Steady-State Versus Chemotherapy-Based Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Study to Analyze Efficacy and Safety.

Background: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell support is recommended in the treatment of eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of steady-state versus chemotherapy-based stem cell mobilization in our Hungarian patient population. Methods: The subjects were 210 MM patients who underwent stem cell mobilization procedure between 2018 and 2022. Solo granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered in 104 cases, while 106 patients received chemotherapy which was followed by G-CSF administration. We evaluated the ratio of successful mobilizations, the amount of collected stem cells, the incidence of infections and cost-effectivity in the two groups. Results: In the steady-state group, there was a significantly higher need for plerixafor (45% vs. 13%, P < 0.001), unsuccessful stem cell mobilization was more frequent (11% vs. 3%, P = 0.024) and the mean amount of collected stem cells was lower (6.9 vs. 9.8 × 106, P < 0.001) than in the chemotherapy group. However, infections were less frequent (4% vs. 27%, P < 0.001) and the number of days spent in hospital was significantly lower (6 vs. 14 days, P < 0.001). Plerixafor was more frequently administered in those who had received lenalidomide or daratumumab than in those who had been treated with other regimens (41% vs. 23%, P = 0.007 and 78% vs. 23%, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Steady-state mobilization is a safe method; however, the higher rate of plerixafor administration and unsuccessful attempts may question its superiority to chemomobilization.

Dexamethasone treatment for COVID-19 is related to increased mortality in hematologic malignancy patients: results from the EPICOVIDEHA Registry.

Not available.

Case report: Targeted treatment strategies for Erdheim-Chester disease.

Introduction: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare disease that belongs to the group of Dendritic and histiocytic neoplasms. Only 2000 cases have been reported worldwide. It can present with a wide range of symptoms, making a differential diagnosis especially difficult. The primary and most important diagnostic tool is a biopsy of the affected organ/tissue. Nowadays the analysis of different mutations affecting the BRAF and MAPK pathways makes it possible to use targeted treatments, such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, or cobimetinib. Objective: Our aim is to present the results of three male patients treated in our hematology department. Results: Our BRAF mutation-positive patient presented with retroperitoneal tissue proliferation and diabetes insipidus. The initial therapy of choice was dabrafenib. After 3 months of treatment, 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans showed regression, and after 2 years of treatment, no disease activity was detected. In our second patient, a recurrent febrile state (not explained by other reasons) and diabetes insipidus suggested the diagnosis. A femoral bone biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. The first-line therapy was interferon-alpha. After 3 months of treatment, no response was observed on 18FDG-PET/CT, and treatment with cobimetinib was started. The control 18FDG-PET/CT imaging was negative. Our third patient was evaluated for dyspnea, and a CT scan showed fibrosis with hilar lymphadenomegaly. A lung biopsy confirmed BRAF-negative ECD. We started treatment with interferon-alpha, but unfortunately, no improvement was observed. Second-line treatment with cobimetinib resulted in a partial metabolic response (PMR) according to control 18FDG-PET/CT. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that an appropriately chosen treatment can lead to a good therapeutic response, but dose reduction may be necessary due to side effects. With advanced targeted therapeutic treatment options, survival and quality of life are significantly improved.

One Step Back from Bedside to the Bench-How Do Different Arterial Stiffness Parameters Behave in Relation to Peripheral Resistance?

