Inflammation of the temporalis muscle and adjacent nerve tissue in giant cell arteritis: expanding the spectrum of inflammatory lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the histopathological features of the temporalis muscle (TM) and adjacent nerve tissue in active cranial giant cell arteritis (C-GCA). METHODS: Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) specimens containing fragments of the TM from patients with active C-GCA fulfilling the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria (n = 11) were assessed by conventional histology and immunohistochemistry in comparison with non-GCA controls (n = 3). Clinical, laboratory and imaging features based on patient charts at time of biopsy were retrospectively recorded. RESULTS: The majority of the studied TAB specimens showed inflammation of the TM (10/11) and adjacent nerve fascicles (7/11) that was characterized by prominent endomysial lymphomonocytic infiltrates, whereas controls showed no inflammatory lesions and no disruption of the local architecture. Association of active C-GCA with sarcolemmal MHC class I (8/8) and MHC class II (6/11) upregulation suggests primary inflammation of the TM in a subset of patients. αB-Crystallin positivity (10/11) highlights areas of pre-necrotic myofibres within the TM. The presence of endomysial fibrosis, signs of atrophy and variations of muscle fibre size suggest a rather longstanding and potentially subclinical process of myoinflammation. CONCLUSION: Our results expand the spectrum of inflammatory lesions known to be associated with active C-GCA. Specifically, inflammatory infiltration of the TM and adjacent nerve structures could contribute to localized symptoms of the temporomandibular region and may be included in future concepts of pathophysiology.

Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis: Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Imaging biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are currently the most specific biomarkers for the diagnosis of this condition. Despite advances in imaging, from plain radiographs-which detect only damage-to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-which identifies disease activity and structural change-there are still many challenges that remain. Imaging in sacroiliitis is characterized by active and structural changes. Current classification criteria stress the importance of bone marrow edema (BME); however, BME can occur in various diseases, mechanical conditions, and healthy individuals. Thus, the identification of structural lesions such as erosion, subchondral fat, backfill, and ankylosis is important to distinguish from mimics on differential diagnosis. Various imaging modalities are available to examine structural lesions, but computed tomography (CT) is considered the current reference standard. Nonetheless, recent advances in MRI allow for direct bone imaging and the reconstruction of CT-like images that can provide similar information. Therefore, the ability of MRI to detect and measure structural lesions is strengthened. Here, we present an overview of the spectrum of current and cutting-edge techniques for SpA imaging in clinical practice; namely, we discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and usefulness of imaging in SpA through radiography, low-dose and dual-energy CT, and MRI. Cutting-edge MRI sequences including volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, ultrashort echo time, zero echo time, and deep learning-based synthetic CT that creates CT-like images without ionizing radiation, are discussed. Imaging techniques allow for quantification of inflammatory and structural lesions, which is important in the assessment of treatment response and disease progression. Radiographic damage is poorly sensitive to change. Artificial intelligence has already revolutionized radiology practice, including protocolization, image quality, and image interpretation.

Diagnostic delay in patients from the international map of axial spondyloarthritis: geographic, socio-demographic and disease-related factors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess diagnostic delay and its associated factors globally, in a large sample of patients included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). METHODS: IMAS is a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5,557 axSpA patients from 27 countries. Diagnostic delay was calculated as the difference between age at diagnosis and age at first symptom onset reported by patients. Associations between diagnostic delay and regions, sociodemographic characteristics, as well as disease-related factors were explored through univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Data from 5,327 patients who reported data on diagnostic delay in IMAS survey were analysed: 3,294 were from Europe, 752 from North America, 590 from Asia, 545 from Latin America, and 146 from Africa. Overall, patients reported a mean diagnostic delay of 7.4 years (median: 4.0) since symptom onset, with substantial variation across regions; being the highest delay in South Africa and the lowest in Asia. The variables associated with longer diagnostic delay in the final multivariable regression model were: younger age at symptom onset (b=-0.100), female gender (b = 2.274), being diagnosed by rheumatologist (b = 1.163), greater number of HCPs seen before diagnosis (b = 1.033), and history of uveitis (b = 1.286). CONCLUSION: In this global sample of axSpA patients, the mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 years, and showed significant differences across regions. Younger age at symptom onset, female gender, diagnosis made by a rheumatologist, greater number of HCPs seen before diagnosis, and the history of uveitis were the parameters associated with a longer diagnostic delay in axSpA patients.

