[Evaluation of The Medical Board Exam in Portugal]. / Avaliação do Exame Final do Internato Médico em Portugal.

INTRODUCTION: There is a high heterogeneity in the structure of postgraduate medical training evaluation worldwide. However, in contrast to other countries, there have been no scientific studies of the final medical board examination, in Portugal. The present study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the medical board examination including its validity as measured by its association with medical school grade average and national seriation examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational study. We analyzed the final results on the medical board examination of 2439 physicians, across 47 specialties, who completed their training in 2016 and 2017, using measures of central tendency and variability. We assessed the association between these grades and the national exam to initiate residency, and the grade average in Medical School. RESULTS: Measures of central tendency and variability, and consequent shape measures, revealed that the distribution of the scores of the final medical board exam is extremely negatively asymmetric and leptokurtic. A positive association was also found between the results in this exam and the score on national exam to initiate residency, and the grade average in Medical School. CONCLUSION: Although the medical board examination was, in general, positively associated with scores on the national exam to initiate residency, and the mean final Medical School grades, thus indicating its potential validity, our results demonstrate that this exam presents no satisfactory discriminative capacity. Therefore, there is room to improve the actual postgraduate medical examination model, including changes in its classification system and potentially consider other assessment models.

Introdução: Existe uma elevada heterogeneidade na estrutura da avaliação da formação médica pós-graduada a nível mundial. No entanto, contrastando com outros países, não existem estudos científicos em Portugal que tenham avaliado o modelo da avaliação final da especialidade. O presente estudo pretendeu avaliar a adequação do exame do final da especialidade aos seus propósitos; aí incluída a sua validade enquanto consubstanciada na relação com a prova nacional de seriação e média final de curso de medicina. Material e Métodos: Estudo transversal, observacional. Foram analisadas com recurso a medidas de tendência central e variabilidade, as notas na avaliação final da especialidade de 2439 médicos, de 47 especialidades, que terminaram a sua formação em 2016 e 2017. Tendo em vista a sua validação cruzada, foram também avaliadas as correlações com a média final de curso e a nota na prova nacional de seriação. Resultados: Das medidas de tendência central e variabilidade, e consequentes medidas de formato, resulta que a distribuição das pontuações do exame final de especialidade se apresenta com uma forma manifestamente assimétrica negativa e leptocúrtica. No geral, verificou-se a existência de uma associação positiva entre a avaliação final da especialidade e a média de curso e a prova nacional de seriação. Conclusão: Apesar de positivamente associado, no geral, com a média de curso e a prova nacional de seriação, o que indica a sua potencial validade, os resultados demonstram que a avaliação final de especialidade não apresenta uma capacidade discriminativa satisfatória. Deste modo, existe oportunidade para melhoria do modelo atual, nomeadamente através da alteração ao seu sistema de classificação e considerando outros modelos de exame.

Left atrial appendage volume as a new predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.

PURPOSE: Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is common, being clinically relevant to identify predictors of recurrence. The left atrial appendage (LAA) role as an AF trigger is scarcely explored. Our aim was to identify if LAA volume is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation. METHODS: We analysed 52 patients (aged 54 ± 10 years, 58% male) with paroxysmal and persistent AF who underwent a first AF catheter ablation and had performed contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) prior to the procedure. RESULTS: The mean left atrial and LAA volumes measured by cardiac CT were 98.9 ± 31.8 and 9.3 ± 3.5 mL, respectively. All patients received successful pulmonary vein isolation and were followed up for 24 months. AF recurrence occurred in 17 patients (33%). LAA volume was significantly greater in patients with AF recurrence than in those without recurrence (11.3 ± 2.9 vs. 8.2 ± 3.4 mL; p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis using Cox regression revealed that LAA volume (hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.55; p = 0.001) and persistent AF (hazard ratio 4.22; 95% confidence interval 1.48-12.07; p = 0.007) were independent predictors for AF recurrence. An LAA volume greater than 8.825 mL predicted AF recurrence with 94% sensitivity and 66% specificity. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower rate free from AF recurrence in the group with an LAA volume >8.825 mL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Larger LAA volume was associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Modified continuity equation using left ventricular outflow tract three-dimensional imaging for aortic valve area estimation.

PURPOSE: Aortic valve area (AVA) is usually estimated by the continuity equation (CE) in which the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area is calculated assuming a circular shape. This study aimed to compare measurements of LVOT area using standard 2D transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE), and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and assess their relative impact on AVA estimated by the CE. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 60 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) who systematically underwent 2DTTE, 3DTEE, and MDCT. Mean LVOT areas obtained by 2DTTE (3.28±0.66 cm2 ) and 3DTEE (3.95±0.90 cm2 ) were significantly underestimated when compared to the mean MDCT LVOT area (4.31±0.99 cm2 ). LVOT was rather elliptical than round, with a mean eccentricity index of 1.47 (ratio of maximum to minimum LVOT diameters) assessed by MDCT. Mean TTE AVA estimated by the CE was 0.62±0.20 cm2 . Substitution of 2DTTE LVOT area by 3DTEE LVOT area in the CE resulted in AVA of 0.74±0.24 cm2 , while using MDCT LVOT area held an AVA of 0.80±0.24 cm2 . MDCT-derived AVA was similar to MDCT planimetric AVA and allowed 24% of patients to be reclassified from severe to moderate AS. CONCLUSIONS: 2DTTE and 3DTEE underestimate LVOT area when compared to MDCT with significant impact on AVA estimation. Assessment through MDCT fusion AVA may be of incremental value in patients with discrepant severity criteria for AS.