The investigation of arterial stiffening is a promising approach to estimating cardiovascular risk. Despite the widespread use of different methods, the dynamic nature of measured and calculated stiffness parameters is marginally investigated. We aimed to determine the stability of large artery elasticity parameters assessed via commonly used, ultrasound-based and oscillometric methods in relation to peripheral resistance modulation. A human experimental environment was composed, and fifteen young males were investigated at rest after extremity heating and external compression. Functional vascular parameters were monitored in each session, and several arterial stiffness parameters were analysed. The distensibility coefficient (DC) did not show significant changes during heat provocation and extremity compression, while DC's stability seemed to be acceptable. The same stability of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was detected with ultrasound measurement (5.43 ± 0.79, 5.32 ± 0.86 and 5.28 ± 0.77, with p = 0.38, p = 0.27 and p = 0.76, respectively) with excellent intersession variability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90, 0.88 and 0.91, respectively). However, the oscillometric PWV (oPWV) did change significantly between the heating and outer compression phase of the study (7.46 ± 1.37, 7.10 ± 1.18 and 7.60 ± 1.21, with p = 0.05, p = 0.68 and p < 0.001, respectively), the alteration of which is closely related to wave reflection, represented by the changes in reflection time. Our results indicate the good stability of directly measured elastic parameters such as DC and PWV, despite the extreme modulation of peripheral resistance. However, the oscillometric, indirectly detected PWV might be altered by physical interventions, which depend on wave reflection. The effective modulation of wave reflection was characterized by changes in the augmentation index, detected using both oscillometry and applanation tonometry. Thus, the environment during oscillometric measurement should be rigorously standardized. Furthermore, our results suggest the dynamic nature of the reflection point, rather than being a fixed anatomical point, proposed previously as aortic bifurcation.

Transfusion-Transmitted Disorders 2023 with Special Attention to Bone Marrow Transplant Patients.

Transfusion medicine is traditionally a strong/fundamental part of clinical practice, saving hundreds of millions of lives. However, blood-borne or transmitted infections are a well-known and feared possibility, a risk we relentlessly mitigate. Pathogens are continuously and rather quickly changing, so during the last decade, many, sometimes exotic, new pathogens and diseases were recorded and analyzed, and some of them were proved to be transmitted with transfusions. Blood or blood component transfusions are carried out after cautious preparative screening and inactivation maneuvers, but in some instances, newly recognized agents might escape from standard screening and inactivation procedures. Here, we try to focus on some of these proven or potentially pathogenic transfusion-transmitted agents, especially in immunocompromised patients or bone marrow transplantation settings. These pathogens are sometimes new challenges for preparative procedures, and there is a need for more recent, occasionally advanced, screening and inactivation methods to recognize and eliminate the threat a new or well-known pathogen can pose. Pathogen transmission is probably even more critical in hemophiliacs or bone marrow transplant recipients, who receive plasma-derived factor preparations or blood component transfusions regularly and in large quantities, sometimes in severely immunosuppressed conditions. Moreover, it may not be emphasized enough that transfusions and plasma-derived product administrations are essential to medical care. Therefore, blood-borne transmission needs continued alertness and efforts to attain optimal benefits with minimized hazards.

Improved survival of autologous stem cell transplantation in primary refractory and relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma in the brentuximab vedotin era - real-world data from Hungary.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment of primary refractory or relapsed Hodgkin-lymphoma, which can provide a cure rate of about 50%. The aim of our study was to analyze the data of 126 HL patients undergoing AHSCT in Hungary between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2020. We assessed the progression-free and overall survival, the prognostic role of PET/CT performed before transplantation and effect of brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment on survival outcomes. The median follow-up time from AHSCT was 39 (1-76) months. The 5-year OS comparing PET- and PET + patients was 90% v. 74% (p = 0.039), and 5-year PFS was 74% v. 40% (p = 0.001). There was no difference in either OS or PFS compared to those who did not receive BV before AHSCT. We compared BV treatments based on their indication (BV only after AHSCT as maintenance therapy, BV before and after AHSCT as maintenance treatment, BV only before AHSCT, no BV treatment). There was statistically significant difference in the 5-year PFS based on the inication of BV therapy. Recovery rates of our R/R HL patient population, who underwent AHSCT, improved significantly. Our positive results can be attributed to the PET/CT directed, response-adapted treatment approach, and the widespread use of BV.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in COVID-19 patients with haematological malignancies: a report from the EPICOVIDEHA registry.

Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment decreases the hospitalisation rate in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19, but data on efficacy in patients with haematological malignancy are scarce. Here, we describe the outcome of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in a large cohort of the latter patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from the multicentre EPICOVIDEHA registry (NCT04733729) on patients with haematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and September 2022. Patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared to those who did not. A logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration in our sample. Mortality between treatment groups was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival plots after matching all the patients with a propensity score. Additionally, a Cox regression was modelled to detect factors associated with mortality in patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Findings: A total of 1859 patients were analysed, 117 (6%) were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 1742 (94%) were treated otherwise. Of 117 patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 80% had received ≥1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose before COVID-19 onset, 13% of which received a 2nd vaccine booster. 5% were admitted to ICU. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms at COVID-19 onset, for example anosmia, fever, rhinitis, or sinusitis (aOR 2.509, 95%CI 1.448-4.347) and 2nd vaccine booster (aOR 3.624, 95%CI 1.619-8.109). Chronic pulmonary disease (aOR 0.261, 95%CI 0.093-0.732) and obesity (aOR 0.105, 95%CI 0.014-0.776) were not associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use. After propensity score matching, day-30 mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 2%, significantly lower than in patients with SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (11%, p = 0.036). No factor was observed explaining the mortality difference in patients after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration. Interpretation: Haematological malignancy patients were more likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir when reporting extrapulmonary symptoms or 2nd vaccine booster at COVID-19 onset, as opposed to chronic pulmonary disease and obesity. The mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was lower than in patients with targeted drugs other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Funding: EPICOVIDEHA has received funds from Optics COMMIT (COVID-19 Unmet Medical Needs and Associated Research Extension) COVID-19 RFP program by GILEAD Science, United States (Project 2020-8223).

Breakthrough COVID-19 in vaccinated patients with hematologic malignancies: results from the EPICOVIDEHA survey.

Limited data are available on breakthrough COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) after anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Adult patients with HM, ≥1 dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and breakthrough COVID-19 between January 2021 and March 2022 were analyzed. A total of 1548 cases were included, mainly lymphoid malignancies (1181 cases, 76%). After viral sequencing in 753 cases (49%), the Omicron variant was prevalent (517, 68.7%). Most of the patients received ≤2 vaccine doses before COVID-19 (1419, 91%), mostly mRNA-based (1377, 89%). Overall, 906 patients (59%) received COVID-19-specific treatment. After 30-day follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis, 143 patients (9%) died. The mortality rate in patients with the Omicron variant was 7.9%, comparable to other variants, with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than in the prevaccine era (31%). In the univariable analysis, older age (P < .001), active HM (P < .001), and severe and critical COVID-19 (P = .007 and P < .001, respectively) were associated with mortality. Conversely, patients receiving monoclonal antibodies, even for severe or critical COVID-19, had a lower mortality rate (P < .001). In the multivariable model, older age, active disease, critical COVID-19, and 2-3 comorbidities were correlated with a higher mortality, whereas monoclonal antibody administration, alone (P < .001) or combined with antivirals (P = .009), was protective. Although mortality is significantly lower than in the prevaccination era, breakthrough COVID-19 in HM is still associated with considerable mortality. Death rate was lower in patients who received monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination with antivirals.

