this audit, we aim to evaluate the impact of electronic patient records (EPR) implementation on tourniquet documentation and subsequent interventions to enhance guideline adherence. Methods This closed-loop audit evaluated 159 emergency trauma cases at a single UK-based district general hospital across three different cycles. The first cycle (n=50) was collected before the trust-wide adoption of an EPR system (EPIC HIVE). Upon collecting the second cycle (n=59), local intraoperative tourniquet usage results compared to BOAST were presented at a departmental audit meeting. A specialised smart phrase template was subsequently shared with the department and the results were re-audited in the third cycle (n=50). Statistical analyses were performed to compare the cycles. Results Following the introduction of the EPR, compliance with documentation standards (fully and partially adhered to) initially declined from 38.0% to 17.0%. Post-intervention, compliance increased to 62.0% (p=0.0005). Individual aspects of documentation revealed notable improvements, including increases in skin assessment pre- and post-tourniquet application (0% to 56% and 0% to 60%, respectively, p<0.0001), isolation method (0% to 60%, p<0.0001), exsanguination method (2% to 24%, p=0.0003), tourniquet pressure (39% to 76%, p=0.0001) and tourniquet time (59% to 94%, p=0.0001). Lower limb tourniquet pressures significantly decreased between audit cycles (mean: 287.06 vs mean: 265.91, p=0.007) while upper limb pressures remained relatively stable (mean: 236.67 vs mean: 236.56, p=0.993). No tourniquet-related complications were reported across all audit cycles. Conclusion While the introduction of new EPR systems may initially present challenges in upholding accurate operative records, the incorporation of specialised electronic templates and active staff engagement has shown to be instrumental in improving tourniquet safety and enhancing care standards.

Impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery into clinical practice for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures.

Background: Given the novelty of three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted fracture surgery in orthopaedics, surgeon familiarity is limited and learning curve is high. As such, it is unclear how the introduction of 3D printing into clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery would impact perioperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery on perioperative outcomes for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures. Methods: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures from 2018 to 2022 at a single tertiary hospital. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups: (1) 3D printing-assisted surgery and (2) conventional surgery. Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes of total surgical duration, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, number fluoroscopy images, fluoroscopy duration and postoperative disposition were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: In total, 26 patients were included in the present study, with 3D printing-assisted surgery being used in 34.6 % (n = 9) of cases. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or fracture type between the 3D printing group and conventional group. As compared to patients who underwent conventional surgery, those that underwent 3D printing-assisted surgery had, on average, shorter surgical duration (299.8 ± 88.2 vs 309.1 ± 143.1 min), lesser estimated blood loss (706.3 ± 330.0 vs 800.0 ± 584.2 ml), lower transfusion rates (50.0 % vs 52.9 %), lower number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images (62.8 ± 74.5 vs 71.6 ± 47.9 images) and shorter fluoroscopy duration (235.0 ± 79.2 vs 242.3 ± 83.5 min), although statistical significance was not achieved. None of the patients in the present study developed surgical complications postoperatively. Conclusion: The introduction of 3D printing-assisted surgery in clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fractures is a safe and viable adjunct in pelvic and acetabular surgery, achieving comparable perioperative outcomes in the initial phase.

A Rare Case of Hallux Saltans Treated using Ultrasound-guided Intralesional Steroid Injection: A Case Report.

Introduction: Stenosing tenosynovitis is a condition characterized by the inflammation and constriction of the tendons within a fibro-osseous tunnel. Case Report: We present a case of a 38-year-old man who presented with hallux saltans, a rare manifestation of this condition which was successfully treated with intralesional steroid injection. The patient experienced significant relief from pain and improved function following the procedure. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering stenosing tenosynovitis as a potential cause of hallux saltans and the efficacy of non-surgical interventions in its management.

An Augmented Vision of Our Medical and Surgical Future, Today?

Incorporating consumer electronics into the operating room, we evaluated the Apple Vision Pro (AVP) during limb preservation surgeries, just as we evaluated Google Glass and FaceTime more than a decade ago. Although AVP's real-time mixed-reality data overlay and controls offer potential enhancements to surgical precision and team communication, our assessment recognized limitations in adapting consumer technology to clinical environments. The initial use facilitated intraoperative decision-making and educational interactions with trainees. The current mixed-reality pass-through resolution allows for input but not for highly dexterous surgical interactions. These early observations indicate that while AVP may soon improve aspects of surgical performance and education, further iteration, evaluation, and experience are needed to fully understand its impact on patient outcomes and to refine its integration into clinical practice.

