Trauma care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a level 1 trauma multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused major healthcare challenges worldwide resulting in an exponential increase in the need for hospital- and intensive care support for COVID-19 patients. As a result, surgical care was restricted to urgent cases of surgery. However, the care for trauma patients is not suitable for reduction or delayed treatment. The influence of the pandemic on the burden of disease of trauma care remains to be elucidated. METHODS: All patients with traumatic injuries that were presented to the emergency departments (ED) of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Academic Medical Center (AMC) and VU medical center (VUMC) and the Northwest Clinics (NWC) between March 10, 2019 and May 10, 2019 (non-COVID) and March 10, 2020 and May 10, 2020 (COVID-19 period) were included. The primary outcome was the difference in ED admissions for trauma patients between the non-COVID and COVID-19 study period. Additionally, patient- and injury characteristics, health care consumption, and 30-day mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: A 37% reduction of ED admissions for trauma patients was seen during the COVID-19 pandemic (non-COVID n = 2423 and COVID cohort n = 1531). Hospital admission was reduced by 1.6 trauma patients per day. Fewer patients sustained car- and sports-related injuries. Injuries after high energetic trauma were more severe in the COVID-19 period (Injury Severity Score 17.3 vs. 12.0, p = 0.006). Relatively more patients were treated operatively (21.4% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001) during the COVID-19 period. Upper-(17.6 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.002) and lower extremity injuries (30.7 vs. 23.0%, p = 0.002) mainly accounted for this difference. The 30-day mortality rate was higher during the pandemic (1.0 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The burden of disease and healthcare consumption of trauma patients remained high during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results of this study can be used to optimize the use of hospital capacity and anticipate health care planning in future outbreaks.

Health-Related Quality of Life Is Decreased After Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections.

BACKGROUND: A necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is a rare but severe infection with a high mortality rate of 12%-20%. Diagnosing is challenging and often delayed. Treatment consists of surgical debridement of all necrotic tissue and administration of antibiotics. Despite adequate treatment, survivors are often left with extensive wounds, resulting in mutilating scars and functional deficits. Both the disease and the subsequent scars can negatively influence the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study was performed to contribute to the knowledge about HRQoL in patients after NSTI. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients treated for NSTI in a tertiary center in the Netherlands. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected and patients were asked to fill in a Short Form 36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a diagnosis of NSTI were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male and mean age was 57 y. Thirty-nine patients (80%) survived. Thirty-one (84%) of the survivors returned the questionnaire after a median follow-up of 4.1 y (interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-5.9 y). Statistically significantly decreased scores when compared to the Dutch reference values were observed for the Short Form 36 domains, physical functioning, role-physical functioning, general health, and the combined Physical Component Score. No differences were observed for the other five domains or for the Mental Component Score. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that NSTI negatively affects HRQoL as reported by the patient, especially on the physical domains. To learn more about HRQoL in patients after NSTI, studies in larger groups with a more disease-specific questionnaire should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, prognostic and epidemiological.

[A man with a painful right shoulder]. / Een man met een pijnlijke rechter schouder.

Posterior sternoclavicular luxations are uncommon and potentially life threatening. When clinically suspected, a computed tomography angiography is the gold standard to investigate whether important structures located in the mediastinum are at risk. A fast reduction should be performed to reduce pain and prevent acute and late complications.

[Falling from a height: Psychiatric comorbidity and complications]. / Vallen van een hoogte: Psychiatrische comorbiditeit en complicaties.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a mental disorder increases the occurrence of complications in patients after 'a fall from a height'. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. METHODS: Data on all patients admitted following a 'fall from a height' in the period 2004-2012 was retrieved from the trauma registry of the Academic Medical Center (AMC) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This was combined with data from the National Surgical Complications Registry (LHCR). A chart review was conducted to determine the presence of mental disorders in these patients. Corrected risk ratio for the risk of complications in patients with a psychological disorder was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients presented to the emergency department at the AMC following a fall from a height; 147 patients (29%) experienced 1 or more complications and 131 patients (25.8%) had a mental disorder. Complications arose in 60 patients with a mental disorder (45.8%) and in 87 patients (23.1%) without a mental disorder. The corrected risk ratio showed that a mental disorder is a statistically significant independent predictor of complications (risk ratio: 1.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.21-2.06). CONCLUSION: The risk of complications following a fall from a height in patients with a mental disorder is one and a half times higher than in patients without a mental disorder. This mental disorder is a significant independent predictor of a medical complication following a fall from a height.