Combined prognostic role of TARC and interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma-real world observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Although the majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has recently become long-term survivors, 20%-30% of HL patients have primary refractory disease or relapse. It is essential to identify patients at risk of treatment failure during first-line therapy. To objective of the present study was to investigate the combined prognostic role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels in Hodgkin lymphoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between 01/01/2013 and 01/03/2019 77 HL patients were enrolled in this study where serum TARC levels were measured by an immunoassay and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline, after the second cycle of ABVD treatment (interim) and at the end of first-line therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (34%) had early-stage HL, while 51 patients presented with advanced-stage disease. Fifteen patients had primary refractory HL, while 1 patient relapsed after first-line therapy. Optimal TARC cut-off value for progression-free survival (PFS) was 700pg/mL based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. With Cox regression analysis, 18F-FDG PET/CT with Deauville scores of 3, 4, or 5 and TARC levels above 700pg/mL predicted treatment failure at interim assessment. Inclusion of HL patients with a Deauville score of 3 to the high-risk population resulted in a 7-fold increase in the estimated risk of relapse compared to patients with Deauville score 4-5 with TARC levels above 700pg/mL. Patients with interim 18F-FDG PET/CT Deauville scores 3-5 had a significant survival benefit if their TARC levels were 700pg/mL. Positive predictive value (PPV) of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT scans with a Deauville score 3-5 was 47.8%, while combined PPV of a similar 18F-FDGPET/CT assessment and elevated TARC levels was 88.8%. CONCLUSION: Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT and TARC analyzed together accurately identify HL patients who do not respond sufficiently to treatment and who need an early change of therapy.

Early administration of remdesivir plus convalescent plasma therapy is effective to treat COVID-19 pneumonia in B-cell depleted patients with hematological malignancies.

Patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) are at a higher risk of developing severe form and protracted course of COVID-19 disease. We investigated whether the combination of viral replication inhibition with remdesivir and administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins with convalescent plasma (CP) therapy might be sufficient to treat B-cell-depleted patients with COVID-19. We enrolled 20 consecutive patients with various HMs with profound B-cell lymphopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2020 and May 2021. All patients demonstrated undetectable baseline anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin levels before CP. Each patient received at least a complete course of remdesivir and at least one unit of CP. Previous anti-CD20 therapy resulted in a more prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity compared to other causes of B-cell lymphopenia (p = 0.004). Timing of CP therapy showed a significant impact on the clinical outcome. Simultaneous use of remdesivir and CP reduced time period for oxygen weaning after diagnosis (p = 0.017), length of hospital stay (p = 0.007), and PCR positivity (p = 0.012) compared to patients who received remdesivir and CP consecutively. In addition, time from the diagnosis to CP therapy affected the length of oxygen dependency (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.0001). In those cases where there were at least 10 days from the diagnosis to plasma administration, oxygen dependency was prolonged vs. patients with shorter interval (p = 0.006). In conclusion, the combination of inhibition of viral replication with passive immunization was proved to be efficient and safe. Our results suggest the clear benefit of early, combined administration of remdesivir and CP to avoid protracted COVID-19 disease among patients with HMs and B-cell lymphopenia.

Transition Between Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma- Our Histopathological and Clinical Experience With Patients With Intermediate Lymphoma.

Even though information about the pathophysiology and clinical features of grey-zone lymphoma, an entity intermediate between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, is growing, there are still a number of unanswered questions. The disease has no easily reproducible diagnostic criteria, which makes identification challenging. Uncommon, mixed histological picture and unusual clinical presentation should raise suspicion for grey-zone lymphoma. In this retrospective analysis we present 9 gray zone lymphoma patients, who were diagnosed in our institute between 2008 and 2018. The histological diagnoses was oftentime challenging, we asked for a revision in three cases due to the unusual clinical behavior and in other three cases only the relapse of the disease proved to be grey-zone lymphoma. Based on the initial histopathological diagnoses we applied adriablastine-bleomycine-vinblastine and procarbasine or cyclophosphamide-vincristine-adriablastine and prednisolon as first line chemotherapy regime with additional rituximab in six cases and brentuximab-vedotine in one patient. In six of the nine patients due to the primary refractory disease we used rituximab plus cisplatine, cytosine-arabinoside, prednisolone salvage treatment and five of these patients responded well enough to become eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. One young male patient was refractory for various treatments and died due to the progression of his lymphoma. As a rare disease grey-zone lymphoma has no existing diagnostic criteria or guiedlines for its standard of care, which makes the everyday practice rather challenging for the clinicians, and emphasize the importance of unique decision making in every case and the repeated consultation between the pathologist and hematologist.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the treatment of polycythemia vera.