Clinical information on imaging referrals for suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis: recommendations from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS).

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to establish expert consensus recommendations for clinical information on imaging requests in suspected/known axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), focusing on enhancing diagnostic clarity and patient care through guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specialised task force was formed, comprising 7 radiologists, 11 rheumatologists from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) and a patient representative. Using the Delphi method, two rounds of surveys were conducted among ASAS members. These surveys aimed to identify critical elements for imaging referrals and to refine these elements for practical application. The task force deliberated on the survey outcomes and proposed a set of recommendations, which were then presented to the ASAS community for a decisive vote. RESULTS: The collaborative effort resulted in a set of six detailed recommendations for clinicians involved in requesting imaging for patients with suspected or known axSpA. These recommendations cover crucial areas, including clinical features indicative of axSpA, clinical features, mechanical factors, past imaging data, potential contraindications for specific imaging modalities or contrast media and detailed reasons for the examination, including differential diagnoses. Garnering support from 73% of voting ASAS members, these recommendations represent a consensus on optimising imaging request protocols in axSpA. CONCLUSION: The ASAS recommendations offer comprehensive guidance for rheumatologists in requesting imaging for axSpA, aiming to standardise requesting practices. By improving the precision and relevance of imaging requests, these guidelines should enhance the clinical impact of radiology reports, facilitate accurate diagnosis and consequently improve the management of patients with axSpA.

Treatment strategies for Spondyloarthritis: Implementation of precision medicine - Or "one size fits all" concept?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a term to describe a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have common pathophysiological, genetic, and clinical features. Under the umbrella term SpA, two main groups are subsumed: axial SpA (radiographic axSpA and non-radiographic axSpA) and peripheral SpA (with the leading representative being psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but also arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated pSpA). The key clinical symptom in axSpA is chronic back pain, typically with inflammatory characteristics, which starts in early adulthood, while the leading clinical manifestations of peripheral SpA (pSpA) are arthritis, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis. Furthermore, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD) can accompany axial or peripheral symptoms. All these factors need to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in SpA patients. Despite the major advances in the treatment landscape over the past two decades with the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and most recently targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), a relevant proportion of patients still does not achieve the desired state of remission (=absence of disease activity). With this implementation of new treatment modalities, clinicians now have more choices to make in the treatment algorithms. However, despite generalized treatment recommendations, all factors need to be carefully considered when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice, aiming at an important first step towards personalized treatment strategies in SpA. In this narrative review, we focus on the efficacy of approved and emerging treatment options in axSpA and PsA as the main representative of pSpA and discuss their selective effect on the different manifestations associated with SpA to provide guidance on drivers of treatment decisions in specific situations.

Introducing New GRAPPA Projects.

Every year at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) annual meeting, new project ideas are presented and discussed with a view to obtaining feedback and support. Arising from previous work, a project proposal was presented at the 2023 meeting; the project aims to improve early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by comparing a physician-based vs a patient questionnaire-based approach. This project has received the backing of the GRAPPA research committee, but additional funding will be required. A second project, approved by GRAPPA, was presented on delivering an epidemiology training module before the GRAPPA annual meeting in 2024, which will target both established GRAPPA clinicians and trainees. Attendance at such a module would enhance the quality of research in psoriatic disease.

Open Access Data and Deep Learning for Cardiac Device Identification on Standard DICOM and Smartphone-based Chest Radiographs.

