Non-invasive cumulus cell analysis can be applied for oocyte ranking and is useful for countries with legal restrictions on embryo generation or freezing.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a strategy for scoring oocyte quality, based on cumulus cell (CC) gene expression, prioritize oocytes with the highest implantation potential, while limiting the number of embryos to be processed in culture and the number of supernumerary embryos to be vitrified? DESIGN: An interventional, blinded, prospective cohort study was retrospectively analyzed. In the original study, patients underwent a fresh Day3 single embryo transfer with embryos ranked based on morphology and CC gene expression (Aurora Test). The additional ranking of the embryos with the Aurora Test resulted in significant higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Now it is investigated if the Aurora Test ranking could be applied to select oocytes. The effect of an Aurora Test based restriction to 2 and 3 2PN or MII oocytes on clinical pregnancy and other outcomes, was analyzed in two subsets of patients with all 2PN (n = 83) or all MII oocytes (n = 45) ranked. RESULTS: Considering only the top three ranked 2PN oocytes, 95% of the patients would have received a fresh SET on Day3 resulting in 65% clinical pregnancies. This was not different from the pregnancy rate obtained in a strategy using all oocytes but significantly reduced the need for vitrification of supernumerary embryos by 3-fold. Considering only top-ranked MII oocytes gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In countries with legal restrictions on freezing of embryos, gene expression of CC can be used for the selective processing of oocytes and would thus decrease the twin pregnancy rate and workload, especially for embryo morphology scoring and transfers as the handling and processing of lower competence oocytes is prevented, while improving the ART outcome.

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: In women scheduled for cancer treatment, oocytes cryopreservation is a well-established procedure. Random start protocols have been a substantial improvement in this setting, allowing to prevent delay in the initiation of cancer treatments. However, there is still the need to optimize the regimen of ovarian stimulation, to make treatments more patient-friendly and to reduce costs. METHODS: This retrospective study compares two periods (2019 and 2020), corresponding to two different ovarian stimulation regimens. In 2019, women were treated with corifollitropin, recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Ovulation was triggered with GnRH agonists. In 2020, the policy changed, and women were treated with a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and dual trigger (GnRH agonist and low dose hCG) Continuous data are reported as median [Interquartile Range]. To overcome expected changes in baseline characteristics of the women, the primary outcome was the ratio between the number of mature oocytes retrieved and serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) in ng/ml. RESULTS: Overall, 124 women were selected, 46 in 2019 and 78 in 2020. The ratio between the number of mature oocytes retrieved and serum AMH in the first and second period was 4.0 [2.3-7.1] and 4.0 [2.7-6.8], respectively (p = 0.80). The number of scans was 3 [3-4] and 3 [2-3], respectively (p<0.001). The total costs of the drugs used for ovarian stimulation were 940 € [774-1,096 €] and 520 € [434-564 €], respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Random start PPOS with hMG and dual trigger represents an easy and affordable ovarian stimulation protocol for fertility preservation in women with cancer, showing similar efficacy and being more friendly and economical.

Improved clinical outcomes after non-invasive oocyte selection and Day 3 eSET in ICSI patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive oocyte quality scoring, based on cumulus gene expression analysis, in combination with morphology scoring, can increase the clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in Day 3 eSET (elective single embryo transfer) ICSI patients. This was first investigated in a pilot study and is now confirmed in a large patient cohort of 633 patients. It was investigated whether CPR, LBR and time-to-pregnancy could be improved by analyzing the gene expression profile of three predictive genes in the cumulus cells, compared to patients with morphology-based embryo selection only. METHODS: A large interventional, non-randomized, assessor-blinded cohort study with 633 ICSI patients was conducted in a tertiary fertility center. Non-PCOS patients, 22-39 years old, with good ovarian reserve, were stimulated with HP-hMG using a GnRH antagonist protocol and planned for fresh Day 3 eSET. The cumulus cells from individually denuded oocytes were ranked by a lab-developed cumulus cell test: qRT-PCR for three predictive genes (CAMK1D, EFNB2 and SASH1) and two control genes (UBC, B2M). The embryo selected for transfer was highest ranked from the pool of morphologically transferable Day 3 embryos. Patients in the control (n = 520) and experimental arm (n = 113) were compared for clinical pregnancy and live birth, using a weighted generalized linear model, and time-to-pregnancy using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The CPR was 61% in the experimental arm (n = 113) vs 29% in the control arm (n = 520, p < 0.0001). The LBR in the experimental arm (50%) was significantly higher than in the control arm (27%,p < 0.0001). Time-to-pregnancy was significantly shortened by 3 transfer cycles independent of the number of embryos available on Day 3 (Kaplan-Meier, p < 0.0001). Cumulus cell tested patients < 35 years (n = 65) or ≥ 35 years (n = 48) had a CPR of 62 and 60% respectively (ns). For cumulus cell tested patients with 2, 3-4, or > 4 transferable embryos, the CPR was 66, 52, and 67% (ns) respectively, and thus independent of the number of transferable embryos on Day 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence of the clinical usefulness of the non-invasive cumulus cell test over time in a larger patient cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03659786 / NCT02962466 (Registered 6Sep2018/11Nov2016, retrospectively registered.

Influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation: an overview.

It is widely known that luteinising hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) are integral in the female reproductive lifecycle. Due to the common binding site and similarity in molecular structure, they were previously thought to have overlapping roles. However, with the development of both purified urinary-derived and recombinant gonadotrophins, the individual characteristics of these molecules have begun to be defined. There is evidence to suggest that LH and hCG preferentially activate different signalling cascades and display different receptor-binding kinetics. The data generated on the two molecules have led to an improved understanding of their distinct physiological functions, resulting in a debate among clinicians regarding the most beneficial use of LH- and hCG-containing products for ovarian stimulation (OS) in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Over the past few decades, a number of trials have generated data supporting the use of hCG for OS in ART. Indeed, the data indicated that hCG plays an important role in folliculogenesis, leads to improved endometrial receptivity and is associated with a higher quality of embryos, while presenting a favourable safety profile. These observations support the increased use of hCG as a method to provide LH bioactivity during OS. This review summarises the molecular and functional differences between hCG and LH, and provides an overview of the clinical trial data surrounding the use of products for OS that contain LH bioactivity, examining their individual effect on outcomes such as endometrial receptivity, oocyte yield and embryo quality, as well as key pregnancy outcomes.

Anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian response in GnRH-antagonist-treated oocyte donors.

Evidence regarding the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) among oocyte donors is limited and only involves gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist-treated donors. This trial assessed the predictive ability of AMH for ovarian response among 108 oocyte donors treated with an antagonist protocol. In multivariate linear regression analysis, both AMH and age were independently associated with ovarian response (unstandardized coefficients 0.904 and -0.378, respectively). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, AMH performed better than age, but was a modest predictive marker for low (≤ 6 oocytes) and excessive (>20 oocytes) ovarian response (area under the curve (AUC) 0.643 and 0.695, respectively). Similarly, a multivariate logistic model including AMH and age was also modest (AUC 0.651 and 0.697 for low and excessive responders, respectively). The predictive ability of AMH did not significantly alter when different thresholds were adopted, such as <4 oocytes for low response and >25 for excessive response (AUC 0.759 and 0.724, respectively). Among oocyte donors treated with a GnRH-antagonist protocol, although AMH was correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, it demonstrates a modest ability in discriminating women with low or excessive ovarian response. Selection of oocyte donors is of paramount importance for the proper and more cost-efficient functionality of the oocyte donation programme. Despite the extensive literature regarding the efficacy of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) for predicting ovarian response among infertile patients, available evidence regarding the role of AMH in oocyte donors is considerably limited and involves only agonist down-regulated cycles. In this trial we assessed whether AMH can be considered a predictive marker for ovarian response among oocyte donors treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. According to our results, among oocyte donors treated with a GnRH-antagonist protocol, although AMH was correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, the correlation is not strong and it appears that AMH has a modest predictive ability to discriminate women who are likely to demonstrate either impaired or excessive response to ovarian stimulation.

Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme.