The Efficacy of Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs) and the Impact of Physician Risk Appetite on Discharge Rates.

Background and objectives Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) allow the triage of emergency department referrals to identify those requiring further care and those that are suitable for discharge. Appropriate discharge from VFC benefits the patient and the healthcare provider by avoiding unnecessary face-to-face appointments. This study investigates factors associated with VFC discharge rates at our hospital and detects potential areas for improvement. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted on 4819 consecutive VFC referrals between March 17, 2021, and March 16, 2022, from a single hospital. Patient demographics, referral outcomes, and triaging consultant data were collected. Sixteen consultants conducted daily VFCs during the study period. Eleven consultants completed the DOSPERT psychometric test to measure their attitude toward risk. The data was analysed using Spearman's rho and Chi-square tests. Results The mean discharge from VFC was 35.4% (29.6-41.0%). The highest rates of discharge were for back pain (100%), followed by fractures of the pubic ramus (100%), the base of the fifth metatarsal (86.89%), the acetabulum (75%), and the proximal radius (73.03%). Consultant experience was significantly negatively correlated with discharge rate (p<0.05). The frequency of conducting a VFC was not associated with the discharge rate (p=0.758). In subspecialty analysis, 90% of lower limb consultants discharged more lower limb presentations from VFC, compared with upper limb consultants (p=0.001). There was no significant correlation between DOSPERT scores and discharge rates (p=0.65). Conclusions VFC remains an important tool for patient care. Consultant experience is associated with a more cautious approach to discharge; however, there was no relationship between a consultant's risk attitude and their VFC discharge rate in this study. Lower-limb consultants appear to discharge lower-limb injuries more readily when compared with their upper-limb colleagues. These insights could be used to improve emergency department and VFC efficiency.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Adult Foot and Ankle Fractures Presenting to the Largest Trust in the United Kingdom.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic induced unprecedented changes in medical practices, prompting a reassessment of their impact on adult foot and ankle fractures within the National Health Service (NHS). This study employs a retrospective observational approach, leveraging the Pathpoint™ eTrauma platform for a comprehensive analysis of prospectively collected data. Methods Data encompassing weekly fracture incidence, weekly surgical procedures, patient demographics, and mean wait time from injury presentation to surgery were systematically evaluated. The study population included all adults (18+) admitted during five distinct periods: pre-pandemic, national lockdown 1, post-lockdown, national lockdown 2, and national lockdown 3. Results An analysis of 434 foot and ankle fractures revealed that national lockdown 1 exhibited the lowest fracture incidence (4.97 per week) and surgeries performed (4.77 per week), reflecting a notable reduction in trauma cases and elective procedures. Conversely, post-lockdown displayed the highest fracture incidence (7.46 per week) and surgeries performed (6.31 per week), suggesting a resurgence in both trauma and elective surgical activities. The pre-pandemic cohort, characterized by the highest mean age (51.98 years) and mean wait time (8.74 days), served as a temporal baseline. Conclusion While the incidence of fractures decreased during all three national lockdowns compared to pre-pandemic or post-lockdown periods, a gradual increase was observed in subsequent lockdowns. Notably, mean wait times showed a significant reduction, reaching the lowest point (5.79 days) during national lockdown 3. These findings underscore the complex interplay between pandemic-related disruptions, evolving guidelines, and adaptive measures within the healthcare system, influencing the dynamics of foot and ankle fracture management.

Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome: Can the Presence of an Orthopaedic Doctor in the Emergency Department Reduce Waiting Times for MRI Scans and Inpatient Stays?

