Cutaneous vascularization of the proximal two-thirds of the dorsal aspect of the hand: descriptive anatomical study of a perforating arterial arch.

PURPOSE: Several reports have suggested that transverse arches between the radial and ulnar sides of dorsal hand skin supply the proximal part of the skin. The main objective of the study was to provide an anatomical and radiological description of a superficial vascular arch in the proximal third of the metacarpals of the long fingers. METHODS: We dissected 11 hands after injection with a mixture of lead and resin. A CT scan was performed before dissection. All vessels supplying the skin were individualized on the back of the hand and measured. RESULTS: A superficial perforating dorsal arch of the hand was present in all cases in this study. It was supplied by a dorsal radial perforating artery arising from the radial artery and by a dorsal ulnar perforating artery arising from the dorsal carpal arch. The distal recurrences of the intermetacarpal spaces communicated with this arch. This arch was the only source of vascularization of thess proximal third of the third space and presented a dominant ulnar side in the majority of cases. It presented numerous anatomical variations. The source vessels had mean diameters of 0.5 mm. There was an excellent radiological-anatomical correlation on CT scan. CONCLUSION: Given the constancy of this arch in the study, perforating flaps not yet described could be considered, having as pivot points the ulnar or radial origin of this arch.

Focus on anatomical aspects of soft tissue coverage options in elbow reconstruction: an updating review.

INTRODUCTION: The elbow joint is particularly exposed to soft tissue injuries associated with fractures and dislocations. Different coverage options within the past decades for recovering loss of soft tissue defects around the elbow region have been proposed based on anatomical research. Our aim was to make an updated focus on the anatomical basis of different techniques of coverage of loss of tissues around the elbow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The main procedures of flaps were defined: local random, axial fasciocutaneous, local muscle pedicle, propeller and free microvascular flaps. A systematic literature review on anatomical basis on these different flaps options was conducted searching on PubMed databases and the selection process was undergone according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Inclusion criteria were: review and original articles, including anatomical basis of the procedures, in English and French languages. RESULTS: The final analysis included 37 relevant articles out of 1499 published references. 640 flaps were referenced, for covering 302 elbows. Local random flaps provide a good quality skin for small tissue defects in posterior elbow and periolecranon area, and depend on dermal and subdermal blood supply. Axial fasciocutaneous flaps have well-defined blood supplies and are designed as peninsular, island, or microvascular free flaps, as the radial forearm, lateral arm, ulnar artery, antecubital fasciocutaneous, and posterior interosseous flaps. Muscular flaps have advantages as strength, capacity to contrast local infection and to avoid empty spaces, and can be used as pedicle or as free transfers. Propeller flaps can be rotated up to 180° around an axis corresponding to the perforator vessel and do not require the sacrifice of a major artery or functional muscle. The concept of perforasome is evoked. Free microsurgical transfers can be proposed to cover any defect around the elbow. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The anatomical basis of the flap's harvesting and the possibilities of elbow coverage are discussed through the selected articles. The different indications according to the areas of soft tissues defects are considered.