Controversy exists about the risk of microbiological contamination from direct contact with unsterile liquid nitrogen during oocyte vitrification. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oocyte vitrification using a high-security closed vitrification system in a donation programme. Oocyte vitrification was performed using CBS High Security closed straws (Cryo Bio System) with DMSO/ethylene glycol/sucrose as the cryoprotectant (Irvine Scientific freeze kit). A total of 123 vitrified metaphase-II oocytes were warmed in 20 recipient cycles (6.2 warmed oocytes per recipient); of these, 111 oocytes (90.2%) survived vitrification and warming. All surviving oocytes were microinjected and 86 (77.5%) were normally fertilized, of which 53 (61.6%) developed up to good-quality day 3. Ten embryo transfers resulted in a clinical pregnancy (50.0%) and an ongoing clinical pregnancy rate of 45%. Five revitrified embryos were warmed in three warming cycles (survival rate 100%). These transfers resulted in an additional ongoing twin pregnancy, leading to a cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per patient of 50% (10/20). The ongoing implantation rate per warmed oocyte and per injected oocyte was 10.6% (13/123) and 11.7% (13/111). The present data demonstrate that oocyte vitrification using a closed vitrification device yields excellent oocyte survival, fertilization and embryo development.

First successful bone marrow transplantation for X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by using preimplantation female gender typing and HLA matching.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donor is currently the only proven curative treatment for chronic granulomatous disease. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with alternative donors is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we performed in vitro fertilization and preimplantation HLA matching combined with female sexing for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chronic granulomatous disease. Ethical and psychological issues were considered carefully. We used in vitro fertilization with X-enriched spermatozoa followed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis to identify female HLA-genoidentical embryos in a family in need of a suitable donor for their boy affected with severe X-linked chronic granulomatous disease. Two preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles were performed in the family. In the second cycle, 2 HLA-genoidentical female embryos were transferred and a singleton pregnancy was obtained, resulting in the birth of an unaffected girl at term. Because of insufficient cell numbers in the cord-blood source, conventional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had to be performed at 12 months of age of the donor and 5 years of age of the recipient and resulted in complete stable donor chimerism and immunologic reconstitution up to 25 months post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after in vitro fertilization and combined female sexing and HLA matching offers a new and relatively rapid therapeutic option for patients with X-linked primary immunodeficiency such as chronic granulomatous disease who need hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but lack an HLA-genoidentical donor.

Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.

The objective of this study was to compare the live birth rates resulting from ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), which combines FSH and human chorionic gonadotrophin-driven LH activities, or recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone in women undergoing IVF cycles. An integrated analysis was performed of the raw data from two randomized controlled trials that were highly comparable in terms of eligibility criteria and post-randomization treatment regimens with either HP-HMG or rFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF, following a long down-regulation protocol. All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of gonadotrophin in an IVF cycle (HP-HMG, n = 491; rFSH, n = 495) were included in the analysis. Subjects who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were excluded. The superiority of one gonadotrophin preparation over the other was tested using the likelihood ratio test in a logistic regression analysis. The live birth rate per cycle initiated was 26.5% (130/491) with HP-HMG and 20.8% (103/495) with rFSH (P = 0.041). The odds ratio in favour of HP-HMG was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.83). Thus, the findings of this integrated analysis demonstrate that ovarian stimulation with HP-HMG, following a long down-regulation protocol, in IVF cycles results in significantly more live births than stimulation with rFSH alone.

Predicting the FSH threshold dose in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND The objective of this investigation was to establish independent predictors of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold dose in anovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction with FSH preparations. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one patients with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate underwent ovarian stimulation with FSH-only preparations following a low-dose step-up protocol. The individual FSH threshold dose was defined as the FSH dose when meeting the human chorionic gonadotrophin criteria (one follicle > or =17 mm, or 2-3 follicles > or =15 mm). The influence of demographics, physical characteristics, obstetric and infertility and menstrual cycle history, ovarian ultrasonography, endocrine parameters and type of gonadotrophin preparation on the FSH threshold dose was assessed through multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, age, body mass index (BMI), failure to ovulate with clomiphene citrate, menstrual cycle history (amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea or anovulatory cycles of 21-35 days), mean ovarian volume, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone and free androgen index were significant (P < 0.05) predictors of FSH threshold dose. In the multivariate analysis, menstrual cycle history, mean ovarian volume and BMI remained significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The individual FSH threshold dose for ovulation induction in anovulatory women can be predicted based on three variables easily determined in clinical practice: menstrual cycle history, mean ovarian volume and BMI. A FSH dosage nomogram was constructed based on these parameters.