Purpose To develop and evaluate a publicly available deep learning model for segmenting and classifying cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) and smartphone-based chest radiographs. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included patients with implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and cardiac monitors who underwent chest radiography between January 2012 and January 2022. A U-Net model with a ResNet-50 backbone was created to classify CIEDs on DICOM and smartphone images. Using 2321 chest radiographs in 897 patients (median age, 76 years [range, 18-96 years]; 625 male, 272 female), CIEDs were categorized into four manufacturers, 27 models, and one "other" category. Five smartphones were used to acquire 11 072 images. Performance was reported using the Dice coefficient on the validation set for segmentation or balanced accuracy on the test set for manufacturer and model classification, respectively. Results The segmentation tool achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.936 (IQR: 0.890-0.958). The model had an accuracy of 94.36% (95% CI: 90.93%, 96.84%; 251 of 266) for CIED manufacturer classification and 84.21% (95% CI: 79.31%, 88.30%; 224 of 266) for CIED model classification. Conclusion The proposed deep learning model, trained on both traditional DICOM and smartphone images, showed high accuracy for segmentation and classification of CIEDs on chest radiographs. Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Segmentation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Celi in this issue.

Inflammatory Back Pain and Psoriasis: Expecting Spondyloarthritis, Discovering Lymphoma.

Inflammatory back pain is a characteristic of spondyloarthritis. It is not, however, an exclusive symptom of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as it can also be associated with non-inflammatory entities. Infrequently, the etiology can be found in neoplastic conditions such as malignant lymphoma. Even in the presence of comorbidities indicatory of underlying rheumatic disease, like psoriasis vulgaris, the clinician should not be led astray. It is essential to pay attention to contradictory findings, as treatment crucially differs depending on diagnosis. Herein, we report on a psoriasis patient who presented with characteristic inflammatory back pain and deceptive imaging results. While the patient was initially thought to suffer from an inflammatory rheumatic disease with axial involvement, it was the accompanying atypical circumstances, particularly her age, that instantly challenged the diagnosis of axial psoriatic arthritis. She was eventually diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma that manifested with rare and exclusively extranodal lesions and spondyloarthritis-like morphology. This case effectively demonstrates the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup and how certain clinical factors, such as the patient's age, should be considered when confronted with inflammatory back pain.

Reporting Sacroiliac Joint Imaging Performed for Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Recommendations.

Whereas previous projects attempted to standardize imaging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), few studies have been published about the need for specific details regarding the image acquisition and lesions that may be less familiar to general radiologists. This work reports consensus recommendations developed by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) that aim to standardize the imaging reports in patients suspected of having or with known axSpA. A task force consisting of radiologists and rheumatologists from ASAS and one patient representative formulated two surveys that were completed by ASAS members. The results of these surveys led to the development of 10 recommendations that were endorsed by 73% (43 of 59) of ASAS members. The recommendations are targeted to the radiologist and include best practices for the inclusion of clinical information, technical details, image quality, and imaging findings in radiology reports. These recommendations also emphasize that imaging findings that indicate differential diagnoses and referral suggestions should be included in the concluding section of the radiology report. With these recommendations, ASAS aims to improve the diagnostic process and care for patients suspected of having or with known axSpA.

International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS): results from the perspective of 5557 patients from 27 countries around the globe.

BACKGROUND: The International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) is a global initiative aimed to assess the impact and burden of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the unmet needs from the patient's perspective. METHOD: IMAS is a collaboration between the Axial Spondyloarthritis International Federation (ASIF), the University of Seville, Novartis Pharma AG and steered by a scientific committee. IMAS collected information through an online cross-sectional survey (2017-2022) from unselected patients with axSpA from Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America and Africa who completed a comprehensive questionnaire containing over 120 items. RESULTS: 5557 patients with axSpA participated in IMAS. Mean age was 43.9 ±12.8 years, 55.4% were female, 46.2% had a university education and 51.0% were employed. The mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 ±9.0 years (median: 4.0), and the mean symptom duration was 17.1 ±13.3 years. 75.0% of patients had active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥4), and 59.4% reported poor mental health (12-item General Health Questionnaire ≥3). In the year before the survey, patients had visited primary care physicians 4.6 times and the rheumatologist 3.6 times. 78.6% had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ever, 48.8% biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 43.6% conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients's greatest fear was disease progression (55.9%), while the greatest hope was to be able to relieve pain (54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: IMAS shows the global profile of patients with axSpA, highlighting unmet needs, lengthy delays in diagnosis and high burden of disease in patients with axSpA worldwide. This global information will enable more detailed investigations to obtain evidence on the critical issues that matter to patients around the world to improve their care and quality of life.

