Ondansetron versus metoclopramide in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). One hundred seventy-five patients with PONV during recovery from anesthesia for gynecological laparoscopy were treated intravenously with either ondansetron 4 mg (58 patients), metoclopramide 10 mg (57 patients), or placebo (60 patients). Early antiemetic efficacy (abolition of vomiting within 10 min and of nausea within 30 min from the administration of the study drugs with no further vomiting or nausea episodes during the first hour) was obtained in 54 of 58 patients (93.1%) in the ondansetron group, in 38 of 57 patients (66.7%) in the metoclopramide group, and in 21 of 60 patients (35%) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). This difference was still significant when controlling for age, body weight, history of motion sickness, previous PONV episodes, duration of anesthesia, and intraoperative fentanyl consumption using a logistic model. Early antiemetic efficacy was inversely related to the amount of fentanyl administered during anesthesia, regardless of treatment. According to the Kaplan-Meier method, the probability of remaining PONV-free for 48 h after a successful treatment was 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.71) in the ondansetron group, 0.45 (0.29-0.60) in the metoclopramide group, and 0.33 (0.15-0.53) in the placebo group (P = 0.003). In conclusion, ondansetron 4 mg is more effective than metoclopramide 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of established PONV.

[Balanced spinal analgesia in the treatment of oncologic pain. Review of the literature]. / Analgesia spinale bilanciata nel trattamento del dolore oncologico. Rassegna della letteratura.

Certain types of cancer pain fail to respond well either to systemic drug therapy or to spinal opioids because of the occurrence of intolerable adverse effects. In addition to spinal opioids other drugs may produce an antinociceptive effect when administered by the spinal route, such as local anesthetics, NSAID, alpha 2-agonists, calcium-channel blockers, NMDA antagonists, cholinergic drugs, peptides such as somatostatin, octreotide or calcitonin, adenosine agonists, benzodiazepines, neurokinin and cholecystokinin antagonists, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and enkephalinase inhibitors. All these drugs may be administered in combination between them, realising the so called balanced spinal analgesia. The aim of this study is to analyse: the available methods for the evaluation of pharmacological interactions, the types of interaction between different spinal antinociceptive drugs and the role of balanced spinal analgesia in the treatment of cancer pain. Analysis of the presented data shows that the spinal synergism between opioids-local anesthetics and opioids-alpha 2-agonists can be useful in the treatment of opioid refractory cancer pain. Furthermore, the use of cholinergic drugs combined with opioids and alpha 2-agonists may be promising. Finally, even if the synergism between NSAID or NMDA antagonists with opioids or alpha 2-agonists have been proved, at the moment their use in man by the spinal route is not advisable because of the absence of adequate studies on their neurotoxicity and adverse effects.

[Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting with ondansetron: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in 90 patients]. / Profilassi della nausea e del vomito postoperatori con ondansetron: studio prospettico e randomizzato, condotto in doppio cieco, su 90 pazienti.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are among the most common complications in surgical patients. In this prospective, double blind, parallel group study we compare the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron versus placebo in 90 patients undergoing general balanced anaesthesia. The patients were stratified according to the kind of surgery and randomly allocated to three treatment groups: 30 patients (Group A) received ondansetron 4 mg i.v. 1 hour before the induction of anaesthesia and placebo 1 hour before the end of surgery; 30 patients (Group B) received placebo 1 hour before the end of anaesthesia and ondansetron 4 mg i.v. 1 hour before the end of surgery; 30 patients (Group C-control group) received placebo in both the administrations. Data were analyzed by Student t test and chi 2 test; significance was taken at p < 0.05. The three groups proved comparable with respect to demographic characteristics, duration of anaesthesia and fentanyl consumption. Analysis of the results showed that PONV had a significantly lower incidence in treated patients (Groups A and B) than in the control group patients (Group C): postoperative nausea occurred in 13%, 30% and 67% of patients in Group A, B and C respectively and it was associated with vomiting in 3%, 7% and 57% of patients in Group A, B and C respectively. Although the patients in Group A showed a lower incidence of PONV in comparison to the patients in Group B, such differences proved to be not statistically significant. No adverse effects in relation to drug administration were observed. We conclude that ondansetron 4 mg i.v. is safe and effective in preventing PONV in the surgical patients, particularly when administered before the induction of anaesthesia.

[Treatment of postoperative pain by balanced spinal analgesia]. / Il trattamento del dolore post-operatorio mediante analgesia spinale bilanciata.

Postoperative pain relief has the aim to provide patient subjective comfort, to inhibit neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to surgical injury and to enhance restoration of function by allowing the patient to breathe, cough, move more easily and to begin enteral nutrition. Opioid analgesics, independently from the route of administration, are unable to provide all this. In addition to spinal opioids other drugs, such as local anesthetics, alpha 2-agonists and cholinergic drugs, may produce an antinociceptive effect when administered by spinal route. All these drugs may be administered in combination between them, realising the so called "balanced spinal analgesia". The aim of this study is to analyse the available methods for the evaluation of pharmacological interactions, the types of interaction among different spinal antinociceptive drugs and the role of balanced spinal analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Analysis of the presented data shows that the spinal synergism between opioids-local anesthetics and opioids-alpha 2-agonists can be useful in the treatment of postoperative pain, because these drug combinations are able to provide a satisfactory pain control at low doses with a reduction of the adverse effects. Furthermore, the combined use of opioids-local anesthetics proved to be effective also in abolishing postoperative incident pain and in inhibiting neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to surgical injury. Especially in high risk patients this is related to a better outcome. Finally, even if the synergism between cholinergic drugs with opioids or a2-agonists have been proved, at the moment their use in man by spinal route in the treatment of postoperative pain is not advisable.

[Is pain therapy just an ethical-behavioral problem?]. / La terapia del dolore è solo un problema etico-compartamentale?

Pain is a subjective sensation caused not only by pathological events which trigger signals perceived as algogenic (sensory component), but also by emotional mechanisms and critical assessments which modify its perception, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Therefore pain is an unique and unrepeatable experience resulting from the interaction of these three components. When faced with a patient suffering pain, it is fundamental to establish the respective quantitative incidences of these three components, in order to define the correct therapy of the pain in its totality. Whereas there are numerous therapies for dealing with the sensory component, the same cannot be said of the emotional and critical elements. We therefore suggest a number of guidelines for tackling the problem and for developing therapeutic strategies. In the literature there are few perspective and randomized studies that may evaluate the real effectiveness of the different treatments; it follows that the tested and accepted by scientific community therapeutical protocols are very few. Only recently some studies that intend to evaluate the different therapeutical strategies in connection with the different algesic syndromes are being published in the most important scientific journals.

[Treatment of pain in advanced-stage intra-abdominal neoplasms]. / Il trattamento del dolore nelle neoplasie endoaddominali in fase avanzata.

Different types of pain are present in far advanced intra-abdominal cancer, sometimes in the same site too. An accurate semeiological analysis of pain is important because different types of pain often differently respond to the available therapeutical tools. In this paper the results and the complications of the most important methods of pain management in far advanced intra-abdominal cancer are examined. Analysis of the data reveals that the association of more methods, pharmacological and non, should be a rule rather than the exception.