Highly purified FSH is as efficacious as recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of a highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone (HP-FSH) preparation compared with a recombinant (rFSH) preparation with respect to ovulation rate (primary end-point). METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, multinational study. Women with anovulatory infertility WHO Group II and resistant to clomiphene citrate were randomized (computer-generated list) to stimulation with HP-FSH (n=73) or rFSH (n=78) using a low-dose step-up protocol. The non-inferiority limit was prespecified at -20%. RESULTS: The ovulation rate was 85.2% (51/62) with HP-FSH and 90.9% (60/66) with rFSH (per-protocol population), and non-inferiority was demonstrated [95% confidence interval: -16.9; 5.6]. No differences were noted between groups in number of follicles>or=12 mm, >or=15 mm or >or=18 mm, mono-follicular development, pregnancy rates, endometrial thickness, number of ovarian stimulation syndrome cases or frequency of injection site reactions/pain. The singleton live birth rate was 15% in both groups (11/73 with HP-FSH and 12/78 with rFSH). CONCLUSIONS: This urinary HP-FSH preparation is non-inferior compared with a rFSH preparation with respect to ovulation rate in anovulatory WHO Group II women failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate.

Principal findings from a multicenter trial investigating the safety of follicular-fluid meiosis-activating sterol for in vitro maturation of human cumulus-enclosed oocytes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of applying follicular-fluid meiosis-activating sterol (FF-MAS) in vitro to immature human oocytes. DESIGN: Phase I bicenter, randomized, parallel-group, controlled, partially blinded trial. SETTING: Third-level referral academic centers, including reproductive biology and genetics laboratories. PATIENTS: Endocrinologically normal women with a medical indication for IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION(S): Subjects were randomized at a ratio 1 to 6 into either conventional GnRH-agonist and recombinant FSH stimulation (IVO) for oocyte retrieval, or minimally stimulated in vitro maturation (IVM) with the use of recombinant FSH. Retrieved immature oocyte cumulus complexes were cultured for 30 or 36 hours in one of six IVM culture conditions containing FF-MAS (range, 0.1-20 microM). Polar body-extruded oocytes from the IVO and IVM groups were processed for chromosomal analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the incidence of metaphase II stage oocytes with numeric chromosomal abnormalities, using full (spectral karyotyping) or partial (fluorescent in situ hybridization with seven probes) karyotyping or Giemsa count. A secondary objective was to document the frequency of metaphase II oocytes after IVM with FF-MAS supplements. RESULT(S): Oocyte cumulus complexes obtained from the IVO (mean, 8.9) and IVM (mean, 6.2) groups had equal maturation rates. Compared to IVO, exposure of germinal-vesicle oocytes for a maturation period of 30 hours did not increase aneuploidy. An exposure period of 36 hours doubled the aneuploidy rate, but this was significant only for the 20-muM dose of FF-MAS. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of 1-10 microM FF-MAS in a 30-hour IVM protocol is safe.

The early luteal phase administration of estrogen and progesterone does not induce premature luteolysis in normo-ovulatory women.

OBJECTIVE: The luteal phase after ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is insufficient. Therefore, luteal phase supplementation is routinely applied in IVF. It may be postulated that premature luteolysis after ovarian hyperstimulation is due to supraphysiological steroid levels in the early luteal phase. In the present study, high doses of steroids are administered after the LH surge in normo-ovulatory volunteers in order to investigate whether this intervention gives rise to endocrine changes and a shortening of the luteal phase. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Forty non-smoking, normal weight women, between 18 and 37 years of age, with a regular menstrual cycle (24-35 days), received either high dosages of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), E2+P or no medication. Blood sampling was performed every other day from the day of the LH surge until LH+14. Duration of the luteal phase and endocrine profiles were the main study outcomes. RESULTS: Early luteal phase steroid concentrations achieved by exogenous administration were comparable with levels observed following ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF. No difference in the luteal phase length was observed comparing all groups. However, a significant decrease in LH levels could be observed 6 days after the mid-cycle LH surge (P<0.001) in women receiving P, resulting in accelerated decrease of inhibin A production by the corpus luteum (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The present intervention of high-dose steroid administration shortly after the LH surge failed to induce a premature luteolysis regularly in cyclic women. It seems that the induced transient suppression in LH allowed for a timely recovery of corpus luteum function. Other additional factors may be held responsible for the distinct reduction in luteal phase length observed after ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF.