Factors Associated with Poor Mental Health in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the prevalence of poor mental health in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and its associated factors in a large sample of patients from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) study from around the globe. METHODS: IMAS is a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) that includes 5557 unselected patients with axSpA worldwide. Mental health was evaluated by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the cut-off point for poor mental health was set at 3. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relationships between the investigated factors and poor mental health (GHQ-12≥3) in patients with axSpA (n=4335). RESULTS: Of 5351 patients, the mean of GHQ-12 was 4.7 and 59.4% were having poor mental health, being 69.9% in South Africa, 63.7% in Latin America, 60.8% in Europe, 54.3% in North America and 51.8% in Asia. Overall, 40.5% and 37.2% of patients experienced anxiety and depression. The factors associated with poor mental health were younger age (OR=0.99), female gender (OR=1.16), being on sick leave or unemployed (OR=1.63), non-physical activity (OR=1.22), smoking (OR=1.20), higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] (OR=1.42), functional limitation (OR=1.02) and shorter symptoms duration (OR=0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Globally, 6 in 10 patients with axSpA had poor mental health, with a higher proportion in South Africa and lower in Asia. The factors associated with poor mental health include domains such as younger age, female gender, employment difficulties, harmful habits, disease burden and symptom duration. A holistic management approach to axSpA should encompass both physical and mental health.

Regional Differences in Diagnosis Journey and Healthcare Utilization: Results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS).

INTRODUCTION: To assess differences in the diagnosis journey and access to care in a large sample of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) from around the world, included in the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). METHODS: IMAS was a cross-sectional online survey (2017-2022) of 5557 unselected patients with axSpA from 27 countries. Across five worldwide geographic regions, the patient journey until diagnosis and healthcare utilization in the last 12 months prior to survey were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable linear regression was used to analyze factors associated with higher healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Of 5557 participants in IMAS, the diagnosis took an average of 7.4 years, requiring more than two visits to HCPs (77.7% general practitioner and 51.3% rheumatologist), and more than two diagnostic tests [67.5% performed human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27), 64.2% x-ray, and 59.1% magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans]. North America and Europe were the regions with the highest number of healthcare professional (HCP) visits for diagnosis, while the lowest number of visits was in the Asian region. In the previous 12 months, 94.9% (n = 5272) used at least one healthcare resource, with an average of 29 uses per year. The regions with the highest healthcare utilization were Latin America, Europe, and North America. In the multiple linear regression, factors associated with higher number of healthcare utilization were younger age (b =  - 0.311), female gender (b = 7.736), higher disease activity (b = 1.461), poorer mental health (b = 0.624), greater functional limitation (b = 0.300), greater spinal stiffness (b = 1.527), and longer diagnostic delay (b = 0.104). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of axSpA usually takes more than two visits to HCPs and at least 7 years. After diagnosis, axSpA is associated with frequent healthcare resource use. Younger age, female gender, higher disease activity, poorer mental health, greater functional limitation, greater spinal stiffness, and longer diagnostic delay are associated with higher healthcare utilization. Europe and North America use more HCP visits and diagnostic tests before and after diagnosis than the other regions.

In-hospital survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter real-world data study.

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a major challenge to healthcare systems globally. Millions of people have been infected, and millions of deaths have been reported worldwide. Glucocorticoids have attracted worldwide attention for their potential efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19. Various glucocorticoids with different dosages and treatment durations have been studied in patients with different severities, with a suitable dosage and treatment duration not yet defined. This study aimed to investigate whether in-hospital survival differs between critically ill patients treated with low-dose glucocorticoids, high-dose glucocorticoids or no glucocorticoids. All critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Charité Hospital-Universitätsmedizin Berlin between February 2020 and December 2021 with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving supplemental oxygen were eligible to participate in this multicenter real-world data study. Patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups: the high corticosteroid dose (HighC) group (receiving 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), the low corticosteroid dose (LowC) group (receiving less than 6 mg parenteral dexamethasone or an equivalent corticosteroid dosage for ten days), or the no corticosteroid (NoC) group. Overall survival and risk effects were compared among groups within the total observation period, as well as at 35 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to compare the risk of death between the treatment groups. Out of 1561 critically ill COVID-19 patients, 1014 were included in the baseline analysis. In the survival study, 1009 patients were assigned to the NoC (n = 346), HighC (n = 552), or LowC group (n = 111). The baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except for age, BMI, APACHE II score, SOFA and SAPS II. While the 35-day survival did not show any differences, a landmark analysis of the patients surviving beyond 35 days revealed differences between groups. The restricted mean survival time was 112 days in the LowC group [95% CI: 97 - 128], 133 days in the HighC group [95% CI: 124 - 141] and 144 days in the NoC group [95% CI: 121 - 167]. The multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that, regardless of age, sex, health status or invasive oxygenation, a low-dose treatment increased the hazard of death of critically ill COVID-19 patients by a factor of 2.09 ([95% CI: 0.99, 4.4], p = 0.05) and a high-dose corticosteroid treatment increased the risk by a factor of 1.07 ([95% CI: 0.53, 2.15], p = 0.85) compared to no treatment with glucocorticoids. The analysis reveals that corticosteroid treatment does not influence the survival of critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit within 35 days. Our evaluations further suggest that regardless of ventilation status, the decision-making process for administering corticosteroid therapy should account for the individual severity of the illness.

