Efficacy and tolerability of three topical acne treatments by body mass index: post hoc analysis including overweight and obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Acne prevalence may be higher in overweight/obese individuals, potentially due to hormonal, inflammatory, and/or dietary factors. However, the effects of body mass index (BMI) on topical acne treatments are largely unknown. METHODS: Post hoc analyses of changes in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions and treatment success were conducted using phase 3 data: clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide (CP/BPO) 1.2%/3.75% gel (NCT01701024); tretinoin 0.05% lotion (NCT02965456 and NCT02932306; pooled); and tazarotene 0.045% lotion (NCT03168321 and NCT03168334; pooled). Data were analyzed by BMI subgroups: <25kg/m2 (underweight-to-normal), 25-<30kg/m2 (overweight), and ≥30kg/m2 (obese). RESULTS: Among participants analyzed (CP/BPO = 495; tretinoin = 1,636; tazarotene = 1,612), ∼20-25% were overweight and 15-20% were obese. At week 12, mean percent changes from baseline in inflammatory lesions were: CP/BPO (overweight: -63.2%, obese: -56.0%); tretinoin (-57.6%, -53.1%); tazarotene (-59.9%, -56.8%). Mean changes in noninflammatory lesions were: CP/BPO (-54.2%, -50.8%); tretinoin (-51.6%, -44.9%); tazarotene (-56.7%, -54.6%). Treatment success rates with active treatment ranged from 16.2% to 33.5% across BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: CP/BPO 1.2%/3.75% gel, tretinoin 0.05% lotion, and tazarotene 0.045% lotion were all effective in reducing acne lesions by ≥45% in overweight/obese patients with moderate-to-severe acne, comparable to the underweight-to-normal group. Efficacy of these topical acne treatments is not greatly impacted by BMI and may be affected more by the formulation.

Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% Gel for Moderate-to-Severe Acne: A Randomized Phase II Study of the First Triple-Combination Drug.

BACKGROUND: A three-pronged approach to acne treatment-combining an antibiotic, antibacterial, and retinoid-could provide greater efficacy and tolerability than single or dyad treatments, while potentially improving patient compliance and reducing antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple-combination, fixed-dose topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% (IDP-126) gel for the treatment of acne. METHODS: In a phase II, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, 12-week study, eligible participants aged ≥ 9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were equally randomized to once-daily IDP-126, vehicle, or one of three component dyad gels: BPO/adapalene; clindamycin phosphate/BPO; or clindamycin phosphate/adapalene. Coprimary endpoints were treatment success at week 12 (participants achieving a ≥ 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and least-squares mean absolute changes from baseline in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts to week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events and cutaneous safety/tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 741 participants were enrolled. At week 12, 52.5% of participants achieved treatment success with IDP-126 vs vehicle (8.1%) and dyads (range 27.8-30.5%; P ≤ 0.001, all). IDP-126 also provided significantly greater absolute reductions in inflammatory (29.9) and noninflammatory (35.5) lesions compared with vehicle or dyads (range inflammatory, 19.6-26.8; noninflammatory, 21.8-30.0; P < 0.05, all), corresponding to > 70% reductions with IDP-126. IDP-126 was well tolerated, with most treatment-emergent adverse events of mild-to-moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily treatment with the novel fixed-dose triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/BPO 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% gel demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and all three dyad component gels, and was well tolerated over 12 weeks in pediatric, adolescent, and adult participants with moderate-to-severe acne. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03170388 (registered 31 May, 2017).

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion for Moderate-to-Severe Acne in Male and Female Participants: A Phase II Post-hoc Analysis.