Introduction Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a very rare but devastating surgical emergency that can lead to permanent bowel, bladder or sexual dysfunction and lower limb paralysis. Although it is a clinical syndrome, an MRI scan is a critical diagnostic investigation for these patients and should be done as soon as possible. Our hospital is a district general hospital with no spinal services on site. There is a protocol in place for the management of these patients locally with MRI scanning during daytime hours. However, if the patient presents after 8 pm, they are discussed with the tertiary spinal centre, which then advises if the patient requires transfer overnight for urgent scanning. Considering an MRI scan is a critical diagnostic step for these patients, we introduced a role for an orthopaedic doctor in the Emergency Department (ED) to assess all of these patients before collecting data for the second cycle. The aim of this audit was to see the effect of having an orthopaedic doctor in the ED for the assessment of these patients and its impact on waiting times and admission rates. Methods A closed-loop audit cycle was done looking into all referrals to trauma and orthopaedics with acute back pain and suspected CES in a district general hospital with no spinal services on site. The first cycle was between September 30, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and included 93 patients in total. Following this, a role for an orthopaedic doctor in ED was introduced from December 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022, for assessment of these patients. Data was then collected retrospectively for all patients referred during this period (n=36). Data was extracted from all relevant clinical systems including electronic patient record (EPR), Patient Pass (Patient Pass Ltd, Greater Manchester, England), which is the system used to digitally communicate with regional spinal services, and PACS (picture archiving and communication systems). The data was collated on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washinton, United States) and analysed. Results Data were collected for a total of 36 patients in the second cycle following the introduction of an orthopaedic doctor in the ED. The age of patients referred was 30-89 years with a mean age of 51; 44.4% were male (n=16) and 55.5% female (n=20). All the patients who were referred received their MRI scan and report within 24 hours of presentation to the ED. In the first cycle of the audit, the mean waiting time for an MRI scan had been 12.5 hours, which was reduced to eight hours following the introduction of an orthopaedic doctor in the ED during daytime hours. This was stratified further according to the time patients presented to the hospital. From 8 am to 4 pm, the mean waiting time for an MRI scan was 9.5 hours pre-intervention and 5.5 hours after. From 4 pm to 12 am, the mean waiting time was 18 hours before and 13 hours after, and from 12 am to 8 am, the waiting time for scans improved from 8.5 hours to 6.5 hours. The number of patients discharged on the same day greatly improved from 29% (n=27) in the initial study to 58% (n=21). This decreased unnecessary inpatient stays from 71% (n=66) to 42% (n=15). Conclusion This study showed that an orthopaedic doctor in the ED for the acute assessment of patients referred with possible CES is an effective way of improving their management. This decreases waiting times for MRI scans and therefore allows the patient to be managed more efficiently.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Neck of Femur Fracture Service in a Tertiary Care Hospital in the United Kingdom.

Introduction The emergence of the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in late 2019 ushered in a global crisis that profoundly impacted healthcare systems worldwide. In the United Kingdom, COVID-19 resulted in a significant toll on public health and the National Health Service (NHS). As the virus surged, the NHS faced unprecedented challenges, including surges in COVID-19 cases, a dire need for medical equipment, and a strain on intensive care units. Simultaneously, stringent nationwide lockdowns were imposed to curb the virus's spread, disrupting daily life and healthcare access. Amid this crisis, the interactions between COVID-19 and other prevalent health conditions came to the forefront of medical research, sparking interest in understanding their connections. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between COVID-19 and neck of femur (NoF) fractures, exploring shared risk factors, resource implications, and potential alterations in patient pathways. Given the severity of both conditions and their impact on the vulnerable elderly population, elucidating these connections is crucial for comprehensive patient care and resource allocation within the healthcare system. Methods This study used data from the National Hip Fracture Audit (NHFA) database, focusing on NoF fracture patients at Wythenshawe Hospital. We examined two cohorts: pre-pandemic (from March 2019 to March 2020) and pandemic (from March 2020 to March 2021). We compared key parameters and incorporated COVID-19 data. Graphs showed trends and cohort similarities. We also analyzed demographic data (age, gender, fracture type, times, COVID-19 status, and mortality), removing outliers for accuracy. Results The data revealed that while certain factors such as patient age and mobilization remained largely unaffected, there was a modest association between COVID-19 incidence and NoF fracture patients. Notably, regional lockdown measures had a substantial impact on patient care. The initial lockdown effectively reduced COVID-19-positive cases upon admission but led to prolonged intervals and surgical delays. However, the second lockdown showed improvements, attributed to lessons learned, increased resource allocation, and better familiarity with hospital-specific lockdown measures. This research sheds light on the intricate relationship between a global pandemic and orthopedic patient care, highlighting the importance of adapting healthcare systems to evolving challenges. Conclusion This study explores the impact of COVID-19 on neck of femur (NoF) fracture patients, highlighting key findings from Wythenshawe Hospital. It uncovers a dynamic relationship between the pandemic and patient care, with increased COVID-19 cases coinciding with reduced NoF fracture rates. Lockdowns influenced outcomes, with the first causing delays and higher post-discharge mortality, while the second improved efficiency and safety. These insights extend beyond Wythenshawe Hospital, offering implications for healthcare practices in the United Kingdom and beyond, especially in countries with limited vaccination resources. This research underscores the need for tailored strategies to optimize NoF fracture patient outcomes during pandemics and lockdowns.

