Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Managed entry agreements (MEAs) consist of a set of instruments to reduce the uncertainty and the budget impact of new high-priced medicines; however, there are concerns. There is a need to critically appraise MEAs with their planned introduction in Brazil. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to identify and appraise key attributes and concerns with MEAs among payers and their advisers, with the findings providing critical considerations for Brazil and other high- and middle-income countries. METHODS: An integrative review approach was adopted. This involved a review of MEAs across countries. The review question was 'What are the health technology MEAs that have been applied around the world?' This review was supplemented with studies not retrieved in the search known to the senior-level co-authors including key South American markets. It also involved senior-level decision makers and advisers providing guidance on the potential advantages and disadvantages of MEAs and ways forward. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Most MEAs included medicines (96.8%), focused on financial arrangements (43%) and included mostly antineoplastic medicines. Most countries kept key information confidential including discounts or had not published such data. Few details were found in the literature regarding South America. Our findings and inputs resulted in both advantages including reimbursement and disadvantages including concerns with data collection for outcome-based schemes. CONCLUSIONS: We are likely to see a growth in MEAs with the continual launch of new high-priced and often complex treatments, coupled with increasing demands on resources. Whilst outcome-based MEAs could be an important tool to improve access to new innovative medicines, there are critical issues to address. Comparing knowledge, experiences, and practices across countries is crucial to guide high- and middle-income countries when designing their future MEAs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rotavirus vaccination in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is a leading cause of severe diarrhea in children under 5. In Argentina, the most affected regions are the Northeast and Northwest, where hospitalizations and deaths are more frequent. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of adding either of the two licensed rotavirus vaccines to the routine immunization schedule. METHODS: The integrated TRIVAC vaccine cost-effectiveness model from the Pan American Health Organization's ProVac Initiative (Version 2.0) was used to assess health benefits, costs savings, life-years gained (LYGs), DALYs averted, and cost/DALY averted of vaccinating 10 successive cohorts, from the health care system and societal perspectives. Two doses of monovalent (RV1) rotavirus vaccine and three doses of pentavalent (RV5) rotavirus vaccine were each compared to a scenario assuming no vaccination. The price/dose was US$ 7.50 and US$ 5.15 for RV1 and RV5, respectively. We ran both a national and sub-national analysis, discounting all costs and benefits 3% annually. Our base case results were compared to a range of alternative univariate and multivariate scenarios. RESULTS: The number of LYGs was 5962 and 6440 for RV1 and RV5, respectively. The cost/DALY averted when compared to no vaccination from the health care system and societal perspective was: US$ 3870 and US$ 1802 for RV1, and US$ 2414 and US$ 358 for RV5, respectively. Equivalent figures for the Northeast were US$ 1470 and US$ 636 for RV1, and US$ 913 and US$ 80 for RV5. Therefore, rotavirus vaccination was more cost-effective in the Northeast compared to the whole country; and, in the Northwest, health service's costs saved outweighed the cost of introducing the vaccine. Vaccination with either vaccine compared to no vaccination was highly cost-effective based on WHO guidelines and Argentina's 2011 per capita GDP of US$ 9090. Key variables influencing results were vaccine efficacy, annual loss of efficacy, relative coverage of deaths, vaccine price, and discount rate. CONCLUSION: Compared to no vaccination, routine vaccination against rotavirus in Argentina would be highly cost-effective with either vaccine. Health and economic benefits would be higher in the Northeast and Northwest regions, where the intervention would even be cost-saving.