CLINICAL TRIALS ID: NCT02938494 BACKGROUND: In a Phase II study, tazarotene 0.045% lotion was statistically superior to vehicle and comparable to tazarotene 0.1% cream in reducing acne lesions, with fewer treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) than the cream. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed data from the aforementioned study post-hoc to evaluate the effects of sex on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Participants aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to tazarotene (0.045% lotion or 0.1% cream) or vehicle (lotion or cream) for 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. Outcomes analyzed in male and female subgroups included changes from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions and TEAEs. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (94 males and 116 females), reductions in lesion count were greater with tazarotene (lotion or cream) than with vehicle. In participants receiving tazarotene 0.045% lotion, the least-squares mean percent changes from baseline to Week 12 were greater in females than males, but the differences were not statistically significant (inflammatory [-70.3% vs. -56.2%]; noninflammatory [-60.0% vs. -53.2%]). In both females and males, the TEAE incidence was lower with tazarotene 0.045% lotion than 0.1% cream. CONCLUSION: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion substantially reduced acne lesions in both female and male participants. This newest tazarotene formulation might benefit patients who cannot tolerate older formulations or other topical retinoids. Given the relatively small size of this study, however, the results of this post-hoc analysis are intended to be exploratory in nature.

Optimized formulation for topical application of a fixed combination halobetasol/tazarotene lotion using polymeric emulsion technology.

BACKGROUND: Successful clinical data on halobetasol propionate 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis are published. This article charts its formulation development. METHODS: Dermal deposition, clinical efficacy, and synergistic effect of HP and TAZ delivered by polymeric emulsion technology was compared to HP 0.05% cream (Ultravate) and TAZ 0.1% cream (Tazorac); skin hydration and barrier maintenance with vehicle lotion through Trans Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) and corneometry using human cadaver tissue; and steroid potency by vasoconstrictor assay (VCA) in healthy volunteers. Safety and tolerability evaluated in clinical studies and patient preference questionnaire. RESULTS: HP/TAZ lotion, using polymeric emulsion technology demonstrated better active ingredient delivery than HP 0.05% or TAZ 0.1% creams; supported by synergistic clinical data, with high HP potency outcome. Efficacy was rapid and sustained posttreatment. Layering TAZ 0.1% cream onto HP 0.05% cream had a negative effect on receptor phase levels. HP/TAZ lotion provided rapid and sustained increases in skin moisturization and gradually decreases in TEWL. Most subjects responded favorably to questions on the physical attributes of the vehicle lotion. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed combination HP 0.01%/TAZ 0.045% lotion formulation utilizing innovative polymeric emulsion technology and optimal selection of solvents/emollients/humectants, has recently been developed. Features inherent in technology translate into rapid, sustained efficacy, low irritation, and good patient acceptance.

Effects of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion on Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Acne.

BACKGROUND: In two phase 3 trials (NCT03168334, NCT03168321), participants with moderate-to-severe acne had significant symptom improvements after 12 weeks of treatment with tazarotene 0.045% lotion. Given the negative psychosocial effects of acne on patients, data from these studies were analyzed to evaluate quality of life in various subgroups. METHODS: Mean changes from baseline to week 12 in Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) domain and item scores were analyzed in the pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in participants who were categorized as follows: Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGSS) score=3 (“moderate”) or score=4 (“severe”) at baseline; Acne-QoL total score ≥60 (better quality of life) or <60 (worse quality of life), based on the median score at baseline. Exploratory analyses based on sex and race were also performed. RESULTS: In the pooled ITT population (N=1614), Acne-QoL improvements were greater with tazarotene 0.045% lotion versus vehicle lotion, with significant differences in the acne symptoms domain, 3 acne symptom items, 2 self-perception items, 1 role-emotional item, and 1 role-social item (all P<0.05). Acne-QoL improvements with tazarotene 0.045% lotion were comparable between the EGSS subgroups. However, participants who self-reported worse quality of life at baseline (Acne-QoL total score <60) had notably greater improvements than those with better quality of life. Female and Black participants had greater Acne-QoL improvements than male and White participants. CONCLUSIONS: Participants treated with tazarotene 0.045% lotion had significant quality-of-life improvements. Clinician-rated symptom severity appeared to have a smaller effect on Acne-QoL outcomes than participants’ own assessments of quality of life. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(11): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5457.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Efinaconazole 10% Topical Solution for Onychomycosis Treatment in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric onychomycosis management is challenging as there are limited treatment options. The objective of this study was to evaluate efinaconazole 10% topical solution in children with onychomycosis. METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, open-label study (NCT02812771) evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of efinaconazole 10% topical solution in pediatric participants (6-16 years). Efinaconazole was administered once daily for 48 weeks, with a 4-week posttreatment follow up. Participants had culture-positive, mild-to-severe distal lateral subungual onychomycosis affecting at least 20% of at least 1 great toenail. The PK subset included participants 12-16 years with moderate-to-severe onychomycosis affecting at least 50% of each great toenail and onychomycosis in at least 4 additional toenails. RESULTS: Of 62 enrolled participants, 60 were included in the safety population and 17 in the PK population. Efinaconazole 10% topical solution was well tolerated. The concentration-time profiles for efinaconazole and its major metabolite were relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations during the 24-hour dosing interval. Systemic exposure to efinaconazole was low. By week 52, 65.0% of participants achieved mycologic cure, with a 36.7% mycologic cure rate observed as early as week 12. A total of 40.0% of participants achieved complete cure, 50.0% achieved clinical efficacy, and 88.3% achieved fungal cure by week 52. CONCLUSION: Efinaconazole was safe and efficacious in pediatric participants with mild-to-severe onychomycosis, with improved mycologic cure and complete cure rates compared with adults from two 52-week studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(9):867-872. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5401.

