The relationship of gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma control.

Purpose: To study whether ACT responses are confounded by gastro-esophageal status (GERD), and if this is in concordance with the variation in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%) and Fractional Excretion of Nitric Oxide (FeNO). Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study (n = 307). Patients were surveyed for demographics data, and underwent ACT scoring, FEV1% and FeNO testing. Results: Patients with GERD had mean ACT scores that were 4.1 (p < .001) lower than without-GERD group. Not-well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% <80, high FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 2.9 (p < .001) for FEV1% <80 and 3.8 (p = .008) for high FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% ≥80, low FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 5.2 (p < .001) for FEV1% ≥80 and 5.1 (p < .001) for low FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that symptoms of GERD can lead to an inaccurate perception of asthma control and ACT as compared to objective measures, such as FEV1% and FeNO. Hence, this can lead to mismanagement of asthma, especially when objective measures are not conducted along with ACT.

Patient-Physician Racial Concordance Associated with Improved Healthcare Use and Lower Healthcare Expenditures in Minority Populations.

BACKGROUND: Racial concordance between patients and clinician has been linked to improved satisfaction and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the likelihood of clinician-patient racial concordance in non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients and (2) to evaluate the impact of patient-clinician race concordance on healthcare use and expenditures within each racial ethnic group. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2010-2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We used bivariate and multivariate models to assess the association between patient-clinician race concordance and emergency department (ED) use, hospitalizations, and total healthcare expenses, controlling for patient socio-demographic factors, insurance coverage, health status, and survey year fixed effects. RESULTS: Of the 50,626 adults in the analysis sample, 32,350 had racial concordance with their clinician. Among Asian and Hispanic patients, low income, less education, and non-private insurance were associated with an increased likelihood of patient-clinician racial concordance. Emergency department use was lower among Whites and Hispanics with concordant clinicians compared to those without a discordant clinician (15.6% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.02 and 12.9% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.01 respectively). Total healthcare expenditures were lower among Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients with race-concordant clinicians than those with discordant clinicians (14%, 34%, and 20%, p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results add to the body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that racial concordance contributes to a more effective therapeutic relationship and improved healthcare. These results emphasize the need for medical education surrounding cultural humility and the importance of diversifying the healthcare workforce.

Graduating With Honors in Resilience: Creating a Whole New Doctor.

BACKGROUND: Although coaching programs have become a prominent piece of graduate medical education, they have yet to become an integral part of undergraduate medical education. A handful of medical schools have utilized longitudinal coaching experiences as a method for professional identity formation, developing emotional intelligence and leadership. OBJECTIVE: We developed A Whole New Doctor (AWND), a medical student leadership development and coaching program at Georgetown University, with the aim of fostering resilience, leadership, and emotional intelligence at the nascent stage of physician training. To our knowledge, ours is the only program that is largely student-managed and uses certified executive coaches in the medical student population. METHODS: Cohort 1 of AWND started in October 2016. For each cohort, we hold a kickoff workshop that is highly interactive, fast-paced and covers coaching, complex thinking, reflective writing, and a coaching panel for Q&A. Following the workshop, students work with coaches individually to address self-identified weaknesses, tensions, and areas of conflict. We believe the program's student-driven nature provides a new structural approach to professional development and leadership programs, offering students a simultaneously reflective and growth-oriented opportunity to develop essential non-technical skills for physician leaders. RESULTS: Of the 132 students in the program, 107 have worked with one of our coaches (81%). Student testimonials have been uniformly positive with students remarking on an increased sense of presence, improvements in communication, and more specific direction in their careers. CONCLUSION: Our pilot coaching program has received positive feedback from students early in their medical training. It will be important to further scale the program to reach an increasing number of students and quantitatively evaluate participants for the long-term effects of our interventions.