Spuriously elevated serum estradiol concentrations measured by an automated immunoassay rarely cause unnecessary cancellation of in vitro fertilization cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a patient in whom serum E2, as measured by an automated E2 assay, remained elevated at levels corresponding to the periovulatory phase (>380 pg/mL), despite 3 weeks of treatment by a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a). DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic center. PATIENT(S): A 39-year-old patient accepted for IVF treatment. In view of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, down-regulation by a GnRH-a was monitored by serum E2 measurement. INTERVENTION(S): Obvious causes for high serum E2 levels (pregnancy, E2-producing ovarian cysts, and noncompliance of the patient) were excluded. The IVF cycle was canceled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum samples were analyzed retrospectively by radioimmunoassay (RIA), and ether extraction of the samples was performed before measurement by the automated E2 assay. RESULT(S): Radioimmunoassay revealed adequately suppressed serum E2 levels under GnRH-a treatment (<15 pg/mL). Ether extraction revealed an interfering component that was soluble in the aqueous phase. CONCLUSION(S): If a patient on a long controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF protocol still has high serum E2 levels after 2 to 3 weeks of down-regulation, and obvious reasons for this (pregnancy, E2 producing ovarian cysts, noncompliance of the patient) are excluded, E2 immunoassay interference should be excluded to avoid unnecessary cancellation of the IVF cycle.

Similar ovulation rates, but different follicular development with highly purified menotrophin compared with recombinant FSH in WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of the LH activity in menotrophin preparations for ovulation induction has been investigated in small trials conducted versus FSH preparations. The objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of highly purified urinary menotrophin (HP-HMG) versus recombinant FSH (rFSH) with respect to the primary outcome measure, ovulation rate. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, multinational study. Women with anovulatory infertility WHO Group II and resistant to clomiphene citrate were randomized (computer-generated list) to stimulation with HP-HMG (n=91) or rFSH (n=93) using a low-dose step-up protocol. RESULTS: The ovulation rate was 85.7% with HP-HMG and 85.5% with rFSH (per-protocol population), and non-inferiority was demonstrated. Significantly fewer intermediate-sized follicles were observed in the HP-HMG group (P<0.05). The singleton live birth rate was comparable between the two groups. The frequency of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or cancellation due to excessive response was 2.2% with HP-HMG and 9.8% with rFSH (P=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation with HP-HMG is associated with ovulation rates at least as good as a rFSH in anovulatory WHO Group II women. LH activity modifies follicular development so that fewer intermediate-sized follicles develop. This could have a positive impact on the safety of ovulation induction protocols.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years.