The Effects of Once-Daily Tretinoin 0.05% Lotion on Quality of Life in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: In two phase III clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe acne (NCT02932306, NCT02965456), tretinoin 0.05% lotion reduced inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions relative to vehicle lotion, with low potential for cutaneous irritation. OBJECTIVE: Data from these studies were analyzed post hoc to investigate the effects of tretinoin 0.05% lotion on patient-reported quality of life, as assessed using the Acne-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL). METHODS: Mean changes from baseline to week 12 in Acne-QoL scores were analyzed in the pooled intent-to-treat population and a subgroup with treatment success (≥ 2-grade improvement on the Evaluator's Global Severity Scale and rating of "clear" or "almost clear"). Pearson correlations were conducted in the pooled intent-to-treat population to assess the relationship between the Acne-QoL acne symptoms domain and each of the other three domains. RESULTS: In the pooled intent-to-treat population (n = 1640), greater mean improvements were found with tretinoin 0.05% lotion vs vehicle in all four domains: self-perception (mean change: 7.4 vs 6.7); role-emotional (6.8 vs 6.0); role-social (4.8 vs 4.6); acne symptoms (6.5 vs 5.6); all p < 0.05. Relative to the intent-to-treat population, participants who experienced treatment success with tretinoin 0.05% lotion had higher (better) mean Acne-QoL scores at week 12. Correlations between acne symptoms and the other three domains were found at baseline and week 12 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with moderate-to-severe acne reported better quality of life after 12 weeks of treatment with tretinoin 0.05% lotion. Clinical improvements in acne symptoms may have contributed to these outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02932306, NCT02965456.

Novel Polymeric Lotion Formulation of Once-Daily Tazarotene (0.045%) for Moderate-to-Severe Acne: Pooled Phase 3 Analysis.

Background: As current tazarotene formulations indicated for acne (0.1%) can cause irritation, a new tazarotene 0.045% lotion formu-lation was developed using polymeric emulsion technology. The objective was to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tazarotene 0.045% lotion in patients with moderate-to-severe acne in a pooled analysis of data from two identical phase 3, double-blind, random-ized, vehicle-controlled 12-week clinical studies. Methods: Patients aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized (1:1) to tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle lotion applied once daily. Inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts and Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGSS) were assessed. Treatment success was defined as a ≥2-grade improvement in EGSS and a score of 'clear'/'almost clear'. Adverse events (AEs) and cutaneous safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: In total, 1614 patients (mean age: 20.5 years) were randomized to tazarotene 0.045% lotion (n=799) or vehicle (n=815). At week 12, tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated statistically significant superiority versus vehicle in reducing inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts (least-squares mean percent changes from baseline: inflammatory, -57.9% vs -47.8% [P<0.001]; noninflam-matory, -56.0% vs -42.0% [P<0.001]). Treatment success at week 12 was also greater with tazarotene 0.045% lotion versus vehicle (30.4% vs 17.9%; P<0.001). The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs related to tazarotene treatment were application site pain (5.3%), dryness (3.6%), and exfoliation (2.1%). Conclusions: The new tazarotene 0.045% lotion formulated with polymeric emulsion technology demonstrated statistically signifi-cantly superior efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients with moderate-to-severe acne in this pooled analysis of 2 vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(3):272-279. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4869.