Patentes, suministro de medicamentos y protección de la Salud Pública / Patents, supply of medicines and protection of public health

INTRODUCCIÓN: A fin de cumplir con las obligaciones asumidas en la Organización Mundial del Comercio, Argentina comenzó a conceder patentes sobre medicamentos en octubre de 2000. Cerca de 1.000 patentes farmacéuticas fueron concedidas entre 2000 y 2007. OBJETIVOS: caracterizar el patentamiento farmacéutico y, en particular, establecer el tipo de materias protegidas, las aplicaciones terapéuticas y el origen de los titulares de patentes otorgadas; examinar el posible impacto del nuevo régimen de patentamiento sobre las adquisiciones públicas de medicamentos; clarificar en qué situaciones y con qué procedimientos pueden otorgarse licencias obligatorias, especialmente en casos de emergencia sanitaria; y examinar qué implicaciones tiene el marco legal nacional e internacional de la propiedad intelectual sobre las políticas de salud pública. MÉTODOS: Se diseñó y analizó una base de datos con las patentes concedidas en el período indicado. Se revisaron los procedimientos de adquisición de medicamentos del Ministerio de Salud de la Nación y el marco legal aplicable, así como las negociaciones internacionales en curso. RESULTADOS: casi la totalidad de las patentes otorgadas pertenecen a empresas extranjeras; la mayoría se refiere a enfermedades del sistema nervioso e incluyen reivindicaciones del tipo “Markush”. La mayoría de las patentes son de derivados o variantes de productos existentes(sales, formulaciones, polimorfos, etc.). CONCLUSIONES: El estudio concluye con recomendaciones, sobre los procedimientos de adquisición, concesión de licencias obligatorias y la transparencia del sistema de patentes en lo concerniente a medicamentos.

INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with its obligationsin the World Trade Organization, Argentina started to grant patents on pharmaceutical products in October 2000. In the period 2000-2007 near one thous and pharmaceutical patents were granted. OBJECTIVES: To characterize pharmaceutical patenting and, in particular, to establish the type of protected subject matter, the therapeutic uses and the origin of patent owners; to examine the possible impact of the new patentin gregime on public procurement of medicines; to clarify in which situations and with which procedures compulsory licenses can be granted, particularly in cases of health emergencies;to examine the implications of the national and international legal framework of intellectual property on public health policies.METHODS: A data base with the patents granted in the above-mentioned period was designed and analyzed, the procurement procedures of the National Ministry of Health were studied, as well as the applicable legal framework and ongoing international negotiations. RESULTS: The study revealed that almost all granted patents belong to foreign companies. The majority refers to diseases of the nervous system and includes‘Markush-type’. In addition, the great majority of patents relate to derivatives or variants of existing products (salts, formulations, polymorphs, etc. ). CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes with recommendations, about procurement procedures, the grant of compulsory licenses and the transparency of the patent system as regards medicines.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the 10- and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: Since the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-10) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) were recently licensed for use in Argentina, both vaccines were evaluated to estimate the costs, health benefits and cost-effectiveness of adding a PCV to the routine child immunization schedule. METHODOLOGY: The integrated TRIVAC vaccine cost-effectiveness model from Pan American Health Organization's ProVac Initiative (Version 1.0.65) was used to assess the health outcomes of 20 successive cohorts from birth to 5 years of age. PCV-10 and PCV-13 were each compared to a scenario assuming no PCV vaccination. A 3+1 (three doses+booster) schedule and a vaccination price of US$ 20.75 per dose was assumed in the base case for both vaccines. RESULTS: Introduction of PCV-13 rather than PCV-10 would increase the number of life years gained (LYG) by at least 10%. The number of LYG (and LYG after adjustment for DALY morbidity weights) was 56,882 (64,252) for PCV-10 compared to 65,038 (71,628) for PCV-13. From the health system perspective, the cost per DALY averted was US$ 8973 and US$ 10,948 for PCV-10 and PCV-13 respectively, and US$ 8546 and US$ 10,510 respectively, after incorporating costs saved by households. When PCV13 was compared to PCV10 directly, the additional benefits of PCV-13 was conferred at a cost of US$ 28,147 per DALY averted. Cost-effectiveness was influenced mainly by vaccine price, serotype replacement, pneumonia mortality and discount rate. CONCLUSION: Routine vaccination against S. pneumoniae in Argentina would be cost-effective with either PCV-10 or PCV-13. PCV-13, with higher coverage of local serotypes, would prevent more cases of pneumonia, invasive pneumococcal disease, sequelae and deaths with a higher number of LYG and DALYs averted, but PCV-10, due its higher impact in the prevention of AOM, would save more costs to the healthcare system.