Surgical margins and outcomes for eyelid melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

No randomized trials exist to inform the peripheral surgical margins or depth of wide excision for eyelid melanoma. We performed a meta-analysis examining surgical margins and Breslow depth for eyelid melanomas. A systematic review was performed in August 2022 using PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline databases (1/1/1990 to 8/1/2022). Inclusion criteria included studies reporting surgical treatment of primary cutaneous melanomas of the eyelid with reported surgical margins. Ten articles were included. The studies were examined by surgical margin size (group 1: ≤ 0.5 cm; group 2 > 0.5 cm and ≤ 1.5 cm) and Breslow depth (group 1: ≤ 1 mm; group 2: > 1 mm). The odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence was 2.55 [95% CI 0.36-18.12], p = 0.18; regional metastasis was 0.70 [95% CI 0.00-23671.71], p = 0.48; and distant metastasis was 2.47 [95% CI 0.00-1687.43], p = 0.66. When examining by Breslow depth, the OR for local recurrence was 0.53 [95% CI 0.14-1.94], p = 0.34; regional metastasis was 0.14 [0.00-176.12], p = 0.54; and the OR for distant metastasis was 0.24 [95% CI 0.01-8.73], p = 0.46. There was a trend toward higher likelihood of recurrence and metastasis in the ≤ 0.5 cm group. Similarly, there is a trend toward higher likelihood of recurrence and metastasis with Breslow depth > 1 mm. A surgical margin of at least 0.5 cm and achievement of negative margins via permanent sections or MMS are likely needed to prevent adverse outcomes. En face sectioning may be a superior method of histological processing for eyelid melanoma.

Postoperative Bleeding Complications Associated With Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are commonly prescribed, recently developed anticoagulants, but limited data exist on NOAC-related bleeding complications in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients taking NOACs compared with patients taking no antithrombotic medications. METHODS/MATERIALS: A 5-year retrospective chart review of all MMS cases performed by a single surgeon was conducted. Patient and surgery characteristics, anticoagulant use, and bleeding complications were recorded. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred eighty-one MMS cases in 1,545 patients were included. There were 696/2,181 cases in which patients were taking at least 1 antithrombotic medication, with 149 on NOAC monotherapy and 15 on NOAC and aspirin combination therapy. Bleeding complications occurred in 22/2,181 cases. Patients on NOAC monotherapy did not have an increased risk of bleeding complications compared with patients on no antithrombotic medications (odds ratio [OR]:1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-7.97, p = .50). In contrast, patients on NOAC and aspirin combination therapy exhibited an increased bleeding risk (OR: 20.5, 95% CI: 3.99-105.7, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Novel oral anticoagulant use alone during MMS was not associated with an increased postoperative bleeding risk, supporting the safety of continuing NOAC therapy during MMS. However, NOAC and aspirin combination therapy was associated with a high postoperative bleeding risk. Nonetheless, these bleeding events did not lead to adverse long-term outcomes.

Cutaneous Manifestations of "Lupus": Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Beyond.

Lupus, Latin for "wolf," is a term used to describe many dermatologic conditions, some of which are related to underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, while others are distinct disease processes. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a wide array of visible skin manifestations and can progress to systemic lupus erythematosus in some cases. Cutaneous lupus can be subdivided into three main categories: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Physical exam, laboratory studies, and histopathology enable differentiation of cutaneous lupus subtypes. This differentiation is paramount as the subtype of cutaneous lupus informs upon treatment, disease monitoring, and prognostication. This review outlines the different cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and provides an update on both topical and systemic treatment options for these patients. Other conditions that utilize the term "lupus" but are not cutaneous lupus erythematosus are also discussed.