New Polymeric Once-Daily Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion Formulation for Moderate-to-Severe Acne: Pooled Phase 3 Pediatric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris affects approximately 85% of adolescents. Topical tazarotene is efficacious and safe for acne treatment but irritation limits its use. The objective was to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a new tazarotene 0.045% lotion formulation in patients aged 10-13 and 14-17 years with moderate-to-severe acne. METHODS: In two phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled 12-week studies, patients with moderate-to-severe acne (N=1,614) were randomized (1:1) to receive tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle once-daily. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions and treatment success (≥2-grade reduction in Evaluator's Global Severity Score [EGSS] and a clear/almost clear score). Quality of life (QoL) and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS: Patients aged 10-13 years (n=136) and 14-17 years (n=548) were pooled. At week 12, mean percent reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts were significantly greater with tazarotene versus vehicle in both age groups (least-squares mean inflammatory 10-13 years: -55.6 vs -37.0%; 14-17 years: -53.3 vs -41.2%; noninflammatory 10-13 years: -47.7 vs -28.2%; 14-17 years: -52.7 vs -32.9%; P<0.01 all). More patients achieved treatment success with tazarotene versus vehicle in both age groups (P<0.05, both). There were no significant differences between tazarotene-treated age groups in lesion counts or treatment success. Acne-QoL scores at week 12 in both age groups were numerically improved in most domains with tazarotene 0.045% lotion versus vehicle. Most treatment-emergent AEs with tazarotene or vehicle were of mild or moderate severity in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was efficacious and well tolerated in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(6): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4959.

Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion for Once-Daily Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris: Results from Two Phase 3 Trials

BACKGROUND: Tazarotene has been extensively studied in clinical trials and is widely used to treat acne vulgaris (acne), with data suggesting that is one of the most potent topical retinoids. Irritation from the cream, foam, and gel formulations has limited its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a unique tazarotene 0.045% lotion formulation based on polymeric emulsion technology in subjects with moderate or severe acne. Methods: A total of 1614 subjects, 9 years and older were randomized to receive tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle in two identical double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled 12-week studies evaluating safety and efficacy (inflammatory [papules and pustules] and noninflammatory [comedonal] lesion counts and using Evaluator Global Severity Scores [EGSS]). Treatment success was defined as at least a 2-grade improvement in EGSS and 'clear'/'almost clear' and efficacy assessed through reduction in lesion counts. In addition, patients completed a validated Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire. Safety, adverse events (AEs), and cutaneous tolerability were assessed throughout. RESULTS: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated statistically significant superiority to vehicle in reducing inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts at week 12. Mean percent reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions were 55.5% and 51.4% (Study 1, both P<0.001 versus vehicle [45.7% and 41.5%, respectively]) and 59.5% and 60.0% (Study 2, both P<0.001 versus vehicle [49.0% and 41.6%, respectively]), with tazarotene 0.045% lotion at week 12. Treatment success was achieved by 25.5% (Study 1) and 29.6% (Study 2) of subjects treated with tazarotene 0.045% lotion (both P<0.001 versus vehicle [13.0% and 17.3%, respectively]). Improvements in QoL domain scores were consistently greater with tazarotene. Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was well-tolerated. The most common treatment-related AEs were application site pain (5.3%), dryness (3.6%), and exfoliation (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Tazarotene 0.045% lotion provides statistically significant greater efficacy than vehicle in terms of lesion reduction and treatment success, with a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile in moderate-to-severe acne patients. JJ Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(1):70-77. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.3977