Enhancing Consistency in Posterior Malleolus Fracture Classification: A Comprehensive Interobserver Reliability Study With 20 Raters Using the Mason & Molloy Classification.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, there has been a growing interest in the identification and treatment of posterior malleolus fragments, driven by a better understanding of their significance. The Mason & Molloy (M&M) classification system has emerged as a valuable tool for systematically categorizing these fractures and assisting clinicians in formulating treatment. We aim to assess the interobserver reliability of the M&M classification for posterior malleolus fracture by using 20 raters. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted at a major foot and ankle referral center in Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK. Thirty-eight Computed Tomography (CT) scans were evaluated by 20 independent raters: 15 general orthopedic and trauma surgeons plus five foot and ankle surgeons. Each rater classified the posterior malleolus fracture according to M&M classification into type 1, 2A, 2B, 3, or not classifiable. Statistical analysis was done with the R software package and SPSS (v26; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was applied. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement was moderate with a global κ value of 0.531 (95% CI: 0.518, 0.544). There were good agreements for identifying type 3 M&M (κ=0.785) and those that are not applicable for M&M classification (κ=0.785). There was a strong correlation between all raters in using M&M classification (Tb=0.53-0.59) except for Rater 12. CONCLUSION: M&M classification remains a valuable tool to guide the management of patients with these subsets of ankle fractures.

Foreign Body Reaction Following Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With the Ligament Advanced Reconstructive System: Patient Outcomes and Clinical Course.

The Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) is a common choice for ligament reconstruction in the lower limb due to its good functional and quality of life (QoL)-related outcomes. It is commonly used for Achilles tendon repair following a rupture. While it facilitates tissue ingrowth and boasts good biocompatibility, we report on multiple cases whereby foreign body reactions have led to the growth of granulomas requiring surgical excision and Flexor Hallucis Longus (FHL) transfer. Following these cases, patients have been shown to have excellent functional and QoL-related outcomes using the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Surgeons should consider FHL transfer as an alternative in patients undergoing Achilles tendon repair and be aware of the risk of foreign body reactions and the impact on ankle function and QoL post-operatively.

Brace for Impact: A Retrospective Analysis of the Modified Broström-Gould Procedure With and Without Internal Brace Augmentation.

Background Chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) is caused by lateral ankle ligament weakness or rupture secondary to recurrent sprains. The surgical management has traditionally involved a modified Broström-Gould (MBG) procedure with or without internal brace (IB) augmentation. This study aims to demonstrate the improved outcomes for patients undergoing an MBG procedure with IB augmentation for CLAI. Methodology A retrospective analysis was performed among 40 patients undergoing an MBG procedure with or without IB for CLAI at a large teaching hospital between January 2012 and June 2019. Functional outcomes were measured using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ). Clinic letters were reviewed to assess additional outcomes including postoperative complications, revision surgery rate, time in a plaster cast, and time to full weight-bearing. Results A total of 23 patients were included in the study, with seven undergoing both MBG and IB procedures and 16 undergoing MBG intervention alone. The average age was 37.1 years in the IB group and 35.7 years in the MBG group. The mean MOxFQ overall raw scores (10.9 vs. 33.6, p < 0.016), standing and walking MOxFQ subscale (4 vs. 15.2, p < 0.012), pain MOxFQ subscale (4.86 vs. 10.9, p < 0.042), and social interaction subscale (2 vs. 7.5 p < 0.023) all showed significantly better results for the IB group versus the MBG group. Patients in the IB group had significantly less number of weeks in plaster than the MBG group and were able to fully weight bear sooner (4.14 vs. 6, p < 0.01). The MBG group suffered a postoperative complication in seven patients compared to zero in the IB group (p < 0.057). There were three re-ruptures in the MBG group requiring further revision surgery compared to zero in the IB group (3 vs. 0, p < 0.53). Conclusions MBG surgery with IB augmentation for CLAI appears to have better outcomes in terms of overall function and may have fewer overall complications. The IB group displayed a lower recurrence of pain, less time in a plaster cast, and a quicker return to walking.

