Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide guidance on quality management for electronic brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The task group used the risk-assessment approach of Task Group 100 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Because the quality management program for a device is intimately tied to the procedure in which it is used, the task group first designed quality interventions for intracavitary brachytherapy for both commercial electronic brachytherapy units in the setting of accelerated partial-breast irradiation. To demonstrate the methodology to extend an existing risk analysis for a different application, the task group modified the analysis for the case of post-hysterectomy, vaginal cuff irradiation for one of the devices. RESULTS: The analysis illustrated how the TG-100 methodology can lead to interventions to reduce risks and improve quality for each unit and procedure addressed. CONCLUSION: This report provides a model to guide facilities establishing a quality management program for electronic brachytherapy.

Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.

This study describes the modeling and the experimental verification and clinical implementation of the alpha release of Pinnacle3 Monte Carlo (MC) electron beam dose calculation algorithm for patient-specific treatment planning. The MC electron beam modeling was performed for beam energies ranging from 6 to 18 MeV from a Siemens (Primus) linear accelerator using standard-shaped electron applicators and 100 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). The agreement between MC calculations and measurements was, on average, within 2% and 2 mm for all applicator sizes. However, differences of the order of 3%-4% were noted in the off-axis dose profiles for the largest applicator modeled and for all energies. Output factors were calculated for standard electron cones and square cutouts inserted in the 10 x 10 cm2 applicator for different SSDs and were found to be within 4% of measured data. Experimental verification of the MC electron beam model was carried out using an ionization chamber and film in solid-water slab and anthropomorphic phantoms containing bone and lung materials. Agreement between calculated and measured dose distributions was within +/-3%. Clinical comparison was performed in four patient treatment plans with lesions in highly irregular anatomies, such as the ear, face, and breast, where custom-designed bolus and field shaping blocks were used in the patient treatments. For comparison purposes, treatment planning was also performed using the conventional pencil beam (PB) algorithm with the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system. Differences between MC and PB dose calculations for the patient treatment plans were significant, particularly in anatomies where the target was in close proximity to low density tissues, such as lung and air cavities. Concerning monitor unit calculations, the largest differences obtained between MC and PB algorithms were between 4.0% and 5.0% for two patients treated with oblique beams and involving highly irregular surfaces, i.e., breast and cheek. Clinical results are reported for overall uncertainty values (averaged over voxels with doses >50% dosemax) ranging from 2% to 0.3% and calculations were performed using cubic voxels with side 0.3 cm. Timing values ranged from 2 min to 24.5 h, depending on the field size, beam energy, number, and thickness of computed tomography slices used to define the patient's anatomy for the overall uncertainty values mentioned above.

Effects of field parameters on IMRT plan quality for gynecological cancer: a case study.

Traditional external beam radiotherapy of gynecological cancer consists of a 3D, four-field-box technique. The radiation treatment area is a large region of normal tissue, with greater inhomogeneity over the treatment volume, which could benefit more with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This is a case report of IMRT planning for a patient with endometrial cancer. The planning target volume (PTV) spanned the intrapelvic and periaortic lymph nodes to a 33-cm length. Planning and treatment were accomplished using double isocenters. The IMRT plan was compared with a 3D plan, and the effects of field parameters were studied. Delineated anatomical contours included the intrapelvic nodes (PTV), bone marrow, small bowel, bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, periaortic nodes (PTV), spinal cord, left kidney, right kidney, large bowel, liver, and tissue (excluding the PTVs). Comparisons were made between IMRT and 3D plans, 23-MV and 6-MV energies, zero and rotated collimator angles, different numbers of segments, and opposite gantry angle configurations. The plans were evaluated based on dosevolume histograms (DVHs). Compared with the 3D plan, the IMRT plan had superior dose conformity and spared the bladder and sigmoid colon embedded in the intrapelvic nodes. The higher energy (23 MV) reduced the dose to most critical organs and delivered less integral dose. Zero collimator angles resulted in a better plan than "optimized" collimator angles, with lower dose to most of the normal structures. The number of segments did not have much effect on isodose distribution, but a reasonable number of segments was necessary to keep treatment time from being prohibitively long. Gantry angles, when evenly spaced, had no noticeable effect on the plan. The patient tolerated the treatment well, and the initial complete blood count was favorable. Our results indicated that large-volume tumor sites may also benefit from precise conformal delivery of IMRT.

Prostate motion and isocenter adjustment from ultrasound-based localization during delivery of radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To study prostate motion from 4,154 ultrasound alignment fractions on 130 prostate patients treated with conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Each prostate patient was immobilized in a vacuum cradle. Daily treatment was verified by ultrasound scan after laser setup with skin marks and before radiation delivery by the same physician responsible for anatomic delineation during planning. Directional statistics were employed to test the significance of shift directions. RESULTS: Polar histograms showed the prevalence of prostate motion in superior-posterior directions. The average direction was about 27 degrees from the superior axis. The average changes of prostate position in superior to inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP), and left to right (LR) directions and in radial distance were 0.25, -0.13, 0.03, and 0.92, cm respectively. Our data indicated that prostate motion was not patient specific, and its average magnitude remained virtually unchanged over time. Recommended planning target volume (PTV) margins for use without ultrasound localization were 0.90 cm in SI, 1.02 cm in AP, and 0.80 cm in LR directions. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound localization revealed a predominance of prostate shift from planning position in the superior-posterior direction, with an average closer to the superior axis. The motion data provides recommended margins for PTV.