Failure rate and complications of angiography and embolization for abdominal and pelvic trauma.

BACKGROUND: Angiography and embolization have become the treatment of choice after abdominal trauma or pelvic injury in hemodynamically stable patients with a suspicion of internal hemorrhage (contrast extravasation, pseudo-aneurysm, or a vessel cutoff diagnosed on computed tomographic scanning). Some studies, however, report a high incidence of rebleeding (failure) or complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the failure rate and the complications in trauma patients undergoing such procedures. METHODS: All consecutive patients (n = 97) admitted to our Level I trauma center between January 2002 and December 2008 in whom angiography with or without embolization was performed were analyzed. Complications were classified as organ specific, puncture site related, and systemic. Additional interventions, required to treat complications, were documented. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 12%. Overall, 48 complications were documented in 28 patients. Organ-specific complications were observed in 18 patients (19%), especially abscess formation and infarction of the liver. Puncture site-related complications occurred in three patients. The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 24%. Three patients developed renal failure. Nine of the 15 patients with rebleeding could be managed with reembolization or operative packing, resulting in an organ salvage rate of 93%. Most (83%) of the organ-specific complications and all of the puncture site-related complications could be managed conservatively or with percutaneous treatment. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the failure rate and incidence of organ-specific and procedure-related complications were low and often could be managed with nonoperative minimally invasive interventions. Trauma patients undergoing angiography have a high chance (24%) of developing contrast-induced nephropathy and should therefore receive optimal prophylactic measures to avoid this complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs.

BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been increasing interest shown in the nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt traumatic injury. The growing use of NOM for blunt abdominal organ injury has been made possible because of the progress made in the quality and availability of the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan and the development of minimally invasive intervention options such as angioembolization. AIM: The purpose of this review is to describe the changes that have been made over the past decades in the management of blunt trauma to the liver, spleen and kidney. CONCLUSIONS: The management of blunt abdominal injury has changed considerably. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage as diagnostic modality in the primary survey. MDCT scanning with intravenous contrast is now the gold standard diagnostic modality in hemodynamically stable patients with intra-abdominal fluid detected with FAST. One of the current discussions in the literature is whether a whole body MDCT survey should be implemented in the primary survey. The progress in imaging techniques has contributed to NOM being currently the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients. Angioembolization can be used as an adjunct to NOM and has increased the success rate to 95%. However, to date many controversies exist about the optimum patient selection for NOM, the proper role of angioembolization in NOM, the best technique and material to use in angioembolization, and the right follow-up strategy of patients sustaining blunt abdominal injury. Conducting a well-designed prospective clinical trial or a Delphi study would be preferable.

Functional treatment versus plaster for simple elbow dislocations (FuncSiE): a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Elbow dislocations can be classified as simple or complex. Simple dislocations are characterized by the absence of fractures, while complex dislocations are associated with fractures. After reduction of a simple dislocation, treatment options include immobilization in a static plaster for different periods of time or so-called functional treatment. Functional treatment is characterized by early active motion within the limits of pain with or without the use of a sling or hinged brace. Theoretically, functional treatment should prevent stiffness without introducing increased joint instability. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare early functional treatment versus plaster immobilization following simple dislocations of the elbow. METHODS/DESIGN: The design of the study will be a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 100 patients who have sustained a simple elbow dislocation. After reduction of the dislocation, patients are randomized between a pressure bandage for 5-7 days and early functional treatment or a plaster in 90 degrees flexion, neutral position for pro-supination for a period of three weeks. In the functional group, treatment is started with early active motion within the limits of pain. Function, pain, and radiographic recovery will be evaluated at regular intervals over the subsequent 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. The secondary outcome measures are the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, Oxford elbow score, pain level at both sides, range of motion of the elbow joint at both sides, rate of secondary interventions and complication rates in both groups (secondary dislocation, instability, relaxation), health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D), radiographic appearance of the elbow joint (degenerative changes and heterotopic ossifications), costs, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a functional treatment for the management of simple elbow dislocations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2025).