Socioeconomic Deprivation as a Predictor of Lower Limb Amputation in Diabetic Foot Disease.

Objective The prevalence of diabetes and its complications are on the rise worldwide. This is particularly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a measure of relative social deprivation. This index classifies England into small subsets called lower layer super output areas (LSOAs) and then ranks these LSOAs into deciles from the most deprived to the least deprived area. We used this to analyse the relationship between deprivation and outcomes in diabetic foot disease (DFD). Methods We evaluated patients admitted to our multidisciplinary unit with DFD over a five-year period. Their postal codes were used to classify these patients into IMD deciles with decile 1 representing the 10% of most deprived LSOAs and decile 10 the least deprived areas in the country. We used this classification to analyse the relationship between deprivation and its influence on surgical outcomes and lower limb amputation. We specifically compared those falling in the top five against the bottom five deciles. Results Our cohort consisted of 70 patients with diabetes who had surgery on their diabetic foot. Of this cohort, 33 (47%) of these underwent amputation. The majority of these procedures were minor amputations conducted on the forefoot (75.6%) and there were no below knee amputations. Of those requiring an amputation, 27 patients (81.8%) had an IMD decile of 5 or below, and only six (18.2%) patients had above 5. Conclusion Our study shows that the likelihood of amputations related to diabetic foot disease is inversely proportional to the index of multiple deprivation.

Can a Fully Electronic Patient Record-Based Virtual Fracture Clinic Increase Compliance With British Orthopaedic Association Guidelines for the Assessment of Acute Orthopaedic Trauma Patients?

Introduction There is clear guidance for the follow-up of acute orthopaedic trauma patients within 72 hours of presentation as per British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) model has been adopted nationwide to increase compliance with these guidelines. Traditionally our VFC was paper-based, but recently it has been made completely electronic with the introduction of Hive which is a comprehensive electronic patient record (EPR). The aim of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Hive VFC and to see the impact it has on improving the patient experience. Methods Data was collected retrospectively by looking at referrals to the Hive VFC across a seven-month period from its date of introduction. No patients were excluded and data was collected for 2,158 patients. Patient demographics, referral details, and outcomes were recorded on a Microsoft Excel version 16.0 for Windows spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States). Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results Data was collected for 2,158 patients between September 9, 2022, and March 31, 2023, in the Hive VFC. The largest proportion of injuries was found in the foot and ankle region with 32% of referrals (n=688), followed by hand and wrist with 30% (n=651), upper limb with 28% (n=595), and lower limb with 7% (n=142). There was a 50.4% (n=125) increase in the number of patients seen in the VFC across the study period with 248 patients being seen in September 2022, increasing to 373 in March 2023. The number of patients with acute traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were assessed within 72 hours on average was 94.5% per month. There was an increase of 7.3% during the study period from September 2022 to March 2023, 89.9% to 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion We believe that Hive VFC is a clinically sound and effective way of assessing acute traumatic orthopaedic patients and increasing compliance with BOA and NICE guidelines. The number of patients needing acute orthopaedic assessment is rising steadily, and this should alert us to find more convenient, time and cost-saving methods of delivering safe and effective patient care.

Arthroscopic management of large subchondral talar cyst: a novel treatment strategy.

Subchondroplasty is a novel and minimally invasive technique used to treat large subchondral talar cysts. It avoids soft tissue scarring, the need for osteotomies, bone grafting and its associated complications as seen with conventional approaches. Subchondroplasty involves arthroscopically approaching the cyst and injecting it with calcium phosphate paste injection, which undergoes an endothermic process and crystallizes in a manner that resembles cancellous bone to fill the defect. This case series presents two patients who underwent subchondroplasty: a 44-year-old female nurse with atraumatic right ankle pain of 2 years with a CT scan revealing a large subchondral cyst over the medial talar dome and a 55-year-old male chemical plant worker with left ankle pain following a biking accident 6 years ago whose CT scan too showed a large subchondral cyst in the medial talus. Both tolerated the surgery well, with significant reductions noted in MOXFQ scores at the 1-year follow-up.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Open Gustilo-Anderson IIIB Fractures Treated With an Adjuvant Local Antibiotic Hydroxyapatite Bio-Composite.

Background Open fractures associated with significant tissue loss are complex and present challenges in management; they are associated with poor outcomes such as infection, non-union or amputation. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of using an adjuvant local antibiotic hydroxyapatite bio-composite in the management of open Gustilo-Anderson IIIB fractures with up to eight years of follow-up. Methods This was a retrospective study. A total of 81 patients with Gustilo-Anderson IIIB fractures treated with "fix and flap" limb reconstruction with adjuvant local antibiotic therapy using a bio-composite carrier were reviewed. Results  The mean follow-up time for all the patients, at the time of data collection, was 55.8 months. Union was achieved in 96% with a limb salvage rate of 96.3% and a deep infection rate of 3.7%. Conclusion The use of local antibiotic therapy, together with a combined orthoplastic "fix and flap" approach for Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open fractures, was found to be associated with a very low rate of metalwork infection and high union and limb salvage rates. Future studies should include some functional and quality of life outcome measures to see the efficacy of this method.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB Open Fractures in 125 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes single-centre outcomes of Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open fractures in relation to the current standards in the United Kingdom, which aim at performing skeletal fixation and soft tissue coverage at an early stage to salvage the limb and achieve bone union with a minimum infection rate. METHODS: A total of 125 patients with 134 Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB open fractures, who had definitive skeletal fixation with soft tissue coverage between June 2013 and October 2021, were prospectively followed up and included in this study. RESULTS: Initial debridement was performed within 12 hours from the time of injury for 62 (49.6%) patients and within 24 hours for 119 (95.2%) patients (mean= 12.4 hours). Definitive skeletal fixation and soft tissue coverage were achieved within 72 hours for 25 (20%) patients and within seven days for 71 (57%) patients (mean= 8.5 days). The mean follow-up duration was 43.3 (6-100) months, and the limb salvage rate was 97.1%. The occurrence of deep infections was associated with time from injury to initial debridement (p=0.049). Three patients (2.4%) developed deep (metalwork) infections, all three had their initial debridement performed within 12 hours from the time of injury. There was no association between time to definitive surgery and the development of deep infection (p=0.340). Bone union was achieved in 84.3% of patients following their primary surgery. Time to union was associated with fixation modality (p=0.002) and type of soft tissue coverage (p=0.028), and was negatively correlated with time to initial debridement (p=0.002, correlation coefficient -0.321). There was a 0.27-month decrease in time to union for every hour delay in time to debridement (p=0.021). CONCLUSION: Delaying initial debridement or definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage didn't increase the rate of deep (metalwork) infections. The time to achieve bone union was negatively correlated with the time from injury to initial debridement. We advise prioritising surgical technique and availability of expertise over strict adherence to time thresholds of surgeries.

Outcomes of ultra-old vs old patients after hip fracture surgery: a matched cohort analysis of 1524 patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of geriatric hip fractures yields improved functional outcomes with decreased morbidity and mortality. Cohort studies have suggested that the older patients within the geriatric age group have worse outcomes with surgery, However, these studies inherently report inflated risks due to poor handling of confounders and have inadequately age-stratified their geriatric population. AIM: This study aims to investigate the effect of age alone on the 1-year mortality and functional status of geriatric patients after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective single institution cohort study based on the prospectively-maintained registry of hip fracture patients. 2603 patients aged 60 years and above were treated surgically under a geriatric-orthopaedic hip fracture pathway from January 2014 to December 2018. Patients were split into two age groups: ultra-old (≥ 85 years) vs old (< 85 years). Baseline demographics and the ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) status and the Modified Barthel's Index (MBI) were obtained at admission and 1 year after the fracture. Adverse outcomes from the fracture and surgery were recorded during a follow-up period of minimally 2 years. A 2:1 matching process based on the gender, fracture type, ASA status, CCI and MBI categories was conducted. RESULTS: There were 1009 and 515 patients in the old and ultra-old age groups, respectively. 1-year mortality was similar for both age groups (4.0% ultra-old vs 3.6% old, p = 0.703). 30-day morbidity was similar except for higher rates of postoperative pneumonia in the ultra-old (14.0 vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). MBI scores at 1-year were lower in the ultra-old (severe dependence: 16.4 vs 10.0%; p = 0.001). Ultra-old patients were less likely to be community ambulant at 12 months (21.2 vs 36.0%) with the deterioration in ambulatory status significant after correction for baseline status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 1-year mortality of surgically-managed geriatric hip fracture patients older than 85 years of age is not determined by age alone. Patients aged 85 years and above are at higher risk for pneumonia postoperatively. Ultra-old hip fracture patients with an intertrochanteric fracture are more likely to have poorer function at 1 year after hip fracture surgery.