Comparing clinical profiles in spondyloarthritis with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis: insights from the ASAS-PerSpA study.

Objectives: Assuming SpA manifestations may vary among patients with different inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subtypes, we explored the clinical characteristics associated with the presence of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: We included 3152 patients of ASAS-PerSpA study diagnosed with either axial SpA or peripheral SpA, according to their treating rheumatologist. Of these, 146 (4.6%) had confirmed IBD by endoscopy and were categorized into CD or UC groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two subgroups. Results: From 146 patients included in the current analysis, 87 (59.6%) had CD [75 (86.2%) axial SpA and 12 (13.8%) peripheral SpA], and 39 (26.7%) had UC [34 (87.2%) axial SpA and 5 (12.8%) peripheral SpA]. CD and UC groups had similar age with average of 44.9 (13.5) vs 44.0 (13.0) years, respectively, and a slight male predominance in CD (63.2%) compared with UC (51.3%). Diagnostic delay for SpA was 7.0 (6.9) years for CD and 8.8 (8.1) years for UC. Chronic back pain was the most reported symptom present in 95.4% of CD patients and 89.7% of UC patients. Both groups had similar musculoskeletal phenotyping, with higher frequency of psoriasis (15.4%) and uveitis 28.2% in UC; and higher tendency to be HLA-B27 positive in CD (51.9% in CD vs.s 39.4% in UC). Conclusion: In our analysis patients with SpA and concurrent CD or UC had mainly similar musculoskeletal phenotypes. However, they differ slightly in extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and HLA-B27 prevalence.

Exploring complement biomarkers in suspected axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate lectin pathway proteins (LPPs) as biomarkers for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a cross-sectional cohort with a suspicion of axSpA, comprising newly diagnosed axSpA and chronic low back pain (cLBP) individuals. METHODS: Serum samples from 515 participants within the OptiRef cohort, including 151 axSpA patients and 364 cLBP patients, were measured using immunoassays for LPPs (mannan-binding lectin (MBL), collectin liver-1 (CL-L1), M-ficolin, H-ficolin and L-ficolin, MBL-associated serine proteases (MASP)-1, -2 and -3, MBL-associated proteins (MAp19 and MAp44) and the complement activation product C3dg). RESULTS: Serum levels of L-ficolin, MASP-2 and C3dg were elevated in axSpA patients, whereas levels of MASP-3 and CL-L1 were decreased, and this remained significant for C3dg and MASP-3 after adjustment for C reactive protein (CRP). A univariate regression analysis showed serum levels of CL-L1, MASP-2, MASP-3 and C3dg to predict the diagnosis of axSpA, and MASP-3 and C3dg remained significant in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Assessment of the diagnostic potential showed that a combination of human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) and measurements of L-ficolin, MASP-3 and C3dg increased the diagnostic specificity for axSpA, however, with a concomitant loss of sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of complement activation, that is, C3dg, and MASP-3 differed significantly between axSpA and cLBP patients after adjustment for CRP. Although combining HLA-B27 with measurements of L-ficolin, MASP-3 and C3dg increased the diagnostic specificity for axSpA, this seems unjustified due to the concomitant loss of sensitivity. However, both C3dg and MASP-3 were associated with axSpA diagnosis in multivariate logistic regression, suggesting an involvement of complement in the inflammatory processes and possibly pathogenesis in axSpA.

