Retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experiences.

AIM: To review the results of our first 40 cases of retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty and to compare them with series of open and other minimally invasive treatments of pelviureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Also to compare our first 20 cases with the second 20 cases to see if there was an improvement in results with experience. METHODS: A retrospective review of the first 40 laparoscopic pyeloplasties performed by a single lead surgeon at two institutions was performed. The diagnosis of PUJ obstruction was confirmed with an intravenous urogram as well as a renogram prior to surgery. A retroperitoneal, dismembered pyeloplasty was routinely performed with three or four ports. All patients were followed up with an intravenous urogram, renogram and review of symptoms at 4 months and annual renogram after that. RESULTS: Average operation time was 236 min and this appeared to decrease with experience. Two cases had to be converted to open operations. The mean hospital stay was 3.4 days. Out of the 40 patients, 34 have had successful laparoscopic operations with total symptomatic relief as well as radiologically proven deobstruction. There were four major complications with 3 patients going on to have redo open pyeloplasty operations. There were seven minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty is an effective and safe means of treating PUJ obstruction. Our results seem to be comparable with series of open pyeloplasty and other laparoscopic series and are better than some other minimally invasive techniques.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience of laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy performed over a 4-year period in terms of feasibility and complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients (58 females, 45 males; median age 58 years) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy between 1 October 1999 and 1 October 2003. The indications were renal cell cancer (n = 39), transitional cell cancer (n = 23), end-stage pyelonephritis (n = 26), end-stage hydronephrosis (n = 11) and renovascular hypertension (n = 4). Ninety-eight patients were operated on transperitoneally and five retroperitoneally. All procedures were done in the lateral position. RESULTS: Seven procedures had to be converted to open procedures for the following reasons: poor visualization of the renal hilum (n = 5); bleeding from a splenic laceration (n = 1); and difficulty finding the kidney via a retroperitoneal approach (n = 1). The median operating time was 190 min, which decreased with experience. The median blood loss was 150 ml. There were two major complications (one small bowel perforation and one port-site herniation, both necessitating re-exploration) and seven minor complications (five infections, one case of temporary hip pain and one of surgical emphysema). Conclusions. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a technically demanding procedure with the risk of serious complications, especially in the initial learning phase. However, after gaining experience the procedure can be performed with an acceptable operating time, minimal morbidity and a short hospital stay. Laparoscopic nephrectomy should be the standard procedure in most cases, both malignant and benign, with the possible exception of tumours > 10 cm. In order to expand the use of the technique, it is important to focus specifically on laparoscopic training in the education of trainee urologists.