Contemporary Concise Review 2023: Asthma.

Asthma research and management needs to meet the priorities of the end user-patients, carers and clinicians. A better understanding of the natural history of asthma and the progression of disease has highlighted the importance of early identification of patients with asthma and the potential role of early intervention. Management of mild asthma requires a consistent approach with the same detail and consideration used when managing severe disease. Evidence around treatable traits approaches continues to evolve, supporting the role of a personalized medicine in asthma. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) stewardship continues to be an urgent issue in asthma management. Strategies to taper OCS doses and the implementation of biologic therapies for their steroid sparing benefits will be important steps to address this problem. The concept of remission in asthma provides an ambitious target and treatment outcome.

Oral corticosteroid stewardship: key insights from the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry.

BACKGROUND: People with severe asthma remain at risk of toxicity from maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and/or frequent OCS burst therapy. Cumulative exposures above 500-1000 mg prednisolone are associated with adverse effects, and recently OCS stewardship principles were promulgated to guide OCS prescription. AIMS: To examine real-world registry data to quantify OCS burden, ascertain trends over time in prescription and assess whether opportunities to implement steroid-sparing strategies were utilised. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry for the period 2013-2021. Assessments were taken at enrolment and then annual follow-up, which included asthma control and OCS use. Descriptive analyses were performed, and subgroups were compared at baseline and over time. RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty-four participants were evaluated and 215/924 (23%) were taking maintenance OCS at baseline, with 44% and 32% of participants having exposure to ≥500 or 1000 mg of OCS respectively in the prior year. Twelve months later, an additional 10% and 9% of participants reached cumulative doses of 500 or 1000 mg. People exceeding thresholds had ongoing poor asthma control. At baseline, 240/924 (26%) people were treated with asthma biological therapy. An additional 83 (12%) participants were identified as potentially benefiting from this steroid-sparing medication. Of these patients, only 23% commenced a biologic agent in the next 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A large national asthma registry identifies exposure to toxic cumulative doses of OCS in more than a third of participants, with further subsequent cumulative dose escalation over 2 years. Steroid-sparing strategies were often not employed, highlighting the need for implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.

Benralizumab and mepolizumab treatment outcomes in two severe asthma clinics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical outcomes of severe asthmatics treated with mepolizumab and benralizumab in a tertiary care severe asthma service setting. METHODS: Patient data at baseline, six and 12 months were collected prospectively at two large tertiary hospital severe asthma clinics following treatment initiation. Two hundred and four patients received treatment with mepolizumab (117) or benralizumab (87). Baseline characteristics between groups were similar in regard to age, gender, body mass index, steroid dose and blood eosinophil count. However, the mepolizumab cohort had a higher Asthma Control Questionnaire Score (ACQ) at baseline (4.0 ± 1.1 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.018), accompanied by more frequent reliever medication usage and lower prebronchodilator FEV1 % (56.0 ± 20.1 vs. 63.8 ± 18.9, p = 0.008). RESULTS: After 6 months treatment, both treatments induced significant improvements in (i) ACQ of 2.3 ± 0.1 (p < 0.001), (ii) oral steroid requiring exacerbations (incident rate ratio 0.26 (0.18-0.37), p < 0.001) and (iii) FEV1 . However, the improvement in FEV1 was 0.18 (0.05-0.30) litres greater with benralizumab than with mepolizumab (p = 0.002) even when adjusting statistically for baseline differences between groups. These differences were even more pronounced at 12 months post-treatment initiation, when the improvement in exacerbation frequency with benralizumab was 64% greater than with mepolizumab (p = 0.01). Whilst both treatments significantly reduced the blood eosinophil count at 6 and 12 months, this reduction was substantially greater with benralizumab than mepolizumab (-260 cells/µL [-400 to -110, p = 0.001]). CONCLUSION: In this large group of severe eosinophilic asthmatics, mepolizumab and benralizumab both improved disease parameters. However, benralizumab treatment appeared significantly more effective than mepolizumab in reducing exacerbations, improving FEV1 and depleting blood eosinophils.

Managing Severe Chronic Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Is Challenging for General Practitioners.

CONTEXT: Patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can develop increasing breathlessness, which can persist despite optimal medical management-refractory breathlessness. Management can be challenging for all clinicians and requires a broad approach that includes optimization of disease directed therapies, non-pharmacological strategies to manage breathlessness and for some patients opioids. OBJECTIVES: To explore the approaches to breathlessness management and palliative care undertaken by Australian General Practitioners (GP) for patients with severe COPD and refractory breathlessness. METHODS: A case-vignette based survey was conducted with Australian GPs to determine their approaches to breathlessness management and palliative care in COPD. RESULTS: Of the 137 GPs, 66% recommended commencing an additional medication to manage refractory breathlessness. Thirty-eight GPs (28%) recommended opioids and 26 (19%) recommended guideline discordant treatments. Two-thirds of GPs had concerns regarding the use of opioids in COPD. Half (55%) of GPs were comfortable providing general palliative care to patients with COPD and 62 (45%) had referred patients with COPD to specialist palliative care services. Most respondents wanted further training to manage severe COPD and severe chronic breathlessness. CONCLUSION: Most GPs recognized and were willing to add specific treatments for severe chronic breathlessness. However, experience prescribing opioids for severe chronic breathlessness was low, with many practitioners holding significant concerns regarding adverse effects. Many GPs are uncomfortable offering a palliative approach to their COPD patients, yet these patients are not routinely referred to specialist palliative care services despite their immense needs. GPs therefore desire education and support to overcome these barriers.

Individualized breathlessness interventions may improve outcomes in patients with advanced COPD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many patients with advanced COPD experience refractory breathlessness and individualized breathlessness interventions may improve management of this complex symptom. The aims of this study were to develop, implement and assess the efficacy of a breathlessness intervention for patients with COPD and refractory breathlessness and to evaluate patient acceptability. METHODS: An individualized breathlessness plan, information leaflets, breathlessness education and a hand-held fan were offered to consecutive patients with severe COPD and refractory breathlessness attending a tertiary integrated respiratory and palliative care service. Validated dyspnoea, quality of life and anxiety/depression questionnaires were administered at baseline and after 6 weeks, with change in dyspnoea scores being the primary outcome measure. A subset of patients participated in a structured telephone interview to qualitatively assess the intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with severe COPD (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) 38%) were included, with a mean age of 74 years. Mean modified Medical Research Council Breathlessness Scale score was 3.5. Anxiety and depression were common, being present in 38% and 35% of participants. At 6 weeks, there was a clinically significant improvement in breathlessness severity as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale. The subset of patients with anxiety/depression also saw significant improvement in all domains of the Self-Administered Standardized Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SAS). Patients reported that the intervention was highly useful and acceptable. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study of individualized breathlessness interventions in patients with severe COPD and refractory breathlessness is the first to demonstrate a clinically significant reduction in dyspnoea scores, with high levels of patient acceptability.