Literature review of the role of ultrasound, computed tomography, and transcatheter arterial embolization for the treatment of traumatic splenic injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The spleen is the second most frequently injured organ following blunt abdominal trauma. Trends in management have changed over the years. Traditionally, laparotomy and splenectomy was the standard management. Presently, nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injury is the most common management strategy in hemodynamically stable patients. Splenic injuries can be managed via simple observation (OBS) or with angiography and embolization (AE). Angio-embolization has shown to be a valuable alternative to observational management and has increased the success rate of nonoperative management in many series. DIAGNOSTICS: Improved imaging techniques and advances in interventional radiology have led to a better selection of patients who are amenable to nonoperative management. Despite this, there is still a lot of debate about which patients are prone to NOM. ANGIOGRAPHY AND EMBOLIZATION: The optimal patient selection is still a matter of debate and the role of CT and angio-embolization has not yet fully evolved. We discuss the role of sonography and CT features, such as contrast extravasation, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, or hemoperitoneum, to determine the optimal patient selection for angiography and embolization. We also review the efficiency, technical considerations (proximal or selective embolization), logistics, and complication rates of AE for blunt traumatic splenic injuries.

Complications in multitrauma patients in a Dutch level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Complication registration is an important part of monitoring the quality of health care. The aim of this article was to describe the incidence, type, and impact of complications occurring within 6 months after the initial trauma in multitrauma patients. METHODS: During a 2-year period, all trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 who were not directly transferred to other hospitals were included. We used the Dutch National Surgical Complication Registry of the Academic Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center, to assess complications within 6 months after the initial trauma. For verification, we additionally performed a chart review. Complications were graded 0 (no real health loss) to 4 (lethal). RESULTS: Three hundred three multitrauma patients were included with a median ISS of 22 (interquartile range, 17-29). Within 181 patients, 358 complications occurred (60%). The most frequently occurring complications were respiratory and urinary tract infections. Most complications (73%) were grade 1 and resolved completely without operative (re-)intervention There were 27 patients (8%) with a grade 2 complication, which required operative (re-)interventions. All eight (2%) grade 3 complications which caused (potential) permanent damage or disability, were of neurologic origin. Overall mortality was 18.8% and complication associated readmission rate was 4%. Emergency interventions and high ISS tended to be associated with the occurrence of complications. In patients with complications, hospital stay was doubled from 9 to 18 days. CONCLUSIONS: Multitrauma patients are at high risk for developing complications. Most frequently encountered complications were infections. The majority of complications resolved completely without a surgical intervention.

An evaluation of a Shockroom located CT scanner: a randomized study of early assessment by CT scanning in trauma patients in the bi-located trauma center North-West Netherlands (REACT trial).

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major source of morbidity and mortality, especially in people below the age of 50 years. For the evaluation of trauma patients CT scanning has gained wide acceptance in and provides detailed information on location and severity of injuries. However, CT scanning is frequently time consuming due to logistical (location of CT scanner elsewhere in the hospital) and technical issues. An innovative and unique infrastructural change has been made in the AMC in which the CT scanner is transported to the patient instead of the patient to the CT scanner. As a consequence, early shockroom CT scanning provides an all-inclusive multifocal diagnostic modality that can detect (potentially life-threatening) injuries in an earlier stage, so that therapy can be directed based on these findings. METHODS/DESIGN: The REACT-trial is a prospective, randomized trial, comparing two Dutch level-1 trauma centers, respectively the VUmc and AMC, with the only difference being the location of the CT scanner (respectively in the Radiology Department and in the shockroom). All trauma patients that are transported to the AMC or VUmc shockroom according to the current prehospital triage system are included. Patients younger than 16 years of age and patients who die during transport are excluded. Randomization will be performed prehospitally. Study parameters are the number of days outside the hospital during the first year following the trauma (primary outcome), general health at 6 and 12 months post trauma, mortality and morbidity, and various time intervals during initial evaluation. In addition a cost-effectiveness analysis of this shockroom concept will be performed. Regarding primary outcome it is estimated that the common standard deviation of days spent outside of the hospital during the first year following trauma is a total of 12 days. To detect an overall difference of 2 days within the first year between the two strategies, 562 patients per group are needed. (alpha 0.95 and beta 0.80). DISCUSSION: The REACT-trial will provide evidence on the effects of a strategy involving early shockroom CT scanning compared with a standard diagnostic imaging strategy in trauma patients on both patient outcome and operations research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN55332315.