A Split-face, Controlled Study to Assess the Compatibility of Tretinoin 0.05% Acne Lotion with Facial Foundation Makeup.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess compatibility of tretinoin 0.05% acne lotion with foundation makeup. DESIGN: This was a single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants were randomized to apply tretinoin 0.05% lotion to either the right or left side of the face before applying full-face foundation makeup. SETTING: Participants were enrolled at a single center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Female individuals aged 18 to 50 years who used facial foundation makeup ≥5 days per week were included. MEASUREMENTS: Investigator-assessed grading for foundation coverage and participant evaluations of makeup appearance were conducted at post-makeup application (Post-Makeup) and Hour 6 (6H) timepoints. Antera 3D® images were taken for skin texture roughness analysis and tolerability evaluations were performed at baseline, post-tretinoin application, Post-Makeup, and 6H timepoints. RESULTS: A total of 30 participants were enrolled and 29 completed the study. There were no significant differences between tretinoin treated and untreated sides for any outcomes of investigator-assessed grading of foundation (percentage coverage, blotchiness, overall coverage, skin tone evenness, visual smoothness). There was a small but statistically significant worsening in percent coverage at 6H versus Post-Makeup on the untreated side, but not the treated side. As rated by participants, even/full coverage and skin smoothness were significantly better on the tretinoin-lotion treated versus the untreated side. Three-dimensional imaging showed there were no significant differences in skin roughness between the treated and untreated sides. Participants reported overall satisfaction with the tretinoin lotion-treated side. CONCLUSION: Tretinoin 0.05% lotion did not interfere with facial makeup application or wearability and was well tolerated.

Novel tretinoin 0.05% lotion for the once-daily treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris: assessment of safety and tolerability in subgroups.

Background: Topical tretinoin's role in acne has been established through evidence-based guidelines. Cutaneous irritation and potential to cause or exacerbate postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) may limit use.Objective: Evaluate safety and tolerability of novel polymeric formulation of tretinoin 0.05% lotion in moderate-to-severe acne.Methods: One thousand six hundred and forty patients randomized to tretinoin 0.05% lotion or vehicle in two double-blind placebo-controlled 12-week studies. Investigator-evaluated cutaneous safety (erythema and scaling) and patient-reported tolerability (itching, burning/stinging) assessed using a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Hyper- and hypo-pigmentation evaluated at each study visit. A number of subpopulations were investigated.Results: Tretinoin 0.05% lotion was considered safe and very well tolerated. Only application site pain (3.1%), dryness (3.7%) and erythema (1.4%) were reported by >1% or patients. Treatment-related adverse events were particularly rare (≤2%) in Hispanic and male subpopulations, and lower in adult females. The severity of cutaneous safety and tolerability scores remained <0.5 (where 1 = mild) and were generally lower than baseline severity. Tretinoin 0.05% lotion did not appear to cause or exacerbate PIH.Conclusions: A novel polymeric formulation of tretinoin 0.05% lotion provides a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile, with an incidence of erythema, dryness, and skin burning lower than that previously reported with other formulations of tretinoin.

Efficacy, Safety, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Brodalumab for 5 Years in a Long-Term, Open-Label, Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis require treatment options that maintain efficacy and tolerability during extended treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Patients who completed a 12-week, phase II, dose-ranging clinical trial received brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks in an open-label extension study. Efficacy was assessed by static physician's global assessment (sPGA) and psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Quality of life, assessed by dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 181 patients received brodalumab for a median of 264 weeks. Brodalumab treatment resulted in rapid improvements in sPGA, PASI, and DLQI that were maintained through week 264. Achieving PASI 90 to < 100 or PASI 100 at weeks 12, 240, and 264 was associated with greater likelihood for DLQI 0 or 1 compared with achieving PASI 75 to < 90. Over 5 years, one adverse event of suicidal ideation was reported, no suicides occurred, and no new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab demonstrated skin clearance and improved quality of life, with an acceptable safety profile, throughout 5 years of treatment. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01101100.