INTRODUCTION: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). A newly developed PV treatment option, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, contains recombinant human alfa monoisomer as an active ingredient, resulting in a novel pharmacologic profile and improved tolerability. Efficacy studies conclude remarkable long-term hematological response and sustained JAK2V617F allele burden reduction. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b compound has been approved for the treatment of polycythemia vera without symptomatic splenomegaly. AREAS COVERED: Current clinical trials are investigating the role of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the first-line setting of treatment for PV. The safety and efficacy results of completed trials are summarized in this review. Metabolic, pharmacokinetic issues are also discussed of ropeginterferon alfa-2b. EXPERT OPINION: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a targeted therapeutic option in the treatment of PV, representing a significant improvement compared to conventional cytoreductive therapies. The single isomer entity of the recombinant human interferon alfa-2b and the mono-pegylation method imparts favorable properties to the compound. The use of ropeginterferon alfa-2b allows extended dosing interval, reduces side effects, and may increase the overall survival of PV patients by reducing the risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia. Clinical data suggests that the compound may provide a disease-modifying option for PV patients with asymptomatic splenomegaly.

Pulmonary Toxicity of Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Standard bleomycin-containing first-line therapy and/or irradiation may cause pulmonary toxicity in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Our aim was to prospectively assess effects of chest irradiation, bleomycin administration, and other factors on lung function in the treatment of patients with HL. METHODS: Pulmonary function of newly diagnosed HL patients was assessed via a St. George Respiratory Questionnaire, dynamic inhalation lung scintigraphy, spirometry, and an assessment of the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) before, during, and after treatment. RESULTS: This prospective study was conducted at the University of Debrecen. The study included 84 patients with classical HL. Most patients received standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy. Both intramuscular and intravenous administrations of bleomycin were used. Brentuximab vedotin combination chemotherapy was administered to 12 patients. Mediastinal involved-field irradiation therapy (IFRT) was used to treat 16 patients. Lung scintigraphy revealed pulmonary toxicity more sensitively than DLCO. Intravenous bleomycin administration decreased diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid clearance. Intramuscular bleomycin had the lowest level of pulmonary toxicity among considered treatments. Currently used, mediastinal IFRT had a lower level of pulmonary toxicity than bleomycin. The current prospective evaluation confirmed previous results that determined that cumulative bleomycin dose and administration are major risk factors for pulmonary toxicity, while the currently used treatment method, mediastinal irradiation, was determined to be relatively safe for treating for HL patients. CONCLUSION: We agree with decreasing bleomycin dosage and number of cycles administered and we do not recommend avoiding mediastinal IFRT, unless multiple pulmonary risk factors are present.

The impact of autoimmune cytopenias on the clinical course and survival of Hodgkin lymphoma.

The characteristics of autoimmune cytopenias (AICP) associated with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are not thoroughly defined. We retrospectively assessed the clinical features of HL-associated AICPs in 563 HL patients diagnosed over a period of 28 years. We identified 8 cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and 8 cases of autoimmune thrombocytopenia among 14 patients altogether. Four (26%) AICPs were present at lymphoma diagnosis, while 11 (74%) cytopenias occurred during follow-up after first-line therapy. The overall incidence of HL-associated AICPs was 2.8%. Nine (75%) cytopenias responded to intravenous steroids. Seven (46%) AICPs led to the diagnosis of HL, indicated a relapse, or revealed secondary malignancies. AIHAs and AICPs altogether were more likely to develop in patients with advanced-stage HL (p = 0.010 and p < 0.004, respectively). HL patients experiencing AICPs had an increased short-term (1-year) mortality compared to the general HL population (p < 0.022). The 5-year OS of HL patients with concurrent AICPs at diagnosis was inferior compared to HL patients developing AICPs during follow-up (p = 0.005), and to HL patients without AICPs (p < 0.001). Patients with HL-associated AICPs appear to have a particular disease-related profile. The association of HL and AICPs may increase short-term mortality, while patients with concurrent AICPs at HL diagnosis have a dismal prognosis.