Significant forefoot varus deformity resulting in progressive stress fractures of all lesser metatarsal bones.

Stress fractures may occur in any bone, but appear most frequently in the metatarsal bones. Consecutive stress fractures of all lesser metatarsals in a short period are rare, and only a few cases have been described in the literature. We report an unusual case of a young man with consecutive stress fractures of four adjacent lesser metatarsal bones. The etiology was in all probability the fixed forefoot varus deformity. This foot deformity may impose increased mechanical loads across the lateral aspect of the foot that, in turn, may result in stress fractures involving the lesser metatarsals. In our patient conservative treatment finally resulted in a satisfactory outcome.

Evaluation of the necessity of clinical observation of high-energy trauma patients without significant injury after standardized emergency room stabilization.

BACKGROUND: Patients involved in a high-energy trauma (HET) are usually admitted for clinical observation, even when no significant injury is found after standard care in the emergency room (ER). The necessity of this observation period is not evidence based. The goal of this study was to identify patients who revealed an initially undiagnosed injury during the observation period. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive HET patients was conducted in two Level I trauma centers. Patients after a HET with two minor injuries or less, diagnosed during the standard ER care, were included. Data were abstracted from patients' medical records. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients were included. None of the patients developed any complications during the clinical observation period or were readmitted to their own hospital within a week after the trauma. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence for the necessity of clinical observation of HET patients with minimal or no injuries diagnosed after standard ER stabilization and evaluation.

External fixators for pelvic fractures: comparison of the stiffness of current systems.

We evaluated the stiffness of external fixation (EF) systems with a reproducible, standardized human pelvic replica of aluminum and perspex in which a type C pelvic ring injury was created. 12 EF systems were analyzed in 2 situations that necessarily occur during a walking cycle. Endpoints were defined as 15 mm of dislocation or tolerance of the maximum load in each situation. In the no weightbearing situation, all except 2 fixators failed; in the weightbearing situation, all fixators failed. Single bar systems performed better than frame configurations. Stability provided by any external fixator is low, and in the case of a type C pelvic ring injury, it is insufficient for patient mobilization and weightbearing. Single bar systems provide more stability than frames.

Trans-Atlantic hospital agreement in reading first day radiographs of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures.

The purpose of this study was to describe the agreement between two hospitals on either side of the Atlantic Ocean in reading first day plain radiographs of suspected scaphoid fractures. Two groups of observers, one North American and one European, consisting of observers at various levels of training were compared. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter- and intra-observer agreement. The receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under this curve (AUC) for each observer were calculated to determine test performance. Scaphoid radiographs of 80 consecutive patients seen with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture were included in the study. The results of the bone scan were used as the reference standard. There is an acceptable agreement between the USA and Europe for both radiologists and orthopaedic surgeons at various levels of training (kappa 0.45-0.88). Intra-observer agreement is acceptable as well (kappa 0.46-0.86). Considering all normal or equivocal radiographs, there is slight to moderate agreement at all levels of training in and between both centres and specialities (kappa 0-0.64). Overall test performance was acceptable for all consecutive radiographs (AUC 0.65-0.82) and poor for the normal radiographs (AUC 0.46-0.65). We could not detect differences in performance due to location of the readers' hospital or institution of training. The use of more sensitive techniques should be restricted to patients with negative or equivocal radiographs in clinically suspected scaphoid fractures.

Emergency endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic rupture in three accident victims with multiple injuries.

PURPOSE: To report an experience with emergency endovascular treatment of traumatic thoracic aortic ruptures in multi-injured patients. CASE REPORTS: Three victims of motor vehicle accidents with multiple head, chest, and abdominal injuries in addition to fractures were treated urgently for thoracic aortic lacerations with transluminal placement of an endovascular graft during the initial emergent laparotomy. In all cases, ruptured visceral organs were treated first and the abdomen closed. Femoral artery access was gained through a cutdown, and the endografts were delivered with no systemic heparinization. The endovascular component of the surgical session took approximately 50 minutes. All patients survived to discharge. Two patients are alive at 5 and 12 months with sustained endovascular exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm, but one patient with severe brain damage died 9 months after treatment from respiratory insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Acute endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic ruptures is feasible and has the advantage of avoiding thoracotomy in otherwise severely injured patients.