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion and Tazarotene 0.1% Cream in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris

Background: Tazarotene has been extensively studied in clinical trials and is widely used to treat acne vulgaris (acne). Irritation potential has limited its use. Objective: To compare efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel formulation tazarotene 0.045% lotion based on polymeric emulsion technology, and tazarotene 0.1% cream in patients with moderate-to-severe acne. Methods: A total of 210 patients, 12 years and older were randomized to receive tazarotene 0.045% lotion, tazarotene 0.1% cream, or respective vehicle in double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, 12-week study evaluating safety and efficacy (inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts and using Evaluator Global Severity Scores [EGSS]). In addition, patients completed a patient satisfaction survey (PSS), and acne-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire. Safety and cutaneous tolerability were assessed throughout. Results: A novel tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated statistically significant superiority to vehicle in reducing inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts (P=.006 and P<.001) and clearly more effective in treatment success at week 12. In addition, at less than half the concentration, tazarotene 0.045% lotion was numerically more effective than tazarotene 0.1% cream. Mean percent reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions were 63.8% and 56.9%, compared with 60.0% and 54.1% with tazarotene 0.1% cream at week 12. Treatment success assessed by the investigator or patients' self-assessment was also numerically greater with tazarotene 0.045% lotion. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction or QoL between the two active treatments. Both were well-tolerated, however, there were more treatment-related adverse events with tazarotene 0.1% cream (5.6% versus 2.9%); most common being application site pain. Limitations: This study was primarily designed to direct the phase 3 program and some of the results are post hoc analyses. Conclusions: A novel tazarotene 0.045% lotion provides statistically significant greater efficacy than vehicle in terms of lesion reduction, and numerically better treatment success than tazarotene 0.1% cream; with a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile in moderate-to-severe acne patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(6):542-548.

Scientific Abstracts. Skin Disease Education Foundation's 43rd Annual Hawaii Dermatology Seminar.

This supplement features scientific abstracts from the Skin Disease Education Foundation's 43rd Annual Hawaii Dermatology Seminar® (February 17-22, 2019).

Safety and efficacy of halobetasol propionate lotion 0.01% in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a pooled analysis of 2 phase 3 studies.

Potent topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are the mainstay of psoriasis treatment. Safety concerns have limited use to 2 to 4 weeks. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of once-daily halobetasol propionate (HP) lotion 0.01% in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis through 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies (N=430). Participants were randomized (2:1) to HP lotion 0.01% or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of follow-up. The primary efficacy assessment was treatment success (at least a 2-grade improvement in baseline investigator global assessment [IGA] score and a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear]). Additional assessments included improvement in psoriasis signs and symptoms, body surface area (BSA), and a composite score of IGA×BSA. Safety and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout. We found that HP lotion 0.01% demonstrated statistically significant superiority over vehicle as early as week 2 and also was superior in reducing psoriasis signs and symptoms and BSA involvement.

