Research and practice for ultra-high risk for psychosis: A national survey of early intervention in psychosis services in England.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials show interventions for young people at ultra-high risk (UHR) of developing psychosis are effective both clinically and economically. While research evidence has begun to be integrated into clinical guidelines, there is a lack of research on the implementation of these guidelines. This paper examines service provision for UHR individuals in accordance with current clinical guidelines within the National Health Service (NHS) in England. METHOD: A self-report online survey was completed by clinical leaders of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) teams (N = 50) within the NHS across England. RESULTS: Of the 50 EIP teams responding (from 30 NHS trusts), 53% reported inclusion of the UHR group in their service mandate, with age range predominantly 14 to 35 years (81%) and service provided for at least 12 months (53%). Provision of services according to NICE clinical guidelines showed 50% of services offered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis, and 42% offered family intervention. Contrary to guidelines, 50% of services offered antipsychotic medication. Around half of services provided training in assessment by Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States, psycho-education, CBT for psychosis, family work and treatment for anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear evidence for the benefit of early intervention in this population, current provision for UHR within EIP services in England does not match clinical guidelines. While some argue this is due to a lack of allocated funding, it is important to note the similar variable adherence to clinical guidelines in the treatment of people with established schizophrenia.

Does insecure attachment mediate the relationship between trauma and voice-hearing in psychosis?

This study extends existing research and theoretical developments by exploring the potential mediating role of insecure attachment within the relationship between trauma and voice-hearing. Fifty-five voice hearers with a psychosis-related diagnosis completed comprehensive assessments of childhood trauma, adult attachment, voice-related severity and distress, beliefs about voices and relationships with voices. Anxious attachment was significantly associated with the voice-hearing dimensions examined. More sophisticated analysis showed that anxious attachment mediated the relationship between childhood sexual and emotional abuse and voice-related severity and distress, voice-malevolence, voice-omnipotence, voice-resistance and hearer-dependence. Anxious attachment also mediated the relationship between childhood physical neglect and voice-related severity and distress and hearer-dependence. Furthermore, consistent with previous research, the relationship between anxious attachment and voice-related distress was mediated by voice-malevolence, voice-omnipotence and voice-resistance. We propose a model whereby anxious attachment mediates the well-established relationship between trauma and voice-hearing. In turn, negative beliefs about voices may mediate the association between anxious attachment and voice-related distress. Findings presented here highlight the need to assess and formulate the impact of attachment patterns upon the voice-hearing experience in psychosis and the potential to alleviate voice-related distress by fostering secure attachments to therapists or significant others.

The relationship between dissociation and voices: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

There are an increasing number of studies exploring the association between voice-hearing (auditory verbal hallucinations) and dissociative experiences. The current study provides a systematic literature review and meta-analytic synthesis of quantitative studies investigating the relationship between voice-hearing and dissociation. A systematic search identified and included 19 clinical studies, comprising 1620 participants, and 12 non-clinical studies, comprising 2137 participants, published between 1986 and 2014. Nineteen of these studies provided sufficient data to be included within the meta-analysis. The narrative review findings suggested that dissociative experiences may be implicated in voice-hearing, and may potentially be a mediating factor within the well-established trauma and voice-hearing relationship. Similarly, the meta-analytic findings suggested that the majority of the identified studies showed a significant positive relationship between dissociative experiences and voice-hearing. The magnitude of the summary effect was large and significant (r=.52), indicating a robust relationship between these two phenomena. However, considerable heterogeneity within the meta-analytic results and methodological limitations of the identified studies were evident, highlighting areas for future investigation. As the majority of the studies were cross-sectional by design, we recommended future research to include longitudinal designs with a view to exploring directional effects. Additionally, future studies should control for potential confounding factors. Clinical implications of the findings were also considered.