Closed, Atraumatic, and Spontaneous Extensor Hallucis Longus Tendon Rupture Following Multiple Steroid Injections and Presence of Talonavicular Osteophyte Repaired using a Turndown Flap: A Case Report.

Introduction: We present a case of spontaneous rupture of the extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon with significantly retracted tendon edges in a patient who had received multiple steroid injections to an arthritic talonavicular joint repaired using novel turndown flap technique. Case Report: This case details a patient who came in with a history of spontaneous EHL tendon rupture on a background of chronic pain in the midfoot due to osteoarthritis with osteophytes at the talonavicular joint for which they had received multiple steroid injections in the past. A novel repair technique was employed which involved split lengthening the proximal segment of the ruptured EHL tendon and making a turndown flap of the same by rotating the lengthened segment 180°, bridging the tendon gap. The lengthened tendon is then sutured to the distal segment of the EHL to achieve a tension-free repair. This bypasses any use of bridging allografts and autografts/tendon transfer, removing complications commonly associated with them. Conclusion: This turndown flap technique is easy to perform, reduces surgical time, avoids complications associated with tendon grafting, and results in good functional outcomes for the patient.

The Relationship of the COVID-19 pandemic with the Incidence and Management of Upper Limb Fractures: Double-Centre Study.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about the placement of severe social restrictions in the United Kingdom, limiting activity and impacting public behavior. Limited studies have been published on the relationship of the coronavirus pandemic with the presentation and management of upper limb fractures. The aims of this study were first to assess the change in the incidence of upper limb fractures at key points during the COVID-19 pandemic such as the enactment and lifting of lockdowns, and second to evaluate the relationship between local COVID-19 burden and measures of service efficiency across our trust. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of all upper limb fracture referrals, admissions, and surgical procedures from the 1st of March 2020 to the 28th of February 2021. Changes in upper limb fracture incidence were mapped to significant changes in social restrictions. Measurements of service efficiency including time from admission to theatre and length of stay for admitted upper limb fracture patients were mapped to local COVID-19 burden. Subgroup analysis was undertaken to compare across age groups, including the pediatric population, all adults, and the elderly. Results: The study involved 1251, 659, and 641 patients with upper limb fracture referrals, admissions, and procedures across the trust, respectively. Referrals (n=128) and procedures (n=72) both peaked in August 2020. Admissions peaked in both May and December 2020 (63 for both). Admissions and procedures both demonstrated a decrease in March and April 2020 compared to the rest of the study period (40 and 38 admissions, as well as 48 and 29 procedures respectively). Across the cohort, referrals and admissions did not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with the relaxing of social restrictions (P=0.504). There were statistically significant differences among referrals, admissions, and procedures when stratifying patients by age (p =<0.001). Length of stay demonstrated an inverse relationship with COVID-19 burden throughout the study period, with the shortest average length of stay recorded in months with the highest number of local COVID-19 cases. The average time from injury occurrence to theatre increased during the winter months (P=0.001). Conclusion: There is a relationship between changes in social restrictions and the incidence of upper limb fractures. These changes also had differing impacts on upper limb fracture rates when stratifying by patient age groups. The orthopedic service demonstrated adaptability in response to the local COVID-19 burden, and further research is needed to determine what effect this had on clinical outcomes.