Assessing the Synergistic Effect of a Fixed Combination Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% and Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Background: Fixed combinations are commonplace in dermatology, providing significant efficacy and tolerability benefits. In some cases, two active ingredients complement each other providing a cumulative or additive effect. In rarer cases, a synergistic effect may be seen where the sum of the two active ingredients combined action is greater than the sum of the efficacy of the constituent parts. Objective: To determine whether a novel halobetasol propionate 0.01% and tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) fixed combination lotion provides a synergistic effect in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: Post hoc analysis of 212 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis randomized (2:2:2:1) to HP/TAZ lotion, HP, TAZ or vehicle once-daily for 8 weeks, with a 4-week posttreatment follow-up. Treatment success was evaluated based on two outcomes: percent of patients achieving at least a 2-grade improvement in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and IGA score equating to 'clear' or 'almost clear'; and percent change from baseline in the IGAxbody surface area (BSA) score, an alternative to assessing response to therapy that is more sensitive to area change than the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). In addition, a clinically meaningful outcome was reported in patients who achieved a 75% reduction in IGAxBSA. Synergy was established when the benefit of combination HP/TAZ lotion was greater than benefit of HP plus TAZ, with a ratio (HP/TAZ divided by HP+TAZ) >1.0. Results: HP/TAZ lotion was synergistic at week 8, and four weeks posttreatment. At week 8, treatment success with HP/TAZ lotion relative to vehicle was 42.8% compared with 32.5% for HP plus TAZ (ratio 1.3); and percent change from baseline in IGAxBSA score relative to vehicle was 51.6% compared with 40.6% for HP plus TAZ (ratio 1.3). At week 12, treatment success with HP/TAZ lotion relative to vehicle was 31.3% compared with 20.0% for HP plus TAZ (ratio 1.6). Percent change from baseline in IGAxBSA score relative to vehicle was 47.3% compared with 34.2% for HP plus TAZ (ratio 1.4). HP/TAZ lotion also provided synergistic benefits in terms of achieving a clinically meaningful outcome, with a ratio of 1.3 and 2.0 at weeks 8 and 12. Conclusions: Halobetasol propionate 0.01% and tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) fixed combination lotion provides a synergistic benefit in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In addition, by combining two agents into one once-daily formulation, this novel formulation reduces the number of product applications and may help patient adherence. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(3):279-284.

Efficacy of a Once-Daily Fixed Combination Halobetasol (0.01%) and Tazarotene (0.045%) Lotion in the Treatment of Localized Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Recently, clinical data on 8 weeks' once-daily treatment of localized moderate-to-severe psoriasis with a novel fixed combination halobetasol propionate 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) lotion were published.1,2 HP/TAZ lotion was significantly more effective than individual active ingredients or vehicle, based on improvements in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), body surface area (BSA) involvement, and signs and symptoms of psoriasis (erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling) at the target lesion as well as a synergistic benefit over individual active ingredients, and good tolerability.

Halobetasol 0.01%/Tazarotene 0.045% Fixed-combination Lotion in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis: Sensitization and Irritation Potential.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder often managed with topical therapy. However, the most widely used treatments, including topical corticosteroids and tazarotene, can cause limiting skin irritation, contact sensitization, and/or present long-term safety concerns. Recently, clinical data on a new fixed combination of halobetasol 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% (HP/TAZ) lotion were published. Objectives: We evaluated the results from two studies that assessed the potential for skin irritation (Study A) and contact sensitization (Study B) of HP/TAZ lotion. Methods: HP/TAZ lotion and vehicle were studied in 244 healthy volunteers for the potential to induce contact skin sensitization. An additional 21-day cumulative irritation study was performed in 40 healthy volunteers to compare HP/TAZ lotion, vehicle, tazarotene 0.05% (Tazorac®; Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) cream, and positive/negative controls. Cutaneous reactions at the application sites were evaluated in both studies clinically. Results: There was no evidence of contact sensitization, while the HP/TAZ lotion exhibited a low level of irritation in the induction phase. Mean cumulative irritation scores were 0.21 (HP/TAZ), 0.07 (vehicle), and 0.04 (saline). In the separate 21-day irritation study, mean cumulative irritation scores were 0.36 (HP/TAZ), 0.56 (tazarotene), 0.03 (vehicle), 0.23 (sodium lauryl sulfate), and 0.04 (saline), while mean total irritation scores were 7.55 (HP/TAZ), 11.60 (tazarotene, p=0.0013 versus HP/TAZ), 0.63 (vehicle), 4.73 (sodium lauryl sulfate), and 0.88 (saline). HP/TAZ was "slightly irritating" but significantly less so than tazarotene (p=0.0009). Conclusion: HP/TAZ lotion caused only minimal skin irritation. It was significantly less irritating than tazarotene cream.