A Systematic Review of the Risk of Motor Vehicle Collision in Patients With Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Drivers at risk of sudden incapacitation from syncope pose a potential threat to themselves and to society. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the risk of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) for patients with a history of syncope. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline (1946-2019) as well as Cinahl, Embase, Psychinfo, and the Transportation Research Information Documentation (1806-2017) for articles on MVCs and drivers with vasovagal syncope (VVS), arrhythmic syncope, or syncope not yet diagnosed (NYD). Quality ratings were assigned by team consensus. RESULTS: Eleven studies of moderate quality were included (n = 42,972). Compared with the general populations of Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom (0.49%-2.29% per driver-year), the prospective MVC risk was lower for VVS (0.0%-0.31% per driver-year; 3 studies; n = 782) and higher for arrhythmic syncope (1.9%-3.4% per driver-year; 2 studies; n = 730). The results were more variable for syncope NYD (0.0%-6.9% per driver-year prospectively; 6 studies; n = 41,460). Patients with syncope NYD had an almost 2-fold increased MVC risk in the largest study, although the smaller studies showed contradictory findings. CONCLUSIONS: VVS patients appear to be at very low risk for MVCs, supporting current guidelines which do not recommend driving suspension for these patients in most cases. Although the data for other forms of syncope are too limited for definitive conclusions and must be improved, arrhythmic syncope appears to be associated with nontrivial risk.

A systematic review of the risk of motor vehicle collision after stroke or transient ischemic attack.

BACKGROUND: Returning to driving after stroke is one of the key goals in stroke rehabilitation, and fitness to drive guidelines must be informed by evidence pertaining to risk of motor vehicle collision (MVC) in this population. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to determine whether stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are associated with an increased MVC risk. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and TRID through December 2016. Pairs of reviewers came to consensus on inclusion, based on an iterative review of abstracts and full-text manuscripts, on data extraction, and on the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Reviewers identified 5,605 citations, and 12 articles met inclusion criteria. Only one of three case-control studies showed an association between stroke and MVC (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.9). Of five cohort reports, only one study, limited to self-report, found an increased risk of MVC associated with stroke or TIA (RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.11-6.61). Two of four cross-sectional studies using computerized driving simulators identified a more than two-fold risk of MVCs among participants with stroke compared with controls. The difference in one of the studies was restricted to those with middle cerebral artery stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence does not support a robust increase in risk of MVCs. While stroke clearly prevents some patients from driving at all and impairs driving performance in others, individualized assessment and clinical judgment must continue to be used in assessing and advising those stroke patients who return to driving about their MVC risk.