Upadacitinib in Active Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: 1-Year Data From a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Upadacitinib improved the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) versus placebo over 14 weeks in the primary analysis of the SELECT-AXIS 2 nr-axSpA study. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib through 1 year in patients with nr-axSpA in SELECT-AXIS 2. METHODS: Patients aged at least 18 years diagnosed with nr-axSpA who fulfilled the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria and were receiving stable background therapy were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo for the 52-week double-blind period. Efficacy was assessed using non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation (NRI-MI) and as-observed analyses for binary endpoints, and mixed-effects model repeated measures for continuous endpoints. RESULTS: Of 314 randomized patients, 259 (upadacitinib, n = 129; placebo, n = 130) completed 52 weeks of treatment. More patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo achieved ≥40% improvement in ASAS at week 52 (63% vs 43%, NRI-MI; nominal P < 0.001). Similar treatment effects were observed for the achievement of axSpA Disease Activity Score inactive disease (33% v 11%, NRI-MI; nominal P < 0.001). Overall, patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo showed greater improvement in disease activity, inflammation, pain, function, enthesitis, and quality of life through 52 weeks. Adverse events were generally comparable between the treatment groups. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, inflammatory bowel disease, or deaths were reported in those receiving upadacitinib. CONCLUSION: Treatment with upadacitinib showed sustained efficacy versus placebo with no new safety findings identified through 1 year. These results support the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib treatment for nr-axSpA.

[Diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) - the current status]. / Diagnostik und Klassifikation der axialen Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) ­ der aktuelle Stand.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory rheumatic disease typically characterized by inflammatory back pain (IBP). The term axSpA has largely replaced the long-used term ankylosing spondylitis (AS). IBP is caused by inflammation in the axial skeleton, with the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) being particularly frequently affected initially. The spine is usually added in later stages, which is then increasingly characterized structurally by the formation of new bone. The overall concept of spondyloarthritis includes other disease manifestations such as uveitis, psoriasis and colitis and comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis.The ASAS classification criteria for axSpA, in place since 2009, have replaced the 1984 modified New York criteria. In the former, in addition to conventional X-rays, changes in the SIJ detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and also the detection of HLA B27 have, for the first time, played a role. It is important to note that these are not diagnostic criteria, as they do not exist. This paper outlines 10 points that should be considered when making a diagnosis.

Diagnostic accuracy in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic evaluation of the role of clinical information in the interpretation of sacroiliac joint imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Radiography and MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) are relevant for the diagnosis and classification of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of clinical information (CI) on the accuracy of imaging interpretation. METHODS: Out of 109 patients referred because of suspicion of axSpA with complete imaging sets (radiographs and MRI of SIJ), 61 were diagnosed with axSpA (56%). Images were independently evaluated by three radiologists in four consecutive reading campaigns: radiographs and radiographs+MRI without and with CI including demographic data, SpA features, physical activity and pregnancy. Radiographs were scored according to the modified New York criteria, and MRIs for inflammatory and structural changes compatible with axSpA (yes/no). The clinical diagnosis was taken as reference standard. The compatibility of imaging findings with a diagnosis of axSpA (precision) before and after the provision of CI and radiologists' confidence with their findings (0-10) were evaluated. RESULTS: The precision of radiographs evaluation without versus with CI increased from 70% to 78% (p=0.008), and for radiographs+MRI from 81% to 82% (p=1.0), respectively. For CR alone, the sensitivity and specificity of radiologic findings were 51% and 94% without and 60% and 100% with CI, while, for radiographs+MRI, they were 74% and 90% vs 71% and 98%, respectively. The diagnostic confidence of radiologists increased from 5.2±1.9 to 6.0±1.7 with CI for radiographs, and from 6.7±1.6 to 7.2±1.6 for radiographs+MRI, respectively. CONCLUSION: The precision, specificity and diagnostic confidence of radiologic evaluation increased when CI was provided.