OBJECTIVE: To provide background information about the average aneuploidy and implantation rates of older patients after IVF with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) when the patients are subdivided into age categories; and to compare pregnancy outcome data after PGD-AS in this group of patients with a similar control group. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Patients in an academic reproductive medicine unit. PATIENT(S): All patients 37 years or older who had PGD-AS between October 1999 and December 2003 and all pregnant patients 37 years or older who had IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection without PGD-AS during the same period of time. INTERVENTION(S): IVF with PGD-AS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, implantation rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and prenatal testing. RESULT(S): Three hundred ninety-four PGD-AS cycles of patients between 37 and 46 years of age were analyzed. The aneuploidy rate gradually increased with age. The implantation rate remained similar over all age groups. There was a trend to a lower miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rate in the PGD-AS group and a higher delivery/live birth rate. There were five elective terminations of pregnancy after prenatal testing and three late miscarriages due to prenatal testing in the control group. CONCLUSION(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening can give valuable information to older patients concerning the reason why their IVF cycles are unsuccessful and whether it is worthwhile to continue IVF treatment, and it can help patients to avoid the emotional trauma that can occur after prenatal testing during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Achievement of pregnancy three times in the same patient during luteal GnRH agonist administration.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration from the mid-luteal phase onwards is considered the gold standard of ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment. It might, however, coincide with an implanting spontaneous pregnancy. Concerns have therefore been raised with regard to the evolution of the resulting pregnancies and long-term outcome of the children born. The current case report describes the achievement of three pregnancies in the same patient during luteal administration of GnRHa. One pregnancy ended in spontaneous abortion and the other two resulted in the delivery of two female infants. The children have so far been followed for 3.5 and 7 years. The physical examination of both children was unremarkable. However, the older child has recently been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and dyslexia.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the aneuploidy rate in embryos of women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriages and to evaluate whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening could be a feasible approach to improve the possibility of successful pregnancy in these couples. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary university referral center. PATIENT(S): Women (n = 49) with recurrent idiopathic miscarriages. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) and aneuploidy rate. RESULT(S): The aneuploidy rate was, respectively, 43.85% and 66.95% in the younger and older group. The ongoing PR per cycle was 25.71% in the younger and 2.94% in the older patients. CONCLUSION(S): There is no therapeutic evidence to prescribe IVF with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening for this heterogeneous group of patients.

Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that the age-related increased aneuploidy rate is correlated with reduced implantation and a higher abortion rate. Therefore, advanced maternal age (AMA) couples are a good target group to assess the possible benefit of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) on the outcome after assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was carried out comparing the outcome after blastocyst transfer combined with PGD-AS using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18, 21 and 22 in AMA couples (aged > or =37 years) with a control group without PGD-AS. From the 400 (200 for PGD-AS and 200 controls) couples that were allocated to the trial, an oocyte pick-up was performed effectively in 289 cycles (148 PGD-AS cycles and 141 control cycles). RESULTS: Positive serum HCG rates per transfer and per cycle were the same for PGD-AS and controls: 35.8% (19.6%) [%/per embryo transfer (per cycle)] and 32.2% (27.7%), respectively (NS). Significantly fewer embryos were transferred in the PGD-AS group than in the control group (P<0.001). The implantation rate (with fetal heart beat) was 17.1% in the PGD-AS group versus 11.5% in the control group (not significant; P=0.09). We observed a normal diploid status in 36.8% of the embryos. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT provides no arguments in favour of PGD-AS for improving clinical outcome per initiated cycle in patients with AMA when there are no restrictions in the number of embryos to be transferred.

Live delivery rates in subfertile women with Asherman's syndrome after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system.

The purpose of this study was to report on a 10-year experience in the treatment of subfertile women with intrauterine adhesions using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system. Forty-six subfertile women with stage I (n = 6), stage II (n = 25) and stage III (n = 15) intrauterine adhesions underwent adhesiolysis with the use of the resectoscope (n = 21) or the Versapoint system (n = 26). Synechiolysis was successful in 43 women (93.5%) after the first attempt. In 13 out of 14 women (92.9%) with oligo/amenorrhoea at presentation, restoration of menses was reported after adhesiolysis (Versapoint: 9/9, resectoscope: 4/5). Overall live delivery rates according to stage of intrauterine adhesions were 33.3, 44.4 and 46.7% for stages I, II and III respectively. Similar cumulative delivery rates were achieved in patients with no additional infertility factors who attempted to conceive naturally after adhesiolysis using the Versapoint (71.7%) or the resectoscope (60%). Ten gestations ended in preterm delivery (50%), while in two of the women who delivered, a hysterectomy was performed due to placenta accreta. In conclusion, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis offers a real chance of parenthood in a substantial proportion of infertile couples either by using the Versapoint system or the resectoscope.

Exogenous luteinizing hormone activity may influence the treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization but not in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Additional analysis of a multinational, open-label, randomized study comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a long protocol revealed that LH activity might favorably influence pregnancy outcome in IVF cycles.