Real-world efficacy of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine as a bridge to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary refractory or relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Up to 30% of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are not responsive to frontline therapy or relapse after primary treatment. In these cases, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard of care. The combination of brentuximab vedotin and bendamustine (BV + B) is an effective salvage regimen in this challenging subpopulation. This nationwide multicenter study investigated the real-world efficacy and safety of the BV + B regimen as a bridge to AHSCT in patients with primary refractory or relapsed cHL. A total of 41 cHL patients underwent AHSCT after receiving at least 1 cycle of BV + B (with brentuximab vedotin given at 1.8 mg/kg on day 1 and bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 on days 1-2 every 4 weeks). After a median of 3 (1-6) cycles of BV + B, the objective response rate was 78%, with 29 (70.7%) patients achieving complete remission. Twelve (29.3%) patients relapsed after AHSCT, 2 (4.9%) of them died, while 2 (4.9%) patients are lost to follow-up. After a median of 17 months of follow-up, the estimated 2-year overall- and progression-free survival after AHSCT was 93 and 62%, respectively. Features of advanced disease at recurrence (p = 0.038) and the presence of stage IV cHL at relapse (p = 0.024) are strong predictor markers of unfavorable outcomes. Twenty-four (58.5%) patients experienced adverse events of any grade, while no grade IV toxicities were reported. BV + B is an effective salvage option with a manageable toxicity profile in cHL. The real-world safety and efficacy of this combination are similar to the observations made on the study population.

Interim PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma may facilitate identification of good-prognosis patients among IPI-stratified patients.

Treating patients with DLBCL remains a challenge, as the response to first-line immunochemotherapy is somewhat unpredictable. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is one of the most widely used methods for assessing prognosis. Interim PET/CT (iPET/CT) can play an important role in the early identification of 'non-responder' patients before the end of treatment examination. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 104 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP-like regimens who underwent iPET/CT imaging during therapy. There was a significant difference in 2-year OS between patients with negative iPET/CT and those with positive iPET/CT. Patients who had positive iPET/CT showed inferior 2-year PFS compared to those with negative iPET/CT. According to IPI, there was a statistically significant difference in 2-year OS and PFS between patients in the lower and higher risk groups. However, these patients can be further subdivided according to iPET/CT. The iPET/CT results in the present study clearly separate good- and poor-prognosis patients according to differences in 2-year OS, both in the lower and higher IPI risk groups. These results are in agreement with those of previous studies that demonstrated that iPET/CT has high negative predictive value, clearly identifying good-prognosis patients even within the poor-prognosis IPI group.

Young adults diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma are at risk of relapsing late: a comprehensive analysis of late relapse in Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Majority of relapses in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occur within 3 years after initial treatment, late relapses (LR), happening 5 or more years after first diagnosis is rare events. Neither clinical characteristics, risk factors, nor optimal treatment is well described for LR patients. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive analysis on the LR of HL to outline a patient population at risk of relapsing late. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 637 HL patients were treated at the University of Debrecen between 1981 and 2010. Patient data was evaluated retrospectively. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and odds ratios (OR) were identified by binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: With a median observational time of 9.08 years 584 (91%) HL patients achieved complete remission (CR) after first line treatment. Relapse occurred in 176 (28%) patients, 26 (4%) of them 5 or more years after first diagnosis. With multivariable analysis, initial diagnosis before the age of 24 (p < 0.001), initial presentation between 1981 and 1990 or 1991-2000 (p = 0.025 and p = 0.023, respectively) and first line treatment with radiotherapy only (p = 0.034) were identified as independent risk factors for LR. We observed a significantly impaired OS for patients with early relapse HL compared to those in long-term remission or experiencing LR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Late relapse of HL presents with clinical characteristics very similar to primary disease and appears to have a good prognosis. First diagnosis in childhood or young adulthood and first line treatment before the ABVD era increases the risk of relapsing late.