Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 49(2): 271-272, March-Apr. 2023. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1440237

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose Hartmann's procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann's reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. Patient and methods Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. Results Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. Conclusion Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann's reversal.

2.
Urology ; 176: 246-247, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36965818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Simple prostatectomy has been established as a management option for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with glands larger than 80 cc.1 Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has been established as a safe and effective management option. This has been reported in multiple studies comparing it with the open approach where no statistically significant differences in complication rates have been found.2 The intrafascial approach is intended to add multiple benefits, such as not requiring continuous bladder irrigation and resection of a larger percentage of the adenoma, potentially leading to a lower reoperation rate and diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients in which this was missed preoperatively.3 OBJECTIVE: To present the resection of a very large prostate can lead to significant intraoperative challenges. Therefore, we demosntrate our intrafascial robotic management of a 470g prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 56-year-old with LUTS (IPSS: 34) for over 6 years, complicated with multiple episodes of urinary retention. PSA: 20.6 ng/mL. MRI reported a 463 cc prostate volume without focal lesions. First, the retropubic space was developed. Cystotomy was performed at the anterior bladder neck. A plane between the prostatic capsule and the surrounding fascia was dissected while carefully preserving the neurovascular bundles. Due to its large size, the prostate was divided into segments to facilitate its extraction. Hemostatic control and vesicourethral anastomosis were performed. RESULTS: Discharged on postoperative day 1 with a Jackson-Pratt drain and Foley catheter removed on days 6 and 9, respectively. Pathology was negative for malignancy. Patient-reported improvement of LUTS (IPSS: 3) and preservation of erectile function (SHIM: 23) at the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The intrafascial technique can be useful in cases where a large-sized prostate hinders a transvesical approach. Additionally, it allows for an easier piecemeal of the gland. A larger series is needed to determine its potential benefits.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Urology ; 175: 107-113, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36822246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience and outcomes using a novel robotic technique for the simultaneous repair of rectovesical fistula (RVF) with vesicourethral anastomotic stricture (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Between 2019 and 2021, four consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted simultaneous repair of RVF with concurrent VUAS after RP were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were examined and reported. Complications were graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system and the European Association of Urology Complications Panel Assessment and Recommendations. RESULTS: Four cases with a median age of 68.5 (63.3-72.3) years were treated. Interposition omentum flaps were used in all our cases. One case had perineal urethral mobilization to reach healthy urethral margins and tension-free vesicourethral anastomosis. Surgeries were uneventful, with no intraoperative complications reported. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 370 (291.3-453) minutes, 255 (175-262.5) mL, and 2.5 (2-3) days, respectively. Median Jackson-Pratt drains, Double-J stents and Foley catheter removal days were 6 (6-10), 38 (32-43), and 30 (27-41) days, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up time was 16.25 (12-26) months, and no fistula recurrence was shown. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair could represent an effective approach for the simultaneous repair of RVF with concomitant VUAS. More studies and management standardization are needed to assess the role of the robotic platform in the simultaneous repair of RVF with VUAS after radical prostatectomy.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Fístula da Bexiga Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos
4.
Urol Case Rep ; 46: 102306, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687745

RESUMO

Cowper's gland syringocele (CGS) is the cystic dilation of its duct. It is an uncommon urological condition and is thought to be more commonly encountered in pediatric urology. However, it is in adults that CGS poses a diagnostic challenge because of its "chameleon-like" clinical presentation that may masquerade multiple urological etiologies. In this population, where urological conditions are more prevalent, CGS may present as bladder outlet obstruction, recurrent urinary tract infections, gross hematuria, urinary retention, perineal pain, or abscess.

5.
J Clin Med ; 12(2)2023 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36675356

RESUMO

Injury to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a rare, underreported, and potentially devastating complication. This study aims to propose a systematic workup to describe how to prevent and manage SMA injury in a standardized stepwise manner. Three different instances of intraoperative injury to the SMA are described in an accompanying video. All three occurred when the SMA was misidentified as the left renal artery during left robotic radical nephrectomy. In the first case, the SMA was mistakenly identified as the renal artery, but after further dissection, the real renal artery was identified and SMA injury was prevented. In the second case, the SMA was clipped and the real left renal artery was subsequently identified, requiring clip removal. In the third case, the SMA was clipped and completely transected, requiring prompt repair by vascular surgery with a successful outcome. This study aims to propose a systematic workup to describe how to prevent and manage SMA injury in a standardized stepwise manner. The proper anatomic recognition of the SMA may prevent its injury. Intraoperative SMA injury should be promptly identified and repaired to avoid its devastating consequences.

6.
Eur Urol ; 83(4): 361-368, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36642661

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obturator nerve injury (ONI) is an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, usually reported in 0.2-5.7% of cases undergoing surgical treatment of urological and gynecological malignancies involving pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). OBJECTIVE: To describe how an ONI may occur during robotic pelvic surgery and the corresponding management strategies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analyzed video content on intraoperative ONI provided by robotic surgeons from high-volume centers. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: ONI was identified during PLND and managed according to the type of nerve injury. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The management approach varies with the type of injury. Crush injury frequently occurs at an advanced stage of PLND. For a crush injury to the obturator nerve caused by a clip, management only requires its safe removal. Three situations can occur if the nerve is transected: (1) transection with feasible approximation and tension-free nerve anastomosis; (2) transection with challenging approximation requiring certain strategies for proper nerve anastomosis; and (3) transection with a hidden proximal nerve ending that may initially appear intact, but is clearly injured when revealed by further dissection. Each case has different management strategies with a common aim of prompt repair of the anatomic disruption to restore proper nerve conduction. CONCLUSIONS: ONI is a preventable complication that requires proper identification of the anatomy and high-risk areas when performing pelvic lymph node dissection. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair using the management strategies described offer patients the best chance of recovery without sequelae. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe the different ways in which the obturator nerve in the pelvic area can be damaged during urological or gynecological surgeries. This is a preventable complication and we describe how it can be avoided and different management options, depending on the type of nerve injury.


Assuntos
Lesões por Esmagamento , Laparoscopia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Nervo Obturador/lesões , Nervo Obturador/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Lesões por Esmagamento/complicações , Lesões por Esmagamento/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos
7.
Int Braz J Urol ; 49(2): 271-272, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515620

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hartmann's procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann's reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. RESULTS: Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann's reversal.


Assuntos
Colostomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colostomia/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Colo , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA